AI Stocks Plunge Violently, Is It GLM's DeepSeek Moment?

marsbitPublished on 2026-06-24Last updated on 2026-06-24

Abstract

On Tuesday, AI-related stocks faced their most severe sell-off of the year, triggered by a sharp decline in South Korean equities. The plunge, led by key AI supply chain players Samsung and SK Hynix, spread to US markets, heavily impacting semiconductor, memory, and storage stocks. Analysts linked the downturn to the recent release of China's powerful open-source model, GLM-5.2, drawing parallels to the market shock caused by DeepSeek's release earlier in 2025. This event reignited investor concerns that cheaper, competitive AI models could undermine the economic rationale for the massive data center investments by major US tech firms. The sell-off was seen as a repricing of the AI trade rather than a rejection of AI demand itself. Market focus shifted from whether AI will grow to whether the current valuations justify the enormous capital expenditures. While some strategists view this as a necessary correction after excessive gains, questions remain about the sustainability of financing for AI infrastructure, particularly as companies increasingly rely on debt. All eyes are now on upcoming earnings reports, like Micron's, to gauge the hardware sector's health. The core debate has become about the cost of growth and which companies can successfully convert their massive investments into sustainable cash flow.

On Tuesday, artificial intelligence trading faced its most intense stress test of the year. It started with a sharp decline in the South Korean stock market led by Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix, before the sell-off spread to the US trading session, hitting memory, storage, and semiconductor stocks particularly hard.

The South Korean KOSPI index tumbled nearly 10% at one point on Tuesday, triggering a 20-minute trading halt. Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix, core players in the global AI supply chain, both suffered heavy losses. According to The Wall Street Journal, the downturn subsequently spread to US stocks, with the Nasdaq Composite closing down 2.2% and the S&P 500 falling 1.4%. AI and chip-related stocks led the decline as investors began reassessing the uncertainties surrounding data center construction costs and future revenue realization.

Some view this global AI stock sell-off as "GLM's DeepSeek moment," mirroring the AI stock plunge triggered by DeepSeek's release in early 2025, where an overly powerful open-source model sparked skepticism about US AI dominance. Investment bank Jefferies noted in a report that GLM-5.2 has entered the top three in the global large language model rankings.

Nathan Lambert, a senior research scientist at Allen Institute for AI and author of Interconnects, called it a "step change" for open-source agent models and compared the market reaction to the shock caused by DeepSeek R1 in early 2025. This discussion within tech circles was quickly picked up by financial media. Barron's interpreted Tuesday's tech stock decline as the return of "cheap Chinese AI" concerns, agreeing this drop is a repeat of January's DeepSeek shock. Gavekal Research analyst Will Denyer was quoted saying GLM-5.2 is one of the most impressive Chinese challenges to US AI dominance yet. For investors, the issue is not just stronger Chinese models, but whether the current valuations of US tech giants, supported by hundreds of billions in data center spending, can hold if cheaper, open-source models become good enough.

Arun Sai, senior multi-asset strategist at Pictet Asset Management, told the Financial Times that the market is facing two pressures simultaneously: growing doubts about AI investment returns and rising interest rate expectations due to US economic resilience. Ben Inker, co-head of asset allocation at GMO, also noted that these stocks had risen too much and were due for a pullback.

The extent of the decline in US chip stocks suggests money is not fleeing the entire tech sector, but rather the hardware chain that previously benefited most from the AI infrastructure narrative. Eric Johnston, chief equity and macro strategist at Cantor Fitzgerald, summarized current trading as selling "the companies spending the most money," pointing to hyperscalers like Alphabet, Amazon, and Meta, which still plan to invest hundreds of billions in AI data centers.

The South Korean market decline might be more attributable to specific events. Lee Chan-jin, head of South Korea's Financial Supervisory Service, said on Monday that the country's previous approval of leveraged single-stock ETFs related to Samsung and SK Hynix was too hasty. The market was also hit by MSCI's decision not to include South Korea on its watchlist for developed market status, dashing investors' expectations of passive fund inflows for now.

Sell-side analysts are focusing on Micron's upcoming earnings report. Dilin Wu, strategist at Pepperstone Group, told Bloomberg that Micron's report this week will be a key test for hardware chain sentiment; strong results would directly benefit Samsung and SK Hynix. Lee Jae Mahn, a strategist at Hana Securities in Seoul, noted that SK Hynix's rally relative to Samsung has been too fast, reflecting excessive optimism.

Another unsettling variable for the market is the increasing reliance on debt to finance AI infrastructure. The Guardian cited Ipek Ozkardeskaya, senior analyst at Swissquote, who noted that SpaceX's pursuit of large-scale debt financing soon after its IPO has renewed investor concerns about major tech companies over-investing in AI infrastructure and supporting this race through debt.

However, bulls are not ready to declare the AI trade over. Dan Ives, global head of technology research at Wedbush Securities, stated in a Tuesday report that the South Korean market pullback would pressure US tech stocks, but he still believes the AI revolution is in its early stages, calling this more of a "gut check" for the tech trade. Jonathan Schiessl, deputy chief investment officer at Westminster Asset Management, also termed this decline a necessary correction after overheating, not the end of the story.

This suggests Tuesday's drop is more a market repricing of the AI trade rather than a denial of AI demand itself. The core question shifts from "Will AI grow?" to "Is the price paid for that growth too high?": Who can convert capital expenditure into cash flow, whose valuation is already overstretched, and who will be forced to sell when leverage and crowded trades unwind.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat triggered the sharp sell-off in global AI-related stocks, particularly in South Korea and the US, as described in the article?

AThe sell-off was triggered by a combination of factors. In South Korea, it was linked to a regulatory comment from the Financial Supervisory Service about the hasty approval of leveraged single-stock ETFs for Samsung and SK Hynix, and disappointment over MSCI not adding South Korea to its watchlist for developed markets. In the US, the decline was driven by market concerns sparked by the release of China's powerful open-source AI model, GLM-5.2, which led to a reassessment of the costs and future returns of massive AI infrastructure investments by US tech giants, reminiscent of the impact of DeepSeek R1 in early 2025.

QHow do analysts cited in the article compare the impact of GLM-5.2 to the DeepSeek R1 event?

AAnalysts and researchers directly compare the two events, labeling the market reaction to GLM-5.2 as a 'DeepSeek moment' or a 'replay' of the DeepSeek impact. They describe GLM-5.2 as a 'step change' for open-source agent models and view it as China's most impressive challenge yet to US AI dominance. The core parallel is the concern that sufficiently powerful and cheaper open-source models could undermine the economic rationale for the massive capital expenditures planned by US hyperscalers.

QAccording to the article, what is the main concern for investors regarding large US tech companies' massive AI infrastructure spending?

AThe main concern is whether the thousands of billions of dollars in planned data center spending by US hyperscalers like Alphabet, Amazon, and Meta can be justified and support their current valuations if cheaper, open-source AI models (like GLM-5.2) prove to be 'good enough.' Investors are questioning if these enormous capital expenditures will translate into expected future cash flows and returns.

QWhat specific event or report are market participants watching as a key test for the hardware supply chain's health after the sell-off?

AMarket participants are closely watching the upcoming earnings report from Micron Technology. Analysts cited in the article state that Micron's financial results will serve as a crucial indicator for the health of the hardware supply chain. A strong performance is seen as potentially benefiting related stocks like Samsung and SK Hynix.

QDespite the sell-off, what is the prevailing view among bullish analysts about the long-term AI trend?

ABullish analysts do not believe the AI trade is over. They characterize the sell-off as a necessary correction after an overheated rally, a 'gut check,' or a market repricing rather than a story-ending event. They maintain that the AI revolution is still in its early stages. The core question has shifted from whether AI will grow to whether the price paid for that growth is too high.

Related Reads

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Title: The Shifting Landscape of Crypto Venture Capital The era of dedicated crypto venture capital funds is undergoing a significant transformation. Once essential for navigating the sector's complexity and high risk, these specialized funds are now facing an identity crisis as the market matures. This shift mirrors historical patterns in other specialized investment classes like cleantech and SPACs, where initial information advantages dissipate as technologies become mainstream and integrated into existing industry frameworks. The article argues that crypto is reaching a critical inflection point, transitioning from a "building phase" to an "integration phase." Major players like Stripe, BlackRock, and Visa now engage with crypto not for its novel mechanics but as a foundational financial infrastructure. Their needs—regulatory compliance, banking partnerships, distribution channels—align with traditional fintech, a domain easily understood by large, generalist funds like Sequoia and Founders Fund. This evolution creates a "barbell effect" within the VC landscape. On one end are massive, diversified platforms that can incorporate crypto as one vertical among many. On the other are small, nimble funds focused on niche, experimental projects. The middle ground—medium-sized dedicated crypto funds—is being squeezed out. Their typical fund size makes it impossible to generate sufficient returns solely from early-stage crypto bets, yet they cannot compete with giants for later-stage deals. Consequently, leading crypto-native firms like Paradigm and Framework Ventures are expanding into AI, robotics, and other sectors, driven partly by LP pressure for better returns amid a broader VC DPI crisis. Others, like Dragonfly and a16z, have narrowed their crypto focus predominantly to financial infrastructure like stablecoins, reframing the sector's core narrative. For crypto entrepreneurs, this consolidation presents challenges. While generalist funds offer larger checks and broader resources, crypto projects now compete fiercely with AI for attention and capital within these firms. Furthermore, the long-term, non-commercial foundational work that built the ecosystem—funded by dedicated crypto VCs—is less likely to attract generalist capital focused on direct returns. The conclusion is that "crypto investor" as a standalone category is becoming obsolete, akin to "internet investor." Crypto is becoming a baseline infrastructure layer. The future will see a barbell structure: large-scale growth financing handled by generalist funds, while pioneering, speculative projects are funded by small, specialized vehicles. The dedicated crypto funds of the 2017-2021 boom, which incubated core infrastructure, are giving way to this new, bifurcated reality.

Foresight News14m ago

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Foresight News14m ago

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

Title: As Consensus Forms Faster, What Are Young Investors Betting On? In the rapid evolution of tech investment, a new generation of young investors is navigating a landscape where AI, robotics, commercial aerospace, and quantum computing are advancing simultaneously. Traditional investment logic based on financial models is giving way to a need for deep technical understanding and the ability to act before industry consensus forms. An analysis of trends from the "WAIC FUTURE TECH" list of young investment leaders reveals key shifts in focus. The first major trend is the movement of AI from the digital screen into the physical world. Investment is shifting from large language models and chatbots towards embodied AI, robotics, AI hardware, and edge computing. While demonstrations generate excitement, the real challenge lies in achieving scalable, reliable, and cost-effective delivery in complex real-world environments like factories and logistics. Success depends not just on algorithms but on the integration of sensors, actuators, and control systems. Second, the competitive focus for large models is moving beyond raw capability toward building an "intelligence flywheel." The goal is to create self-reinforcing systems where user interaction generates data, improving the model, which in turn enhances the user experience and attracts more engagement. Companies that successfully embed AI into workflows to create these closed-loop systems can build lasting value that isn't easily erased by the next model upgrade. Third, facing a potential bottleneck in high-quality human-generated data, investors are looking at new underlying technologies. Reinforcement learning and self-play, as demonstrated by AlphaGo Zero, offer paths for AI to generate its own experience. Scientific foundation models, which aim to build general AI capabilities for fields like life sciences and materials discovery, represent a non-consensus direction that could unlock new frontiers of knowledge and data. Finally, in deep-tech areas like quantum computing, commercial aerospace, and space-based infrastructure, patient capital is essential. These fields have long, uncertain development and validation cycles involving complex engineering, supply chains, and regulations. Investment here requires a long-term view, focusing on foundational team capabilities and the eventual emergence of market demand, even if commercial returns are distant. Collectively, these trends illustrate how young investors are adapting to a new era. They are learning to make earlier, technically-informed judgments, balance hype with real-world viability, and provide the patient capital needed to build the deep-tech foundations of the future.

marsbit42m ago

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

marsbit42m ago

Can Japan Buy Growth with AI? Will the Bond Market Believe It?

Japan's cabinet has introduced the 2026 Basic Policy on Economic and Fiscal Management and Reform, shifting its primary fiscal target. The new framework moves away from the traditional annual primary balance goal and instead prioritizes a stable reduction of the debt-to-GDP ratio. This change is tied to a strategy of increased "responsible proactive fiscal" spending, aiming to boost long-term growth through investments in strategic sectors like AI, semiconductors, energy, and robotics. The government estimates total public and private investment in 62 key technologies could exceed 370 trillion yen by 2040. The market reaction has been mixed and cautious. While equity markets may respond to policy signals, bond markets are focused on fiscal credibility. Concerns center on whether the weakening of the clear primary balance anchor could lead to looser fiscal discipline. If investors doubt that these strategic investments will generate sufficient productivity gains, tax revenue, and nominal growth to outpace rising interest costs, they may demand higher yields on Japanese Government Bonds (JGBs). Recent volatility in the yen and JGB yields, with the 10-year yield briefly reaching 2.9%, reflects this skepticism. The success of this new framework hinges on two factors: whether Japan can achieve a nominal growth rate consistently higher than its long-term interest rates, and whether future budgets demonstrate disciplined control over bond issuance. The government's narrative is that strategic investment is essential to break Japan's cycle of low growth, aging, and labor shortages. However, the bond market will continuously assess the credibility of this plan, pricing the risk that it may represent fiscal expansion rather than a viable growth strategy.

marsbit1h ago

Can Japan Buy Growth with AI? Will the Bond Market Believe It?

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of AI (AI) are presented below.

活动图片