Blackrock Leads with $305 Million Inflow into Bitcoin and Ether ETFs

cryptonews.ruPublished on 2026-08-06Last updated on 2026-08-06

Abstract

Money continued to flow rapidly into the largest cryptocurrency ETFs. Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs collectively attracted over $305 million in inflows, with BlackRock again leading the charge, marking the third consecutive session of strong institutional demand. The broader market picture was mixed. Hyperliquid ($HYPE) ETFs finally saw renewed buying interest, while XRP ($XRP) ETFs faced outflows, and Solana-based products remained stagnant. In a strong session, Bitcoin ETFs recorded a net inflow of $244.42 million across five funds. BlackRock's IBIT dominated with $196.83 million, followed by ARK 21Shares' ARKB at $37.63 million and Fidelity's FBTC at $11.28 million. Vaneck's HODL was the sole fund to see an outflow (-$14.67 million), barely impacting the category's overall positive trend. Total trading volume reached $1.58 billion. Ethereum ETFs also continued their positive run, attracting $60.86 million. BlackRock's ETHA led with $50.34 million. The staking-oriented ETHB and Fidelity's FETH followed. No Ethereum ETF saw outflows. Among smaller tokens, Hyperliquid ETFs saw a minor but notable inflow of ~$966,690, potentially signaling easing selling pressure. Conversely, XRP ETFs experienced a $3.58 million outflow. Solana ETFs saw no net activity. The session solidified Bitcoin and Ethereum as the focal point for institutional capital, with BlackRock as the dominant source of demand, while activity in altcoin ETFs remained volatile.

Money continued to flow rapidly into the largest cryptocurrency funds. Bitcoin and Ether ETFs collectively attracted over $305 million, with Blackrock once again leading the charge, and institutional demand strengthened for the third consecutive session.

The overall market picture was mixed. Funds for $HYPE finally found buyers, ETFs for $XRP faced outflows, while Solana products remained in the shadows.

Blackrock Leads Another Strong Session

Bitcoin ETFs (Exchange-Traded Funds) recorded a net inflow of $244.42 million across five funds. Blackrock's IBIT accounted for the majority of this sum — $196.83 million. It was followed by ARK 21Shares' ARKB with $37.63 million, while Fidelity's FBTC attracted $11.28 million.

Bitwise's BITB attracted $10.56 million, and Morgan Stanley's MSBT attracted $2.79 million. Vaneck's HODL fund was the only one to lose capital, recording an outflow of $14.67 million. This outflow had practically no impact on the overall category growth.

The total trading volume for Bitcoin ETFs reached $1.58 billion. Combined net assets at the end of the day stood at $79.21 billion.

August started successfully for Bitcoin ETFs: over three days, the inflow totaled $626 million.

Ether ETFs also continued their positive trend, attracting $60.86 million across five products. The leader was Blackrock's ETHA ETF with an inflow of $50.34 million. The same company's staking-oriented ETHB ETF attracted $4.94 million, while Fidelity's FETH ETF attracted $2.87 million.

Bitwise's ETHW ETF and 21Shares' TETH ETF attracted $1.37 million and $1.34 million, respectively. No Ether ETF recorded an outflow. The trading volume for the entire category was $550.67 million, and net assets at the end of the session totaled $10.61 billion.

$HYPE Halt Decline Amid Weakening $XRP

ETF funds for $HYPE returned to inflows after a prolonged period of redemptions. Bitwise's BHYP fund attracted approximately $966,690, pushing combined net assets up to $267.78 million. Trading volume reached $11.63 million. The growth was modest, but it was the first sign that selling pressure might be easing after several challenging weeks.

ETFs for $XRP moved in the opposite direction. Bitwise's $XRP fund recorded an outflow of $3.58 million, which constituted the entire net outflow for this category. Trading volume for $XRP ETFs rose to $20.16 million. Net assets fell below the $1 billion threshold, closing at $993.38 million.

ETFs for Solana recorded neither net issuances nor redemptions. Combined assets at the end of the day stood at $878.51 million.

Wednesday's performance allowed Bitcoin and Ether to remain in the spotlight for institutional investors. Blackrock remained the dominant source of demand, while activity for funds dealing with smaller tokens continued to fluctuate sharply from one trading session to another.

end-content

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhich company led the capital inflow into Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs with $305 million?

ABlackrock led the capital inflow into Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs with $305 million.

QWhat was the net inflow amount for Bitcoin ETFs across the five funds mentioned?

AThe net inflow amount for Bitcoin ETFs across the five funds was $244.42 million.

QWhich Bitcoin ETF was the only one to experience an outflow of funds according to the article?

AThe HODL ETF from VanEck was the only Bitcoin ETF to experience an outflow of funds, amounting to $14.67 million.

QHow much did Ethereum ETFs attract in total, and which specific Blackrock ETF was the leader?

AEthereum ETFs attracted a total of $60.86 million. The leading specific Blackrock ETF was ETHA, with an inflow of $50.34 million.

QWhat trend did the ETF for $HYPE (Hyperliquid) show after a prolonged period, and what was the ETF's symbol from Bitwise?

AThe ETF for $HYPE (Hyperliquid) showed a return to capital inflow after a prolonged period of buybacks. The ETF's symbol from Bitwise is BHYP, which attracted approximately $966,690.

Related Reads

Capital is Moving from Cryptocurrency Speculation to Tokenized RWA Assets

In 2026, tokenized real-world assets (RWA) became one of the fastest-growing areas in crypto. Investors, weary of market volatility, are shifting capital from speculative crypto trading towards assets offering stable yield. These include tokenized government bonds (e.g., T-bills), private credit, real estate income, commodities, and money market funds. Data shows a clear preference for transparent, regulated products. Deposits into RWA protocols more than tripled year-on-year, reaching $7.4 billion in Q2, while spot trading activity surged 220%. The total on-chain value of tokenized RWAs exceeded $30 billion in 2026, more than doubling from the previous year, and approached $38 billion by August. RWA acts as a bridge between traditional finance and blockchain, not a replacement. It allows banks and asset managers to launch regulated products on public blockchains, while DeFi users gain access to previously unavailable real-world assets. Blockchain provides 24/7 settlements, transparency, programmability, and lower fees, while traditional finance contributes capital, regulation, and proven products. Tokenized private credit remains the largest RWA category (over $7 billion on-chain), benefiting from blockchain's cost reduction and transparency. Treasury bills are the fastest-growing institutional segment, driven by higher interest rates. Tokenized commodities, especially gold, are expanding, combining asset safety with blockchain trading ease. Real estate, though smaller, is also growing steadily. Tokenization is increasingly viewed as core financial infrastructure.

cryptonews.ru1h ago

Capital is Moving from Cryptocurrency Speculation to Tokenized RWA Assets

cryptonews.ru1h ago

Lone Bitcoin Miner Defies All Odds, Hits $200,000 Jackpot with Block Reward

A solo Bitcoin miner, contrary to all predictions, won a $200,000 jackpot as a block reward. The payment went to an address linked to CKPool, a solo-mining service. This was the 317th solo block found by the pool. The reward consisted of the 3.125 BTC fixed subsidy and about 0.032 BTC in transaction fees from 4,243 transactions. CKPool operator Dr -ck (Con Kolivas) confirmed the win, noting the miner's hashrate was "extremely volatile, presumably rented," peaking at 100 PH/s. This represented about 0.011% of Bitcoin's total network hashrate. At that level, a miner could statistically expect to find a block roughly every 64 days, far more likely than for a typical small home setup. Solo mining differs from pool mining, where rewards are shared based on contributed work. In solo mining, a miner gets nothing unless they personally find a block, but then receives the entire reward. CKPool charges a ~2% fee on blocks found. Dr -ck noted the hashrate pattern suggested rented computing power, a practice making solo wins more accessible. He also highlighted this was the first mainnet block mined after integrating Stratum V2 code into ckpool, though the block itself was found using the older Stratum V1 protocol. Against a backdrop of mining concentration in large industrial pools, such solo finds remain rare but demonstrate that anyone with sufficient hashrate can claim a full reward without corporate or government permission. The block subsidy will remain 3.125 BTC until the next halving around April 2028. The miner's identity remains unknown, as is typical. Bitcoin's mining difficulty is due for an adjustment, and network hashrate has declined from late 2025 peaks, partly due to competition for power and hardware from AI data centers.

cryptonews.ru1h ago

Lone Bitcoin Miner Defies All Odds, Hits $200,000 Jackpot with Block Reward

cryptonews.ru1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

1.6k Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片