Bitcoin's Financial War: How Digital Gold is Disrupting the Traditional Banking System?

Author: Wang Lijie

"Financialists": An Empire Built on Debt Stacking

First, let's get to know one faction—the "Financialists." Who are they? They include the Federal Reserve, JPMorgan Chase, the historic banking families of Europe, and the complex derivatives markets that support them. It can be said that since secretly establishing the skeleton of a synthetic monetary system in a small room in 1913, they have controlled the world for over a century.

Their core means of controlling the world is not through direct ownership of assets, but through the continuous circulation and accumulation of "debt."

• Collateral
• Yield
• Price Signals
• Credit System
• Eurodollars, Swaps, Futures, Repo

These tools are layered and interconnected like a tightly packed Luohan formation, firmly gripping the entire financial轨道 and monetary flow. They are like "behind-the-scenes assassins" in the financial world, building a vast financial empire with debt.

"Sovereignists": Seeking a Way Out

In stark contrast to the "Financialists" is another emerging force—the "Sovereignists." They include:

• Nations trying to break free from the钳制 of dollar hegemony
• Enterprises tired of the inefficiency and层层盘剥 of the banking system
• And ordinary people like you and me, who choose to firmly control their wealth in their own hands and pursue "permissionless" assets

Although their motivations differ, their core诉求殊途同归: they all渴望 to find a way out of the old, constantly吸血 financial system. And Bitcoin has become the first "escape pod" they see.

Bitcoin's "Fuse" and MicroStrategy's Qualitative Change

Initially, what ignited this war was not Bitcoin itself. Bitcoin was more like a fuse; it shook people's perceptions and demonstrated another financial possibility. However, what truly撼动 the power foundation of the old world was MicroStrategy. This company proved through its actions that Bitcoin can serve as collateral and be deeply integrated into the capital markets—a qualitative change in its status within the financial system.

To understand this transformation more clearly, we must mention a product that sounds quite hardcore—STRC. STRC is not an ordinary bond, nor is it a typical new financial product; it wasn't even created out of thin air by MicroStrategy.

STRC: A Disruptive Bitcoin Financial Engine

STRC is the world's first regulated financial engine collateralized by Bitcoin. What does this mean? It means that ordinary savers can now openly purchase, within their brokerage accounts, a yield-generating product backed by Bitcoin. You don't need a bank account, nor do you need to venture into the complex shadow banking system. Even more notably, the current STRC yield can reach up to 10.75%, starkly contrasting with traditional bank savings interest rates, which typically range from 0.1% to 1%.

However, what is most remarkable about STRC is not just its high yield, but the monetary feedback loop it embodies—this is the fundamental reason why the "Financialists" are restless.

• Investors buy STRC: Funds flow into MicroStrategy.
• MicroStrategy uses these funds to buy real Bitcoin: The supply of Bitcoin in the market tightens.
• Bitcoin price rises: As supply decreases and demand increases.
• The value of Bitcoin as collateral increases: MicroStrategy's borrowing costs decrease accordingly.
• Lower costs attract more investors to buy STRC: Forming a virtuous cycle, the company needs to buy more Bitcoin.

This is a perfect self-reinforcing flywheel, a perpetual motion machine of ever-increasing scarcity! This is the core of what truly frightens the traditional financial giants.

The traditional banking system cannot run this mechanism. They cannot accept Bitcoin as collateral, cannot use Bitcoin for settlement, cannot凭空 "print" Bitcoin, and cannot easily freeze it. In the past, they could control everything because they could无限创造 "debt"; now, Bitcoin is a physical thing, a hard currency.

JPMorgan's Sniper Attack and the "Synthetic Counterattack"

In July 2025, JPMorgan's "Prime Brokerage" department suddenly announced that it would significantly increase MicroStrategy's margin requirement from 50% to 95%. This means that if you want to buy $100,000 worth of MSTR stock, you now need to put up $95,000 in cash, almost堵死了 the possibility of leveraged trading.

This is not a normal market adjustment.要知道, JPMorgan did not take similar action against high-volatility stocks like Tesla, Nvidia, or Coinbase. MSTR became the sole target. Behind this, it's clearly not simple market competition, but更像 a预谋ed, coordinated suppression campaign.

紧接着, the "synthetic counterattack" followed. On November 25, 2025, JPMorgan filed with the SEC to launch a leveraged Bitcoin-linked structured note tied to BlackRock's IBIT ETF. This is a textbook demonstration of Wall Street's "old tricks."

History Repeats: The Unreplicable "Monetary Physics"

Looking back at history, whether it was the transition of the US from agricultural finance to industrial finance in the early 20th century, or the patterns of power concentration and narrative control over the past century, we find惊人 similarities. Whenever the old system is threatened, the response is always to concentrate power, control the narrative, and suppress everything that doesn't fit the new standards.

However, the script cannot be reused this time. Because the real war has already surpassed Bitcoin vs. the dollar, or even Bitcoin vs. Wall Street. It is about the争夺 of "轨道"—those systems that channel value into Bitcoin and create credit from Bitcoin. Whoever controls these轨道 controls the future monetary system.

MicroStrategy, through its STRC product, has exposed a secret Wall Street doesn't want the world to know: Bitcoin *can* function as flawless collateral in the capital markets!

Once this fact surfaced, the model of the "Financialists" began to瓦解. For over a hundred years, their power was rooted in the ability to multiply collateral: gold could have a 100:1 paper claim system built upon it, dollars were infinitely multiplied through fractional reserve banking, and treasuries were repeatedly rehypothecated within the banking system. However, Bitcoin breaks all these advantages. You can create synthetic Bitcoin exposure, but you cannot create synthetic Bitcoin collateral!

Wall Street's Demand: Submission and争夺

Wall Street's own behavior is the best proof. BlackRock launched the fastest-growing ETF in history, and its underlying asset is not bonds, stocks, or gold, but Bitcoin! Fidelity, Franklin Templeton followed suit. Even JPMorgan, which had raised margin requirements for MicroStrategy and specifically targeted Bitcoin-related companies, is now racing to launch Bitcoin-linked structured notes. This makes one reflect: "Why?"

The answer is simple: they深知 Bitcoin is becoming what—a new collateral layer that will absorb more liquidity than any other asset in the financial system.

极

Your Choice: Own the Real Asset

However, you don't need to buy these synthetic versions at all. You don't need banks to act on your behalf, nor do you need those structured notes, third-party custodians, or derivative desks. You can directly own Bitcoin—this real asset, this scarce collateral—which is exactly what Wall Street is scrambling to package, repackage, and try to strip from your hands! This is the real return.

The "Financialists" are not fighting against Bitcoin because it poses a threat; they are fighting to get a piece of the pie because they realize Bitcoin is the cornerstone of the next system. They try to control the轨道 because they know where the flow of liquidity is going. But you, you don't need their轨道. Bitcoin has already provided its own轨道 for you.

Those who can understand this early and prepare before this transformation becomes一目了然 will be the true winners in this era of change. The choice is now in your hands.

Recommended Reading:

Why Isn't Asia's Largest Bitcoin Treasury Company Metaplanet Buying the Dip?

Multicoin Capital: The Era of Fintech 4.0 Has Arrived

a16z's Heavily Funded Web3 Unicorn Farcaster Forced to Pivot, Is Web3 Social a False Proposition?