12月10日:BTC、ETH、SOL 、MERL 、ZEC行情分析

金色财经Published on 2025-12-10Last updated on 2025-12-10

Abstract

12月10日加密货币行情分析显示,比特币(BTC)在昨晚美股时段突然拉升,最高触及94640美元,随后回落至92000附近。机构持续溢价买入,市场信心增强,但散户情绪仍偏弱,需BTC重回10万美元才能恢复信心。技术面显示,BTC日线放量突破下跌趋势线,MACD即将上穿0轴,有望进一步反弹。关键支撑位在92000和90540,跌破90540则短期不宜做多。 以太坊(ETH)日线四连阳,突破3260美元,现报3320附近,但4小时级别有回撤需求。建议高空为主,压制位关注3380和3480,支撑位在3230、3150和3060。 SOL近期表现较弱,未突破147美元。若突破147.5并站稳138以上,可能上探154-158。但需注意压力位回踩,低多和高空均可操作,但需设定明确止盈点。 MERL空头趋势明显,一个月内三次试探0.5美元均失败,高点逐步降低。关键支撑在0.2美元附近,此处为项目方成本和散户心理防线,跌破可能引发恐慌抛售。建议观望,避免逆势操作。 ZEC多单建议止盈,1小时级别出现上升楔形和M顶形态,存在顶背离,短期可能回调。成本359美元,现价440美元,利润可观,不宜贪心。 整体而言,市场机构信心增强,但需警惕短期回调风险,操作上建议谨慎布局,关注关键支撑和压力位。

比特币昨晚美股时间突然拉盘,最高直接拉到了94640美金,随后又被砸到92000附近,CB持续的溢价效应重现,说明机构正在疯狂的逢低买进。

最近木头姐、CZ 等都出来喊4年周期结束,目前市场层面主流机构信心倍增,但是散户信心依然很弱,要想散户信心重新恢复唯有拉盘,让比特币重回10完美金,到时候散户就会再次疯狂。

BTC

BTC目前从日线级别形态看,放量突破上涨趋势线,走出了下跌形态,回踩可以继续做多,MACD形态,即将上0轴,有进一步反弹的需求,放量上涨,多天力量增强,做空稍微谨慎一点。上方压力98000附近。

四小时级别的 突破已经完成,突破后 回踩的两个重要位置,一个是上行通道的中轨位置,一个是 突破前的压力转支撑位(两个位置都在图中表明了)

两个关键位:92000,90540。 跌破90540关键位,短期不要做多,这两个位置都可以轻仓做多,跌破止损即可。

ETH

以太坊日k更强势,走出4连阳走势,直接突破3260,目前价格3320一线,价格震荡布林上轨附近。4小时级别冲高回落,有回撤需求。

日内思路依旧还是高空为主,错过了多单,也不要去高位追涨。上方压制关注3380跟3480这里,高空围绕这里布局,走回撤的话。

下方支撑关注3230跟3150以及3060这里。跌破3000才能往下去看2900跟2820和2730以及2620这些位置。

SOL

SOL弱了较长一段时间,一直没有突破147。以前都是sol比btc变盘早一步,这次是eth率先突破关键压力,那么今晚很可能sol也要紧随其后突破一下。如果能突破147.5,回踩高于141.85-138.85即站稳138,那么后面几天就有望去上探154-158

SOL3日线级别反抽还没有形成。今晚往上拉一下就差不多启动生效。但到了压力点该回踩还是要回踩,低多能盈利,逢高空一样可以,但要知道回踩到什么点位就止盈,尔后反手再开多。

$MERL

MERL 这一个月三次摸0.5附近,全被无情拍死,拉盘成交看着热闹,其实全是空气,买盘根本跟不上,现在高点一个比一个低,反弹也越来越短,空头结构明摆着的。

0.2 这位置我一直盯着,主要有三点:

1. 项目方成本基本就在 0.18-0.22 这个区间,跌到这儿通常不会一点反应都没有;

2. 散户心理防线也在这儿,守住了可能喘口气,破了就是恐慌盘砸穿;

3. 趋势关键点:站稳了说明空头开始乏力,破了就彻底放飞,后面空间随便开。 所以现在别急着动手抄底,也别指望它能突然拉个独立行情。

MERL 空头趋势没跑,0.2 之前别轻易站多头,等0.2附近看它到底是继续砸还是有反弹迹象,盘面会给答案。现金拿好,顺势做,别逆。

ZEC

多单全部止盈落袋吧,1h级别形态处于上升楔形,而且存在m顶,短期可能要回调一波,而且还处于顶背离,考虑到利润回撤,建议多单全部落袋,利润已经不少了,我们的成本在359u,现在价格440u呢,不贪最后一口了。

如果觉得我们的内容不错,就把我们的公众号分享给你的小伙伴吧!欢迎加入关注关照,了解币圈最新信息!每一波暴跌后迎来的都是星辰大海,对后续行情布局相当迷茫的可以关注甜梦,交硫葳:RFGH8689

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

Playing the "Decoupling" Card Again? Domestic Optical Modules Face a Stress Test

The U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is reportedly drafting a ban on importing new models of Chinese-made optical transceiver modules, with a potential implementation target of 2026. This "decoupling" move comes as Chinese firms, led by industry leaders like Zhongji Innolight and Eoptolink, dominate the global optical module market with over 60% share, and hold an even larger position in the high-speed 800G and 1.6T segments critical for AI data centers. Market reactions were mixed: U.S. optical module stocks initially rose, while Chinese A-shares opened lower but largely recovered by the close. Analysis suggests a complete U.S. decoupling from Chinese modules faces significant hurdles. North American cloud giants (Meta, Google, Microsoft, Amazon) and NVIDIA have massive demand for high-speed modules, estimated at around 40 million units in 2026. U.S. manufacturers' combined monthly production capacity for these modules is less than one-fifth that of a single major Chinese player like Zhongji Innolight, which reported production of 23.76 million units in 2025. Chinese companies are heavily reliant on the U.S. market, with over 90% of revenue for top firms coming from overseas, primarily the U.S. However, they have begun mitigating risks by establishing assembly plants in Southeast Asia and Mexico. Industry observers note the final impact depends on whether any potential U.S. restrictions target specific companies or products based on origin. Past U.S. sanctions on Chinese tech firms have often spurred increased domestic R&D and market diversification. Despite initial stock volatility, shares of major Chinese optical module companies pared losses, indicating market belief in the sector's resilience and the practical difficulties of abruptly replacing Chinese supply.

marsbit10m ago

Playing the "Decoupling" Card Again? Domestic Optical Modules Face a Stress Test

marsbit10m ago

When the Competition in Chip Manufacturing Equipment Stops Being Just About Who Is More Advanced

The competition in chip manufacturing equipment is no longer solely about who has the most advanced technology. While performance, yield, and cost remain key, U.S. export controls are adding a critical new dimension: long-term supply chain reliability. Major chipmakers like Samsung and SK Hynix, despite having mature supply chains with leading American and European vendors, are reportedly evaluating etching equipment from China's AMEC for their Chinese factories. This move is not primarily about immediate replacement or AMEC's current capabilities. Instead, it's a risk mitigation strategy. Companies are concerned that future U.S. policies could disrupt their access to spare parts, software updates, and maintenance for existing equipment over its decade-long lifespan. For chipmakers investing billions in fabs with long planning cycles, this policy-induced uncertainty is a significant new risk. The U.S., through its controls, is inadvertently eroding the very reliability and certainty that were foundational strengths of its equipment suppliers. This creates a pivotal shift for Chinese semiconductor equipment. Previously seen largely as a "domestic replacement" option when foreign gear was unavailable, they are now being assessed as potential "contingency suppliers" by global players—even before a supply disruption occurs. This provides a crucial entry point for validation in real production lines, which is essential for iterative improvement. Chinese equipment, particularly in areas like etching, has progressed from prototypes to participating in mass production within China, gaining valuable experience. However, this does not signify full global competitiveness. Gaps remain in advanced lithography, metrology, and other key tools. The current evaluations are largely confined to foreign firms' China-based fabs, not their global procurement networks. The core change is in the decision-making framework. Efficiency-driven globalization favored single, optimal suppliers. An era of heightened geopolitical risk is forcing companies to value "replaceability." While technical prowess remains paramount, supply chain certainty is now being factored into a device's competitive equation. Ultimately, U.S. policies have not made Chinese equipment more advanced, but they have given global customers a compelling reason to start testing it. The competition has expanded: it's no longer just about who is more advanced, but also about who can be relied upon to stay.

marsbit11m ago

When the Competition in Chip Manufacturing Equipment Stops Being Just About Who Is More Advanced

marsbit11m ago

Trading Volume Increased by 2.5x, Why Did Circle's Revenue Only Grow by 7%?

Circle's Q2 performance presents a seemingly contradictory picture: the transaction volume of its stablecoin USDC surged 151% year-over-year to $14.8 trillion, while its "Total Revenue & Reserve Revenue" grew by only 7% to $701 million. This discrepancy highlights the core of Circle's business model. Revenue is primarily driven not by transaction volume, but by the average amount of USDC in circulation and the yield generated from its reserves. Key points: 1. **Revenue Drivers:** Over 90% of revenue comes from "reserve income," which is a function of average USDC circulation (up 25% YoY) and the reserve yield (which fell by 66 basis points). The net effect was a mere ~5% increase in reserve income. 2. **Transaction vs. Revenue:** High transaction volume indicates robust usage of USDC for payments and settlements, but does not translate directly to revenue. It must first convert into a sustained, average circulating balance. 3. **Cost Structure:** After accounting for distribution and other costs, the metric "Revenue Less Direct Costs" (RLDC) grew faster than total revenue, with its margin improving. However, rising operating expenses (up 23% YoY) meant that Adjusted EBITDA growth was limited to 8%. 4. **New Initiatives:** Circle reported progress on new networks like the Circle Payments Network and upcoming products (Arc, Agent Stack), but these are currently measured by adoption metrics (e.g., transaction run-rate, number of services) rather than material revenue contribution this quarter. In summary, the financial results are determined by the interplay of USDC circulation, reserve yields, and cost structures, while high transaction volume signals underlying network strength that has not yet fully flowed through to the income statement.

marsbit28m ago

Trading Volume Increased by 2.5x, Why Did Circle's Revenue Only Grow by 7%?

marsbit28m ago

Samsung China, Another Step Back

Samsung China Takes Another Step Back Samsung Electronics is further retreating from the Chinese consumer market. Following the exit of its home appliance business in May, its mobile phone division is now reportedly scaling down. Stores with monthly sales below 300,000 RMB are being closed in several cities. Data shows Samsung's smartphone market share in China has plummeted to 0.1% in Q2 2026, a stark contrast to its 22% global leadership. The decline is attributed to intense competition from domestic brands offering better value, higher specs (like faster charging), and superior localization in software and services. Samsung's premium pricing and less adapted One UI system have struggled against rivals like Huawei, Xiaomi, and Honor. This consumer electronics retreat coincides with Samsung's record-breaking semiconductor profits, driven by the AI boom. In Q2 2026, the chip division contributed nearly all operating profit, while the mobile and home appliance unit posted its first-ever operating loss. Internal dynamics, like the chip division charging market prices to the mobile unit, have increased cost pressures. Samsung's strategy now appears to be a focused retreat towards the ultra-premium segment in China, similar to its global push in high-end foldables like the Galaxy Z Fold8. The company is likely to retain only key stores in major cities to serve a niche, high-end clientele. While its deep semiconductor reserves offer a cushion, this shift away from mass-market consumer electronics reduces business diversification. The move is pragmatic but signifies a fundamental transformation; Samsung is ceding mass-market influence and betting heavily on its semiconductor strength and a narrowed premium product focus.

marsbit32m ago

Samsung China, Another Step Back

marsbit32m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

1.5k Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片