Web3 AI市场领军者能否再创辉煌

marsbitPublished on 2024-09-25Last updated on 2024-09-25

如果你现在还没有听说过$TAO ,那你就太与世隔绝了。

去年,它主导了人工智能的讨论,随后逐渐冷却,现在又开始升温。

这是一个转瞬即逝的时刻,还是$TAO正在演变成更大的东西?

以下是你需要知道的内容

$TAO

自 2023 年 10 月子网推出以来, $TAO飙升了 10 倍。

该指数在 2024 年 3 月达到峰值,但随着市场转向避险,该指数暴跌了 74%。

经过三次重新测试后,支撑位稳定在 220 美元左右。

现在,随着流动性的增加, $TAO可能创下新高。

$TAO

什么是 Bittensor?

Bittensor 是一个“激励智能”的去中心化市场。

其激励网络吸引了顶尖人才和创新者。

基于加密的奖励推动了其在子网中的增长。

$TAO

专业技能市场:

加密团队使用 Bittensor 来外包情报。

其专家网络使得吸引贡献者变得更容易。

贡献者将因其努力而获得$TAO即时奖励。

KaitoAI 和 MyShell 等著名项目都使用 Bittensor。

$TAO

愿景:

随着人工智能项目的兴起,激励资源至关重要。

Bittensor 是一个具有竞争力的激励层。

子网使用 $TAO 利用节点和贡献者。

这类似于 dApp 如何从以太坊的安全性中受益。

生态系统概览:

Bittensor 托管 45 多个子网。两个主要亮点包括:

> ReadyAI 的表现远胜于 MTurk 和 GPT-4o。

> SocialTensor 每天使用 AI 生成超过 2100 万张图像。

$TAO

代币经济学概述:

$TAO于 2021 年推出,代币供应量为 2100 万个。

与比特币一样,它每四年经历一次减半周期。

预计第一次减半将在 2025 年 11 月发生。

$TAO激励、管理和支付服务。

$TAO

供需动态:

$TAO的需求由效用和投机共同驱动。

每个区块创建 1 $TAO ,由矿工和验证者共享。

更多子网 = 更大$TAO需求。

投机兴趣仍然对其价格起着重要作用。

竞争概况:

$TAO是 Web3 AI 的市场领导者,并且也延伸到 Web2。

它与 Web2 领域的 Together AI 等项目竞争。

与大多数 Web3 AI 项目不同, $TAO协调整个堆栈。

其集成框架涵盖了从数据到模型的所有内容。

$TAO

主要风险:

Bittensor 的每日通货膨胀率约为 320 万美元或每年 1 美元2B 。

这种通货膨胀给代币的价值增加了​​巨大的抛售压力。

子网不断壮大,但面临横向竞争的挑战。

还必须对验证者知识做出主要的信任假设。

最后的想法:

$TAO是 Web3 AI 运动中无可争议的领导者。

然而,其当前的代币飞轮有几个关键的限制。

即将到来的 dTAO 升级可以更好地协调激励措施,促进增长。

(非财务建议)Crypto,Distilled 团队不拥有$TAO或与 Bittensor 有任何关联。

Related Reads

Bankless Co-founder: Why I Sold All My ETH

Author David Hoffman, founder of Bankless, explains his decision to sell all his ETH, despite being a prominent figure in the Ethereum ecosystem. He clarifies that his move is not a bearish take on Ethereum itself, which he remains highly optimistic about as a network. His core argument is that the "ETH is money" thesis, which he helped popularize, has largely played out. Hoffman argues that ETH has achieved the market valuation it deserves based on Ethereum's current success and competitive position. He details several reasons for this view. First, the path for ETH to become global money required nearly flawless execution and sustained dominance across Ethereum's entire technical and social stack—a coordination challenge he now believes had a narrower window for success than anticipated. Second, market data shows a strong correlation between L1 chain activity/fees and the price of its native asset; Ethereum's fee dominance has been challenged by competitors like Solana. Third, the "strong version" of crypto (decentralized, native crypto economies) that ETH's monetary thesis relied upon has struggled to maintain a positive mainstream narrative and stable adoption beyond a brief period. Finally, Ethereum's architecture as a "giver"—providing secure block space and tokenization capabilities at cost to L2s and applications—means it doesn't capture premium value directly. Its rollup-centric roadmap further directs most profits to L2s and applications ("fat app theory"). In conclusion, Hoffman believes the opportunity for ETH to be revalued significantly upward as money has diminished. He sold not because ETH will fail, but because its monetary thesis has matured, and he seeks to allocate capital to other opportunities he finds more compelling.

链捕手2h ago

Bankless Co-founder: Why I Sold All My ETH

链捕手2h ago

From Issuer to Infrastructure Owner: Circle's Arc Strategy and the Fatal Gap in the GENIUS Act

Circle raised $222 million for its proprietary Layer-1 blockchain, Arc, positioning itself not just as a stablecoin issuer but as the owner of the settlement infrastructure USDC relies on. This move, backed by investors like BlackRock and Apollo, highlights a significant structural conflict unaddressed by the GENIUS Act of 2025. While the act focuses on stablecoin reserves and issuer oversight, it remains silent on the market structure implications of an issuer controlling the underlying network—a scenario akin to a currency issuer also owning the payment rails. Traditionally, financial regulations separate issuers from settlement infrastructure to ensure neutrality. With Arc, Circle gains control over transaction ordering, fees, and network rules, potentially favoring USDC over competitors. The article argues that this creates a permanent structural temptation, even if no abuse occurs. The solution lies in applying established market infrastructure principles: mandating neutral transaction ordering, transparent fee schedules, and governance separated from Circle’s commercial interests. The current pre-mainnet phase offers a critical window for regulators to establish these rules before Arc becomes entrenched. Once operational, enforcing changes would be costly and disruptive. The core question remains: should a regulated stablecoin issuer be allowed to own the settlement network its competitors must use? The GENIUS Act doesn’t answer this, but Circle’s Arc strategy makes it urgent.

marsbit2h ago

From Issuer to Infrastructure Owner: Circle's Arc Strategy and the Fatal Gap in the GENIUS Act

marsbit2h ago

What Are the Key Variables Determining the AI Bull Market?

Title: What Determines the AI Bull Market? Key Variables Revealed Despite rising oil prices above $100/barrel, persistent inflation, and fragile Fed rate cut expectations—a traditionally hostile environment for high-valuation tech stocks—the AI sector continues to drive the market to new highs. According to analysts, the current AI boom is in a phase of "rational fervor": while bubbles exist, they are not yet out of control. The crucial shift is the emergence of Agentic AI, which is evolving from an assisting tool (Copilot) to an autonomous execution tool (Autopilot), creating a clearer commercial path from investment to revenue. This shift accelerates Token consumption and inference computing demand while boosting revenue forecasts for leading firms. The market is now rewarding capital expenditure as it transforms from a burden into a competitive moat, supporting hardware chains like GPUs, optical modules, and storage. However, valuations have already priced in growth expectations for 2027-2028. The forward P/E ratio for the "Magnificent Seven" tech giants is about 35x, compared to 25x for the rest of the S&P 500. This premium implies AI adoption must occur 5 to 8 times faster than past technological revolutions—a scenario with little room for error. The sustainability of the AI bull market hinges on three key variables: 1. **Short-term liquidity shocks**: Risks include sustained high oil prices, resurgent inflation, rising interest rates, and potential unwinding of the yen carry trade. The critical question is whether the upward revision speed of Annual Recurring Revenue (ARR) can outpace the rise in interest rates. 2. **Mid-term industry realization**: Can the actual pace of AI adoption and commercialization match the current lofty valuations? Historically, general-purpose technology revolutions follow a non-linear path with periods of acceleration and deceleration. 3. **Long-term structural constraints**: These include energy and power grid limitations, employment displacement and consumer purchasing power, social acceptance and potential backlash, and potential hardware technology breakthroughs that could disrupt current supply chains. While the long-term prospects for AI remain optimistic with potential for significant productivity gains, the stock market's pricing depends not just on the vision but on the actual speed of realization amid these growing constraints. The direction is clear, but the pace of execution will determine whether the bubble remains controlled or spirals out of control.

marsbit2h ago

What Are the Key Variables Determining the AI Bull Market?

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of AI (AI) are presented below.

活动图片