Can short-squeeze narrative for Ethereum, Bitcoin actually deliver results

Ambcrypto發佈於 2022-09-15更新於 2022-09-15

文章摘要

Negative market sentiment for Ethereum [ETH] and Bitcoin [BTC] caused derivative funding rates to remain negative. While both prices suffered a major setback, short traders followed the selling ritual. Now, could this provide an opportunity for the patient (long) traders following a “potential” squeeze?

Negative market sentiment for Ethereum [ETH] and Bitcoin [BTC] caused derivative funding rates to remain negative. While both prices suffered a major setback, short traders followed the selling ritual.

""

Now, could this provide an opportunity for the patient (long) traders following a “potential” squeeze?

""

Deep wounds

""

The funding rates for BTC and ETH have remained negative for derivative traders for quite a while. Furthermore, derivative prices have kept funding rates generally below zero since May. Ergo, depicting the overall sentiment of the traders and how they viewed future market conditions.

'"

But could this narrate a potential short-term bull signal for traders? Well, yes.

""

The annualized funding rate spread between BTC and ETH perpetual pushed to a new all-time high (ATH) of 77% as per data from Glassnode. The graph below showcased the same.

Source: Glassnode

""

Although, short trades seem to be focused on ETH rather than BTC given its Merge season. In this regard, Glassnode added,

""

“This indicates traders are heavily short ETH relative to BTC, likely speculating/hedging for the upcoming Merge.”

""

This means hedging their risk exposure to ETH by going short perpetual futures. In fact, ETH funding rates dipped to their most negative since July 2021.

""

The difference in sentiment for crypto’s two flagship assets seemed to pivot in anticipation of the upcoming Merge. The event formerly known as Ethereum 2.0, when the proof-of-work (PoW) Ethereum mainnet will merge with the proof-of-stake (PoS) Beacon chain.

""

Additionally, a report by Kaiko found that Ether perpetual futures traded at more than 7x the volumes of spot markets. This stands at a four-times increase from November 2021.

""

Opportunity arises

""

However, given the past scenarios, a ‘short-squeeze‘ could see a potential uptick for the flagship token. Every time the funding dropped to the negative side during the past month, prices increased.

""

Thus, funding rates moved towards the positive territory. Ergo, long traders took advantage of the leftover space from the short ones.

""

Nonetheless, social sentiment continues to form a blanket around Ethereum. As per LunarCrush, Ethereum’s social activity accelerated over the last three months. It even continued to reach new heights.

Source: LunarCrush

""

Negative to positive

""

On the other hand, the largest cryptocurrency BTC’s funding rates flipped positive although the (positive) rate might not be significant enough.

""

Nevertheless, long traders paid a premium to the short traders, at press time, in order to hold onto their positions.

""

The only question remains- Could Bitcoin possibly have further room to grow? Well, funding rates have been quite positive recently. Especially, when the price kept suffering- BTC lost more than 10% in just 24 hours after the CPI announcement.

Source: CoinMarketCap

你可能也喜歡

谷歌AI人才接连流失,是压力测试还是“讣告”前奏?

谷歌接连失去三位顶级AI人才:工程副总裁、Transformer架构提出者之一Noam Shazeer加入OpenAI;DeepMind副总裁、AlphaFold核心人物John Jumper加入Anthropic;对话式AI先驱Daniel De Freitas的动向也引人关注。这些流失触及了Transformer、对话式AI和科学AI等关键领域,引发市场对谷歌竞争力的担忧。 然而,将此事视为谷歌的“讣告”可能为时过早。这更应被看作一次压力测试。人才流失本身反映了谷歌仍是AI顶级人才的核心储备库,正因其重要才成为竞争对手IPO前夜的重点挖掘对象。 谷歌的优势在于其远超单一模型的“全栈”能力:拥有自研TPU、云基础设施、Gemini等模型矩阵,以及搜索、YouTube、安卓等覆盖数十亿用户的终端产品,构成了强大的集成生态和分发网络。此外,谷歌通过巨额投资和云服务与Anthropic等对手形成深度绑定,在“AI淘金热”中同时扮演“掘金者”和“卖水人”的角色。 尽管面临创新者困境,核心搜索业务转型挑战以及大公司决策迟缓等问题,但谷歌正通过积极整合Gemini、重塑搜索体验、战略性收购(如Character.AI)等方式应对。AI竞赛是长期游戏,谷歌凭借其技术栈、资源与生态,仍是少数有能力在多层面参与竞争的公司。当前的动荡是一次严峻考验,但并非终局。

marsbit7 分鐘前

谷歌AI人才接连流失,是压力测试还是“讣告”前奏?

marsbit7 分鐘前

Vitalik算法稳定币设想:从期权视角解读机制与挑战

Vitalik Buterin 近期提出了一种新颖的算法稳定币设想,该方案从期权视角出发,试图规避传统抵押债务头寸(CDP)稳定币的清算风险。其核心设计是将1单位ETH拆分为两类权益:稳定侧(P)和上涨侧(N)。稳定侧类似一个深度实值的合成备兑看涨期权,旨在获得低于某一执行价的“稳定”价值;上涨侧则获得执行价以上的全部上涨收益。两部分权益之和始终等于1 ETH,因此系统无需债务、保证金或清算机制。 然而,该设计面临显著挑战。为实现稳定,稳定侧资产需持续滚动(展期)深度实值期权,这会带来交易滑点、固定交易路径被抢跑以及流动性不足等问题。更根本的难点在于,每一份稳定资产的创造,都需要有参与者持续持有对应的上涨侧资产——这本质上是一种无资金费率、无清算风险的杠杆ETH多头。该需求能否长期、规模化存在,是系统成功扩张的关键。 作者结合其DeFi期权协议Rysk的经验指出,期权过去难以在DeFi中成为主流交易产品,因其过于复杂。但若转变思路,将期权作为底层金融基础模块,用于构建稳定币、结构化收益产品等更复杂的资产,则可能展现出巨大潜力。期权的未来机会或许不在于成为下一个永续合约,而在于成为下一代链上金融产品的定价与风险分配引擎。

marsbit1 小時前

Vitalik算法稳定币设想:从期权视角解读机制与挑战

marsbit1 小時前

交易

現貨
合約
活动图片