When AI's Bottleneck Is No Longer the Model: Perseus Yang's Open Source Ecosystem Building Practices and Reflections

marsbit發佈於 2026-04-13更新於 2026-04-13

文章摘要

In 2026, the AI industry's primary bottleneck is no longer model capability but rather the encoding of domain knowledge, agent-world interfaces, and toolchain maturity. The open-source community is rapidly bridging this gap, evidenced by projects like OpenClaw and Claude Code experiencing explosive growth in their Skill ecosystems. Perseus Yang, a contributor to over a dozen AI open-source projects, argues that Skill systems are the most underestimated infrastructure of the AI agent era. They enable non-coders to program AI by writing natural language SKILL.md files, transferring power from engineers to all professionals. His project, GTM Engineer Skills, demonstrates this by automating go-to-market workflows, proving Skills can extend far beyond engineering into areas like product strategy and business analysis. He also identifies a critical blind spot: while browser automation thrives, agent operations are nearly absent from mobile apps, the world's dominant computing interface. His project, OpenPocket, is an open-source framework that allows agents to operate Android devices via ADB. It features human-in-the-loop security, agent isolation, and the ability for agents to autonomously create and save new reusable Skills. Yang believes the value of open source lies not in the code itself, but in defining the infrastructure standards during this formative period. His work validates the SKILL.md format as a portable unit for agent capability and pioneers new architectures for...

Author: Liu Jun

In 2026, a consensus is forming in the AI industry: model capability is no longer the bottleneck. The gap lies outside the model—in the encoding of domain knowledge, in the interface between agents and the real world, in the maturity of toolchains. This gap is being filled by the open-source community, and the speed exceeds everyone's expectations. OpenClaw gained 60,000 GitHub stars within 72 hours, surpassing 350,000 three months later. The Claude Code Skill ecosystem grew from 50 to over 334 Skills within half a year. Hermes Agent is even more radical, enabling agents to autonomously build reusable skills. Data from Vela Partners shows that in the past 90 days, the combined categories of personal AI assistants and Agentic Skill plugins added 244,000 new stars. This is a Skill explosion.

Perseus Yang's work sits at the heart of this explosion. With a background in Mathematics and Computer Science from Cornell, a member of the Forbes Business Council, and a THINC Fellowship recipient, he has participated in and maintained over a dozen AI-related open-source projects on GitHub in recent years, covering areas such as agent skill expansion, mobile device-level control, AI engine optimization toolchains, GEO data analysis agents, content automation workflows, and payment protocol infrastructure. His characteristic is possessing both a deep engineering background and strong product intuition. He doesn't just write code; he defines what a tool should look like based on user needs, then builds it end-to-end and drives its adoption.

Here are several core judgments he has formed during this process.

First Judgment: The Skill System is the Most Underestimated Infrastructure in the AI Agent Era

After Anthropic released Agent Skills as an open standard at the end of 2025, OpenAI's Codex CLI also adopted the same SKILL.md format. OpenClaw's ClawHub registry has accumulated over 13,000 community-contributed Skills, and the Claude Code ecosystem is quickly following suit. The significance of Skills goes far beyond "adding plugins to agents." It essentially enables people who don't know how to code to participate in AI programming. An operations personnel can write a SKILL.md in natural language, enabling an agent to learn a new workflow. This is a paradigm shift: the true power of AI depends not on the model's parameter count, but on what domain knowledge is injected into the model, and Skills extend the power to inject knowledge from engineers to everyone.

But Perseus observed a problem. The vast majority of Skills are concentrated in the engineering field—code review, front-end design, DevOps, testing. Expertise in non-engineering fields has hardly been systematically encoded into Skills. This means the coverage of the Skill ecosystem is far from reaching its potential boundary.

This observation drove a series of his open-source work in the GTM (Go-To-Market) toolchain direction. The most representative is GTM Engineer Skills, a set of Claude Code and Codex skill sets covering the complete workflow of AI engine discoverability, which has accumulated over 600 stars on GitHub. It encodes work that traditionally requires collaboration between SEO experts, content strategists, and front-end developers into an automated process executable by a single person: website AI discoverability audit, content structure optimization, keyword research, a machine-parsable layer for data visualization. The auditor doesn't output suggestions; instead, it automatically detects the front-end framework and generates code fixes that can be directly submitted as a Pull Request. Around the same direction, he also built a supporting GEO analysis tool that can simultaneously send queries to ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity to analyze brand mention rates, sentiment, market share, and competitive positioning, outputting interactive HTML reports and structured data.

The actual results demonstrate the product value of this toolset. Companies like Articuler AI and Axis Robotics used GTM Engineer Skills to complete the full process from research to Resource Center setup in a few hours, whereas such work traditionally requires dozens of hours of cross-team collaboration. This efficiency gap is not achieved by model capability, but by Perseus's deep understanding and productized breakdown of the GTM workflow: he broke down a vague "improve AI discoverability" requirement into standardized stages executable step-by-step by an agent, each with clear inputs, outputs, and quality checks. This toolchain is currently adopted by over a dozen startups and several Fortune 500 companies. The open-source tool is the entry point, the commercial product is the scaled extension, and both share the same technical core.

The project itself is valuable, but Perseus believes the proposition is more important: the capability boundary of the Skill system extends far beyond the engineering field. Product strategy, go-to-market, business analysis—any expertise that can be structurally described can be encoded into agent capabilities.

Second Judgment: AI Agent's Operational Boundary Should Not Stop at Browsers and APIs

The agent discussion in 2026 is dominated by browser agents and API integrations. LangGraph, CrewAI, and Google ADK constitute a thriving multi-agent orchestration ecosystem. But Perseus noticed a structural blind spot: most global digital activity happens in native mobile apps—social, payment, gaming, communication—and these apps lack public APIs and browser equivalents. Existing frameworks cannot operate WeChat, Douyin, WhatsApp, or Alipay. Mobile is the world's dominant computing interface, but the infrastructure for native mobile agents is almost zero.

Perseus's thinking is: Why is everyone teaching AI to operate browsers, but no one is seriously teaching it to operate phones? The prosperity of browser agents is largely because the web is naturally automation-friendly, with DOM, APIs, and mature toolchains like Playwright. But the phone is a completely different world. Native apps are black boxes, without structured interface descriptions; operations can only be performed by simulating human touches and swipes. The difficulty of this problem lies not in getting the LLM to understand whether a button should be pressed, but in building the entire execution layer infrastructure from scratch: device connection management, screen state parsing, device mutex between multiple agents, security boundaries for sensitive operations.

This judgment drove the birth of OpenPocket. It is an open-source framework that uses ADB to allow LLM-driven agents to autonomously operate Android devices, currently with about a dozen contributors and over 500 commits. What users are really doing with it speaks volumes: automatically managing social media accounts, replying to messages in IMs for you, handling payments and bills on the phone, even automatically playing mobile games. A typical scenario is: the user tells the agent in natural language "Open Slack every morning at 8 am to check in," and the agent will persistently run this task in an isolated session, turning a previously manual, repetitive daily operation into background automation.

Perseus made several key product and architectural choices in this project. First, agents can automatically create new Skills during runtime. When encountering an unfamiliar operation flow, it can save the learned steps as a reusable SKILL.md for direct调用 next time. This means the agent is not a tool with fixed capabilities, but a system that grows stronger with use. Second, all sensitive operations must be approved by a human, rather than letting the agent judge what is safe. In his view, the most dangerous thing about autonomous agents is not that they do the wrong thing, but that they do the wrong thing "confidently" while thinking they are right. Third, each agent is completely isolated, bound to an independent device, configuration, and session state, allowing multiple agents to run simultaneously without interfering with each other. If only TypeScript engineers can extend the agent's capabilities, this ecosystem will never grow large, so OpenPocket, like Claude Code, uses SKILL.md as the standard format for capability extension.

The entire system supports 29+ LLM configurations. Agent phones are completely isolated from users' personal phones, and all data remains local. In 2026, with OWASP listing "Tool Misuse" among the Top 10 Risks for Agentic AI and the high-risk obligations of the EU AI Act about to take effect, this local-first, human-in-the-loop design is not conservative but a prerequisite for agents entering real-world scenarios.

Third Judgment: The Value of Open Source Lies Not in the Code Itself, But in the Definition of Standards at the Infrastructure Layer

Perseus's understanding of open source is not "putting code on GitHub." He repeatedly mentions a viewpoint: The open-source AI ecosystem in 2026 is in a window where standards have not yet solidified. The architectural patterns and interface specifications adopted by the community now will become the industry's default infrastructure in the coming years. In this window, defining a niche is more important than optimizing an existing solution.

Specifically, his Skill project pushed forward something technically meaningful: proving that the SKILL.md format is not just a container for engineering tools, but a sufficiently general standard for encoding domain knowledge. When the same SKILL.md can be loaded and executed by Claude Code, OpenAI Codex CLI, and OpenClaw, it de facto becomes the "portable capability unit" of the AI agent ecosystem. Perseus stuffed the complete workflow of go-to-market—a non-engineering field—into this format and successfully ran end-to-end automation from audit to code fix. This is a significant validation of the generality of the entire Skill standard.

His mobile agent project addresses an architectural gap at the agent execution layer. Existing agent frameworks rely on structured interfaces at the tool-calling level, either APIs or DOM. OpenPocket must operate in an environment without any structured interface, relying purely on screen pixel parsing and touch event injection. This forced the project to redesign the agent's perception-decision-execution loop from the ground up, including real-time parsing of device state, device mutex protocols for multiple agents, and automatic recovery mechanisms after operation failures. These are not simple adaptations of existing agent frameworks, but an architectural solution independently evolved for the problem of "autonomous operation in API-less environments."

The engineering design of the two projects is worth mentioning separately. OpenPocket adopts a three-layer separated architecture of Manager, Gateway, and Agent Runtime, where each layer can be iterated independently, and community contributors only need to focus on the layer they are familiar with. Each Skill within GTM Engineer Skills follows a staged pipeline design internally, where the output of the previous stage is the input of the next, with mandatory quality check gates in between. The workflow can be interrupted and resumed at any stage, and errors can be pinpointed to a specific stage. The purpose of these architectural choices is the same: to make the open-source project trustworthy for real users in production environments.

From a product perspective, these two projects also share a commonality: Perseus always places "who will use it" and "how to extend it" at the forefront of architectural decisions. The target users of GTM Engineer Skills are not engineers but growth teams, so each Skill has clear input-output contracts and built-in quality checks, allowing non-technical users to understand what the agent is doing. OpenPocket's SKILL.md extension mechanism, natural language scheduled tasks, and multi-channel access (Telegram, Discord, WhatsApp, CLI) are all designed to lower the barrier to entry for non-engineering users. In his view, if an open-source infrastructure project can only be used by engineers, its ceiling is the size of the engineering community. The truly leveraged design is to enable the boundary of agent capabilities to be expanded collectively by practitioners from all fields.

This pattern runs through his multiple projects. It's not about doing application-layer development on existing frameworks, but identifying missing components in the infrastructure layer of the agent ecosystem and then building them.

The Bigger Picture

The open-source AI ecosystem in 2026 is experiencing a moment similar to the early cloud-native ecosystem of the 2010s: standards and tools at the infrastructure layer are being defined, and these definitions will constrain the entire industry's development path for years to come. In this window, every Skill format adopted by the community, every agent architectural pattern validated, every ecosystem gap filled, is participating in shaping the next interface layer of AI.

What Perseus Yang is doing is simple: using engineering capability and product thinking to explore the paradigm at the technological frontier of the AI era. Models will continue to become more powerful, but who defines how agents should interact with the real world, who decides in what form domain knowledge should be encoded and distributed—the answers to these questions will not grow out of models. They can only be figured out bit by bit by people who build things.

相關問答

QAccording to the article, what is the current bottleneck in the AI industry as of 2026?

AThe bottleneck is no longer the model capabilities themselves, but rather the gap in encoding domain knowledge, creating interfaces for agents and the real world, and the maturity of toolchains.

QWhat is the significance of the SKILL.md format, as discussed in the article?

AThe SKILL.md format is an open standard that allows non-coders to participate in AI programming. It enables anyone to define a new workflow for an AI agent using natural language, making it a portable unit of capability that can be executed across different AI platforms like Claude Code and OpenAI Codex CLI.

QWhat problem did Perseus Yang identify with the current landscape of AI agents and mobile applications?

AHe identified a structural blind spot: while most digital activity happens within native mobile apps (like WeChat, TikTok, WhatsApp, Alipay), these apps lack public APIs and are not accessible to browser-based agents. This creates a significant gap, as there is almost no infrastructure for native mobile AI agents.

QWhat are the key architectural and safety features of the OpenPocket project?

AKey features include: agents that can autonomously create new Skills from learned operations; a requirement for human approval on sensitive operations; complete isolation of each agent with its own device and session state; and a design that keeps all operations local to the device for security and privacy.

QHow does Perseus Yang view the role of open source in the current AI ecosystem?

AHe believes the value of open source lies not just in sharing code, but in defining the architectural patterns and interface standards that will become the default infrastructure for the entire industry. He focuses on identifying and building missing components at the infrastructure layer to shape how agents interact with the real world.

你可能也喜歡

交易

現貨
合約

熱門文章

什麼是 $S$

理解 SPERO:全面概述 SPERO 簡介 隨著創新領域的不斷演變,web3 技術和加密貨幣項目的出現在塑造數字未來中扮演著關鍵角色。在這個動態領域中,SPERO(標記為 SPERO,$$s$)是一個引起關注的項目。本文旨在收集並呈現有關 SPERO 的詳細信息,以幫助愛好者和投資者理解其基礎、目標和在 web3 和加密領域內的創新。 SPERO,$$s$ 是什麼? SPERO,$$s$ 是加密空間中的一個獨特項目,旨在利用去中心化和區塊鏈技術的原則,創建一個促進參與、實用性和金融包容性的生態系統。該項目旨在以新的方式促進點對點互動,為用戶提供創新的金融解決方案和服務。 SPERO,$$s$ 的核心目標是通過提供增強用戶體驗的工具和平台來賦能個人。這包括使交易方式更加靈活、促進社區驅動的倡議,以及通過去中心化應用程序(dApps)創造金融機會的途徑。SPERO,$$s$ 的基本願景圍繞包容性展開,旨在彌合傳統金融中的差距,同時利用區塊鏈技術的優勢。 誰是 SPERO,$$s$ 的創建者? SPERO,$$s$ 的創建者身份仍然有些模糊,因為公開可用的資源對其創始人提供的詳細背景信息有限。這種缺乏透明度可能源於該項目對去中心化的承諾——這是一種許多 web3 項目所共享的精神,優先考慮集體貢獻而非個人認可。 通過將討論重心放在社區及其共同目標上,SPERO,$$s$ 體現了賦能的本質,而不特別突出某些個體。因此,理解 SPERO 的精神和使命比識別單一創建者更為重要。 誰是 SPERO,$$s$ 的投資者? SPERO,$$s$ 得到了來自風險投資家到天使投資者的多樣化投資者的支持,他們致力於促進加密領域的創新。這些投資者的關注點通常與 SPERO 的使命一致——優先考慮那些承諾社會技術進步、金融包容性和去中心化治理的項目。 這些投資者通常對不僅提供創新產品,還對區塊鏈社區及其生態系統做出積極貢獻的項目感興趣。這些投資者的支持強化了 SPERO,$$s$ 作為快速發展的加密項目領域中的一個重要競爭者。 SPERO,$$s$ 如何運作? SPERO,$$s$ 採用多面向的框架,使其與傳統的加密貨幣項目區別開來。以下是一些突顯其獨特性和創新的關鍵特徵: 去中心化治理:SPERO,$$s$ 整合了去中心化治理模型,賦予用戶積極參與決策過程的權力,關於項目的未來。這種方法促進了社區成員之間的擁有感和責任感。 代幣實用性:SPERO,$$s$ 使用其自己的加密貨幣代幣,旨在在生態系統內部提供多種功能。這些代幣使交易、獎勵和平台上提供的服務得以促進,增強了整體參與度和實用性。 分層架構:SPERO,$$s$ 的技術架構支持模塊化和可擴展性,允許在項目發展過程中無縫整合額外的功能和應用。這種適應性對於在不斷變化的加密環境中保持相關性至關重要。 社區參與:該項目強調社區驅動的倡議,採用激勵合作和反饋的機制。通過培養強大的社區,SPERO,$$s$ 能夠更好地滿足用戶需求並適應市場趨勢。 專注於包容性:通過提供低交易費用和用戶友好的界面,SPERO,$$s$ 旨在吸引多樣化的用戶群體,包括那些以前可能未曾參與加密領域的個體。這種對包容性的承諾與其通過可及性賦能的總體使命相一致。 SPERO,$$s$ 的時間線 理解一個項目的歷史提供了對其發展軌跡和里程碑的關鍵見解。以下是建議的時間線,映射 SPERO,$$s$ 演變中的重要事件: 概念化和構思階段:形成 SPERO,$$s$ 基礎的初步想法被提出,與區塊鏈行業內的去中心化和社區聚焦原則密切相關。 項目白皮書的發布:在概念階段之後,發布了一份全面的白皮書,詳細說明了 SPERO,$$s$ 的願景、目標和技術基礎設施,以吸引社區的興趣和反饋。 社區建設和早期參與:積極進行外展工作,建立早期採用者和潛在投資者的社區,促進圍繞項目目標的討論並獲得支持。 代幣生成事件:SPERO,$$s$ 進行了一次代幣生成事件(TGE),向早期支持者分發其原生代幣,並在生態系統內建立初步流動性。 首次 dApp 上線:與 SPERO,$$s$ 相關的第一個去中心化應用程序(dApp)上線,允許用戶參與平台的核心功能。 持續發展和夥伴關係:對項目產品的持續更新和增強,包括與區塊鏈領域其他參與者的戰略夥伴關係,使 SPERO,$$s$ 成為加密市場中一個具有競爭力和不斷演變的參與者。 結論 SPERO,$$s$ 是 web3 和加密貨幣潛力的見證,能夠徹底改變金融系統並賦能個人。憑藉對去中心化治理、社區參與和創新設計功能的承諾,它為更具包容性的金融環境鋪平了道路。 與任何在快速發展的加密領域中的投資一樣,潛在的投資者和用戶都被鼓勵進行徹底研究,並對 SPERO,$$s$ 的持續發展進行深思熟慮的參與。該項目展示了加密行業的創新精神,邀請人們進一步探索其無數可能性。儘管 SPERO,$$s$ 的旅程仍在展開,但其基礎原則確實可能影響我們在互聯網數字生態系統中如何與技術、金融和彼此互動的未來。

85 人學過發佈於 2024.12.17更新於 2024.12.17

什麼是 $S$

什麼是 AGENT S

Agent S:Web3中自主互動的未來 介紹 在不斷演變的Web3和加密貨幣領域,創新不斷重新定義個人如何與數字平台互動。Agent S是一個開創性的項目,承諾通過其開放的代理框架徹底改變人機互動。Agent S旨在簡化複雜任務,為人工智能(AI)提供變革性的應用,鋪平自主互動的道路。本詳細探索將深入研究該項目的複雜性、其獨特特徵以及對加密貨幣領域的影響。 什麼是Agent S? Agent S是一個突破性的開放代理框架,專門設計用來解決計算機任務自動化中的三個基本挑戰: 獲取特定領域知識:該框架智能地從各種外部知識來源和內部經驗中學習。這種雙重方法使其能夠建立豐富的特定領域知識庫,提升其在任務執行中的表現。 長期任務規劃:Agent S採用經驗增強的分層規劃,這是一種戰略方法,可以有效地分解和執行複雜任務。此特徵顯著提升了其高效和有效地管理多個子任務的能力。 處理動態、不均勻的界面:該項目引入了代理-計算機界面(ACI),這是一種創新的解決方案,增強了代理和用戶之間的互動。利用多模態大型語言模型(MLLMs),Agent S能夠無縫導航和操作各種圖形用戶界面。 通過這些開創性特徵,Agent S提供了一個強大的框架,解決了自動化人機互動中涉及的複雜性,為AI及其他領域的無數應用奠定了基礎。 誰是Agent S的創建者? 儘管Agent S的概念根本上是創新的,但有關其創建者的具體信息仍然難以捉摸。創建者目前尚不清楚,這突顯了該項目的初期階段或戰略選擇將創始成員保密。無論是否匿名,重點仍然在於框架的能力和潛力。 誰是Agent S的投資者? 由於Agent S在加密生態系統中相對較新,關於其投資者和財務支持者的詳細信息並未明確記錄。缺乏對支持該項目的投資基礎或組織的公開見解,引發了對其資金結構和發展路線圖的質疑。了解其支持背景對於評估該項目的可持續性和潛在市場影響至關重要。 Agent S如何運作? Agent S的核心是尖端技術,使其能夠在多種環境中有效運作。其運營模型圍繞幾個關鍵特徵構建: 類人計算機互動:該框架提供先進的AI規劃,力求使與計算機的互動更加直觀。通過模仿人類在任務執行中的行為,承諾提升用戶體驗。 敘事記憶:用於利用高級經驗,Agent S利用敘事記憶來跟蹤任務歷史,從而增強其決策過程。 情節記憶:此特徵為用戶提供逐步指導,使框架能夠在任務展開時提供上下文支持。 支持OpenACI:Agent S能夠在本地運行,使用戶能夠控制其互動和工作流程,與Web3的去中心化理念相一致。 與外部API的輕鬆集成:其多功能性和與各種AI平台的兼容性確保了Agent S能夠無縫融入現有技術生態系統,成為開發者和組織的理想選擇。 這些功能共同促成了Agent S在加密領域的獨特地位,因為它以最小的人類干預自動化複雜的多步任務。隨著項目的發展,其在Web3中的潛在應用可能重新定義數字互動的展開方式。 Agent S的時間線 Agent S的發展和里程碑可以用一個時間線來概括,突顯其重要事件: 2024年9月27日:Agent S的概念在一篇名為《一個像人類一樣使用計算機的開放代理框架》的綜合研究論文中推出,展示了該項目的基礎工作。 2024年10月10日:該研究論文在arXiv上公開,提供了對框架及其基於OSWorld基準的性能評估的深入探索。 2024年10月12日:發布了一個視頻演示,提供了對Agent S能力和特徵的視覺洞察,進一步吸引潛在用戶和投資者。 這些時間線上的標記不僅展示了Agent S的進展,還表明了其對透明度和社區參與的承諾。 有關Agent S的要點 隨著Agent S框架的持續演變,幾個關鍵特徵脫穎而出,強調其創新性和潛力: 創新框架:旨在提供類似人類互動的直觀計算機使用,Agent S為任務自動化帶來了新穎的方法。 自主互動:通過GUI自主與計算機互動的能力標誌著向更智能和高效的計算解決方案邁進了一步。 複雜任務自動化:憑藉其強大的方法論,能夠自動化複雜的多步任務,使過程更快且更少出錯。 持續改進:學習機制使Agent S能夠從過去的經驗中改進,不斷提升其性能和效率。 多功能性:其在OSWorld和WindowsAgentArena等不同操作環境中的適應性確保了它能夠服務於廣泛的應用。 隨著Agent S在Web3和加密領域中的定位,其增強互動能力和自動化過程的潛力標誌著AI技術的一次重大進步。通過其創新框架,Agent S展現了數字互動的未來,為各行各業的用戶承諾提供更無縫和高效的體驗。 結論 Agent S代表了AI與Web3結合的一次大膽飛躍,具有重新定義我們與技術互動方式的能力。儘管仍處於早期階段,但其應用的可能性廣泛且引人入勝。通過其全面的框架解決關鍵挑戰,Agent S旨在將自主互動帶到數字體驗的最前沿。隨著我們深入加密貨幣和去中心化的領域,像Agent S這樣的項目無疑將在塑造技術和人機協作的未來中發揮關鍵作用。

675 人學過發佈於 2025.01.14更新於 2025.01.14

什麼是 AGENT S

如何購買S

歡迎來到HTX.com!在這裡,購買Sonic (S)變得簡單而便捷。跟隨我們的逐步指南,放心開始您的加密貨幣之旅。第一步:創建您的HTX帳戶使用您的 Email、手機號碼在HTX註冊一個免費帳戶。體驗無憂的註冊過程並解鎖所有平台功能。立即註冊第二步:前往買幣頁面,選擇您的支付方式信用卡/金融卡購買:使用您的Visa或Mastercard即時購買Sonic (S)。餘額購買:使用您HTX帳戶餘額中的資金進行無縫交易。第三方購買:探索諸如Google Pay或Apple Pay等流行支付方式以增加便利性。C2C購買:在HTX平台上直接與其他用戶交易。HTX 場外交易 (OTC) 購買:為大量交易者提供個性化服務和競爭性匯率。第三步:存儲您的Sonic (S)購買Sonic (S)後,將其存儲在您的HTX帳戶中。您也可以透過區塊鏈轉帳將其發送到其他地址或者用於交易其他加密貨幣。第四步:交易Sonic (S)在HTX的現貨市場輕鬆交易Sonic (S)。前往您的帳戶,選擇交易對,執行交易,並即時監控。HTX為初學者和經驗豐富的交易者提供了友好的用戶體驗。

1.4k 人學過發佈於 2025.01.15更新於 2025.03.21

如何購買S

相關討論

歡迎來到 HTX 社群。在這裡,您可以了解最新的平台發展動態並獲得專業的市場意見。 以下是用戶對 S (S)幣價的意見。

活动图片