‘Scammers are liable’: Uniswap CEO reacts to landmark court dismissal

ambcrypto發佈於 2026-03-03更新於 2026-03-03

文章摘要

In a landmark ruling, a New York federal court dismissed a lawsuit against Uniswap that sought to hold the decentralized exchange and its CEO, Hayden Adams, liable for financial losses users suffered from scam tokens traded on its platform. Judge Katherine Polk Failla ruled that Uniswap cannot be held responsible for the misconduct of unidentified third-party token issuers, stating it defies logic to hold the drafter of open-source code accountable for a third party’s misuse of the platform. The case, ongoing since April 2022, was dismissed with prejudice. Uniswap’s CEO hailed the decision as a "good, sensible outcome" and a significant legal precedent for DeFi, emphasizing that scammers—not open-source developers—should be held liable for fraud. The ruling is seen as a major win for the DeFi industry, providing decentralized platforms greater legal protection and breathing room. Following the news, Uniswap’s native token UNI saw a brief price increase of approximately 5%. The case may influence ongoing legislative efforts, such as the CLARITY Act, which aims to establish safe harbor protections for open-source developers in crypto.

DeFi exchange Uniswap has hailed the latest court ruling that dismissed a case that sought to hold it accountable for scam tokens traded on the platform.

In an opinion issued on the 2nd of March, federal Judge Katherine Polk Failla of the Southern District of New York (SDNY) dismissed the complaint with prejudice.

Judge Failla ruled that the petitioners can not hold Uniswap CEO Hayden Adams and Uniswap Labs (defendants) responsible for misconduct carried out by unidentified third-party token issuers.

The petitioners claimed losses from trading tokens on the Uniswap platform. They alleged the tokens were ‘rug pulls’ and ‘pump and dump’ schemes.

According to them, Uniswap facilitated fraud by running a marketplace that allows the selling and buying of these alleged scam tokens.

But the court dismissed this argument, stating that,

“It defies logic that a drafter of computer code underlying a particular software platform could be liable under Section 29(b) for a third-party’s misuse of that platform.”

Uniswap leadership hails the ruling

The case has been running since April 2022. Reacting to the ruling, Uniswap CEO called it a ‘good, sensible outcome’ and a new legal precedent for the sector.

“If you write open source smart contract code, and the code is used by scammers, the scammers are liable, not the open source developers.”

Stani Kulechov, Founder of Aave, called the update a “great win for DeFi.”

The change gives DeFi players breathing room. Fully decentralized platforms will no longer face legal liability for losses caused by third-party token issuers.

Lawmakers are also pushing for a safe harbor for open-source developers in the crypto market structure bill, the CLARITY Act. Still, the final draft will determine whether those developer protections actually hold.

Uniswap is one of the largest DeFi platforms and has operated for over eight years. Since its inception, the exchange has recorded a cumulative of over $5 billion in fees and recently activated a token accrual program for its governance token UNI.

Following the court update, the Uniswap [UNI] token surged by about 5%, but was still stuck between $3.6 and $4.2 short-term price range.


Final Summary

  • Judge Failla ruled that Uniswap and other DeFi platforms can’t be held responsible for misconduct done by unidentified third-party token issuers.
  • The case could set the tone for the protection of open-source DeFi developers, according to policy watchers.

相關問答

QWhat was the outcome of the court case against Uniswap regarding scam tokens?

AThe court dismissed the case with prejudice, ruling that Uniswap and its CEO could not be held liable for the misconduct of unidentified third-party token issuers.

QWho was the judge that issued the ruling in the Uniswap case?

AFederal Judge Katherine Polk Failla of the Southern District of New York (SDNY) issued the opinion.

QWhat was the core legal argument the judge used to dismiss the complaint?

AThe judge stated that it defies logic to hold the drafter of computer code liable for a third party's misuse of that platform under Section 29(b).

QHow did Uniswap CEO Hayden Adams react to the court's decision?

AHe called it a 'good, sensible outcome' and a new legal precedent, stating that scammers are liable, not the open-source developers.

QWhat was the immediate market reaction of the UNI token following the court update?

AThe UNI token surged by about 5% following the court ruling.

你可能也喜歡

交易

現貨
合約

熱門文章

如何購買T

歡迎來到HTX.com!在這裡,購買Threshold Network Token (T)變得簡單而便捷。跟隨我們的逐步指南,放心開始您的加密貨幣之旅。第一步:創建您的HTX帳戶使用您的 Email、手機號碼在HTX註冊一個免費帳戶。體驗無憂的註冊過程並解鎖所有平台功能。立即註冊第二步:前往買幣頁面,選擇您的支付方式信用卡/金融卡購買:使用您的Visa或Mastercard即時購買Threshold Network Token (T)。餘額購買:使用您HTX帳戶餘額中的資金進行無縫交易。第三方購買:探索諸如Google Pay或Apple Pay等流行支付方式以增加便利性。C2C購買:在HTX平台上直接與其他用戶交易。HTX 場外交易 (OTC) 購買:為大量交易者提供個性化服務和競爭性匯率。第三步:存儲您的Threshold Network Token (T)購買Threshold Network Token (T)後,將其存儲在您的HTX帳戶中。您也可以透過區塊鏈轉帳將其發送到其他地址或者用於交易其他加密貨幣。第四步:交易Threshold Network Token (T)在HTX的現貨市場輕鬆交易Threshold Network Token (T)。前往您的帳戶,選擇交易對,執行交易,並即時監控。HTX為初學者和經驗豐富的交易者提供了友好的用戶體驗。

612 人學過發佈於 2024.12.10更新於 2025.03.21

如何購買T

相關討論

歡迎來到 HTX 社群。在這裡,您可以了解最新的平台發展動態並獲得專業的市場意見。 以下是用戶對 T (T)幣價的意見。

活动图片