What’s the truth behind RWA tokenization? ‘More friction, more cost’

ambcrypto發佈於 2026-03-04更新於 2026-03-04

文章摘要

The article examines the debate surrounding the real-world asset (RWA) tokenization trend, questioning whether it truly adds value. Analyst Anndy Lian criticizes the sector for contradicting core crypto principles like decentralization and trust minimization, arguing that it introduces more intermediaries, friction, and costs. He believes only tokenized stocks offer a clear advantage over traditional crypto products. Despite these concerns, major institutions like BlackRock and platforms like Robinhood are actively pursuing tokenization, highlighting its potential to democratize access to financial markets. The RWA market has grown to $26 billion, with increasing user adoption. The recent Iran tensions demonstrated the utility of 24/7 trading platforms like Hyperliquid for price discovery and hedging. While challenges remain, the trend appears resilient and may evolve to address existing risks.

Is tokenization, wrapping a real-world asset (RWA) and offering it via crypto rail, really worth it?

There’s been sharp debate over the efficacy of the overall RWA trend after analyst Anndy Lian poked holes into the sector’s value proposition.

For Lian, the sector lacks key crypto ethos (trust minimization, permissionless, and decentralization).

In contrast, it just adds a new layer of middleman and more overhead costs to run 24/7.

For him, the only segment that makes sense is tokenized stock, which is a better offering than crypto perps (perpetual contracts with no expiry dates).

However, in general, the additional layer with similar traditional disclosure requirements just adds to operational cost, warned Lian.

“Reality: tokenizing RWAs adds intermediaries: Legal wrapper entities, custody providers, compliance oracles, insurance layers, off-chain dispute resolution. More parties, more friction, more cost.”

Do benefits outweigh costs?

While Lian’s argument is plausible, the fact that major players like BlackRock are still betting on it means that the benefits could outweigh the mentioned costs.

In fact, the main argument by supporters is that tokenization democratizes access to financial markets.

And Robinhood is already giving European citizens access to U.S. stock markets via crypto rails. Securitize, Ondo Finance, and other issuers have also ramped up scaling.

As of writing, the global RWA market has hit $26 billion, up 8% in the past 30 days of trading. Over the same period, the total asset holders have crossed half a million to 657K users.

And the growth has been tremendous even as the broader crypto rout deepened, underscoring the demand for these RWA products.

Interestingly, the Iran escalations over the weekend reinforced the need for 24/7 markets, especially for hedging purposes.

According to Bloomberg, Hyperliquid was one of the select available and liquid platforms for traders (including speculators) to express their macro views over the weekend as global tensions heightened.

During the tensions, oil, gold, silver, and other derivatives tracking traditional assets hit record highs on Hyperliquid.

For Flowdesk OTC trader Karim Dandashy, Hyperliquid acted as the ‘price discovery over the weekend.’

Put differently, the RWA trend may be here to stay despite the inherent issues highlighted by Lian. Perhaps, it will evolve to better handle the risks raised rather than be stifled by the perceived cost implications.


Final Summary

  • Analyst discredited the tokenization trend as ‘non-crypto’ that adds more friction and cost rather than offering any ‘real value.’
  • BlackRock and Robinhood are still positioning themselves for the tokenization boom, suggesting that the benefits may outweigh the perceived risks.

你可能也喜歡

韩国交易所“大战”监管机构,挑战执法、立法边界

韩国加密行业正与金融监管机构FIU(金融情报分析院)爆发正面冲突。过去FIU通过反洗钱法规对交易所严格处罚,但近期交易所开始通过法律诉讼和行业倡议系统性挑战其监管依据。 首尔行政法院在一审中撤销了FIU对Upbit运营公司Dunamu的部分营业停止处分,认为FIU对违规标准和处罚依据说明不足。法院强调,监管机构实施重罚必须证明交易所在明确规则下存在故意或重大过失。FIU已就此案提出上诉。同样,法院也暂停了FIU对Bithumb的六个月营业停止处分,以避免审理期间造成不可逆的损失。 在立法层面,韩国拟修订《特定金融信息法》,计划将1000万韩元以上加密资产转移一律纳入可疑交易报告范围。行业自律组织DAXA强烈反对,指出该“毒丸条款”可能违反法律保留原则,并将导致STR报告量暴增85倍,淹没真正的高风险信号,反而削弱反洗钱效率。 深层矛盾在于,韩国加密市场活跃但综合监管框架尚未成熟,目前主要依赖FIU的执法。交易所从被动接受转向通过司法和立法程序挑战监管,标志着韩国加密监管进入新阶段,监管规则本身的正当性将受到更严格审视。这场冲突短期内可能升级,但长期或有助于推动韩国建立更成熟、可持续的加密监管体系。

marsbit51 分鐘前

韩国交易所“大战”监管机构,挑战执法、立法边界

marsbit51 分鐘前

50倍存储后,孙宇晨永远在看下一个十年

孙宇晨以拍下巴菲特午餐、吃下天价香蕉等出位行为闻名,也面临SEC诉讼等争议,但其投资眼光常被忽略。早在2016年,他就建议年轻人投资比特币、英伟达、特斯拉等。以英伟达为例,若当时投资1万元,至2026年5月价值约240万元。 2025年底,他预言“存储是新的石油”,随后西部数据分拆的闪迪(SNDK)股价一年内大涨近50倍。当市场狂热追逐存储概念时,孙宇晨已将目光投向更具未来感的赛道:具身智能、无人机、空间计算和太空探索。 他认为,具身智能(如人形机器人)正从执行代码转向“看世界做事”,是AI在物理世界落地的关键。无人机已在军事、农业、物流等领域跑通商业闭环。空间计算(如苹果Vision Pro)旨在让AI理解物理空间,是机器人、自动驾驶等的基础。在太空领域,他本人于2025年乘坐蓝色起源飞船完成亚轨道飞行,并看好太空经济与区块链的结合。 他的投资逻辑是:押注确定性的赛道,两端布局,不赌单家公司。例如在机器人领域,既押注特斯拉(身体/制造),也押注英伟达(大脑/AI芯片);在无人机领域,看好其在军事应用中替代传统装备的趋势;在太空领域,关注即将IPO的SpaceX及其产业链。 孙宇晨将这些趋势串联起来,描绘出一幅“物理AI”改变现实世界运行方式的图景:从工厂机器人到自动驾驶,从无人机蜂群到星际探索。他认为,过去互联网改变了信息流动,而未来AI将重塑物理世界本身。

marsbit1 小時前

50倍存储后,孙宇晨永远在看下一个十年

marsbit1 小時前

史上最昂贵中期选举背后的亿万富翁们

彭博社分析指出,2026年美国中期选举已成为史上最昂贵的一选战,联邦政治委员会已募集超47亿美元,预计政治广告支出将达108亿美元。亿万富豪成为关键资金力量,其捐款不仅争夺国会控制权,也直接影响与自身利益密切相关的政策走向,如财富税、加密货币与人工智能监管等。 目前巨额资金多流向共和党阵营。顶级个人捐赠者包括:乔治·索罗斯(1.026亿美元)主要支持进步主义事业;埃隆·马斯克(8480万美元)大力支持特朗普阵营及共和党竞选委员会;Jeff Yass(8180万美元)是特朗普MAGA Inc.的最大金主之一,关注择校权等议题;OpenAI联合创始人Greg Brockman夫妇(5000万美元)支持特朗普及人工智能议题。 其他重要捐赠者有:Richard Uihlein(4530万美元)资助保守派议程;风投家Marc Andreessen(4470万美元)和Ben Horowitz(4440万美元)聚焦加密货币与人工智能政策;Miriam Adelson(4260万美元)长期支持特朗普及亲以色列政策;对冲基金大佬Paul Singer(3392万美元)转向支持特朗普对以强硬立场;建材巨头Diane Hendricks(2579万美元)亦是特朗普的坚定支持者。 匿名政治捐款的占比持续攀升。随着11月选举日临近,预计将有更多富豪加入顶级捐赠者行列。这场选举的结果将深刻影响美国未来两年的政策方向。

marsbit1 小時前

史上最昂贵中期选举背后的亿万富翁们

marsbit1 小時前

交易

現貨
合約
活动图片