Cloudflare CEO: How I Decided Which Employees to Replace with AI?

marsbitPublished on 2026-05-22Last updated on 2026-05-22

Abstract

Cloudflare CEO Matthew Prince explains his decision to lay off over 20% of the company's staff, despite record-high growth and revenue. He frames this as a necessary adaptation to AI-driven business transformation, drawing on Peter Drucker's framework of three corporate roles: builders, sellers, and measurers. Prince argues AI primarily targets "measurers"—roles in auditing, finance, legal, compliance, middle management, and operations. AI systems can perform these measuring and oversight tasks with superior objectivity, efficiency, and scale, enabling continuous auditing and faster financial processes. This allows for consolidation and automation in these areas. Conversely, "builders" (e.g., engineers) and "sellers" are seen as secure and even more valuable. AI amplifies their productivity, and human relationships remain crucial for sales. The layoffs were not merely cost-cutting but a reallocation of resources to hire more builders and sellers. Prince highlights the company's record number of open roles and its highly AI-native intern class, who are primarily builders and sellers. He concludes that AI will reshape every company by enhancing measurement capabilities, allowing human talent to focus on creating and capturing value through building and selling.

Author: Matthew Prince

Compiled by: Deep Tide TechFlow

Two weeks ago, I laid off more than 20% of our company's employees. I did not make this decision because Cloudflare was in trouble. On the contrary, our revenue growth has hit a record high, cash flow is ample, and the number of new customers we've acquired globally has reached unprecedented levels. I made this decision because the business environment is undergoing a dramatic shift; and to win in the future, Cloudflare must adapt.

Searching through American business history, you might not find a second publicly traded company like ours that, while maintaining over 30% high growth, also laid off 20% of its staff. However, what we did over the past two weeks will likely become the industry norm within the next year. This is a story about how artificial intelligence (AI) is reshaping everything, but unfortunately, many executives and commentators misunderstand how exactly AI will disrupt business rules and who will be impacted.

To figure this out, I reopened an old book published in 1954 (this book is 20 years older than me): Peter Drucker's "The Practice of Management." In this book, Drucker deeply analyzes the various roles within an enterprise. I categorize these roles into three types: builders, sellers, and measurers.

As the names suggest, "builders" are responsible for creating products, and "sellers" are responsible for selling them. "Measurers" encompass everything else: internal audit, revenue recognition (an accounting term referring to the process of determining when a sale can be officially recorded as income on the company's books according to accounting standards), finance, legal, compliance, middle management, daily operations, and so on, to name a few.

Contrary to the pessimistic predictions of some analysts, the jobs of "builders" are very secure and aren't going anywhere. If an engineer on my team could increase their productivity tenfold with the help of AI, I would definitely hire all such talent I could find in the market.

"Sellers" also have no need to worry about being replaced. Because those who control budgets are still living humans, they prefer to buy from people who are willing to take the time to listen to their needs, can build trust, and can provide support when problems arise.

"Measurers" are also crucial to the enterprise, but they are fundamentally different from the first two. Top "measurers" are often worth their weight in gold. They work tirelessly behind the scenes, not seeking the flowers and applause of front-of-house roles (like servers in a restaurant who directly face customers, referring to positions that easily attract external attention and praise); ideally, they can also maintain an objective perspective independent of other company departments. Drucker pointed out that measuring business performance is important, but customers are ultimately won through "building" and "selling." A truly top-tier company should invest the most resources in these two core functions.

The wave of AI is not targeting "builders" or "sellers"; it is truly aimed at "measurers." Tireless, absolutely independent, extremely efficient, and always online—today's AI systems, when measuring and examining a company, achieve a level of objective detail and precision that even the most outstanding employees of the past could not match.

Take Cloudflare, for example. In the past, our internal audit team could only sample a few business risk points for review each quarter. Now, we are fully implementing a new system that conducts continuous, 24/7 audits on every single business risk point. We are closing our books (closing our books, referring to the regular process where a company settles its accounts and issues financial statements at month-end or year-end) faster. We are making fewer mistakes, and even when occasional errors occur, they can be identified more accurately and reliably. As CEO, I now have unprecedented, excellent tools that not only allow me to precisely measure the company's overall operational status but also help me accurately identify rising stars within the team.

The vast majority of the employees we laid off last week were "measurers." We streamlined middle management across the company because, with AI assistance, managers can now oversee more direct reports while still conducting accurate performance evaluations and providing effective guidance. We consolidated scattered operational roles into a unified business support group, leveraging AI to fill gaps when specific expertise is needed. We also significantly reduced the marketing team—like most companies, it was once a heavy concentration area for "measurers." Furthermore, within the entire finance team, we found ample opportunities to consolidate roles and automate tasks.

However, the fundamental purpose of this layoff was absolutely not simply to reduce headcount. In fact, the number of open positions we are currently hiring for has reached a record high. I expect our total employee count to continue growing in the coming years. Precisely because the work of "measuring" no longer requires as much manpower, we can now free up resources to heavily invest in the talent that truly drives company growth.

This summer, we received nearly one million resumes competing for 1,111 paid internship positions. The interns we finally hired are not only exceptionally outstanding but also naturally AI-native (AI-native, referring to the new generation who grew up in the AI era, naturally adapting to and viewing AI as a mindset and fundamental tool). Without exception, they are all "builders" or "sellers," and we expect the vast majority of them to ultimately receive full-time offers.

They are the new generation of the future, who will invent new ways to power our business. Thanks to AI, we can now more precisely measure their contributions and accurately identify those future leaders. AI is by no means a harbinger of disaster leading to bleak unemployment for young people—quite the opposite is true.

AI will not end all jobs, but it will inevitably reshape every business. In the end, time will prove Drucker right. AI will greatly enhance our ability to measure our organization, so that the living humans on our team can focus all their energy on where they can truly create and capture value: building and selling.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QAccording to the article, why did the Cloudflare CEO decide to lay off more than 20% of employees despite strong company performance?

AHe did it because the business environment is changing drastically, and Cloudflare must adapt to win the future. The decision was driven by how artificial intelligence (AI) is reshaping business rules, specifically targeting certain types of roles.

QBased on Peter Drucker's framework mentioned in the article, what are the three types of roles within a company, and which are most safe from AI disruption?

AThe three roles are Builders (who make products), Sellers (who sell products), and Measurers (who handle internal audit, finance, legal, compliance, operations, etc.). According to the CEO, Builders and Sellers are very safe, as their jobs are not threatened by AI. The AI wave is primarily aimed at Measurers.

QHow has AI specifically changed the work of 'Measurers' at Cloudflare, according to the CEO?

AAI has enabled continuous, around-the-clock auditing of every business risk point, faster financial book closing, fewer and more precisely caught errors, and provided the CEO with superior tools to measure company performance and identify rising talent. This increased efficiency and objectivity reduced the need for many human Measurers.

QWhat was the ultimate goal of the layoffs, and what is Cloudflare's hiring outlook?

AThe ultimate goal was not simply to reduce headcount. It was to reallocate resources toward roles that drive growth. Cloudflare currently has a record number of open roles, and the CEO expects total employee count to grow in the coming years. The savings from automating 'Measurement' allow the company to invest heavily in more Builders and Sellers.

QWhat does the CEO say about the new generation of 'AI-native' interns and the future of work with AI?

AHe states that the new generation of AI-native interns are exceptionally talented and are inherently Builders or Sellers. He sees AI not as a disaster causing unemployment but as a tool that will reshape every business. AI will enhance the ability to measure an organization, allowing humans to focus their energy where they truly create and capture value: building and selling.

Related Reads

After Three Consecutive Quarters of Decline, Can the Crypto Market Find a Window for Stabilization in Q3?

The cryptocurrency market has just concluded its worst-performing quarter since 2022, with total capitalization dropping 12.6% to $2.1 trillion. All core metrics indicate capital is leaving the sector, not just rotating within it. Bitcoin fell 14.2% and Ethereum dropped 25.4% in Q2, breaking their previous correlation with US tech stocks. A key driver is the reversal in US spot Bitcoin ETF flows, which saw a net outflow of approximately $4.67 billion in Q2, including a record monthly outflow near $4.5 billion in June. While recent data suggests long-term holders are accumulating again, sustained ETF outflows mean continued selling pressure. Market focus is now singularly on the Federal Reserve. The upcoming July FOMC meeting is seen as the most critical event for Q3. A dovish signal could support Bitcoin reclaiming a $68,000-$84,000 range, while a hawkish stance might establish a new trading band around $50,000-$56,000. Additionally, regulatory uncertainty persists, with the progress of the crucial *CLARITY Act* stalling in the Senate, reducing its perceived 2026 passage probability to 40-45%. Despite the broad downturn, a few sectors showed growth. Prediction markets saw nominal volume surge 48.7% year-over-year to $113.8 billion, and tokenized collectibles transaction volume rose 143% quarterly to $1.4 billion. The Real-World Asset (RWA) tokenization sector also continued steady growth, now representing ~$28.1 billion in on-chain value. The market's foundation for an extreme crash appears limited, with Bitcoin price hovering near its 200-week moving average. However, the trading paradigm has shifted from narrative-driven speculation to decisions based on price action, policy developments, and interest rate expectations, making a broad sentiment-driven rally unlikely in the near term.

marsbit5h ago

After Three Consecutive Quarters of Decline, Can the Crypto Market Find a Window for Stabilization in Q3?

marsbit5h ago

BIT Trading Moment: BTC Still Suppressed by Weekly 200 EMA, Rejection May Restart Decline; Storage and Semiconductors that Surged Last Night Begin Falling in Evening Trading

**Crypto & Stock Market Wrap: Bitcoin Tests Resistance, Stocks Retreat After AI Surge** Bitcoin consolidates around $66,000, facing key resistance near $68,000—an area seen as a major psychological and technical hurdle where previous rallies have failed. Analysts note the cryptocurrency is caught between its 200-week moving average (~$63,333) and 200-week EMA (~$68,328). A clear break above $68k is needed to signal a stronger bullish trend, while a rejection could lead to a retest of $63k support. Market sentiment remains cautious, with low futures open interest pointing to a low-liquidity rebound rather than a full bull market. Bitcoin spot ETFs saw another $203 million inflow. US stock futures pointed lower after a strong Tuesday session led by a massive rebound in semiconductors and memory stocks. The rally was fueled by renewed optimism about AI-driven hardware demand, with Micron, SanDisk, and SK Hynix surging. However, those gains reversed in pre-market trading. Super Micro Computer (SMCI) soared over 20% after hours on strong guidance and a record backlog. Other standouts included Rocket Lab and nuclear energy plays Oklo and X-Energy. Rising oil prices (Brent above $91) and climbing Treasury yields (10-year near 4.64%), however, are reigniting inflation concerns and acting as a headwind for equities. In Asia, markets were mixed. South Korea's KOSPI pared early gains to close slightly higher as semiconductor stocks like SK Hynix gave back initial surges. Japan's Nikkei edged lower as the yen hit a fresh 38-year low against the dollar, raising fears of potential market intervention. Key events to watch include the Samsung Galaxy launch, AMD's AI event, and a slew of major tech earnings from Alphabet, Tesla, and IBM after the close on Wednesday, followed by the ECB meeting and Intel's earnings on Thursday.

marsbit5h ago

BIT Trading Moment: BTC Still Suppressed by Weekly 200 EMA, Rejection May Restart Decline; Storage and Semiconductors that Surged Last Night Begin Falling in Evening Trading

marsbit5h ago

Former CFTC Chairman, Circle President Tarbert: Preaching Long-Termism While Cashing Out $30 Million Himself

Former CFTC Chairman and Circle President Heath Tarbert has consistently advocated for a long-term vision in public, urging patience from investors as Circle’s stock price has fallen significantly from its peak. However, it has been revealed that since Circle’s IPO, Tarbert has continuously sold his CRCL shares through pre-arranged trading plans, cashing out approximately $30 million, without making any public market purchases. This contrast between his public messaging and personal actions has drawn criticism. Tarbert joined Circle in July 2023 as Chief Legal Officer, leveraging his regulatory experience to help guide the company through its IPO and expansion. Despite promoting stablecoins as long-term infrastructure, he established a 10b5-1 trading plan just before Circle went public, leading to substantial stock sales over the following year. In March 2026, he initiated another plan to sell more shares. His career trajectory highlights a pattern of moving between high-level regulatory roles and influential positions in the financial sector. After resigning as CFTC Chairman in early 2021, he joined Citadel Securities as Chief Legal Officer just 27 days later, during a period of intense regulatory scrutiny for the firm. He later joined Circle, aiding its efforts to navigate regulatory challenges for its public listing. While Tarbert's expertise in policy and compliance is valuable to companies like Circle, his actions—advocating long-term confidence while personally divesting—raise questions about the alignment between his public statements and his private financial decisions, leaving investors who followed his advice to bear the market risks.

marsbit5h ago

Former CFTC Chairman, Circle President Tarbert: Preaching Long-Termism While Cashing Out $30 Million Himself

marsbit5h ago

Gate Research Institute: The 'Wall Street-ization' Wave of Crypto Financial Products – Competition or Integration?

The article titled "Gate Research Institute: Are Crypto Financial Products Sparking a 'Wall Street' Wave—Competition or Convergence?" explores the evolving relationship between the crypto ecosystem and traditional finance (TradFi). The piece begins by reflecting on Bitcoin's original 2009 vision of decentralization, disintermediation, and moving away from banks. It then contrasts this with the 2024 landscape, where key crypto assets like Bitcoin are increasingly held through Wall Street products like ETFs issued by giants like BlackRock. The article questions whether this signifies that TradFi is systematically taking over the rights to issue, price, custody, and distribute crypto financial assets. The core argument is that this is not a zero-sum takeover but rather a bidirectional convergence where each side addresses the other's weaknesses. Crypto offers 24/7 global markets, programmable settlement, and open access but lacks compliant channels, institutional-grade custody, deep fiat liquidity, and mainstream distribution. TradFi possesses these but is constrained by legacy systems, limited operating hours, and slow settlement. Two primary convergence paths are highlighted: * **Path A (CEX to TradFi):** Exemplified by Gate, which has progressed from offering tokenized stocks and CFDs to providing direct, real stock trading (US, Hong Kong, South Korea) within its platform, using USDT. * **Path B (TradFi to Crypto):** Exemplified by Robinhood, which has integrated crypto trading, acquired exchanges like Bitstamp, and is moving traditional assets like stocks onto the blockchain via tokenization and its own Layer 2. Both paths are ultimately competing to become the next-generation, unified financial account—a "super account" where users can seamlessly trade cryptocurrencies, stocks, ETFs, RWA (Real World Assets), and tokenized treasury products in one interface. The growth of RWA and tokenized treasuries (e.g., BlackRock's BUIDL) is presented as the asset-layer fusion, providing stable, yield-bearing assets on-chain and acting as a bridge between the two worlds. In conclusion, the "Wall Street-ization" of crypto is framed as a mutual transformation. Decentralized ideals persist in the protocol layer, while at the application layer, a more efficient, global, and accessible unified capital market is emerging from this convergence. The future competition lies not between crypto exchanges and stockbrokers, but between platforms vying to offer the most comprehensive asset coverage, liquidity, and user experience within a single account.

marsbit5h ago

Gate Research Institute: The 'Wall Street-ization' Wave of Crypto Financial Products – Competition or Integration?

marsbit5h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of AI (AI) are presented below.

活动图片