3 reasons why Ethereum price keeps rejecting at the $1,300 level

Cointelegraph發佈於 2022-12-07更新於 2022-12-07

文章摘要

Traders are not sure if ETH will be able to hold the $1,200 level while the S&P 500 rapidly approaches the crucial 3,900 support and ETH derivatives data hints at more downside.

Ether rallied 11.3% between Nov. 28 and Dec. 5, peaking at $1,300 before facing a 4.6% rejection. The $1,300 resistance level has been holding ground for twenty-six days and is the most likely explanation for the correction to $1,240 on Dec. 6.

Ether/USD price index, 12-hour. Source: TradingView

So from one side, traders are relieved that Ether is trading 16% above the $1,070 low reached on Nov. 22, but it must be frustrating to fail at the same level the entire week. In addition to the price rejection, investors' mood worsened after three members of the United States Senate reportedly requested information from Silvergate Bank regarding its relationship with FTX.

The lawmakers raised questions after "reports suggesting that Silvergate facilitated the transfer of FTX customer funds to Alameda'' and gave the bank until Dec. 19 to issue a response.

On Dec. 5, NBC News reported that Silvergate claimed to be a "victim" of FTX's and Alameda Research's "apparent misuse of customer assets and other lapses of judgment."

Newsflow remained negative after the Financial Times reported that the United Kingdom Treasury is finalizing some guidelines to restrict cryptocurrency sales from abroad. The changes would enable the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) to monitor the crypto companies' operations in the region. The guidelines are being prepared as a part of the financial services and markets bill.

Investors are afraid that Ether could lose the $1,200 support, but as highlighted by trader CashMontee, the S&P 500 stock market index will be the key — but for now, "market too bullish."

Let's look at Ether derivatives data to understand if the bearish newsflow has impacted crypto investors' sentiment.

Slight uptick in bearish demand for ETH futures' leverage

Retail traders usually avoid quarterly futures due to their price difference from spot markets. Meanwhile, professional traders prefer these instruments because they prevent the fluctuation of funding rates in a perpetual futures contract.

The two-month futures annualized premium should trade between +4% to +8% in healthy markets to cover costs and associated risks. Thus, when the futures trade at a discount versus regular spot markets, it shows a lack of confidence from leverage buyers — a bearish indicator.

Ether 2-month futures annualized premium. Source: Laevitas.ch

The above chart shows that derivatives traders remain bearish as the Ether futures premium is negative. So, bears can celebrate that the indicator is far from the neutral 0% to 4% premium, but that does not mean traders expect an immediate adverse price action.

For this reason, traders should analyze Ether's options markets to exclude externalities specific to the futures instrument.

Options traders are getting comfortable with the downside risks

The 25% delta skew is a telling sign when market makers and arbitrage desks are overcharging for upside or downside protection.

In bear markets, options investors give higher odds for a price dump, causing the skew indicator to rise above 10%. On the other hand, bullish markets tend to drive the skew indicator below -10%, meaning the bearish put options are discounted.

Ether 60-day options 25% delta skew: Source: Laevitas.ch

The delta skew has stabilized in the past week, signaling that options traders are more comfortable with downside risks.

As the 60-day delta skew stands at 12%, whales and market makers are getting closer to a neutral sentiment for Ether. Ultimately, both options and futures markets point to pro traders fearing that the $1,200 support retest is the natural course for ETH.

The answer might as well be hidden under the macroeconomic calendar ahead, which includes the EuroZone's and Canada's Gross Domestic Product (GDP) on Dec. 7 and the United States Consumer Price Index (CPI) on Dec. 13.

Currently, the odds favor Ether bears because the newsflow implies that the possibility of stricter regulation is weighing down the market.

你可能也喜歡

巨头打响Context之战,重构AI护城河

今年以来,美国AI三巨头(OpenAI、Anthropic、Google)围绕“Context”(上下文/语境)展开激烈竞争,这正在重构AI时代的护城河。 Context的含义已从最初衡量模型输入长度的技术参数,演变为涵盖用户资产、工具权限、任务状态和个性化理解的综合概念。竞争经历了三次跃迁: 1. **长上下文窗口**:早期比拼模型一次性能处理多少文本,从数万字迅速扩展到百万级。 2. **跨会话记忆(Memory)**:焦点转向AI能否长期记住用户偏好和历史交互,建立连续性关系。 3. **进入真实环境**:最新趋势是AI通过浏览器、桌面应用和GUI操作能力,主动进入用户任务现场,获取动态、实时的Context。 三家巨头路径各异: * **OpenAI**:以ChatGPT账户为核心,反向整合各种场景(应用、浏览器、编程),使其成为汇聚和调用Context的中枢。 * **Anthropic**:聚焦高价值垂直场景(如编程、Agent),通过Computer Use(GUI操作)和MCP(工具连接协议)主动获取任务环境中的动态Context。 * **Google**:面临将海量但分散的旧有数据(搜索、邮件、文档等)重构为AI可理解、可用的任务型Context的工程挑战,正逐步将其生态产品转化为Gemini的个性化背景。 竞争逻辑正从互联网时代的“网络规模”转向AI时代的“个体纵深”。护城河不再仅依赖于用户数量,而更取决于: 1. **Context的复利**:AI在每次任务中加深对用户的理解,降低后续冷启动成本。 2. **权限与工具链的嵌入**:AI获得授权进入真实工作流,迁移成本变高。 3. **信任关系的形成**:长期、可靠的服务才能获得执行复杂任务的权限。 AI产品争夺的是“任务入口”。国内如腾讯等公司,其挑战也在于如何将存量生态(关系、内容、服务)高效转化为AI可进入和调用的任务Context。这场Context之战的核心,是看谁能将生态更快转化为AI的工作环境,并在深度理解用户中建立新壁垒。

marsbit18 分鐘前

巨头打响Context之战,重构AI护城河

marsbit18 分鐘前

交易

現貨
合約
活动图片