Bitcoin Retail Demand Turns Positive Again: Is The Crowd Coming Back?

bitcoinistPublished on 2026-05-13Last updated on 2026-05-13

Abstract

Bitcoin retail demand has turned positive again, with its 30-day change surging to +4.38% after plunging into negative territory in March. This metric tracks transaction activity for transfers under $10,000, indicating renewed interest from small-scale investors. While this marks a significant improvement from last month's low of -8.2%, overall retail transaction volume remains below February levels. Concurrently, the recent price recovery has improved the situation for short-term holders (STHs), with the percentage of their supply in loss dropping to 38%. Bitcoin is currently trading around $80,700. The key question is whether this positive shift in retail sentiment will continue and lead to a full-scale return of small investors.

On-chain data shows the Bitcoin retail demand change has surged back into the green zone after a plunge underwater earlier in the year.

Bitcoin Retail Investor Demand Change Has Surged To +4%

In a new post on X, CryptoQuant author Axel Adler Jr has talked about the latest trend in the 30-day change of the Retail Investor Demand for Bitcoin. This indicator measures, as its name suggests, the degree of demand for the network that’s coming from retail traders.

Retail investors refer to the smallest of entities on the network who don’t tend to have any notable number of tokens in their wallet balance. As a proxy for their demand, the indicator makes use of the amount of transaction activity that they are participating in.

Naturally, the transfers made by this group are usually quite small in scale, so the metric specifically tracks the transfer volume associated with transactions involving a value of less than $10,000.

Below is the chart shared by Adler Jr that shows the trend in the 30-day change of the Bitcoin Retail Investor Demand over the last few years.

Looks like the value of the metric has been climbing in recent days | Source: @AxelAdlerJr on X

As is visible in the graph, the Bitcoin Retail Investor Demand saw its 30-day change collapse deep into the negative zone back in March. This means that retail traders shifted their attention away from the cryptocurrency.

Since then, however, the metric has climbed its way back up, with its value returning back into the green zone recently. Earlier, the indicator dropped to -8.2%, but this recovery has meant that it’s now sitting at +4.38%, a notable swing.

While this indicates a relative improvement in retail mood compared to one month ago, the analyst noted that full participation from the cohort has still not returned, with the transaction volume sitting at levels lower than February. It now remains to be seen whether the 30-day change in the Bitcoin Retail Investor Demand will continue its recent trajectory in the near future and if small investors will start pouring back into the asset in full force.

In some other news, the recent price recovery has led to an improvement in the situation of the short-term holders (STH), as analyst Maartunn has pointed out in an X post. The STHs refer to the BTC investors who purchased their tokens within the past 155 days.

Previously, these investors saw the vast majority of their supply dip into losses as Bitcoin went through its drawdown. As the below chart shows, though, the percentage of the STH supply in loss has dropped to just 38% after the recent price rally.

The trend in the STH Supply in Loss over the past decade | Source: @JA_Maartun on X

BTC Price

At the time of writing, Bitcoin is trading around $80,700, down 1% over the past week.

The price of the coin seems to have been moving sideways recently | Source: BTCUSDT on TradingView

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat is the '30-day change of the Retail Investor Demand for Bitcoin' indicator, and what does a recent positive value signify?

AThe '30-day change of the Retail Investor Demand for Bitcoin' indicator measures the degree of demand for the Bitcoin network from retail traders, specifically by tracking the transfer volume of transactions valued under $10,000. Its recent surge to a positive value of +4.38% signifies that retail demand has turned positive again after being in negative territory, indicating a relative improvement in retail investor sentiment and activity compared to one month ago.

QAccording to the analyst, what is the current state of full retail participation compared to earlier in the year?

AAccording to the analyst, while the retail demand indicator shows improvement, full participation from retail investors has not yet returned. The transaction volume associated with retail activity is still at levels lower than those seen in February.

QHow did the recent Bitcoin price recovery affect Short-Term Holders (STHs), and what is an STH?

AAn STH (Short-Term Holder) is a Bitcoin investor who purchased their tokens within the past 155 days. The recent price recovery has significantly improved their situation. The percentage of the STH supply held at a loss has dropped to just 38% after having seen the vast majority of their supply in losses during the previous price drawdown.

QWhat was the approximate Bitcoin price mentioned in the article, and what was its weekly performance?

AAt the time of writing in the article, Bitcoin was trading around $80,700. It was down approximately 1% over the past week, with its price described as moving sideways recently.

QWhat key metric related to retail demand dropped into deep negative territory in March, and what was its approximate value at that low point?

AThe key metric was the 30-day change of the Bitcoin Retail Investor Demand. It collapsed deep into negative territory in March, dropping to approximately -8.2%, indicating retail traders were shifting their attention away from Bitcoin.

Related Reads

Unpacking the Truth Behind On-chain Assets: Leverage, Liquidity, and Risk

The article analyzes the concept of "real-world asset" (RWA) tokenization, arguing that while tokenizing assets on-chain is a useful step, it is far from transformative on its own. The author compares it to placing a barcode on a shipping container—it enables identification but does not build the necessary market infrastructure. The core argument is that true value emerges not from tokenization, but from integrating these tokens into DeFi systems where they can be valued, financed, hedged, traded, and liquidated under stress. Key challenges identified include: 1. **Multiple Time Clocks**: A fundamental tension exists between blockchain's 24/7 settlement and the slower, business-hour-dependent processes of traditional markets, custody, and redemption. This "duration mismatch" can create dangerous liquidity gaps during crises. 2. **Liquidity Misconceptions**: True liquidity is not measured by Total Value Locked (TVL) or trading pairs, but by the ability to exit a position within a required timeframe at an acceptable price. It requires analyzing multiple exit paths and stress-testing scenarios. 3. **Leverage and Risk**: Leverage unlocks economic utility (e.g., using tokenized assets as collateral) but also introduces fragility. Risk models must account for more than asset volatility, incorporating factors like legal enforceability, oracle freshness, and market structure. Paradoxically, a "safer" asset like tokenized Treasury bonds could require a higher collateral discount than ETH due to slower, less-proven liquidation mechanisms. 4. **A Risk Graph**: RWA risk should be modeled as a network of interconnected dependencies (e.g., issuers, custodians, oracles, stablecoin pools), not a single score. Failures can propagate through this graph, turning operational issues into systemic liquidity crises. The article states that tokenized government bonds are merely an entry point, while more complex frontiers like computing power and energy assets present greater challenges and opportunities. It also examines the interplay and risks between tokenized stocks and perpetual futures contracts. The conclusion is that the future lies not in "tokenizing everything," but in building robust market layers where tokenized rights become resilient financial primitives within a programmable capital system. The token is just the barcode; the market is the machine.

marsbit11m ago

Unpacking the Truth Behind On-chain Assets: Leverage, Liquidity, and Risk

marsbit11m ago

The End of Mathematics: 40 Top Mathematicians Gather at Secret OpenAI Meeting

In August 2026, OpenAI hosted a closed-door summit with approximately 40 leading mathematicians, including recent Fields Medalist Jacob Tsimerman and OpenAI researcher Sébastien Bubeck. The meeting, spurred by a series of recent AI breakthroughs in mathematics, grappled with the potential existential threat AI poses to the field. The backdrop includes several high-profile AI achievements: OpenAI models disproving long-standing conjectures like the unit distance problem, generating 10 new mathematical discoveries, and Anthropic's Claude aiding in constructing complex multidimensional objects. These results often bypass traditional academic pipelines, appearing directly on social media. The mathematical community is divided. Over 3000 researchers signed the "Leiden Statement," advocating for responsible AI use and verification. Others resist AI entirely to preserve human-centric mathematics. A key concern is AI's current inability to *explain* proofs, particularly the difficult steps, which is central to mathematical understanding. At the summit, Bubeck outlined four potential futures: mathematics becoming like collaborative software engineering, a compute-driven field like physics, a curatorial exercise where humans interpret AI output, or a mass transition of mathematicians into AI safety. While emphasizing that "mathematics only makes sense when mathematicians learn from it," no consensus was reached. The event highlights a profound moment of reflection. As AI demonstrates increasing competence in solving complex problems, mathematicians are forced to question their future role and the very meaning of their discipline.

marsbit15m ago

The End of Mathematics: 40 Top Mathematicians Gather at Secret OpenAI Meeting

marsbit15m ago

Anthropic's New Models 'Catch the Gossip', The Strongest Fable 5 Unexpectedly Falls Flat

Anthropic has been discovered working on two new, previously unknown models codenamed "Marshmallow" (claude-marshmallow-eap) and "Melon" (claude-melon-eap), with early tests showing Marshmallow potentially surpassing Claude Opus 5 in conversational naturalness. Their emergence coincides with surprising new data revealing that Anthropic's flagship Fable 5 model, released two months ago as its strongest and most expensive offering, is being largely ignored by the enterprise market. According to spending data from Ramp tracking over 70,000 US companies, Fable 5 accounts for only about 11% of total token spending on Anthropic's models. This pales in comparison to OpenAI's flagship GPT-5.6 Sol, which commands roughly 25% of token spending in the same period. The tepid adoption is largely attributed to Fable 5's extremely high cost—double that of Opus 4.8 and ten times that of Haiku 4.5—without delivering proportionally superior performance for most business applications. Compounding the issue, the later-released Claude Opus 5, priced at half the cost of Fable 5, has achieved comparable or even better results in key benchmarks like programming and knowledge work, quickly surpassing Fable 5 in enterprise spending share. Furthermore, the rapid rise of powerful, low-cost open-source models—whose token usage share surged from 11% in April to 62% in August while costing less than 4% of enterprise AI budgets—applies additional pressure. Analysts suggest the sudden appearance of Marshmallow and Melon may be an urgent move by Anthropic to address this gap in its lineup. The goal is to offer models that are not only powerful but also cost-effective enough for businesses to adopt widely and sustainably, moving beyond a flagship that serves more as a showcase than a workhorse.

marsbit16m ago

Anthropic's New Models 'Catch the Gossip', The Strongest Fable 5 Unexpectedly Falls Flat

marsbit16m ago

Three Months After the Passing of Little Dog Rosie, Her Medical Records Transformed into an AI Healthcare Company

Three months after the passing of his dog Rosie, AI entrepreneur Paul S. Conyngham secured $4 million in seed funding from Founders Fund for his new startup, Gamgee. The company aims to industrialize the experimental, AI-assisted process he pioneered to create a personalized mRNA cancer vaccine for Rosie, who suffered from mast cell tumors. With no formal biology background, Conyngham used AI tools like ChatGPT and AlphaFold to analyze Rosie's tumor DNA, identify target neoantigens, and design a custom mRNA vaccine sequence. Laboratory partners at UNSW produced the vaccine. Initial treatment showed tumor reduction, but Rosie's cancer later recurred and she was euthanized. Gamgee's goal is to streamline this "N-of-1" approach into a repeatable service for canine cancer patients, handling sequencing, vaccine design, production, and delivery. Clinical trials are planned in Australia in collaboration with research institutions. The company also eyes a longer-term vision of establishing personalized, mRNA-based medicine across species. The story highlights the broader challenge in personalized cancer treatment: compressing the entire timeline from design and regulatory approval to manufacturing and administration to match the patient's prognosis. While AI can accelerate target discovery, the remaining logistical and regulatory hurdles are significant. The article concludes by emphasizing that, for now, consulting qualified veterinary oncologists remains the responsible path for pet owners.

marsbit25m ago

Three Months After the Passing of Little Dog Rosie, Her Medical Records Transformed into an AI Healthcare Company

marsbit25m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

2.1k Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片