Morgan Stanley analiza las criptomonedas: crecimiento en las reservas de Bitcoin y Ethereum, y primera transición hacia altcoins!

cryptonews.ruPublished on 2026-08-14Last updated on 2026-08-14

Abstract

En el segundo trimestre, Morgan Stanley incrementó significativamente su exposición al sector de criptomonedas. Según un informe 13F presentado ante la SEC, el banco aumentó su participación en Circle (CRCL) de aproximadamente 1,46 millones a 8,32 millones de acciones. Amplió sustancialmente sus posiciones en ETF spot de Bitcoin y Ethereum. Su participación en el BlackRock iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) creció un 23% en número de acciones, aunque su valor de mercado cayó un 18% debido al descenso del precio de Bitcoin. También aumentó sus posiciones en otros ETF de Bitcoin como Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust, Bitwise Bitcoin ETF y Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC), con un aumento del 38% en este último. Para Ethereum, el crecimiento fue más agresivo: su posición en BlackRock iShares Ethereum Trust (ETHA) se incrementó aproximadamente un 202% y en Grayscale Ethereum Staking Mini ETF un 26%. Además, el banco realizó sus primeras inversiones en productos de Solana, abriendo nuevas posiciones en Grayscale Solana Staking ETF y Fidelity Solana Fund. En acciones de empresas del sector, aumentó sus posiciones en compañías de minería e infraestructura como Cipher Digital, Core Scientific, Hut 8 y Bitdeer. Sin embargo, redujo su participación en Coinbase en unas 550.000 acciones, recortó su posición en CleanSpark en más de 3,1 millones de acciones y cerró completamente su posición en Bitfarms.

En el segundo trimestre, Morgan Stanley aumentó significativamente su participación en Circle y, al mismo tiempo, expandió sus inversiones en el sector de las criptomonedas. Según un informe 13F presentado ante la Comisión de Bolsa y Valores de EE. UU. (SEC) el 14 de agosto, Morgan Stanley incrementó sus posiciones en acciones de Circle (CRCL) de aproximadamente 1,46 millones a 8,32 millones al 30 de junio.

Durante el mismo período, el banco también amplió sus posiciones en los ETF de Bitcoin y Ethereum al contado. La posición de Morgan Stanley en el BlackRock iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) aumentó de 13,4 millones de acciones en el primer trimestre a aproximadamente 16,5 millones de acciones. Esto representa un aumento de aproximadamente el 23 por ciento en el número de acciones en propiedad. Al mismo tiempo, debido a la caída del precio de Bitcoin, el valor de mercado de la posición en IBIT disminuyó aproximadamente un 18 por ciento, de 667 millones de dólares a 549 millones de dólares.

Morgan Stanley también incrementó sus posiciones en el Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust, el Bitwise Bitcoin ETF y el Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC), poseyendo aproximadamente 2,57 millones de acciones de MSBT por un valor de alrededor de 43,3 millones de dólares. El aumento de la participación del banco en FBTC fue de aproximadamente el 38 por ciento.

Ethereum también mostró un crecimiento más agresivo. La posición de Morgan Stanley en el BlackRock iShares Ethereum Trust (ETHA) aumentó aproximadamente un 202% hasta 4,6 millones de acciones, y la posición en el Grayscale Ethereum Staking Mini ETF creció aproximadamente un 26% hasta 5,1 millones de acciones.

El banco también se volvió hacia productos de inversión de Solana. En el segundo trimestre, Morgan Stanley abrió nuevas posiciones en el ETF Grayscale Solana Staking y en el fondo Fidelity Solana Fund, cuyos valores fueron de aproximadamente 4,25 millones de dólares y 2,26 millones de dólares, respectivamente.

En el mercado de acciones de empresas relacionadas con criptomonedas, se observó un panorama más diversificado. Morgan Stanley aumentó sus posiciones en empresas de minería e infraestructura, como Circle, Cipher Digital, Core Scientific, Hut 8 y Bitdeer.

Por otro lado, el banco redujo su posición en Coinbase en aproximadamente 550,000 acciones, y también disminuyó sus posiciones en CleanSpark en más de 3.1 millones de acciones. Morgan Stanley también cerró completamente su posición en Bitfarms, que era de aproximadamente 8 millones de acciones.

*Esto no es una recomendación de inversión.

end-content

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

Q¿En qué empresa relacionada con criptomonedas Morgan Stanley aumentó significativamente su inversión en el segundo trimestre?

AMorgan Stanley aumentó significativamente su inversión en Circle (CRCL), incrementando sus posiciones de aproximadamente 1,46 millones a 8,32 millones de acciones.

Q¿Cómo cambió la posición de Morgan Stanley en el ETF de Bitcoin de BlackRock (IBIT) en términos de número de acciones y valor de mercado?

ALa posición de Morgan Stanley en el BlackRock iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) aumentó aproximadamente un 23% en número de acciones (de 13,4 a 16,5 millones). Sin embargo, debido a la caída del precio de Bitcoin, su valor de mercado disminuyó alrededor de un 18%, de 667 a 549 millones de dólares.

Q¿Qué criptomoneda mostró el crecimiento de inversión más agresivo por parte de Morgan Stanley según el artículo?

AEthereum mostró el crecimiento de inversión más agresivo. La posición de Morgan Stanley en el BlackRock iShares Ethereum Trust (ETHA) aumentó aproximadamente un 202%, y su posición en el Grayscale Ethereum Staking Mini ETF creció alrededor de un 26%.

Q¿A qué altcoin o moneda alternativa dirigió sus inversiones Morgan Stanley por primera vez en el segundo trimestre?

AMorgan Stanley dirigió inversiones por primera vez a Solana, abriendo nuevas posiciones en el ETF Grayscale Solana Staking y en el fondo Fidelity Solana Fund, valorados en aproximadamente 4,25 y 2,26 millones de dólares respectivamente.

Q¿En cuáles de las siguientes empresas de criptomonedas Morgan Stanley redujo o cerró su posición según el informe?

AMorgan Stanley redujo su posición en Coinbase (en aproximadamente 550.000 acciones) y en CleanSpark (en más de 3,1 millones de acciones). Además, cerró completamente su posición en Bitfarms, que era de aproximadamente 8 millones de acciones.

Related Reads

Shocking: OpenAI Fully Open-Sources Codex Harness

OpenAI has open-sourced the core framework of Codex, called "Harness," under an Apache-2.0 license. This move allows developers to deeply integrate AI agents into their own applications and workflows, moving beyond the limitations of generic chat interfaces. The Harness is the underlying execution system that manages an AI agent's complete lifecycle: understanding tasks, maintaining memory, using tools, handling failures, and requesting human approvals. OpenAI demonstrated that optimizations to the Harness alone can dramatically boost a model's performance, tripling scores on a benchmark while using significantly fewer tokens. The release includes three key components: a CLI tool (`codex exec`) for automated tasks, official SDKs (TypeScript/Python) for programmatic control, and the `app-server` for embedding agents directly into products. This enables features like persistent state, real-time event streaming, and human-in-the-loop controls. Early adopters showcase its versatility beyond coding. Examples include a tax preparation system that cut processing time by one-third, Cisco's platform for building apps with natural language, and a demo logistics dashboard where agents analyze data and propose actions within the existing interface. This paradigm shift grants developers full control over the user interface, context, tools, and security boundaries. AI becomes an invisible assistant within specialized software, rather than a separate chatbot. By open-sourcing the engine behind its powerful agents, OpenAI aims to spark a new wave of native, deeply integrated AI applications.

marsbit4m ago

Shocking: OpenAI Fully Open-Sources Codex Harness

marsbit4m ago

Haiwei Huaxin's Official Seal Seized by Over a Hundred People, High-Stakes Corporate Battle's 'Nuclear Deterrence' in Action Again

On August 18th, Haowei Huaxin, a semiconductor firm specializing in gallium arsenide and gallium nitride wafers, reported that over a hundred individuals forcibly entered its offices and seized the company's official seals from a safe, including the corporate, contract, and party committee seals. The incident is the latest escalation in a protracted control dispute. Haowei Huaxin, established in 2010, was originally a joint venture. Control became contested after 2021 when Zhenwei Financial Holding injected capital, becoming the largest shareholder (34.01%), while former parent Haite High-Tech's stake was diluted to 33.79%. An agreed-upon governance structure collapsed, leading to mutual accusations. Haite claimed it was locked out of the subsidiary's premises, while also alleging improper management like livestock being kept on the chip fabrication site. After state-owned Qingdao Haiyue Holdings took over Zhenwei's stake in 2023, Haite accused it of illegally seizing control. Despite Haite winning several legal battles in 2024-2026, which affirmed its rights to nominate directors and the chairman, it failed to regain physical control or recover the seals. The stakes are high: market valuations for Haite's stake in Haowei Huaxin are estimated between 3.7 to 5 billion USD, yet it is only valued at about 83 million USD on Haite's books. Losing control effectively jeopardizes a significant portion of Haite's value. In response to the seal seizure, Haite framed it as a "shareholder rights protection" action agreed upon by five shareholders. This mirrors a pattern in Chinese corporate disputes where seizing physical seals becomes a tactic to paralyze the opponent's daily operations, seen in past conflicts at companies like Dangdang and Bitmain. However, such actions don't resolve underlying ownership issues; the opposing party can report the seals stolen, declare them void, and apply for new ones, albeit with significant delay. The incident underscores how fragile corporate governance can devolve into physical confrontations over symbols of authority, with control ultimately determined by law and shareholding, not possession of a seal.

marsbit49m ago

Haiwei Huaxin's Official Seal Seized by Over a Hundred People, High-Stakes Corporate Battle's 'Nuclear Deterrence' in Action Again

marsbit49m ago

Bernstein Interprets MRNA's 177% Surge: What's Fundamentals and What's Hype?

Bernstein's analysis of Moderna's 177% stock surge following positive Phase 3 results for its individualized neoantigen therapy (INT) in melanoma distinguishes fundamental drivers from market speculation. The clinical breakthrough is real: the INTerpath-001 trial met its primary and key secondary endpoints, providing crucial validation for mRNA technology in oncology beyond infectious diseases. However, Bernstein argues the magnitude of the stock move cannot be justified by this single trial's fundamentals alone. The surge was amplified by three key factors: 1) A re-rating of Moderna's mRNA platform potential for expansion into other cancers, 2) A massive short squeeze, given ~15% of shares were sold short pre-announcement, and 3) The compelling "cancer vaccine" narrative that fueled broader investor enthusiasm. While the melanoma success is significant, Bernstein cautions that replication in lung, kidney, and bladder cancers—which have different immunogenicity—is not guaranteed. Furthermore, INT's commercial model faces challenges: it's a personalized treatment, not a mass-market vaccine, implying higher production costs and potential margin pressures despite a projected multi-billion dollar peak sales opportunity. The report also notes sector rotation, with some funds moving from crowded AI/semiconductor trades into defensive healthcare stocks, adding further momentum. In conclusion, Bernstein maintains a "Market-Perform" rating and a $45 price target, far below the post-surge price. It views the current valuation as pricing in an optimistic multi-cancer platform success and efficient commercialization that are yet to be proven. The clinical inflection point is clear, but the earnings inflection point awaits validation across future trials and commercial execution.

marsbit49m ago

Bernstein Interprets MRNA's 177% Surge: What's Fundamentals and What's Hype?

marsbit49m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

2.0k Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片