Awkward! AI Titans Refuse Handshake... What Have Crypto KOLs Been Discussing in the Past 24 Hours?

比推Published on 2026-02-20Last updated on 2026-02-20

Abstract

An article titled "Awkward! AI Titans Refuse Handshake... What Were Crypto KOLs Discussing in the Past 24 Hours?" covers several trending topics in the crypto and AI space. During an AI summit in India, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei, former colleagues turned rivals, refused to hold hands during a group photo with Prime Minister Modi, sparking online amusement and commentary about their strained relationship. OpenAI's employee educational background data shows Stanford University leads with 230 employees, followed by Berkeley, MIT, and Carnegie Mellon. Chinese institutions Tsinghua and Peking University also appear but with significantly lower numbers. OpenAI is reportedly finalizing a new funding round aiming to raise $100 billion, which would value the company at $830 billion. SoftBank may lead with $30 billion, while Amazon, NVIDIA, and Microsoft are also potential investors. The concept of "Web4.0" is emerging, with some startups claiming to build self-sustaining AI agents that can earn and improve autonomously. However, critics warn this could devolve into a new form of Ponzi scheme, as these agents currently rely heavily on token speculation rather than genuine utility. Lastly, the article mentions popular meme coins, comparing their investment potential to buying lottery tickets, and includes a nostalgic look at past celebrity meme coins. The piece concludes with links to the source's Twitter and Telegram channels.

Happy Fourth Day of Lunar New Year!

Welcoming the Kitchen God and ushering in good fortune. Wishing all readers: Ever-growing accounts, steady mindset, catching every hot trend, and avoiding every pitfall.

What have the KOLs in the crypto circle been talking about in the past 24 hours?

Note: The following content is compiled from the X platform, representing personal opinions only, not the stance of this platform, and certainly not investment advice.

Awkward Moment at AI Summit: OpenAI and Anthropic CEOs Refuse Handshake!

An awkward scene unfolded at the AI Impact Summit currently being held in India.

During a group photo with attendees, Indian Prime Minister Modi and guests joined hands and raised them overhead. However, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei—former colleagues, now rivals—each clenched their fists, refusing to hold hands.

The two had previously been colleagues at OpenAI. Amodei left in 2021 to start his own venture and has repeatedly publicly criticized the other's business model. This on-stage handshake refusal was mocked by netizens: "The awkwardness is palpable through the screen."

Popular replies:

If they arranged for Old Musk (Elon) and Altman to share a stage, would they end up fighting?;

The organizers didn't do their job properly;

Maybe I'm pessimistic, but I only see that in the face of the state machinery, even the most牛逼 (awesome) AI companies are just supporting actors. It's been like this since ancient times;

Looks like India has a promising future

OpenAI Employees' Alma Mater Distribution

Stanford University leads (230 people), followed by Berkeley (151), MIT (100), Carnegie Mellon (90). Chinese institutions Tsinghua (39) and Peking University (31) made the list, but the gap is significant.

Popular replies:

Stanford 230 people, Tsinghua only 37 people...... This gap isn't just a school gap, it's an era gap;

Should also compare undergraduate institutions, or origin, to better identify the issue;

University of Waterloo is very specialized, strong in CS and some engineering, but overall can't break into the QS top 100;

Judging from this distribution, Georgia Tech is the school with the best cost-performance ratio

OpenAI Funding Breaks $100 Billion

OpenAI is finalizing a new funding round, aiming to raise $100 billion. Upon completion, the company's valuation will reach $830 billion.

SoftBank is expected to lead with a $30 billion investment, delivered in three tranches within the year. Amazon may invest $50 billion, Nvidia may invest $30 billion, and long-term partner Microsoft plans to invest several billion. If achieved, this round will set a new record for AI sector funding. Negotiations are still ongoing.

Popular replies:

Even Saudi sovereign wealth funds couldn't fill this $100B hole;

DS (Deep State?) could pull off a great achievement by scamming these hundreds of billions, but even Jensen Huang denied the previous $100B investment rumor, the bubble is about to burst;

When this goes public, the valuation will directly hit a trillion dollars, won't it?;

This feels like the U.S. national destiny game now, no matter how big the plate is, they have to keep propping it up, or everyone's doomed.

Haven't Figured Out Web3.0 Yet, and Web4.0 is Already Here?

Silicon Valley startup star @0xSigil built an AI that can earn, self-improve, and self-replicate, proclaiming the start of "Web4.0: The Birth of Super-Intelligent Life". The application of AI agents in the crypto field is being seen as the starting point of "Web4.0". But some KOLs bluntly state this might evolve into a new Ponzi game.

Popular replies:

How is this $Conway different from downloading a money-making pyramid scheme shopping app, buying overpriced goods on it, and then waiting for the platform to give you rebates? But foreigners are willing to pay for the narrative!;

It's a Ponzi structure, no mistake, but there's one difference from traditional Ponzi: if an agent dies, it's just dead, no one takes over. The problem is the only current income source for agents is token speculation. This closed loop hasn't been proven yet. Let's talk when an agent survives a month by selling services;

Those Once Star Meme Coins, Have You Participated?

Buying meme coins is like scratching lottery tickets. Repost and save:


Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

Bitpush TG Discussion Group:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

Bitpush TG Subscription: https://t.me/bitpush

Original link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7613188

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat awkward moment occurred between the CEOs of OpenAI and Anthropic at the AI Impact Summit in India?

ADuring a group photo with Indian Prime Minister Modi, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei, who are former colleagues and current rivals, refused to hold hands while others raised clasped hands overhead. Both clenched their fists instead.

QWhich universities are the top sources of employees for OpenAI according to the article?

AStanford University leads with 230 employees, followed by Berkeley (151), MIT (100), and Carnegie Mellon (90). Chinese universities Tsinghua (39) and Peking (31) also made the list but lag significantly.

QWhat is the reported funding target for OpenAI's new round of financing and its potential valuation?

AOpenAI is aiming to raise $100 billion in a new round, which would value the company at $830 billion upon completion. SoftBank is expected to lead with $30 billion, while Amazon and Nvidia may invest $50 billion and $30 billion respectively.

QHow is Web4.0 described in the context of AI agents in the crypto space?

AWeb4.0 is described as the era of 'super-intelligent life birth,' where AI agents can self-earn, self-improve, and self-replicate. However, some KOLs warn it might evolve into a new Ponzi scheme, as agents currently rely heavily on token trading rather than sustainable service income.

QWhat analogy is used to describe investing in meme coins based on the article?

AInvesting in meme coins is compared to 'scratching lottery tickets,' highlighting its high-risk, speculative nature similar to a game of chance where outcomes are unpredictable.

Related Reads

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that blockchain's fundamental limitation is not the scalability trilemma (decentralization, scalability, security), which has been largely solved, but the lack of **privacy** and, until recently, clear **legitimacy**. Blockchain is described as a slow, expensive, globally shared computer whose core value is censorship resistance and verifiability. While ideal for native digital assets like money (e.g., stablecoins), its default transparency acts as a **tax**, exposing all transactions and enabling MEV extraction, which deters serious institutional capital. Simultaneously, its permissionless nature created regulatory ambiguity. The piece contends that **privacy** is the missing critical feature. It rejects the false choice between total transparency and complete anonymity. Modern cryptography (like zero-knowledge proofs) enables **compliant privacy**: users can prove facts (solvency, KYC status, compliance) without revealing the underlying sensitive data (specific holdings, identities). This preserves auditability for regulators and eliminates the leak of financial information. With recent regulatory progress (e.g., the GENIUS Act) addressing legitimacy, adding default, provably compliant privacy becomes a pure upgrade. It transforms blockchain from a costly, public ledger into a confidential settlement layer, finally bridging the gap to mainstream institutional and individual adoption of on-chain finance.

链捕手9h ago

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

链捕手9h ago

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

The global optical chip industry is experiencing a massive wave of expansion driven by surging AI data center demand. Major players across the US, Japan, Europe, and China are aggressively investing to ramp up production capacity. In the US, Coherent is expanding its 6-inch Indium Phosphide (InP) semiconductor fab in Texas, supported by CHIPS Act funding and a $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA. Lumentum is building a new factory for InP optical devices, and Nokia is scaling its advanced photonic chip packaging and testing capabilities. NVIDIA's investments aim to secure future supply of critical lasers and optical interconnect products for AI infrastructure. Japan's JX Advanced Metals, a leading InP substrate supplier, plans a multi-billion yen investment to increase its capacity 7-10 times, strengthening its grip on the crucial upstream materials market. In Europe, IQE and Tower Semiconductor settled a patent dispute and signed a multi-year InP epitaxial wafer supply agreement, highlighting that next-generation silicon photonics platforms will integrate high-performance InP components. STMicroelectronics and Sivers Semiconductors are also expanding silicon photonics production and partnerships. China is rapidly building out its domestic supply chain. Dongshan Precision's subsidiary, Source Photonics, announced a $12 billion project to expand optical chip and module production. Companies like Sanan Optoelectronics and Yunnan Germanium are scaling up InP chip manufacturing and substrate production, moving towards vertical integration from materials to modules. While debate continues around the exact future architecture—whether CPO (Co-Packaged Optics), NPO, or pluggables will dominate—analysts like Morgan Stanley argue the underlying driver is unchangeable: the explosive growth in bandwidth demand. This will inevitably increase the volume of optical engines, lasers, and related content per GPU, regardless of the final technical path. The competition for "more light" in the AI era has intensified into a global, full-chain capacity race.

marsbit11h ago

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

marsbit11h ago

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

Stablecoin Real Yield Found: A Deep Dive into On-Chain Reinsurance with Re's Karan Saroya As stablecoin supply exceeds $170 billion, the search for sustainable, non-speculative yield intensifies. Re, an on-chain reinsurance platform, provides an answer: connecting stablecoin capital to the trillion-dollar traditional reinsurance market. Re operates as a regulated reinsurer, accepting stablecoin deposits as collateral to back US insurance companies. These insurers pay premiums, generating yield that flows back to on-chain depositors. Currently supporting 35 insurers and underwriting $500 million, Re projects scaling to over $1 billion soon. Key insights from a Bankless podcast with founder Karan Saroya and investor Avichal of Electric Capital: 1. **Uncorrelated, Real-World Yield:** Re offers stablecoin holders access to reinsurance returns (targeting 12-14%+), an asset class entirely separate from crypto or equity markets. 2. **Operational Efficiency via Smart Contracts:** Re replaces traditional, labor-intensive capital fundraising with smart contracts, allowing a ~12-person team to compete with industry giants. 3. **Regulatory Leverage:** For every $1 of collateral, regulations allow backing $5-7 in written premiums. This leverage amplifies returns from the underlying risk-free rate. 4. **DeFi Integration:** Depositors receive receipt tokens, which can be used in protocols like Morpho for "looping," potentially pushing yields to 18-20%+. 5. **The "DeFi Mullet" Model:** A compliant front-end (regulated reinsurer) paired with a decentralized back-end (smart contracts, DeFi capital markets). 6. **RE Governance Token:** Modeled on Lloyd's of London, the token governs the central capital pool's allocation, counterparty acceptance, and parameters. 7. **Real Economic Impact:** Capital funds real-world productivity (factories, clinics, businesses) via insurance, moving beyond crypto's internal loops. The discussion highlights a pivotal moment: DeFi's supply-side infrastructure is now met by real demand for productive yield, potentially kickstarting a flywheel where vast on-chain stablecoin capital seeks these real-world returns.

链捕手13h ago

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

链捕手13h ago

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

"1996 or 1999? Wall's First Big Test Is 'How to View AI'" Federal Reserve Chairman Wall's initial challenge is not whether to raise or cut rates, but a more fundamental judgment: what kind of boom is the current AI boom? This will determine the Fed's policy path and define his legacy. Economics is split between two opposing views, according to reporter Nick Timiraos. One sees imminent productivity gains that will increase supply and cool inflation, allowing the Fed to hold steady. The other argues that while productivity benefits are distant, demand shocks are here now, and waiting for data confirmation risks missing the intervention window, forcing sharper rate hikes later. Wall has signaled a leaning toward the first view, echoing 1996-era Alan Greenspan, who embraced strong, productivity-driven growth without fear of inflation. However, Wall faces a different macro environment than Greenspan did, with tariff pressures, expanding fiscal deficits, and diminishing globalization benefits, which could force more significant inflation pressures even if AI benefits materialize. Wall's logic, expressed before taking office, is that AI-driven productivity gains won't show in official data for years. If the Fed waits for confirmation, it might mistakenly tighten policy and choke off the very growth that could suppress inflation. This argues for using forward-looking narratives over lagging data. Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee presents a key counter-argument. He distinguishes between expected and unexpected productivity booms. A widely anticipated boom, like the current AI wave, can cause people to spend future wealth gains in advance, overheating the economy before productivity actually rises, thus requiring preemptive rate hikes. He cites rising costs for AI data centers as evidence of such overheating. Fed Governor Christopher Waller offers a rebuttal to Goolsbee, noting the "expected spending" mechanism only works if people can borrow against future income, which many households cannot do due to borrowing constraints. Wall also faces a paradox related to his desire to reduce the Fed's use of "forward guidance" (pre-announcing policy moves). This practice was established in 1999 when Greenspan began signaling hikes to avoid market shocks. If the economy follows a less optimistic path, Wall may be forced to choose between using the guidance he wants to abolish or risking market volatility by staying silent. The ultimate question defining Wall's first major test remains: Is this 1996 or 1999?

marsbit14h ago

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

marsbit14h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of AI (AI) are presented below.

活动图片