Kyle Samani Is Back: This Time, We're Outperforming CEX in Efficiency!

marsbit發佈於 2026-03-12更新於 2026-03-12

文章摘要

Kyle Samani, former co-founder of Multicoin Capital, has returned to advocate for PropAMM, a breakthrough in market microstructure innovation on Solana. He argues that PropAMM could surpass traditional centralized exchanges (CEXs) in efficiency by hosting market maker algorithms directly on the blockchain, eliminating latency from bidirectional communication between exchanges and market makers. In CEXs, market makers co-locate servers and constantly exchange data with the exchange, leading to delays. In contrast, PropAMM runs algorithms on the same physical hardware as the Solana blockchain, allowing price updates to occur almost instantaneously within the same silicon chip. This reduces latency significantly compared to traditional systems. Currently, PropAMM already offers narrower spreads for SOL-USDC spot trading than major CEXs. Samani expects it to dominate on-chain trading this year, including spots, perpetuals, and prediction markets. Challenges remain in ensuring best execution for takers due to private algorithms and non-deterministic routing, but solutions from aggregators like Jupiter and dFlow are anticipated. Upcoming Solana upgrades—such as higher compute limits, reduced slot times, and lower network latency—will further enhance PropAMM performance, solidifying its advantage over CEXs.

Source:Kyle Samani

Compiled | Odaily Planet Daily (@OdailyChina); Translator | Azuma (@azuma_eth)

Editor's Note: The man who knows best how to promote Solana, former co-founder of Multicoin Capital Kyle Samani, who had loudly exited the crypto world not long ago, is back!

Last night, Kyle Samani posted a long Thread on his personal X account. In the post, Kyle Samani once again demonstrated his highly persuasive "promotion" (not derogatory here) rhetoric, using "efficiency"—a weak point in the decentralized narrative—as a breakthrough. He detailed how the PropAMM currently being promoted in the Solana ecosystem will catch up with or even surpass traditional centralized models in efficiency, arguing that PropAMM is one of the most important innovations in market microstructure in recent years, or even decades.

  • Related articles: 《The Man Who Knows Best How to Promote SOL Exits the Crypto World》; 《Is There More to Kyle Samani's Exit?》.

Below is the original content by Kyle Samani, compiled by Odaily Planet Daily.

PropAMM is one of the most important innovations in market microstructure in recent years, and perhaps even one of the most significant in decades.

To help everyone understand this conclusion, let's first look at how market makers (MM) quote prices on traditional centralized exchanges (CEX).

Market makers typically physically co-locate with the exchange. Each market maker runs an algorithm on a server and connects to another server running the exchange's system via a network cable of uniform length (e.g., 50 meters).

A massive stream of data is constantly sent back and forth between market makers and the exchange. Every time a market maker sends an order to the exchange—whether it's a limit order, cancellation, or market order—the exchange must broadcast this information to all other market makers; then, other market makers resend their own orders based on the new information; this cycle repeats indefinitely.

Here is a simple diagram.

Now let's look at how propAMM works on the Solana mainnet.

The beauty of propAMM on Solana is that the blockchain itself directly "hosts" the market maker algorithms. This means the system no longer needs to send billions of messages back and forth between market makers and the exchange; the market-making algorithms will run directly on the same physical machine as the exchange.

The new diagram is as follows. (Yes, only the Solana blockchain is needed!)

There has long been a common view in the cryptocurrency industry that decentralized systems must be slower (have higher latency) than centralized systems because they require communication between global nodes.

But if you think about it differently, on-chain hosted algorithms may actually have lower latency than traditional centralized exchanges in finance.

Why is that? The reason is that the latency required for propAMM to update prices only involves electrons moving within the same physical piece of silicon. For example, if the last market order causes a change in the SOL-USD price, this information is immediately visible to all propAMMs and used to price the next market order. Everything happens within the same piece of silicon; no bidirectional communication between servers is needed.

It's worth noting that propAMM does require frequent oracle updates, but this is not a problem and does not change the overall fact I described above.

The most critical point remains: when the exchange—in this case, the Solana blockchain—directly hosts the propAMM algorithms, the market makers' pricing changes in real-time within the same physical piece of silicon.

propAMM has already become the dominant mechanism for SOL-USDC spot quotes on Solana, with narrower spreads than all major CEXs. I expect this market structure to become the dominant model for on-chain trading this year, including spot, perpetual contracts (perps), and even prediction markets.

The biggest challenge for propAMM is that there is currently no way to ensure that the taker always gets the best execution, because:

  • All propAMM algorithms are not public (which is reasonable, as traditional market-making algorithms are also proprietary);
  • When routing trades between multiple propAMMs, the result is non-deterministic.

However, this problem can be solved. I expect all relevant aggregator teams to launch solutions this year, such as Jupiter and dFlow for spot, and Phoenix for contracts.

Current propAMM is still not fully optimized and is subject to various limitations of the Solana blockchain itself. This year, Solana will roll out a series of major upgrades that will significantly improve propAMM's performance, including:

  1. Higher CU (compute unit) limits per transaction and larger transaction sizes;
  2. Higher CU limits per block;
  3. Alpenglow: reducing slot time from 400ms to 100–150ms;
  4. DoubleZero: reducing global network latency;
  5. Application-controlled execution;
  6. Multiple concurrent leaders.

If propAMM on the Solana mainnet can already offer narrower quotes than all CEXs without these upgrades, imagine how powerful they will become as these upgrades are gradually implemented.

相關問答

QWhat is PropAMM and why does Kyle Samani consider it a major innovation in market microstructure?

APropAMM is a mechanism on Solana where market-making algorithms are hosted directly on the blockchain, eliminating the need for constant bidirectional communication between market makers and exchanges. Kyle Samani considers it one of the most important innovations in market microstructure in recent years, or even decades, because it significantly improves efficiency by running algorithms on the same physical hardware as the exchange, reducing latency and narrowing spreads compared to traditional CEXs.

QHow does PropAMM on Solana achieve lower latency compared to traditional centralized exchanges (CEXs)?

APropAMM achieves lower latency by hosting market-making algorithms directly on the Solana blockchain, which runs on the same physical hardware. This means price updates and order processing occur within the same silicon chip, eliminating the delay caused by network communication between separate servers in traditional CEX setups. Electronic movements within the chip are faster than inter-server data transfers.

QWhat current evidence does Kyle Samani provide to show PropAMM's effectiveness on Solana?

AKyle Samani points out that PropAMM has become the dominant mechanism for SOL-USDC spot quotes on Solana, with narrower spreads than all major centralized exchanges (CEXs). This demonstrates its superior performance in market efficiency and execution quality compared to traditional systems.

QWhat are the main challenges facing PropAMM, and how does Samani expect them to be addressed?

AThe main challenges are ensuring best execution for takers, as PropAMM algorithms are not public and routing between multiple PropAMMs is non-deterministic. Samani expects solutions to be developed by aggregator teams like Jupiter and dFlow for spot trading, and Phoenix for perpetual contracts, within the year to optimize routing and execution.

QWhat upcoming Solana upgrades does Samani mention that will further enhance PropAMM performance?

ASamani mentions several Solana upgrades: higher CU (Compute Unit) limits per transaction and larger transaction sizes, higher CU limits per block, Alpenglow (reducing slot time from 400ms to 100-150ms), DoubleZero (reducing global network latency), application-controlled execution, and multiple concurrent leaders. These will collectively boost PropAMM efficiency and performance.

你可能也喜歡

意大利央行未发现稳定币在汇款中存在系统性优势

意大利银行的一项研究显示,稳定币在跨境汇款中并未展现出持续的成本与速度优势。其潜在优势被法币出入金手续费以及本地支付基础设施的处理流程所抵消。 研究比较了通过200 USDC在意大利与巴西、阿根廷、日本、阿联酋和南非等10条双向通道进行汇款的成本与结算时间,并与标准汇款服务进行对比。 结果显示,稳定币转账的总成本在0.3%到近9%之间波动,具体取决于汇款方向。在具备即时支付系统的通道中,结算可在20分钟内完成;若缺乏此类基础设施,则需一至两个工作日。 主要成本和延迟源于货币兑换以及当地基础设施的质量。区块链网络手续费并非主要因素。 尽管在大多数研究通道中,稳定币成本低于世界银行统计的全球平均汇款成本(6.65%),但与传统汇款服务商Wise相比,仅在七条可比通道中的三条具备成本优势。 研究者认为,若稳定币能直接用于商品服务消费而无需兑换成当地货币,其优势将更为明显。同时指出,禁令性监管无法消除市场对稳定币的需求,而过严的规则只会增加零售用户的使用难度。 此外,报告提及,稳定币总市值在7月已从5月峰值下跌超100亿美元,至约3100亿美元,创下自2022年5月Terra崩溃以来的最大月度跌幅。

cryptonews.ru1 小時前

意大利央行未发现稳定币在汇款中存在系统性优势

cryptonews.ru1 小時前

比特币热潮正酣:塞勒尔新声明引发关于购买的猜测

纳斯达克上市公司MicroStrategy(代码:MSTR)的执行董事长迈克尔·塞勒于8月2日发布信息“Bitcoin Drive engaged”(比特币驱动已启动),再次引发市场对于该公司将在周一宣布新一轮比特币购买的猜测。其周日的帖子附带了该公司惯用的购买追踪图表,这符合塞勒通常在每周财报发布前暗示其金库变动的做法。 塞勒的附图报告显示,MicroStrategy的比特币储备为843,775枚BTC,市值约532.5亿美元。平均购买成本为每枚75,653美元,未实现亏损为105.8亿美元(-16.58%)。截至8月2日,累计进行了113次购买操作。 此前在7月27日,类似的周日信号曾预告了公司的公告,当时塞勒发文称“我们还需要一种颜色”,随后MicroStrategy披露了其更大的现金储备。这种时间上的巧合强化了市场对周一将发布新金库状况公告的预期。 然而,该公司实时账本显示,在最近两次共计出售3,588枚BTC(包括1,363枚和2,225枚)后,其比特币储备已从847,363枚降至843,775枚。根据提交给美国证券交易委员会(SEC)的文件,这些出售是为了资助优先股支付并补充美元储备。最近的报告还显示,在截至7月26日的一周内,MicroStrategy没有购买任何比特币,同时将其美元储备增加至约37.5亿美元,这使其优先股股息和债务利息的预计覆盖期限延长至约2.1年。 财务风险依然高企,该公司报告2026年第二季度运营亏损83.3亿美元,与上年同期140.3亿美元的运营利润形成急剧逆转。这些业绩包含了公司数字资产方面83.2亿美元的未实现亏损,而2025年第二季度为未实现利润140.5亿美元。 管理层还可能通过额外出售比特币获得高达12.5亿美元,以补充用于支付优先股股息和债务利息的美元储备。因此,预计周一的披露将揭示“Bitcoin Drive”信息是否标志着资产积累的恢复,因为MicroStrategy需要在平衡其843,775枚BTC自有储备与不断增长的现金负债和积极的资本管理之间做出抉择。

cryptonews.ru1 小時前

比特币热潮正酣:塞勒尔新声明引发关于购买的猜测

cryptonews.ru1 小時前

交易

現貨
活动图片