Avertissement aux investisseurs XRP : Ripple annonce un partenariat avec une grande banque ! « Ce sera la première banque de ce type dans son pays ! »

cryptonews.ruPublished on 2026-08-18Last updated on 2026-08-18

Abstract

Malgré la hausse significative du prix du XRP, Ripple renforce sa position dans l'écosystème blockchain en étendant ses services. La société a annoncé un partenariat stratégique avec Jeonbuk Bank, une importante banque régionale sud-coréenne du groupe JB Financial. Cette collaboration fera de Jeonbuk Bank la première banque régionale de Corée du Sud à adopter la solution de paiement transfrontalier Ripple Payments. L'objectif est de fournir des services de paiement internationaux plus rapides, notamment pour les clients entreprises comme les sociétés d'import-export, les startups technologiques et les créateurs de contenu en ligne. L'infrastructure Ripple Payments permettra de traiter les paiements en quelques secondes ou minutes, 24h/24 et 7j/7, réduisant ainsi les multiples étapes intermédiaires du système traditionnel SWIFT. Les dirigeants des deux parties ont souligné que ce partenariat reflète l'intérêt croissant du secteur financier sud-coréen pour l'infrastructure des actifs numériques et vise à renforcer la compétitivité de la banque dans les services financiers numériques globaux.

Malgré la hausse significative continue du prix du XRP, Ripple s'efforce de consolider sa position de leader dans l'écosystème blockchain.

Ripple étend actuellement ses services d'actifs numériques d'entreprise en concluant de nouveaux partenariats pour poursuivre sa croissance mondiale.

À cet égard, la société Ripple a annoncé la conclusion d'un partenariat stratégique avec la Jeonbuk Bank, l'une des banques régionales les plus importantes de Corée du Sud.

La banque, qui opère sous l'égide du JB Financial Group, utilisera l'infrastructure Ripple Payments pour les paiements transfrontaliers commerciaux.

Selon la déclaration officielle de Ripple, la Jeonbuk Bank deviendra la première banque régionale de Corée du Sud à utiliser le système de paiement Ripple Payments.

L'objectif du partenariat est de fournir des services de paiement transfrontaliers plus rapides, en particulier pour les clients institutionnels tels que les entreprises d'import-export, les startups technologiques et les créateurs de contenu en ligne effectuant des paiements internationaux.

Grâce à Ripple, les paiements seront traités en quelques minutes !

La déclaration indique que l'infrastructure Ripple Payments permet de traiter les paiements en quelques secondes ou minutes, 24 heures sur 24 et 7 jours sur 7.

La déclaration explique que l'utilisation par la Jeonbuk Bank du système de paiement Ripple Payments pourrait réduire les nombreuses étapes intermédiaires associées au processus actuel de transfert d'argent international basé sur SWIFT et assurer des paiements en temps réel en quelques secondes.

La directrice générale de Ripple pour la région Asie-Pacifique, Fiona Murray, a déclaré que ce partenariat démontre l'intérêt croissant du secteur financier institutionnel sud-coréen pour l'infrastructure des actifs numériques.

Le président du conseil d'administration de la JB Jeonbuk Bank, Park Chun-won, a déclaré dans son message que grâce à cette collaboration, la banque prévoit d'améliorer sa compétitivité dans les services financiers numériques et d'élargir sa gamme de services financiers mondiaux.

*Ceci n'est pas une recommandation d'investissement.

end-content

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QQuel est le nom de la banque régionale sud-coréenne avec laquelle Ripple a noué un partenariat ?

ALa banque s'appelle Jeonbuk Bank (Banque Jeonbuk), une importante banque régionale de Corée du Sud opérant sous l'égide du JB Financial Group.

QQuel service ou infrastructure de Ripple la banque Jeonbuk Bank utilisera-t-elle ?

AJeonbuk Bank utilisera l'infrastructure Ripple Payments pour ses paiements transfrontaliers commerciaux.

QQuel est l'objectif principal de ce partenariat stratégique selon l'article ?

AL'objectif principal est de fournir des services de paiement transfrontaliers plus rapides, en particulier pour les clients corporatifs comme les sociétés d'import-export, les startups technologiques et les créateurs de contenu en ligne effectuant des paiements internationaux.

QQuel avantage majeur la technologie de Ripple offre-t-elle par rapport au système traditionnel SWIFT selon le texte ?

AL'infrastructure Ripple Payments permet de traiter les paiements en quelques secondes ou minutes, 24h/24 et 7j/7, réduisant ainsi les nombreuses étapes intermédiaires du processus traditionnel basé sur SWIFT et permettant des règlements en temps réel.

QQui est Fiona Murray et quel commentaire a-t-elle fait concernant ce partenariat ?

AFiona Murray est la directrice générale de Ripple pour la région Asie-Pacifique. Elle a déclaré que ce partenariat démontre l'intérêt croissant du secteur sud-coréen de la finance d'entreprise pour l'infrastructure des actifs numériques.

Related Reads

Token Economy Surges, Have Ordinary People Got a Slice of the Pie?

Token Frenzy: Is the Average Person Getting a Piece of the Pie? As AI adoption soars in China, daily Token consumption—the basic unit for AI text processing—has skyrocketed, exceeding 140 trillion. This "Token economy" is often measured like GDP, touted as a sign of progress. However, this metric primarily reflects supply-side activities: corporate investment, infrastructure scaling, and platform revenues. The crucial question of whether this growth translates into tangible benefits for ordinary citizens—higher wages, better jobs, improved public services, or increased leisure—remains largely unanswered. The article argues there's a fundamental mismatch. Policy, exemplified by subsidies in Beijing's Yizhuang district, often stimulates "demand" by incentivizing companies to consume more Tokens (an intermediate business cost), rather than by boosting household income or final consumer spending. This creates a closed loop where growth in Token usage justifies further production capacity expansion, without necessarily extending value to the broader population. Several disconnects are highlighted. High Token usage doesn't equal completed tasks, increased profits, or macroeconomic productivity gains. Even when corporate efficiency improves, the benefits may not trickle down due to existing economic structures favoring investment over household consumption. The risk is that AI, a genuinely productive technology, becomes another tool for supply-side expansion within a system adept at measuring output (like server capacity and call volumes) but less focused on distributing the gains widely. Drawing a parallel to Henry Ford's assembly line, the piece notes that Ford's revolution combined ruthless production efficiency with a social compact (higher wages, stability) that enabled mass consumption. Today's "Token economy" narrative enthusiastically champions the first part—process re-engineering and cost reduction—but lacks a credible mechanism for the second: ensuring that productivity gains lead to broader societal welfare. The ultimate challenge is not whether Tokens have value, but whether their economic benefits can escape a system that excels at building supply but struggles to cultivate its own demand.

marsbit7m ago

Token Economy Surges, Have Ordinary People Got a Slice of the Pie?

marsbit7m ago

Overnight Global Shock: Why Did AI Stocks Plunge Across the Board?

Overnight, U.S. AI-related stocks fell sharply, with the Nasdaq down 1.33% and the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index plunging nearly 5%. Panic spread globally, dragging down Asia-Pacific markets. Key negative drivers included: 1. **Geopolitical Tension & Macro Pressure:** Escalating U.S.-Iran tensions pushed oil prices higher, fueling inflation fears and expectations of prolonged high interest rates. Rising bond yields pressured high-valuation, capital-intensive AI stocks, especially as soaring AI infrastructure financing costs became evident. 2. **AI Commercialization Concerns:** OpenAI's Q2 results showed slowing revenue growth and widening losses, dampening market optimism about near-term AI application profitability. This shifted investor focus from pure capital expenditure narratives to actual commercial returns. 3. **Supply Chain Uncertainty:** U.S.-South Korea semiconductor investment disputes intensified. Market fears that Korean memory giants (Samsung, SK Hynix) face a dilemma—either divert capital to costly U.S. production or risk trade barriers—disrupted the critical HBM memory sector, amplifying sell-offs via leveraged ETFs. While long-term AI demand remains, the market is now scrutinizing real profitability, financing costs, and supply chain stability rather than paying premiums for unchecked growth stories. For markets like China's A-shares, the impact is primarily sentiment-driven, requiring distinction between short-term panic and fundamental deterioration.

marsbit8m ago

Overnight Global Shock: Why Did AI Stocks Plunge Across the Board?

marsbit8m ago

Q2 Wall Street Institutional Crypto Holdings: Most Institutions Increased Positions Against the Trend, ETH Exposure Outperformed BTC Across the Board

In Q2 2024, despite a roughly 14.2% decline in Bitcoin's price, many Wall Street institutions increased their crypto holdings, revealing a divergence from ETF flow trends. Overall institutional Bitcoin exposure grew by 7.5% to ~536k BTC, while aggregate spot Bitcoin ETF holdings declined. Notably, exposure concentration increased, with fewer reporting institutions holding larger positions. A key trend was the significant outperformance of Ethereum (ETH) exposure growth over Bitcoin (BTC) among major banks. For instance, JPMorgan's ETH exposure surged 67.3% versus 12.2% for BTC, and Morgan Stanley's ETH exposure grew 18.6% versus 3.7%. Individual bank holdings of Ethereum ETFs like ETHA saw dramatic increases, even as the overall Ethereum ETF market experienced net outflows during the quarter. Trading firms like Jane Street significantly rebuilt its iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) position, while several hedge funds, including Brevan Howard and Graham Capital, reduced spot ETF holdings but added substantial option positions (both calls and puts), indicating more complex strategies. Institutions showed diverging views on crypto-related equities: some sold shares of MicroStrategy (MSTR) after its announced Bitcoin sales, while others like Renaissance Technologies and BlackRock were buyers. New entrants like Spain's Santander Bank disclosed initial crypto ETF positions. Meanwhile, long-term holders like Abu Dhabi's sovereign wealth funds paused their accumulation, and Harvard's endowment maintained a flat Bitcoin position. Key signals include the deepening institutionalization of crypto assets, a clear institutional preference for accumulating Ethereum, and growing divergence in views on crypto equities. This institutional buying in Q2 preceded a price recovery and renewed inflows into Ethereum ETFs in July and August.

marsbit27m ago

Q2 Wall Street Institutional Crypto Holdings: Most Institutions Increased Positions Against the Trend, ETH Exposure Outperformed BTC Across the Board

marsbit27m ago

TSMC, Another Winning Bet

TSMC Gains Another Strategic Advantage as Samsung Delays 1.4nm Process Samsung Foundry has adjusted its advanced process roadmap, postponing the mass production timeline for its 1.4nm process from 2027 to 2029. This two-year delay signals a strategic shift from aggressively pursuing the next node to focusing on maturing and scaling its 2nm platform. Samsung plans to extend the commercial lifespan of its 2nm technology through derivative versions optimized for different applications, including those incorporating backside power delivery for AI and HPC chips. A notable aspect of this shift is Samsung's cautious approach toward High-NA EUV lithography. The company views it as essential for 1nm-class nodes and beyond but not as an immediate necessity for 1.4nm, opting instead to refine its existing Low-NA EUV-based processes. This highlights a broader industry trend where the competition is evolving beyond simply reaching the next node. Success now depends on achieving high yield, managing soaring costs, integrating new transistor architectures like GAA, and delivering a compelling overall package of performance, power efficiency, and area (PPA) at a viable cost. While Samsung consolidates its 2nm efforts, TSMC continues its advance. Its N2 node is in production, and the A16 node (post-2nm, ~1.6nm) is scheduled for mass production in the second half of 2026. A16 introduces TSMC's Super Power Rail backside power delivery technology, which is expected to deliver significant performance and power efficiency gains. TSMC's previously stated cautious stance on High-NA EUV appears validated by Samsung's roadmap adjustment. The delay underscores that the competition in leading-edge semiconductor manufacturing is entering a new phase. It is no longer just a race to smaller node numbers but a multifaceted contest involving process maturity, yield, cost, design-technology co-optimization (DTCO), and advanced packaging. Samsung aims to solidify its 2nm platform over the next three years. However, as it targets 1.4nm for 2029, the industry will be watching how far ahead TSMC and Intel have moved by then.

marsbit32m ago

TSMC, Another Winning Bet

marsbit32m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

What is $BANK

Bank AI: A Revolutionary Step in the Future of Banking Introduction In an era marked by rapid advancements in technology, Bank AI stands at the intersection of artificial intelligence (AI) and banking services. This innovative project seeks to redefine the financial landscape, enhancing operational efficiency, security measures, and customer experiences through the power of AI. As we embark on this exploration of Bank AI, we will delve into what the project entails, its operational dynamics, its historical context, and significant milestones. What is Bank AI? At its core, Bank AI represents a transformative initiative aimed at integrating artificial intelligence into various banking operations. This project harnesses the capabilities of AI to automate processes, improve risk management protocols, and enhance customer interaction through personalised services. The primary objectives of Bank AI include: Automation of Banking Functions: By leveraging AI technologies, Bank AI aims to automate routine tasks, reducing the burden on human resources and enhancing efficiency. Enhanced Risk Management: The project utilises AI algorithms to predict and identify risks, thereby fortifying security measures against fraud and other threats. Personalisation of Banking Services: Bank AI focuses on offering tailored financial products and services by analysing customer data and behaviours. Improving Customer Experience: The implementation of AI-driven solutions, such as chatbots and virtual assistants, aims to provide users with more human-like interactions, revolutionising the way customers engage with banks. With these goals, Bank AI positions itself as a crucial player in rendering banking more efficient, secure, and user-centric. Who is the Creator of Bank AI? Details regarding the creator of Bank AI remain unknown. As such, no specific individual or organisation has been identified in the available information. The anonymity surrounding the project's inception raises questions but does not detract from its ambitious vision and objectives. Who are the Investors of Bank AI? Similar to the project's creator, specific information regarding the investors or supporting organisations of Bank AI has not been disclosed. Without this information, it is challenging to outline the financial backing and institutional support that might be propelling the project forward. Nevertheless, the importance of having a robust investment foundation is pivotal for sustaining development in such an innovative field. How Does Bank AI Work? Bank AI operates on several innovative fronts, focusing on unique factors that differentiate it from traditional banking frameworks. Below are key operational features: Automation: By applying machine learning algorithms, Bank AI automates various manual processes within banks. This results in reduced operational costs and allows human workers to redirect their efforts towards more strategic activities. Advanced Risk Management: The integration of AI into risk management practices equips banks with tools to accurately predict potential threats such as fraud, ensuring that customer information and assets remain secure. Tailored Financial Recommendations: Through continuous learning from customer interactions, the AI systems develop a nuanced understanding of user needs, enabling them to offer tailored advice on financial decisions. Enhanced Customer Interactions: Utilizing chatbots and virtual assistants powered by AI, Bank AI enables a more engaging customer experience, allowing users to have their queries resolved quickly, thus reducing wait times and improving satisfaction levels. Together, these operational features position Bank AI as a pioneer in the banking sector, establishing new benchmarks for service delivery and operational excellence. Timeline of Bank AI Understanding the trajectory of Bank AI requires a look at its historical context. Below is a timeline highlighting important milestones and developments: Early 2010s: The conceptualisation of AI integration into banking services began to gain attention as banking institutions recognised the potential benefits. 2018: A marked increase in the implementation of AI technologies occurred when banks started using AI tools like chatbots for basic customer service and risk management systems for improved security handling. 2023: The sophistication of AI continued to advance, with generative AI being introduced for more complex tasks such as document processing and real-time investment analysis. This year marked a significant leap in the capabilities afforded to banks by AI technology. 2024-Current Status: As of this year, Bank AI is on an upward trajectory, with ongoing research and developments poised to further enhance capabilities in banking operations. Continued exploration of AI applications hints at exciting developments yet to come. Key Points About Bank AI Integration of AI in Banking: Bank AI focuses on adopting artificial intelligence to streamline banking processes and improve user experiences. Automation and Risk Management Focus: The project strongly emphasises these areas, aiming to shift the burden of routine tasks while enhancing security frameworks through predictive analytics. Personalised Banking Solutions: By harnessing customer data, Bank AI enables tailored banking services that cater to individual user needs. Commitment to Development: Bank AI remains committed to ongoing research and development efforts, ensuring its adaptability and ongoing relevance as technology continues to evolve. Conclusion In summary, Bank AI exemplifies a crucial step forward in the banking industry, leveraging artificial intelligence to reshape operational paradigms, enhance security, and promote customer satisfaction. Despite gaps in information surrounding the creator and investors, the clear objectives and functional mechanisms of Bank AI provide a strong foundation for its ongoing evolution. As AI technology continues to advance and merge with the banking sector, Bank AI is well-positioned to significantly impact the future of financial services, enhancing the way we understand and interact with banking.

404 Total ViewsPublished 2024.04.06Updated 2024.12.03

What is $BANK

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BANK (BANK) are presented below.

活动图片