AI Industry Welcomes a Cash-Rich Tether

marsbitPublished on 2026-01-05Last updated on 2026-01-05

Abstract

Tether, the company behind the stablecoin USDT, reported a staggering $13 billion profit in 2024, significantly outperforming major AI companies like OpenAI and Anthropic, both of which incurred substantial losses. With only 150 employees, Tether achieved a per capita output 60 times greater than OpenAI’s. Its business model is simple: for every USDT issued, Tether holds one US dollar, primarily investing these reserves in U.S. Treasury bonds. It earns the interest income without paying any to USDT holders. In 2024, interest alone contributed $7 billion to its profits. Now, Tether is aggressively investing in AI. It loaned over $600 million to Northern Data, Europe’s largest GPU cloud provider, acquiring what is effectively an AI training base. It also released QVAC Genesis, a massive open-source AI training dataset. Furthermore, Tether invested $200 million in Blackrock Neurotech, a pioneering brain-computer interface company. Additional investments in robotics could bring its total AI-related spending to nearly $2 billion. Tether’s move into AI may be driven by both anxiety over declining Treasury yields and ambition to establish itself as a tech leader. Ironically, it promotes "decentralized AI" despite being a highly centralized company itself. While OpenAI and Anthropic struggle with profitability and continuous fundraising, Tether leverages its highly profitable stablecoin business to fund its AI ambitions risk-free, making a paradoxical case that the best business m...

Written by: Curry, Deep Tide TechFlow

Tether earned $13 billion in 2024.

You might not have a clear idea of this number. Let me put it another way: OpenAI had a revenue of $3.7 billion in 2024 but lost $5 billion. Anthropic had a revenue of $1 billion and also lost $5 billion.

The combined losses of these two legitimate AI companies still fall short of what Tether made in a year.

Tether has 150 employees, while OpenAI has over 3,000. The per capita output difference is roughly:

60 times.

How does Tether make money? When you buy 1 USDT, they take $1 and use it to buy U.S. Treasury bonds. The interest from the bonds goes to them, not you.

The essence of this is that Tether doesn't pay interest. Banks pay interest on savings, but Tether doesn't. You hold your money as USDT and get zero interest. They use your money to buy U.S. Treasury bonds, earning $7 billion in interest in 2024 alone.

150 people managing over $130 billion in Treasury bonds, doing nothing, and the interest just rolls in.

Who wouldn't want to lie back with a business like this?

But with so much money, it has to be spent. Tether has chosen a direction:

AI.

And they’re not just casually investing in a few projects.

First, computing power.

Running AI requires GPUs—the more, the better, and the more expensive, the better. Tether lent over $600 million to a German company called Northern Data.

What does this company do?

It’s Europe’s largest GPU cloud service provider. They have over 10,000 Nvidia H100 GPUs—the same ones OpenAI used to train GPT, each costing $20,000 to $30,000.

The cluster formed by these GPUs ranks 26th in the global TOP500 supercomputer list. Tether’s $600 million investment essentially buys an AI training base in Europe.

Next, data.

Training AI requires feeding it data. Last week, Tether released a dataset called QVAC Genesis, covering 19 disciplines including mathematics, physics, chemistry, and computer science. They claim it’s the world’s largest open-source AI training dataset.

Keep in mind that OpenAI and Anthropic’s training data are not public. Tether is releasing it for free, available to anyone.

Then comes the more sci-fi part.

In April 2024, Tether spent $200 million to acquire a company called Blackrock Neurotech. The name includes "Blackrock," but it has no relation to the asset management firm BlackRock.

This company works on brain-computer interfaces. They implant chips in people’s brains, allowing paralyzed individuals to type with their thoughts, control wheelchairs, and operate robotic arms. It sounds like science fiction, but they started in 2008—eight years before Musk’s Neuralink.

How impressive is this company?

Globally, 35 people have brain-computer interface chips implanted, and 31 of them use Blackrock’s technology. In 2016, a fully paralyzed patient used their device to control a robotic arm and fist-bump Obama. The chip implanted in the sensory cortex allowed him to "feel" the president’s hand.

Last year, this brain-computer interface company enabled an ALS patient to "speak" again. The chip in his brain translated his thoughts into speech at a rate of 62 words per minute.

Tether spent $200 million to become the majority shareholder of this company.

Combined, Tether has invested nearly $1 billion in AI-related fields. Rumor has it they’re also negotiating with a German robotics company, offering $1.2 billion. If that goes through, the total investment could reach $2 billion.

What does this mean?

Anthropic raised $3.5 billion in funding throughout 2024. Tether’s investment alone is almost half of what a top-tier AI company raised in a year.

OpenAI spent $6.7 billion on R&D in the first half of 2025. Tether, with just a fraction of its profits, can play the role of a big spender in the AI world.

Why is a stablecoin company diving into AI?

We think there are two possibilities.

The first is anxiety. The Fed is cutting interest rates, and Treasury yields are falling. In 2024, they made $7 billion in interest just by lying back. From 2025 onward, things might not be as rosy. Even money-printing machines need new stories.

The second is ambition. The whole world is talking about AI—investors, media, politicians. If you say you’re a stablecoin company, no one bats an eye. But if you say you’re working on AI, brain-computer interfaces, and humanoid robots, you become:

A tech leader.

The most amusing part?

Tether’s AI efforts come with slogans like "decentralization," "local operation," and "returning intelligence to individuals."

But Tether itself is the most centralized company in the crypto world.

They decide how many coins to issue, how much reserve to hold. In ten years of operation, they’ve never been audited. Only they know where users’ money is.

Now, this company wants to teach the world what "decentralized AI" means.

It’s a bit like a casino owner teaching people how to quit gambling.

Not that it’s impossible.

After all, OpenAI is still losing money and isn’t expected to break even until 2029. Anthropic is in a similar boat, targeting 2028. Sam Altman is fundraising everywhere, and Dario Amodei is doing the same. The two companies have burned through $10 billion combined and are still telling stories to investors.

Tether doesn’t need to tell stories. The money is already in their pocket.

What’s the biggest challenge in the entire AI industry? The business model.

How to make money? No one knows. When will it make money? No one knows. Can it make money? No one knows.

Tether doesn’t have this problem. Their business model is:

Not doing AI.

They use the profits from stablecoins to invest in AI. If it works out, it’s foresight. If it fails, it’s a learning expense. Either way, it doesn’t affect their core business.

Those doing AI are losing money; those not doing AI are making money. Those doing AI are fundraising; those not doing AI are investing.

In 2026, the best AI business model might just be not doing AI.

First, get your money-printing machine in order.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QHow much profit did Tether make in 2024, and how does it compare to major AI companies like OpenAI and Anthropic?

ATether made a profit of $13 billion in 2024. In comparison, OpenAI had revenue of $3.7 billion but lost $5 billion, while Anthropic had revenue of $1 billion and also lost $5 billion. Combined, the losses of these two major AI companies were less than Tether's profit.

QWhat is Tether's core business model that generates such significant profits?

ATether's core business model involves issuing the USDT stablecoin. When users buy 1 USDT, Tether receives 1 US dollar and uses it to purchase U.S. Treasury bonds. Tether earns the interest from these bonds but does not pay any interest to USDT holders, allowing it to profit significantly from the interest income.

QWhat are some key AI-related investments Tether has made, and how much has it invested?

ATether has invested nearly $1 billion in AI-related areas. Key investments include over $600 million in loans to Northern Data, Europe's largest GPU cloud service provider with over 10,000 Nvidia H100 GPUs; $200 million to acquire brain-computer interface company Blackrock Neurotech; and the release of the QVAC Genesis dataset. It is also reportedly negotiating a $1.2 billion deal with a German robotics company, which would bring total investments to around $2 billion.

QWhy is Tether, a stablecoin company, investing heavily in AI technologies?

ATether is investing in AI due to two main reasons: anxiety over declining U.S. Treasury bond yields, which threaten its primary revenue source, and ambition to position itself as a tech leader in the rapidly growing AI field, enhancing its reputation beyond being just a stablecoin issuer.

QWhat ironic contrast does the article highlight between Tether's actions and its stated AI goals?

AThe article highlights the irony that Tether, which is promoting 'decentralized AI,' 'local operation,' and 'returning intelligence to individuals,' is itself one of the most centralized companies in the crypto space. It has full control over USDT issuance, reserve management, and has never undergone an audit, making its advocacy for decentralization seem contradictory.

Related Reads

Ethereum Q1 2026 Report: Fees Decline, Users and Transaction Volume Hit New Highs

Ethereum Q1 2026 Report: Fees Down, Users & Transactions Hit New Highs Token Terminal's Q1 2026 report on Ethereum presents a pivotal development: the network achieved record highs in monthly active users (13.2M, +85.9% YoY), total transactions (200.4M, +81.5% YoY), and throughput (25.78 TPS), while transaction fees on the mainnet plummeted by 47.9% quarter-over-quarter. This shift is attributed to the network's strategic move into a "low fees for scale" phase, exemplified by the Fusaka upgrade which increased data capacity and lowered block space costs, releasing pent-up demand (a manifestation of Jevons's Paradox). The report highlights a core narrative shift for Ethereum: from a DeFi-centric blockchain to a global financial settlement layer. It maintains a dominant position in tokenized assets, holding majority market shares among top chains in stablecoins (61.8%), tokenized funds (73.0%), and tokenized commodities (84.0%). Growth in tokenized funds (+73.1% YoY) and commodities (+325.9% YoY) was particularly strong, driven by institutions like BlackRock and JPMorgan entering the space. Contrasting these usage gains, several USD-denominated value metrics declined in Q1: fully diluted market cap fell 30.3% QoQ, total value locked (TVL) dropped 11.0%, and ecosystem transaction volume decreased 24.0%. The report interprets this as Ethereum prioritizing long-term network expansion and cementing its role as the default settlement layer for finance over short-term fee capture. The commentary from Etherealize argues that, much like the early internet, Ethereum's open, permissionless model is poised to win over closed alternatives as institutional tokenization accelerates.

marsbit1h ago

Ethereum Q1 2026 Report: Fees Decline, Users and Transaction Volume Hit New Highs

marsbit1h ago

He Just Raised 2.7 Billion, and Li Fei-Fei Also Invested

Pete Florence, a former senior research scientist at Google DeepMind and a key contributor to the Vision-Language-Action (VLA) model architecture, is deliberately distancing his startup, Generalist AI, from the trendy "world model" label. He argues that the industry should prioritize concrete goals over buzzwords. His goal is to create robots that can perform a vast range of unseen tasks with high speed and success rates, without needing task-specific training data. Recently, his company raised $400 million (¥2.7 billion) at a $2 billion valuation. Notable investors include NVIDIA's NVentures, Bezos Expeditions, NFDG, as well as Xiaomi co-founder Lin Bin, Zoom founder Eric Yuan, and renowned AI scientist Fei-Fei Li. Florence's approach stems from his academic background at MIT under Professor Russ Tedrake, focusing on understanding the physical world. After joining DeepMind, he developed models like Transporter Network and co-created the VLA framework. He left in 2025 to found Generalist AI. The company has launched two models: GEN-0, which demonstrated that scaling laws apply to physical motion, and GEN-1. GEN-1 was trained on over 500,000 hours of physical interaction data collected via a specialized wearable device. It achieves a 99% success rate on precise mechanical tasks like folding boxes and maintains performance three times faster than its predecessor. Florence believes GEN-1 is reaching a commercial utility threshold similar to the GPT-3 inflection point. The substantial funding round, following GEN-1's release, signifies strong investor confidence in Generalist AI's practical, goal-driven path to creating versatile, useful robots, regardless of the "world model" terminology.

marsbit1h ago

He Just Raised 2.7 Billion, and Li Fei-Fei Also Invested

marsbit1h ago

Two Legends Lost in Three Days: Is Google's AI Talent Dam Cracking?

In three days, Google lost two AI legends. On June 18, Noam Shazeer, co-author of the seminal "Attention is All You Need" paper and Gemini co-lead, left for OpenAI. Just 48 hours later, John Jumper, 2024 Nobel laureate and AlphaFold lead, departed DeepMind for Anthropic. This follows Andrej Karpathy joining Anthropic in May. These moves highlight a structural trend: top AI talent is concentrating at mission-driven, pre-IPO firms like OpenAI and Anthropic, while Google becomes a primary source. The exodus stems from a core mission mismatch. Google's ad-centric model often subordinates AI research to product and revenue goals, creating friction for pioneers like Shazeer, who returned in 2024 only to leave again. In contrast, OpenAI and Anthropic offer singular focus on pushing AI boundaries, whether towards AGI or safety-aligned models, which deeply appeals to top researchers like Jumper. Financial incentives amplify the pull. With both OpenAI and Anthropic nearing IPO, employees stand to gain immensely from equity, an upside Google's mature stock cannot match. Furthermore, the 2023 merger of Google Brain and DeepMind, intended to consolidate strength, has instead created cultural tension and slowed the path from research to product, as evidenced by Gemini's pace. This talent redistribution is reshaping the AI landscape. While Google retains vast data and compute resources, its true crisis is the quiet, continuous loss of the people who define the field's future. The real moat in AI is not infrastructure, but the concentration of brilliant minds—a battle Google is currently losing.

marsbit3h ago

Two Legends Lost in Three Days: Is Google's AI Talent Dam Cracking?

marsbit3h ago

Behind the AI Report Card, Lies a Chinese 'Exam Setter'

Beyond the familiar performance charts like MMLU-Pro and MMMU, which major AI models strive to ace, stands a key "examiner": Chinese-Canadian researcher Wenhu Chen. An assistant professor at the University of Waterloo and founder of TIGERLab, Chen addresses the crucial need for more rigorous AI evaluation. As models like GPT-4 began scoring near-perfect results on older benchmarks like MMLU, it became difficult to distinguish their true capabilities. In response, Chen introduced MMLU-Pro in 2024, featuring harder, more reasoning-focused questions with more answer choices, successfully reintroducing meaningful performance gaps. His work extends to multi-modal evaluation with MMMU and its enhanced version, MMMU-Pro. These benchmarks test a model's ability to understand and reason with complex information from images, charts, and text across diverse academic subjects, exposing the significant challenges even top models face in genuine comprehension. Chen's background in complex QA, table reasoning, and his experience at Google DeepMind on projects like Gemini inform his approach. He understands that effective benchmarks must anticipate how models might "cheat" by memorizing data or avoiding visual analysis. His lab also actively researches video understanding and generation models (e.g., UniVideo, Vamba), ensuring his evaluation work is grounded in practical model-building challenges. Now at Meta's Super Intelligence Lab, Chen continues his focus on multi-modal data and evaluation, representing the deep yet often unseen contributions of Chinese talent in shaping the fundamental tools of the AI industry.

marsbit3h ago

Behind the AI Report Card, Lies a Chinese 'Exam Setter'

marsbit3h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of AI (AI) are presented below.

活动图片