Показатели на JustLend указывают на грядущую фазу роста курса TRX

cryptonews.ruPublished on 2025-01-29Last updated on 2025-10-30

Анализ последних данных платформы JustLend показывает важный сдвиг в поведении участников экосистемы TRON. Об этом заявил исследователь CryptoQuant Жоао Ведсон. Динамика резервов и объемов заимствований по активам jTRX и jUSDT демонстрирует классический паттерн накопления ликвидности, который ранее предшествовал устойчивым фазам роста котировок криптовалюты TRX. Аналитик подчеркнул: в 2023 году подобная ситуация уже приводила к значительному повышению котировок, и текущие метрики указывают, что процесс повторяется в 2025 году.

По данным протокола, рост резервов jTRX относительно объема заемных средств обычно отражает переход рынка в более осторожную фазу. Инвесторы сокращают размер кредитного плеча, гасят свои долги и оставляют больше свободных активов в системе. Именно это, по мнению исследователя, создает фундамент для следующего импульса роста. Подобное поведение наблюдается и сейчас: совокупные резервы TRX увеличиваются быстрее, чем заемный объем, указывая на накопление «энергии» перед возможным рывком курса TRX.

«В сегменте jUSDT фиксируется рекордный поток стейблкоинов, что говорит о большом объеме капитала, выжидающего подходящий момент для входа в рискованные активы. Эти средства представляют собой «сухой порох» рынка, готовый к активации при смене настроений», — подчеркнул эксперт.

Анализ jTRX и jUSDT формирует вывод: экосистема TRON в данный момент характеризуется высокой ликвидностью, низким уровнем заимствований и осторожной позицией инвесторов. Исторически именно такая конфигурация предшествовала значительным периодам роста. Если динамика сохранится, TRX может войти в новую фазу роста, подкрепленную не спекуляцией, а реальными ончейн-метриками ликвидности.

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

You Use Claude and Codex Every Day, but Meta Has Restricted Internal Use

In May, Meta imposed internal restrictions on its engineers regarding the use of Claude Code and Codex, two widely used AI programming tools. Despite being a major client, Meta's guidelines, still in effect, prohibit these external models from being used for specific tasks to prevent potential "escalations with partners." The core concern is "distillation"—the risk that outputs from Claude or Codex could inadvertently contaminate the training data and evaluation processes for Meta's in-house AI coding assistant, MetaCode. If MetaCode is trained or evaluated using data generated by these external models, it risks learning their capabilities rather than developing its own, blurring the line of intellectual origin. The restrictions are precise: engineers cannot use the external models to generate test questions, debug source code, or suggest test cases. AI-generated content is also barred from environments accessible to MetaCode. However, AI can still assist with peripheral tasks like workflow setup and code organization, provided all outputs are manually reviewed. This caution reflects a broader industry dilemma. While distillation is a common technique, using a competitor's model output for training raises legal and ethical questions about the ownership of derived capabilities. Contractual terms from companies like OpenAI and Anthropic explicitly forbid using their outputs to build competing products, putting enforcement power in the hands of rivals. The move is also financially motivated, as Meta seeks to reduce its hefty internal AI spending, estimated in the billions this year. Meta's policy illustrates the delicate balance companies must strike: leveraging powerful external AI tools while safeguarding the integrity and independence of their own AI development. As AI systems increasingly help build other AIs, distinguishing the origin of capabilities becomes a fundamental challenge for the entire industry.

marsbit2h ago

You Use Claude and Codex Every Day, but Meta Has Restricted Internal Use

marsbit2h ago

Why Do We Need an AI Content Perspective Today?

The article "Why Do We Need an AI Content Perspective Today?" explores the complex and often contentious integration of AI into the cultural and creative industries, particularly film and television. It begins with the cancellation of Amazon's AI-generated animation "Punky Duck," highlighting the ethical debates surrounding AI content. AI's rapid advancement is transforming video production, enabling cost-effective, full-length AI films (e.g., "RAPHAEL," "Dreams of Violets") while sparking industry resistance over issues like "synthetic actors." The core debate has shifted from whether to use AI to how to use it responsibly. The article analyzes why AI's entry into film is uniquely unsettling. It distinguishes between "cultural fast food" (short-form, fast-paced content like micro-dramas) and "cultural main courses" (traditional, long-form film/TV). AI currently excels at the former, matching its fragmented narratives, shallow emotional needs, and free-to-consumer models. However, venturing into the latter challenges the human-centric essence of storytelling—creativity, emotional depth, and the unique value of human labor and experience. While AI can generate massive volumes of content and lower costs, it risks devaluing human creativity, leading to homogenized output, and creating unfair competition through potential intellectual property infringement. Its efficiency also amplifies content safety risks, making preemptive governance crucial. To counter these risks, the article proposes establishing clear boundaries guided by a human-centered AI content perspective. It outlines four principles: 1) Amplify, rather than displace, human creative space; 2) Respect and protect human creative output; 3) Ensure human creative control and responsibility remain paramount; and 4) Guarantee transparency and traceability in AI creation. The conclusion emphasizes that humans must act as the "helmsmen" of technology, steering AI development to enhance, not replace, the core human values at the heart of cultural expression.

marsbit2h ago

Why Do We Need an AI Content Perspective Today?

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

How to Buy TRX

Welcome to HTX.com! We've made purchasing TRON (TRX) simple and convenient. Follow our step-by-step guide to embark on your crypto journey.Step 1: Create Your HTX AccountUse your email or phone number to sign up for a free account on HTX. Experience a hassle-free registration journey and unlock all features.Get My AccountStep 2: Go to Buy Crypto and Choose Your Payment MethodCredit/Debit Card: Use your Visa or Mastercard to buy TRON (TRX) instantly.Balance: Use funds from your HTX account balance to trade seamlessly.Third Parties: We've added popular payment methods such as Google Pay and Apple Pay to enhance convenience.P2P: Trade directly with other users on HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): We offer tailor-made services and competitive exchange rates for traders.Step 3: Store Your TRON (TRX)After purchasing your TRON (TRX), store it in your HTX account. Alternatively, you can send it elsewhere via blockchain transfer or use it to trade other cryptocurrencies.Step 4: Trade TRON (TRX)Easily trade TRON (TRX) on HTX's spot market. Simply access your account, select your trading pair, execute your trades, and monitor in real-time. We offer a user-friendly experience for both beginners and seasoned traders.

26.2k Total ViewsPublished 2024.03.29Updated 2026.06.02

How to Buy TRX

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of TRX (TRX) are presented below.

活动图片