OCC Highlights Major Concerns Over Crypto Debanking Practices Among Major Banks

bitcoinist發佈於 2025-12-11更新於 2025-12-11

文章摘要

The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) has raised concerns over "harmful debanking policies" among nine major US banks, including JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, and Wells Fargo. A review found that between 2020 and 2023, these institutions restricted services or imposed heightened scrutiny on customers in legal industries—including crypto, oil and gas, firearms, and adult entertainment—based on the banks' own values rather than legality. OCC Comptroller Jonathan V. Gould criticized the use of "government-granted charter and market power" for such practices. The agency is evaluating thousands of debanking complaints and recently allowed national banks to facilitate crypto transactions, aiming to provide a more regulated environment than external exchanges.

On Wednesday, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) released findings that have raised alarm bells regarding crypto debanking, reigniting fears of what some are dubbing “Operation Chokepoint 2.0” within the financial sector.

This supervisory review focused on nine of the largest national banks under OCC supervision, including JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Citibank, Wells Fargo, US Bank, Capital One, PNC Bank, TD Bank, and BMO Bank.

‘Harmful Debanking Policies’

The preliminary findings from the OCC reveal troubling trends: between 2020 and 2023, these banks appeared to make unwarranted distinctions among customers based on their legal business activities.

Specifically, many of these institutions maintained policies that either restricted access to financial services or required heightened scrutiny and approvals for certain clients.

The OCC identified examples where at least one bank imposed limitations on various sectors, including crypto, due to their engagement in activities considered “contrary to [the bank’s] values,” even though those activities were not illegal.

Sectors affected by these policies included oil and gas exploration, coal mining, firearms, private prisons, tobacco and e-cigarettes, adult entertainment, and notably, digital assets.

The findings indicated that many banks placed strict limitations on crypto-related activities as well, which often stemmed from concerns about financial crime.

These practices, the OCC confirmed, were prevalent at each of the banks examined in the review. Comptroller Jonathan V. Gould expressed frustration regarding the situation, stating:

It is unfortunate that the nation’s largest banks thought these harmful debanking policies were an appropriate use of their government-granted charter and market power.

Gould noted that while many of these policies were publicly announced, some banks have maintained that they did not participate in debanking.

In his comments, Comptroller Gould emphasized the OCC’s commitment to eliminating practices that would “weaponize finance,” whether instigated by regulators or the banks themselves.

National Banks To Facilitate Crypto Transactions

The agency disclosed that it is still evaluating “thousands of complaints” related to allegations of political and religious debanking, with plans to report on these findings “in due course.” The OCC aims to hold banks accountable for these actions and ensure that unlawful debanking practices do not persist.

This follows Tuesday’s letter from the banking regulator that allows national banks to participate in “riskless principal transactions” involving cryptocurrencies. This permits national banks to buy and sell cryptocurrencies for their customers’ accounts.

This new structure allows users to transact in crypto-assets through established national banks, resulting in a more regulated environment than exchanges that operate outside of strict oversight regulation.

The daily chart shows the total crypto market cap valuation at $3.16 trillion. Source: TOTAL on TradingView.com

Featured image from DALL-E, chart from TradingView.com

你可能也喜歡

Bittensor 的智力套利陷阱:资本只炒代币,优质 AI 无人买单

本文探讨了去中心化人工智能网络Bittensor存在的机制缺陷与资本炒作风险。Bittensor通过代币TAO激励开发者构建AI子网,但其奖励分配机制核心依赖于各子网原生代币(Alpha)的价格或资金流动,而非AI成果的实际质量或商业化收入。这导致了一个自我强化的循环:资金推高代币价格→子网获得更多TAO奖励→持有者收益增加并可能继续买入。然而,该体系缺乏对真实用户付费和使用量的衡量,价值锚定薄弱。 文章指出系统存在两大漏洞:一是验证者评分机制在作弊方控制过半质押量时会失效,可能导致矿工与验证者串通套利;二是存在“评分复制”问题,部分验证者无需实际工作即可获利。尽管项目方通过硬分叉尝试修复,但规则频繁变更(从代币价格到资金流再改回价格)显示出其根本症结:激励标尺是代币流通收益而非真实业务价值。 目前,少数运营商掌控大量质押代币,市场资金空转明显。尽管存在缺陷,作者认为Bittensor在推动分布式AI基础设施(如算力、训练资源)方面仍有价值,类似于互联网泡沫催生了光纤网络。同时,Grayscale等机构申请Bittensor ETF若获批准,虽会引入风险,但大量传统资金和监管审查也可能倒逼生态优化。最终,文章呼吁关注其构建开放、非垄断AI生态的潜力,期待子网未来能脱离补贴实现自我造血。

Foresight News1 小時前

Bittensor 的智力套利陷阱:资本只炒代币,优质 AI 无人买单

Foresight News1 小時前

交易

現貨
活动图片