Borderless Capital представляет фонд DePIN на сумму 100 млн долларов США, поддерживаемый Peaq и Solana Foundation

cryptonews.ruPublished on 2020-05-18Last updated on 2024-09-18

  • Borderless Capital представил свой третий фонд DePIN с объемом поддержки в 100 миллионов долларов.
  • Среди инвесторов фонда — ориентированный на DePIN блокчейн Peaq, а также Solana Foundation, Jump Криптo и IoTeX.

Инвестиционный менеджер Borderless Capital представил свой третий фонд децентрализованной физической инфраструктуры (DePIN) с поддержкой в размере 100 миллионов долларов.

Среди инвесторов фонда числятся ориентированный на DePIN блокчейн Peaq, а также Solana Foundation, Jump Криптo и IoTeX, сообщил Borderless в электронной почте в среду.

DePIN относится к сетям физической инфраструктуры, созданным с использованием Технологии блокчейн и токенизированных стимулов, которые другие проекты могут использовать без необходимости покупать и эксплуатировать собственное оборудование.

«DePIN станет мировым стандартом для развертывания физической инфраструктуры, координации Human ресурсов и создания миллиардов пассивного дохода, одновременно обеспечивая легкий доступ и более низкие затраты для пользователей», — сказал Альваро Грасия, партнер Borderless Capital.

ONE из наиболее распространенных областей DePIN являются децентрализованные беспроводные сети, такие как Helium, которая стимулирует пользователей предоставлять подключение через точки доступа с помощью своего собственного токена HNT.

По данным отчета Криптo, по состоянию на апрель этого года 10 крупнейших проектов DePIN в совокупности привлекли более 1 миллиарда долларов .

Читать дальше: Провайдер WiFi Andrena привлекает 18 миллионов долларов для предложения децентрализованного широкополосного доступа

ОБНОВЛЕНИЕ 18.09.24; 15.26 UTC: Добавляет IoTeX в список инвесторов.

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

RIP: Atlas, Which Lived Only 292 Days

On August 9, 2026, OpenAI discontinued its standalone AI browser, Atlas, just 292 days after its launch on October 21, 2025. Initially positioned as a challenger to Chrome and the broader AI browser ecosystem, Atlas aimed to fundamentally redesign how users interact with browsers by deeply integrating ChatGPT. Its features included an AI-powered address bar, a sidebar for webpage analysis, Browser Memories for context retention, and an Agent Mode to automate multi-step tasks like shopping and research. Despite building on Chromium with a custom OWL (OpenAI Web Layer) framework, OpenAI struggled with the immense complexity of maintaining a full-fledged browser. The team spent significant time addressing basic functionalities—password managers, extensions, input methods—that mainstream browsers already handled seamlessly. Atlas's core AI agent capabilities also faced issues with reliability, speed, and security vulnerabilities like prompt injection. Furthermore, Atlas was limited to Apple Silicon Macs, failing to release promised Windows, iOS, and Android versions. This, coupled with the high switching cost for users entrenched in Chrome or Edge's ecosystems, hindered its adoption. By mid-2026, updates slowed, and OpenAI announced its shutdown, opting to integrate Atlas's AI explorations into the ChatGPT desktop app and browser extensions instead. The article contrasts two AI browser development paths: standalone products like Atlas, Perplexity's Comet, and Dia, which redesign the browser around AI but face user migration barriers; and the approach of incumbents like Chrome and Edge, which add AI features atop existing, widely-used platforms. The key question remains whether users need a completely new "AI browser" or simply AI capabilities within their current browser. While Atlas's experiment ended, the broader trend of AI integration into browsing continues.

marsbit33m ago

RIP: Atlas, Which Lived Only 292 Days

marsbit33m ago

Bitcoin's "Anti-Spam" Update Failed, Lasting Less Than a Day

A Bitcoin update proposal aimed at curbing spam by temporarily banning non-financial data from being stored on the network, BIP-110, has failed decisively. After months of debate, developers attempted to launch a separate blockchain, which collapsed within a day. The failure stemmed from a critical lack of miner support, with less than 1% signaling approval for the update. The vast majority of miners chose to continue mining the main Bitcoin blockchain without providing explanations. Despite this, the initiative's developers proceeded to launch an alternative blockchain—a hard fork of Bitcoin—on August 8. This meant a small subset of miners stopped mining Bitcoin to support the new chain with BIP-110 changes. However, the new network inherited Bitcoin's mining difficulty. With only a tiny fraction of the total computational power, block times stretched to roughly 7 hours instead of the standard 10 minutes, rendering the network practically non-functional. Michael Saylor, founder of major corporate Bitcoin holder MicroStrategy and a vocal opponent of BIP-110, commented: "Bitcoin worked exactly as designed. The BIP-110 fork occurred, and network participants were free to choose which chain to follow. As a result, about 99.85% of the network's hash power remained with Bitcoin." The event had no significant impact on Bitcoin's price, which traded in a narrow range between approximately $64.5k and $65.5k from August 7 through August 10.

cryptonews.ru39m ago

Bitcoin's "Anti-Spam" Update Failed, Lasting Less Than a Day

cryptonews.ru39m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of SOL (SOL) are presented below.

活动图片