Uniswap Wins Legal Battle as U.S. Federal Judge Dismisses Crypto Rug-Pull Lawsuit

TheNewsCrypto發佈於 2026-03-03更新於 2026-03-03

文章摘要

A U.S. federal judge dismissed a class-action lawsuit against Uniswap Labs and its founder, Hayden Adams, which sought to hold the decentralized exchange accountable for alleged rug pulls and pump-and-dump schemes on its platform. Judge Katherine Polk Failla ruled that Uniswap cannot be held responsible for the fraudulent actions of anonymous token issuers, emphasizing that operating a decentralized, open-source trading platform does not constitute assisting fraud. The plaintiffs had refiled the case with state-level consumer protection claims after an earlier dismissal, but the court reaffirmed legal protections for DeFi infrastructure. Following the decision, Uniswap's native token UNI saw a price increase and higher trading volume. The ruling is seen as a significant legal victory for the DeFi sector.

Uniswap Labs and its founder, Hayden Adams, saw a significant legal victory when a US federal judge dismissed a four-year-old class-action complaint seeking to hold the decentralized exchange accountable for rug pull and pump-and-dump fraud on its platform.

The decision was delivered by Judge Katherine Polk Failla in Manhattan on March 2, ruling that Uniswap cannot be held responsible for the actions of anonymous token issuers and that operating as a decentralized platform providing an open‐source trading environment does not constitute assisting fraud.

Federal Court Backs DeFi Infrastructure

Nessa Risley led the plaintiffs and filed the first lawsuit against Hayden Adams and Uniswap in April 2022. The lawsuit was dismissed in August 2023 and upheld on appeal. Again, the plaintiffs refiled in May; this time, they switched to state consumer protection concerns and claimed that the platform permitted pump-and-dump schemes and rug pulls.

The court upheld the legal safeguards for open-source DeFi platforms by rejecting the arguments once more.

Then, Brian, policy and legal lead at Uniswap Labs, said the ruling marks “another precedent-setting win for DeFi,” He stressed that even though the plaintiffs switched to state-level claims, the court once more determined that Uniswap cannot be held accountable for stated scams carried out by anonymous third-party token issuers, adding that it “defies logic” to hold a smart contract developer accountable for how others abuse the protocol.

As this decision marks Uniswap’s another major courtroom victory, as in February, Bancor-affiliated entities filed a patent infringement lawsuit against the exchange, which was dismissed by a New York federal judge, ruling that the patents at issue were based on abstract ideas and therefore not eligible for protection under U.S. patent law.

Following the ruling and continued legal wins, UNI is trading up about 1.5%, at $3.86, with a total market cap of $2.45 billion. Also, the 24-hour trading volume climbed over 23%, which signals increased market activity.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Hong Kong and Shanghai Authorities Integrate Cargo Data on Blockchain

TagsUNIUniswap

相關問答

QWhat was the outcome of the US federal judge's ruling regarding Uniswap Labs and the class-action lawsuit?

AThe US federal judge dismissed the class-action complaint against Uniswap Labs, ruling that the decentralized exchange cannot be held accountable for rug pull and pump-and-dump fraud conducted by anonymous token issuers on its platform.

QWho is the judge that delivered the decision in the Uniswap lawsuit and on what date?

AJudge Katherine Polk Failla in Manhattan delivered the decision on March 2.

QWhat did the plaintiffs claim in their refiled lawsuit against Uniswap in May?

AThe plaintiffs refiled the lawsuit switching to state consumer protection concerns, claiming that the platform permitted pump-and-dump schemes and rug pulls.

QHow did the legal representative of Uniswap Labs characterize this court ruling?

ABrian, the policy and legal lead at Uniswap Labs, said the ruling marks 'another precedent-setting win for DeFi' and stated that it 'defies logic' to hold a smart contract developer accountable for how others abuse the protocol.

QWhat was the market reaction of UNI token following the court ruling?

AFollowing the ruling, UNI was trading up about 1.5% at $3.86, with a 24-hour trading volume that climbed over 23%, signaling increased market activity.

你可能也喜歡

TechFlow 情报局:特朗普关联公司在访华前转移 1200 万美元资产,大空头原型再次警告美股泡沫

近日科技与财经领域动态频出。AI安全成为焦点:Mozilla首次用AI进行大规模代码审查并发现大量漏洞,Google确认黑客已使用AI工具发现并利用零日漏洞发动攻击。同时,ChatGPT内容进入教科书引发争议,OpenAI使用未公开的GPT-5.5检查数学题目错误,Anthropic扫描并销毁百万实体书用于AI训练被法院裁定为“合理使用”。Google疑似泄露的新视频模型“Omni”在文字连贯性上表现突出。 加密市场方面,美国银行业试图阻止允许稳定币支付收益的法案条款但遭白宫拒绝,贝莱德选择以太坊作为代币化基金平台。值得注意的是,特朗普关联公司在其访华前转移了1200万美元加密资产。 芯片与硬件领域,台积电向美国工厂追加巨额投资,而随特朗普访华的科技领袖名单中未见英伟达CEO黄仁勋。 科技公司动态包括:GitLab裁员并放弃原有价值观,Meta被指控由扎克伯格授权使用盗版内容训练AI,欧盟拟立法限制美国云巨头处理政府敏感数据,微软因监控问题解雇以色列子公司负责人。 美股市场,《大空头》原型人物迈克尔·伯里再次警告美股泡沫风险,相关历史对比文章引发投资者热议。 其他要闻包括:国际油价因地缘紧张突破100美元,京沪高铁宣布涨价,以及宇树公司发布低价人形机器人。 贯穿各领域的暗线是,AI正从工具转变为基础设施,对旧秩序构成替代压力,而新秩序尚未成熟,导致市场出现普遍焦虑。

marsbit1 小時前

TechFlow 情报局:特朗普关联公司在访华前转移 1200 万美元资产,大空头原型再次警告美股泡沫

marsbit1 小時前

2026新政解读:智能体与AI终端的"双向奔赴",AIoT产业迎来三大价值重构

2026年5月8日,中国发布了两项重磅AIoT产业政策:一是《智能体规范应用与创新发展实施意见》,首次从国家层面定义了具备自主能力的智能体并列出19个典型应用场景;二是《人工智能终端智能化分级》国家标准,为七大品类终端建立了L1到L4的四级智能化阶梯。这两项政策构成“灵肉双轨”的顶层设计,标志着中国正将AIoT定义为“智能基础设施”。 政策的核心意义在于:将AI能力从模糊概念变为可衡量的工程指标;明确智能体为独立产品形态而非功能模块;通过起草单位揭示了未来产业链的关键竞争节点。这为产业提供了清晰的“能力地图”、“风险地图”和“方向地图”。 其中,L4协同级是未来最大变数,它将推动产业价值从“万物智联”(连接)转向“万物智行”(代理)。在C端,用户与设备关系将从操作工具变为委托代理;在B端,将从数据看板转向由多个智能体协同的自主执行。跨过L4的厂商将定义规则、占据价值中枢。 面对未来18-24个月的关键窗口期,AIoT企业需在三类赛道中选择:成为标准定义者、场景集成者或底座构建者。并可采用“四借”策略:借助L级国标获取背书与红利;借助19个典型场景进行深耕;借助开源生态降低成本或卡位;借助国内外协议生态抢占先机。 这组政策是未来十年产业竞速的发令枪,企业需明确自身定位,把握从“智联”到“智行”的范式转变机遇。

marsbit2 小時前

2026新政解读:智能体与AI终端的"双向奔赴",AIoT产业迎来三大价值重构

marsbit2 小時前

交易

現貨
合約
活动图片