On the Eve of Circle's Earnings Report, Wall Street Shows Major Divergence in CRCL Valuation

marsbit發佈於 2026-08-04更新於 2026-08-04

文章摘要

On the eve of Circle (CRCL) releasing its quarterly earnings report, Wall Street analysts are deeply divided over the company's valuation. Morgan Stanley downgraded Circle from "Equal Weight" to "Underweight," slashing its price target from $106 to $38. Analyst James Faucette argues the market overestimates the growth potential of Circle's core USDC stablecoin, noting its circulation hasn't increased since Q3 2025 and new use cases beyond remittances and card spending are limited. He warns that slowing USDC growth could pressure the crucial "reserve income" and shift revenue toward lower-margin transaction fees. In stark contrast, TD Cowen initiated coverage with a "Buy" rating and an $82 price target. Analyst Bryan Bergin believes the market underestimates Circle's potential to evolve from a stablecoin issuer into a broader digital financial infrastructure platform. He forecasts a ~31% annual growth rate for USDC through 2030 and expects faster growth in fee-based revenue from services like payments, RWA tokenization, and its Arc network. A key external factor adding uncertainty is the stalled progress of the CLARITY Act in the US Senate, whose delay could dampen institutional adoption expectations for stablecoins. The core disagreement lies in whether Circle's future hinges on USDC circulation growth or a successful platform-based transformation. The upcoming earnings report is keenly awaited for insights into reserve income trends and the progress of newer business verti...

Original | Odaily Planet Daily (@OdailyChina)

Author | Azuma (@azuma_eth)

At 8:00 AM Beijing Time on August 5th, stablecoin issuer Circle (CRCL) will release its quarterly earnings report before the US stock market opens. However, on the eve of this report, Wall Street has already shown a clear divergence regarding Circle's future value.

On August 3rd, Morgan Stanley (hereafter referred to as "MS") downgraded Circle's rating from "Equal Weight" to "Underweight" and significantly lowered its price target from $106 to $38.

Simultaneously, TD Cowen initiated coverage of Circle for the first time, assigning a "Buy" rating with a price target of $82.

The two institutions have presented completely opposing rating judgments. The core divergence reflected behind this lies in how to define the current Circle — is it still a stablecoin issuer dependent on the growth of USDC's scale, or is it evolving into a technology company transitioning towards a digital financial infrastructure platform?

Institutional Divergence: MS Bearish on USDC Growth, TD Cowen Bets on Platform Transformation

The MS analyst issuing the "Underweight" rating is James Faucette. On TipRanks, Faucette holds a four-star rating (out of five). He is widely considered an above-average sell-side analyst. Although Faucette's average return rate over the past two years is only 3.1%, his success rate in judgment is as high as 60%.

Faucette's bearish logic primarily revolves around Circle's current revenue model.

In his view, the market may have overestimated USDC's future growth potential, and the expansion speed of stablecoin use cases is also lower than previously expected — since Q3 2025, USDC's circulating supply has not actually grown. Currently, aside from remittances and stablecoin-linked card payments, no large-scale new use cases for USDC have emerged.

This suggests that Circle's most core revenue source, "Reserve Income," may face growth pressure. Currently, Circle's main revenue is highly dependent on investing USDC reserve assets in assets such as cash and short-term U.S. Treasury bills to earn interest income. Therefore, the growth of USDC's circulation is often seen as a key driver for the company's profit expansion.

Faucette believes that if USDC scale growth slows down, Circle's future revenue structure may gradually tilt towards transaction income, which has lower profit margins. Based on this judgment, he expects Circle's future earnings performance may fall short of market expectations and considers the current valuation to already reflect overly high growth expectations.

An analyst holding a similar bearish view to Faucette is Dan Dolev from Mizuho Securities. Dolev's rating on TipRanks is 4.5 stars, higher than Faucette's. This analyst assigned Circle a "Hold" rating last Friday but lowered his price target from $50 to $45.

As for TD Cowen, the analyst providing the "Buy" rating is Bryan C. Bergin. However, on TipRanks, Bergin's personal performance rating is only half a star, with a historical average return of -3.4% and a success rate of only 43%......

Bergin believes the market may currently be underestimating Circle's potential to transform from a stablecoin issuer into a broader financial infrastructure platform.

Within his analytical framework, Circle's future value does not solely depend on USDC's circulation scale, but rather on its ability to build a more comprehensive financial service ecosystem around stablecoins. This includes businesses such as payments, treasury management, real-world asset (RWA) tokenization, developer services, and blockchain infrastructure.

Bergin projects that by 2030, USDC's circulating supply could maintain a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of approximately 31%. Simultaneously, fee-based revenue is expected to grow significantly faster than traditional reserve income. Furthermore, Circle's ongoing development of the Arc network is seen as a potential growth catalyst, which could further expand Circle's influence in the digital financial infrastructure space.

Another Recent Key Variable: CLARITY Act Progress

Apart from the company's own business model, regulatory progress is also a crucial factor currently influencing market expectations for Circle.

Previously, the market widely viewed the CLARITY Act as a key catalyst for further development in the stablecoin industry — if the bill is ultimately enacted, the issuance, trading, and related financial services of stablecoins would obtain a clearer regulatory framework, potentially reducing compliance uncertainty for institutional adoption of stablecoins.

However, as of now, the progress of the CLARITY Act has not been smooth. With only the final few working days left before the Senate's summer recess, market expectations for its short-term advancement have significantly declined.

  • Odaily Note: Refer to "So Close, Yet So Far: What's Stalling the Clarity Act?" and "What if the CLARITY Act Ultimately Fails?".

If the advancement of this bill continues to be delayed, the market may reassess the commercialization speed of the stablecoin industry and the growth expectations for Circle. Therefore, ahead of the earnings report, the uncertainty surrounding the CLARITY Act has also become a factor suppressing market sentiment towards CRCL.

Earnings Report Approaching, Market Awaits Circle's Answers

Ultimately, Wall Street's divergence regarding Circle stems not from short-term performance but from different judgments about the company's future positioning. Bearish analysts focus on whether Circle's traditional reserve income model can still support its current valuation if USDC growth slows. Bullish analysts are betting on Circle's ability to evolve into a digital financial infrastructure platform by leveraging its stablecoin business.

Therefore, in this earnings report, besides focusing on revenue and profit performance, the market will also closely observe the progress of reserve income (especially distribution agreements with Coinbase and other partners) as well as businesses like payments and RWA.

Following the release of tomorrow night's earnings report, Odaily Planet Daily will also provide an earnings analysis for everyone as soon as possible.

相關問答

QWhat are the two opposing Wall Street ratings for Circle (CRCL) just before its earnings report, and what are the respective target prices?

AMorgan Stanley ("Big Mo") downgraded Circle's rating from "Equal Weight" to "Underweight," slashing its target price from $106 to $38. In contrast, TD Cowen initiated coverage with a "Buy" rating and set a target price of $82.

QAccording to the article, what is the core disagreement among analysts regarding Circle's future?

AThe core disagreement is how to define Circle. One side (e.g., Morgan Stanley) sees it primarily as a stablecoin issuer whose growth depends on USDC circulation, while the other side (e.g., TD Cowen) views it as a tech company evolving into a broader digital financial infrastructure platform.

QWhat is the main reason cited by Morgan Stanley analyst James Faucette for his "Underweight" rating on Circle?

AJames Faucette's main concern is that the market has overestimated USDC's future growth potential and the speed of new use case development. He notes that USDC circulation has not grown since Q3 2025, and the lack of new large-scale applications could pressure its core "reserve revenue" model, potentially shifting revenue towards lower-margin transaction income.

QWhat potential catalyst for the stablecoin industry is facing uncertainty, and how might it affect Circle?

AThe potential catalyst is the CLARITY Act, which would provide a clearer regulatory framework for stablecoins. Its progress has been slower than expected, with low odds of passing before the Senate's summer recess. If further delayed, it could lead the market to reassess the pace of stablecoin commercialization and Circle's growth prospects.

QBesides revenue and profit, what specific business areas will the market be closely watching in Circle's upcoming earnings report?

AThe market will be closely monitoring the progress of "reserve revenue" (especially distribution agreements with partners like Coinbase), as well as newer business lines such as payments, real-world asset (RWA) tokenization, and its transformation into a financial infrastructure platform.

你可能也喜歡

别把「AI股神爆仓」和「韩股崩盘」当噪音,它们是一场更大风暴的预演

上周,“AI股神”旗下对冲基金因高杠杆AI交易失败清仓160亿美元,同期韩国KOSPI指数在48小时内暴跌逾20%后大幅反弹。市场将这两起事件视为孤立“噪音”,但德意志银行报告指出,它们实为同一深层问题的症状:十余年低利率环境催生了系统内杠杆的过度积累。 韩国股市的剧烈波动导致大量杠杆散户被强制平仓,家庭财富真实受损,指数“收平”掩盖了实际损失。杠杆ETF在暴跌中放大风险,类似产品在欧美也在快速增长,一旦发生在美国可能引发更广泛的连锁冲击。 报告认为,低利率压制了市场波动,鼓励了杠杆堆积;而利率正常化后,波动重现,杠杆风险开始暴露。自2022年以来,市场波动事件频率已明显增加,同时传统避险资产多次失效,使金融体系的缓冲能力减弱。 此外,美联储撤回前瞻指引可能意在重新引入“不确定性溢价”,以抑制过度杠杆。这意味着类似“小波动”事件可能更频繁出现,不应再被简单视为偶发。 报告最后警示,私募股权中持有的大量长期资产,以及上市公司背负的低效并购资产,仍是潜在的隐性风险点。市场将这些事件归为“噪音”的本能可能是危险的,尤其在政策制定者倾向于容忍更多日常波动的背景下。

marsbit1 小時前

别把「AI股神爆仓」和「韩股崩盘」当噪音,它们是一场更大风暴的预演

marsbit1 小時前

交易

現貨
活动图片