Los ETF de bitcoin y ether captaron 2.600 millones de dólares en la semana más exitosa desde octubre

cryptonews.ruPublished on 2026-08-24Last updated on 2026-08-24

Abstract

La semana ha sido excepcional para los ETF de criptomonedas, con un flujo de entrada récord de 2.620 millones de dólares en fondos de Bitcoin y Ethereum, el mejor resultado semanal desde octubre de 2025. Los ETF de Bitcoin lideraron la carga, atrayendo 1.920 millones de dólares netos durante la semana. La demanda se aceleró notablemente, pasando de 297,56 millones el lunes a más de 600 millones el jueves, impulsada por el precio de Bitcoin superando los 70.000 dólares. El fondo IBIT de BlackRock fue el principal receptor, con 1.330 millones. El volumen de operaciones semanal de estos ETF se triplicó hasta los 22.100 millones de dólares. Los ETF de Ethereum también experimentaron un fuerte impulso, atrayendo 697 millones de dólares. Aunque en términos absolutos fue menos que Bitcoin, este flujo representó un porcentaje mucho mayor (4,9%) de sus activos bajo gestión, lo que refleja una intensa demanda relativa que ayudó a impulsar el precio de ETH hacia máximos cercanos a los 2.550 dólares. Otras criptomonedas como XRP (39,78 millones) y Solana (28,34 millones) también registraron entradas de capital significativas, especialmente hacia el final de la semana. El mercado cerró la semana con una de las rachas de compras institucionales más activas del año, liderada por Bitcoin pero con una participación sólida de Ethereum y altcoins.

La semana comenzó con una recuperación y terminó con un fuerte repunte.

Los ETF de bitcoin captaron capital nuevo en cada sesión: el flujo de fondos, que comenzó el lunes con 297,56 millones de dólares, se convirtió en un repunte de tres días que llevó a esta categoría a su mejor resultado semanal en meses. El ether siguió la misma trayectoria, mientras que los fondos de $XRP y Solana ganaban impulso discretamente durante toda la semana.

Bitcoin lideró la ola de compras de cinco días

El flujo neto semanal hacia los ETF de bitcoin fue de 1.920 millones de dólares.

El lunes entraron 297,56 millones, el martes 189,30 millones. La demanda se aceleró el miércoles, cuando el precio del bitcoin superó los 70.000 dólares, lo que generó una entrada de 517,19 millones en los fondos. El jueves se registró la mayor entrada diaria, de 606,29 millones, y el viernes entraron otros 307,45 millones.

El fondo IBIT de Blackrock lideró el informe semanal con entradas de 1.330 millones de dólares. El fondo FBTC de Fidelity captó 293,1 millones, y el ARKB de ARK 21Shares, 126,9 millones.

El flujo total hacia los ETF de bitcoin en agosto alcanza actualmente los 2.380 millones de dólares. Fuente: Sosovalue

El fondo BITB de Bitwise captó 87,3 millones de dólares. El fondo MSBT de Morgan Stanley captó 28,9 millones, el fondo GBTC de Grayscale 21,2 millones y el Bitcoin Mini Trust 36,2 millones. El fondo HODL de Vaneck fue la principal excepción, perdiendo 16,1 millones.

El volumen de operaciones de los ETF de bitcoin durante la semana alcanzó los 22.100 millones de dólares, más del triple que la semana anterior (6.900 millones). Los activos bajo gestión crecieron a 96.070 millones, un aumento del 25%. Solo en las últimas tres sesiones de negociación, los ETF de bitcoin recibieron casi 1.000 millones de dólares: el mayor crecimiento de tres días desde que el bitcoin cotizó por última vez por encima de los 80.000 dólares.

Fuente: Glassnode

Ether y los altcoins se unieron al repunte

Los ETF de ether también terminaron cada sesión en positivo, captando 697 millones de dólares en la semana.

Las entradas aumentaron de 30,85 millones el lunes a 71,47 millones el martes, para luego acelerarse a 189,15 millones el miércoles y 220,77 millones el jueves. El viernes cerró con entradas de 184,93 millones.

El flujo conjunto hacia los ETF de bitcoin y ether alcanzó los 2.620 millones de dólares, la mayor cifra semanal desde octubre de 2025.

Los ETF de $XRP captaron 39,78 millones de dólares, impulsados por importantes entradas el jueves y viernes de 13,24 y 18,38 millones, respectivamente.

Los fondos de Solana captaron 28,34 millones, con la mayor parte de la demanda concentrada al final de la semana. El flujo neto hacia los ETF de HYPE fue de 3,89 millones de dólares. La salida del miércoles de 1,97 millones fue más que compensada por la entrada del jueves de 5,86 millones.

Sosovalue destacó la diferencia en la intensidad del flujo entre los dos mayores criptoactivos. La entrada semanal a bitcoin de 1.920 millones representó aproximadamente el 2,0% de sus activos de 96.070 millones, mientras que la entrada a ether de 697 millones equivalió a aproximadamente el 4,9% de su base de activos de 14.290 millones.

"ETH continuó atrayendo significativamente más capital en comparación con el volumen actual de ETF", señaló Sosovalue. Esta demanda proporcionalmente más fuerte contribuyó a que el precio de Ether subiera desde alrededor de 1.900 dólares hasta un máximo de 2.546 dólares, mientras que las compras de ETF, las posiciones de tesorerías corporativas y las restricciones de oferta relacionadas con el staking, todos contribuyeron a tensar la dinámica de oferta y demanda.

Al cierre del mercado el viernes, se había presenciado una de las semanas más activas de compras institucionales del año. Bitcoin seguía siendo el claro centro de atención, mientras que ether y los grandes fondos de altcoins también participaron de este repunte.

end-content

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

Q¿Cuál fue el monto total de entrada de capital a los ETF de bitcoin y ether durante la semana mencionada, y cuándo fue la última vez que se registró una cifra semanal superior?

AEl flujo neto combinado a los ETF de bitcoin y ether fue de 2.620 millones de dólares. Esta fue la semana con mayor entrada de capital desde octubre de 2025.

Q¿Qué ETF de bitcoin lideró en cuanto a captación de fondos durante la semana y cuál fue el monto aproximado que atrajo?

AEl fondo IBIT de BlackRock fue el que lideró la captación, con un flujo de entrada de aproximadamente 1.330 millones de dólares.

QSegún el análisis de Sosovalue, ¿cuál de los dos principales activos (bitcoin o ether) mostró una mayor intensidad de entrada de fondos en proporción a sus activos bajo gestión (AUM)?

AEl ether mostró una mayor intensidad. Su entrada de 697 millones de dólares representó aproximadamente un 4.9% de sus AUM (14.29 mil millones), mientras que la entrada de bitcoin (1.920 millones) fue de aproximadamente un 2.0% de sus AUM (96.07 mil millones).

Q¿Qué factores, según el artículo, contribuyeron al fortalecimiento de la dinámica de oferta y demanda del ether, impulsando su precio?

ALos factores mencionados fueron: las compras por parte de los ETF, las posiciones de las tesorerías corporativas y las restricciones de oferta relacionadas con el staking (participación en la red para validar transacciones).

Q¿Qué fondos de criptomonedas alternativas (altcoins) se mencionan que también recibieron entradas de capital significativas durante la semana, además de los de bitcoin y ether?

AEl artículo menciona que los ETF de XRP atrajeron 39.78 millones de dólares, los de Solana (SOL) 28.34 millones y los de HYPE 3.89 millones de dólares.

Related Reads

Conversation with Charles Zhang: Amidst the AI Frenzy, Why Pursue 'Anti-Efficiency' Content?

Dialogue with Charles Zhang: In the Era of AI's Sprint, Why Create "Anti-Efficiency" Content Standing out among China's early internet pioneers, Charles Zhang, founder and CEO of Sohu, maintains a distinct personal identity. He keeps a consistent public presence and embodies traits of high-energy individuals: sleeping only 4-5 hours daily, running 5km or marathons, and hosting frequent offline tech forums and dialogues with Nobel laureates. He has shifted focus from external business expansion to internal self-reconstruction, adhering to his own pace. "People aren't afraid of being busy; the busier you are, the better your health. Having nothing to do can lead to emotional issues and poor health." Marking the 10th anniversary of his live-streamed "Charles Zhang's English Class," he recently took it offline for a real-world classroom session. Following this, he discussed the course's decade-long journey, Sohu Video's content ecosystem, and the value of content in the AI era. **Pen and Mouth Diligence: A Class Against Instant Mastery** His English class began in August 2016 on "Qianfan Live." He spends about 40 minutes daily preparing, reviewing dozens of news headlines, reading five in detail, and selecting three for the lesson. Over ten years, he has completed over 2000 live sessions totaling more than 110,000 minutes, with over 52 million views. Initially, the stream was a way to "talk more" and combat emotional struggles. He started by repeating after TV news anchors, then moved to live-streaming with the launch of Qianfan Live. It was 40% for personal emotional regulation ("like a monk chanting sutras"), 30% to deliver authentic news, and 30% to promote the new platform. This daily "ritual" helped him overcome depression, leading to what he calls his "peak life state." From a product perspective, it was counter-intuitive—launched without prior market research or growth strategies, based on the founder's personal need that resonated with users. Yet, his content creation follows a strict routine. The decade of covering geopolitics, economics, tech, health, and society has built a vast "knowledge compound interest" system. In an age of AI summaries and algorithmic content, Zhang insists on "hard work": meticulous reading, handwritten notes, and manually created teaching materials, refusing AI-generated content. The English class is now a fixed daily rhythm; preparing for his weekly physics class requires a full day of solitary deduction on a blackboard. In his live streams, Zhang positions himself as a "content creator," not a CEO or teacher. He sees physics as extreme brain training and English as a "sensor" to understand the world. This explains why a top entrepreneur persists for a decade in seemingly "unprofessional" pursuits—it's the information input and psychological healing method he found during a low point. It's fundamentally an "anti-efficiency" commitment. He believes the meaning of reading lies in finding community and spiritual support, not just fleeting conversation points. For today's media, he states: "Reading news isn't the goal. As humans with many confusions, we need reference points, to find a group, find kindred spirits, or seek support and spiritual nourishment. Large language models can't satisfy these starting points; they only give you information." This offers solace and a value defense for media professionals impacted by AI summaries. **"Don't Think Earth Stops Turning Because AI Arrived"** A content creator expressed anxiety: after feeding their article to AI, it produced a more comprehensive, profound version, making their work feel valueless. Zhang responded with an analogy: "Carrots from the market, with a bit of soil, not glossy, taste delicious and flavorful. Tomatoes forced by chemical fertilizer have no taste at all." He sees AI giving world content a "plastic feel," but acknowledges its significant role in improving information access efficiency, especially in physics and social science research where he often queries AI for quick professional answers. The key, Zhang stresses, is that the outside world still needs to guide our perspective. LLMs provide "information," while the outside world offers "viewpoints." He cares deeply about *what* that external viewpoint is and *how* someone thinks about an issue. "Don't think the Earth stops turning because AI arrived," he analyzes. AI currently replaces rule-based work, noting significant impact on the software industry with many programmers laid off as even less experienced people can now write decent code. However, AI cannot yet replace arts, social sciences, emotions, and creative content. "Hollywood remains thriving, producing great works. Oscars will continue, Nobel Literature Prizes will still be awarded—all by real people, with works conceived by real people." While wary of AI, Zhang isn't anti-technology and is open to its applications. Sohu itself has launched AI assistants. In Sohu's AI practice, Zhang defines his role as a "large language model corpus provider." He believes LLM training is inseparable from human-original content as its data foundation, so original content retains irreplaceable value. "The era of self-media indeed offers everyone new ways to discover their strengths and achieve growth." He suggests every young person should consider self-media. Most importantly, the bottom line of content creation should be "authenticity." If using AI avatars, they must be clearly labeled; not doing so and misleading viewers wastes their time, especially when people still prefer real human content. Behind AI's sprint lie unavoidable realities. As AI quickly provides seemingly perfect answers, people grow accustomed to accepting "summarized" results, omitting processes of questioning, deduction, and trial-and-error, leading to a decline in deep thinking. Zhang's "anti-efficiency" practice with his two live-streamed classes is his answer to AI's狂奔: In an algorithm-driven era chasing ultimate efficiency, don't expect AI to fill inner voids. Read books, speak in front of a camera, sweat on a running track, and build connections with real people.

marsbit12m ago

Conversation with Charles Zhang: Amidst the AI Frenzy, Why Pursue 'Anti-Efficiency' Content?

marsbit12m ago

Zcash's ETF Gilding: How a Privacy Coin Was Packaged by Wall Street into a Compliant Asset

The article traces the decade-long path of Zcash (ZEC), a privacy-focused cryptocurrency, to its potential launch as the first privacy coin spot ETF, with Grayscale's ZCSH filing in August 2026. It argues ZEC's suitability stemmed not from regulatory acceptance of its privacy technology, but from its centralized, institutional structure from inception—a commercial company (ECC) with venture capital backing and a Founder's Reward—making it easier to package than decentralized alternatives. Three key institutions, intertwined in a network, drove the process: Grayscale (owned by DCG, an early ZEC investor), which had held ZEC in a trust since 2017; Coinbase, providing custody, prime brokerage, derivatives, and venture investment; and ZODL, a new for-profit entity formed in 2026 when ECC's core development team split from the non-profit foundation. The major regulatory hurdle was SEC scrutiny (2023-2026) over ZEC's historical structure, which resembled an unregistered investment contract due to automatic block rewards to ECC and the Foundation. This was resolved through governance changes (NU6 upgrade in 2024) that ended direct funding and shifted control to community voting, coinciding with a broader shift in SEC enforcement policy. Notably, the law firm Davis Polk represented both the Zcash Foundation in its SEC defense and Grayscale in the ETF filing. The push is also driven by DCG's dire financial needs amid Genesis bankruptcy lawsuits, seeking high-fee products (the ZEC ETF charges 2.5%). Concurrently, major mining operations by entities like Cypherpunk Technologies (backed by Winklevoss Capital) and DCG's Fortitude Mining expanded, motivated by profitability and aiming to influence the network. The article concludes with irony: to become a compliant ETF asset, ZEC must shed its core privacy feature for the fund's holdings, which will be held in transparent, auditable addresses. Wall Street is not adopting privacy technology but packaging the *concept* of privacy into a tradable, fee-generating financial product. The transformation was not a single master plan but the result of a network of aligned interests capitalizing on regulatory, governance, and market shifts over ten years.

marsbit22m ago

Zcash's ETF Gilding: How a Privacy Coin Was Packaged by Wall Street into a Compliant Asset

marsbit22m ago

Bitcoin Core Developer Warns That Bitcoin Payments Are Disappearing at 'Bitcoin Beach'

A Bitcoin Core developer, John Atack, who has lived in El Salvador since 2022, shared a concerning anecdote about Bitcoin adoption in the country. While dining at El Zonte, a region known as "Bitcoin Beach," he paid with Bitcoin and was told it was the first such payment the establishment had received in a month. Staff explained Bitcoin payments, once common, have now virtually disappeared, with nearly all customers using cards. An employee even declined a Bitcoin tip, stating she had forgotten how to use her wallet and declaring "It's already dead." Atack emphasized this was a single observation but noted the employee had witnessed the payment evolution over three years. His comments sparked mixed reactions. Some disputed his experience, with one user confirming successful Bitcoin payments in the same area. However, Bitcoin reporter Juan Galt acknowledged an underlying "economic problem," arguing that expecting price appreciation makes using Bitcoin for everyday transactions counterintuitive to economic incentives needed for a circular crypto economy. Despite the concerning report, Atack also reflected that El Salvador remains a global leader in cryptocurrency adoption and progressive legislation, sometimes causing locals to take these advancements for granted. The story highlights the ongoing challenges of mainstream Bitcoin adoption for daily commerce, even in pioneering nations.

cryptonews.ru24m ago

Bitcoin Core Developer Warns That Bitcoin Payments Are Disappearing at 'Bitcoin Beach'

cryptonews.ru24m ago

A Huge 'Sleeping' Wave of New Bitcoin Buyers Has Not Even Bought Bitcoin Yet

A recent study by the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, titled "Do You Even Crypto, Bro? Cryptocurrencies in Household Finance," reveals that Bitcoin and other crypto assets are less understood than other financial assets in US households. The primary reasons for not owning crypto are a lack of knowledge and the perception that it is a poor investment. Even among owners, the main motivations are profit-seeking and portfolio diversification rather than an understanding of the underlying technology's benefits, such as independence from banks. The research found that showing respondents Bitcoin's past 12-month performance increased their desired portfolio allocation by about 47%, indicating investment decisions are driven more by recent returns than fundamental comprehension. Crypto gains are often treated like lottery winnings, leading to one-off luxury purchases rather than sustained increases in spending. While non-owners largely view crypto as high-risk, owners are somewhat less likely to do so, though they exhibit greater uncertainty about future returns compared to traditional assets like stocks or gold. This ambiguity about Bitcoin's nature and valuation contributes directly to its price volatility. The study concludes that this volatility will persist, but education efforts combined with price appreciation could convert today's uninformed non-owners into future Bitcoin holders.

cryptonews.ru27m ago

A Huge 'Sleeping' Wave of New Bitcoin Buyers Has Not Even Bought Bitcoin Yet

cryptonews.ru27m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片