Ethereum Foundation memperingatkan beberapa alat mungkin rusak dengan peningkatan Glamsterdam

cointelegraphPublished on 2026-08-18Last updated on 2026-08-18

Abstract

Yayasan Ethereum (EF) telah memperingatkan bahwa beberapa dompet digital, indekser, dan alat estimasi biaya gas (gas estimators) mungkin mengalami gangguan karena perubahan model gas dalam peningkatan jaringan (upgrade) Glamsterdam yang akan datang. Tim Protokol DevOps EF menyatakan bahwa alat apa pun yang mengandalkan batas maksimum gas yang dikodekan secara kaku (hardcoded) "akan rusak" dan harus diperbarui. Mereka mendesak para pengembang untuk menguji sistem mereka di Plataberget, jaringan pengujian publik (testnet) yang akan beroperasi selama beberapa bulan. EIP-8037 dalam Glamsterdam akan memperkenalkan dimensi gas-status terpisah untuk operasi yang membuat status baru. Perubahan ini berarti transfer ETH biasa ke akun yang sudah ada akan tetap berbiaya 21.000 gas, tetapi mengirim ETH ke akun baru akan dikenakan biaya gas-status tambahan. Pengembang harus meninjau ulang perangkat lunak yang berasumsi bahwa 21.000 gas mencakup setiap transfer ETH atau hanya menggunakan satu dimensi gas dalam memperkirakan biaya transaksi. Upgrade Glamsterdam juga mencakup pemisahan proposer-pembangun yang diabadikan (enshrined proposer-builder separation), daftar akses tingkat blok, dan peningkatan batas ukuran kode kontrak serta kode inisialisasi. Fork Glamsterdam dijadwalkan aktif di jaringan utama pada Kamis, sebelum diterapkan di testnet Sepolia dan Holesky.

Ethereum Foundation (EF) telah memperingatkan bahwa beberapa dompet, indexer, dan estimator gas mungkin rusak karena perubahan model gas dalam peningkatan Glamsterdam yang akan datang.

Pada hari Senin, tim Protocol DevOps EF mengatakan bahwa alat apa pun yang bergantung pada batas gas maksimum yang dikodekan keras "akan rusak" dan harus diperbarui. Mereka mendesak para pengembang untuk menguji sistem mereka di Plataberget, sebuah testnet publik yang dimaksudkan untuk beroperasi selama beberapa bulan.

Menurut pelacak peningkatan Forkcast, Plataberget diluncurkan pada 13 Agustus. Sementara itu, fork Glamsterdam dijadwalkan akan diaktifkan di jaringan pada hari Kamis, sebelum penyebarannya di testnet Sepolia dan Hoodi.

Tim Protocol DevOps EF mengatakan EIP-8037 akan memperkenalkan dimensi state-gas terpisah untuk operasi yang membuat state baru. Di bawah perubahan ini, transfer ETH biasa ke akun yang sudah ada masih akan dikenakan biaya 21.000 gas, sementara mengirim ETH ke akun baru akan dikenakan biaya state-gas tambahan.

Yayasan tersebut mengatakan para pengembang harus meninjau kembali perangkat lunak yang berasumsi bahwa 21.000 gas mencakup setiap transfer ETH atau hanya menggunakan satu dimensi gas saat memperkirakan biaya transaksi.

Glamsterdam juga mencakup pemisah proposer-pembangun yang terpatenkan, daftar akses tingkat blok, dan peningkatan batas ukuran kontrak dan kode inisialisasi.

Terkait: Ethereum Foundation mencapai tonggak 'Glamsterdam', tunjuk pemimpin protokol baru

Trending Cryptos

ctr
CitreaCTR
wstusdt
wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT
apr
CapricornAPR
ctx
Cryptex FinanceCTX
audio
AudiusAUDIO
mantra
MantraMANTRA
waxl
AxelarWAXL
bill
Billions NetworkBILL
pyth
PYTH (Pyth)PYTH
rune
THORChainRUNE
velodrome
Velodrome FinanceVELODROME
brev
BrevisBREV
cake
PancakeSwapCAKE
dos
DAPPOSDOS
jst
JUSTJST

Related Questions

QApa yang diperingatkan oleh Ethereum Foundation mengenai peningkatan Glamsterdam?

AEthereum Foundation memperingatkan bahwa beberapa dompet, indekser, dan estimator gas mungkin akan rusak karena perubahan model gas dalam peningkatan Glamsterdam yang akan datang. Alat apa pun yang bergantung pada batas gas maksimum yang dikodekan secara keras "akan rusak" dan harus diperbarui.

QApa yang harus dilakukan pengembang untuk menguji sistem mereka sebelum peningkatan Glamsterdam?

AEthereum Foundation mendesak para pengembang untuk menguji sistem mereka di Plataberget, yaitu testnet publik yang dimaksudkan untuk beroperasi selama beberapa bulan sebelum peningkatan.

QPerubahan apa yang diperkenalkan oleh EIP-8037 dalam peningkatan Glamsterdam?

AEIP-8037 memperkenalkan dimensi state-gas terpisah untuk operasi yang membuat state baru. Dengan perubahan ini, transfer ETH biasa ke akun yang sudah ada tetap berbiaya 21.000 gas, sementara mengirim ETH ke akun baru akan dikenakan biaya state-gas tambahan.

QTanggal berapa jadwal fork Glamsterdam diaktifkan di jaringan utama?

AFork Glamsterdam dijadwalkan untuk diaktifkan di jaringan pada hari Kamis, sebelum diterapkan di testnet Sepolia dan Holesky (Hoodi).

QFitur lain apa saja yang termasuk dalam peningkatan Glamsterdam selain perubahan model gas?

ASelain perubahan model gas, peningkatan Glamsterdam juga mencakup pemisahan proposer-builder yang diabadikan (enshrined), daftar akses tingkat blok (block-level access lists), dan peningkatan batas ukuran kontrak serta kode inisialisasi.

Related Reads

Crypto short liquidations pass $3B mark as Bitcoin price nears $72K

Bitcoin and altcoins surged as the cryptocurrency market witnessed over $3.1 billion in short position liquidations from August 19-20, driven by Bitcoin's rise toward $72,000. This price increase was partly a reaction to a US Treasury liquidity intervention, leading to the largest single-day short squeeze on record. While Bitcoin accounted for about half of these liquidations, this event was smaller than previous long liquidation cascades. Concurrently, short-term Bitcoin holders took profits, moving a record 43,300 BTC to exchanges in 2026 as their cost basis was surpassed, signaling a significant profit-taking move after a period of unrealized losses.

cointelegraph46m ago

Crypto short liquidations pass $3B mark as Bitcoin price nears $72K

cointelegraph46m ago

HYPE Soars 26.86%, Approaching All-Time High: What Is the Market Buying Into?

HYPE surged 26.86%, nearing its all-time high. The primary catalyst is news that former President Trump stated U.S. CFTC Chairman Michael Selig is actively working to bring the Hyperliquid protocol into the U.S. in a fully compliant manner. This aligns with Hyperliquid's own lobbying efforts, including a recent proposal with trade.xyz to the SEC for introducing pre-IPO perpetual contracts (IPOPs) to provide price discovery before public listings. Key points driving the optimism include: Hyperliquid's established position as a leading on-chain perpetual exchange; active engagement with U.S. regulators (SEC and CFTC) on frameworks for compliant derivatives trading; and significant political and regulatory momentum under the current administration to foster crypto innovation with clearer rules. Potential paths for Hyperliquid's U.S. entry are discussed: 1) Partnering with licensed U.S. entities for clearing and KYC, 2) Listing Hyperliquid assets on already compliant platforms like Coinbase, or 3) The more complex route of acquiring/building a fully regulated U.S. exchange. The process is estimated to take several months to a year but marks a significant step towards legitimizing on-chain derivatives in the U.S. market, boosting HYPE's price prospects.

Odaily星球日报51m ago

HYPE Soars 26.86%, Approaching All-Time High: What Is the Market Buying Into?

Odaily星球日报51m ago

Jameson Lopp's BIP-110 Postmortem: Bitcoin Is Driven by Game Theory, Not Morality

Jameson Lopp's analysis concludes that BIP-110, a proposal to restrict arbitrary data (like inscriptions) on Bitcoin, failed due to economic and technical realities, not moral arguments. The proposal, championed by Luke Dashjr and others, aimed to "cleanse" the chain but never reached its 55% miner activation threshold. Upon its forced signaling deadline in August, only the OCEAN pool (with ~1% hash rate) supported it, creating a short-lived fork that quickly died as miners faced unredeemable block rewards. Lopp's earlier predictions about its economic infeasibility were proven correct. Technically, BIP-110 was flawed; workarounds to embed data compliant with its rules were demonstrated almost immediately, proving it couldn't achieve its stated goal. The debate often devolved into moralistic rhetoric, with supporters accusing opponents of supporting child exploitation material—a tactic Lopp criticizes as ineffective for building consensus. Lopp argues Bitcoin is driven by incentives and game theory, not morality. Past forks like Bitcoin Cash promised economic benefits, while BIP-110 offered only restrictions and reduced miner fees, gaining no substantial support from major economic players. He predicts the "puritans" behind the failed fork will continue complaining but their new chain will remain insignificant. The episode reaffirms that attempting to censor data on a permissionless, anti-censorship network like Bitcoin is a futile battle.

marsbit53m ago

Jameson Lopp's BIP-110 Postmortem: Bitcoin Is Driven by Game Theory, Not Morality

marsbit53m ago

Tokenization Scale Soars to $4.3 Billion, But Why Did Securitize Incur a $5.5 Million Loss?

Securitize's first quarterly report post-IPO reveals a paradox: while its tokenized assets under management hit a record $4.3 billion (up 16% YoY) and platform trading volume surged 147% to $5.3 billion, total revenue fell 5% to $14.4 million. Tokenization revenue specifically dropped ~12% to $7.8 million, leading to an adjusted EBITDA loss of $5.5 million. CFO Francisco Flores explained that most trading volume is not yet monetized, with the majority of tokenization revenue still coming from one-time projects like new protocol integrations. In contrast, asset servicing revenue, a more recurring stream, grew slightly to $6.6 million. The company has lowered its full-year revenue guidance to $70-$80 million from an initial projection of $110 million. Industry experts note this highlights a structural challenge for the tokenization sector. Scaling assets on-chain doesn't automatically scale a profitable business model. Current implementations often rely on costly, customized projects for each new asset or jurisdiction. The future, they argue, lies in building standardized infrastructure that generates recurring "infrastructure revenue" from post-issuance activities like compliance, distributions, and secondary trading—similar to enterprise software. Analysts caution against misinterpreting high trading volumes as indicative of a mature fee-based model, as Securitize's broad volume metric includes many non-monetized actions. The key test for the industry is whether adding billions in new assets can generate sustainable revenue without constant new custom projects.

marsbit55m ago

Tokenization Scale Soars to $4.3 Billion, But Why Did Securitize Incur a $5.5 Million Loss?

marsbit55m ago

The Five Paradoxes of Artificial Intelligence

**Five Paradoxes of Artificial Intelligence** Artificial intelligence (AI) is an era filled with paradoxes, which we navigate as we advance. **1. The Prediction Paradox** AI experts, from pioneers like Marvin Minsky to contemporary figures like Geoffrey Hinton and Demis Hassabis, have a history of inaccurate forecasts regarding AI's capabilities and timelines, such as achieving human-level machine intelligence or surpassing radiologists. Predictions about Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) vary wildly between optimistic entrepreneurs and skeptical academics, highlighting the inherent unpredictability of technological futures. **2. The Employment Quantification Paradox** Despite numerous studies from institutions like the OECD, IMF, and McKinsey attempting to quantify AI's impact on jobs, estimates of affected employment range from 0.4% to 67%, revealing vast inconsistencies. This paradox arises because isolating AI's effect from other economic, social, and technological factors is virtually impossible, and forecasts depend on static assumptions about a dynamically evolving technology. **3. The Productivity Paradox** While AI is a transformative General Purpose Technology, significant productivity growth has not yet materialized in major economies like the EU and has only matched historical averages in the US. This disconnect between rapid innovation and slow productivity gains, reminiscent of the "Solow Paradox" from the computer age, is often explained by time lags. History shows it takes decades for such technologies to diffuse and trigger complementary innovations that boost productivity. **4. The Data Value Paradox** Data is hailed as the "new oil" and critical for AI, yet its economic value is paradoxical. Its worth is realized only in use, not in straightforward trade. Despite policy emphasis and initiatives for data asset recognition on corporate balance sheets in China, the monetized value remains negligible—accounting for only about 0.06% of major telecom operators' total assets—highlighting the gap between perceived utility and financial valuation. **5. The Industrial Revolution Paradox** For decades, nearly every major new technology, from the internet and nanotechnology to blockchain and now AI, has been proclaimed as the driver of a "Fourth Industrial Revolution." This constant reassignment suggests prior labels were premature. True industrial revolutions are typically identified in hindsight, not in real-time. Furthermore, the coexistence of such a proclaimed transformative revolution with ongoing economic crises would be historically anomalous. Whether AI truly defines a new industrial revolution remains a narrative for the future to decide.

marsbit58m ago

The Five Paradoxes of Artificial Intelligence

marsbit58m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片

Top Questions