Veteran Chinese Public Chain NEO's Two Founders in a Feud, Financial Opacity as the Core Reason

marsbit發佈於 2026-01-01更新於 2026-01-01

文章摘要

Summary: A public conflict has erupted between Erik Zhang (Zhang Zhengwen) and Da Hongfei, the two co-founders of the Chinese-origin blockchain project NEO. The core issue is a lack of financial transparency within the NEO Foundation. Zhang, who had left NEO years ago and officially returned in September, accused Da of maintaining a "black box" of assets. He claims Da has sole control over the Foundation's non-token assets and lacks a proper audit mechanism. Zhang also alleged that Da was using NEO's resources to develop a separate project, EON, which prompted his return. The dispute escalated in December when Zhang publicly demanded financial disclosures and unilaterally announced that Da would be removed from NEO mainnet affairs to focus on sidechain and new project development starting January 1, 2026. In response, Da countered that Zhang actually controls the majority of the ecosystem's funds (NEO/GAS tokens) and consensus node voting power. He accused Zhang of delaying the transfer of these funds to a multi-signature wallet for years. Da committed to releasing a financial report for 2025 by Q1 2026.

It's unexpected that a veteran domestic public chain could come to such a day. What's even more lamentable is that top domestic AI projects like Manus, Kimi, and Minimax have had major news for two consecutive days—either being acquired for billions of dollars or raising hundreds of millions in funding—while this old-school public chain has started a feud.

As it stands, the two co-founders of the NEO public chain, founded in 2014, Zhang Zhengwen (Erik Zhang) and Da Hongfei, have essentially completely fallen out, continuing to trade barbs on X. Based on their statements and publicly available information online, let's try to figure out what exactly happened between the two founders of this veteran public chain.

Financial Black Box

Actually, Zhang Zhengwen had left NEO a few years ago, which he confirmed on his own Twitter, and then officially returned in September this year. The trigger for this feud was in November. According to community news and public information, Zhang Zhengwen, as the technical core, encountered obstacles when seeking to obtain the detailed financial report and fund flow of the Neo Foundation.

Subsequently, Zhang Zhengwen accused the Neo Foundation of long-term opaque operations, with its financial status resembling a "black box." He pointed out that Da Hongfei has long solely controlled the foundation's assets other than NEO/GAS tokens, and there is a lack of a complete, auditable disclosure mechanism.

In today's exchange of accusations, we also discovered the reason for Zhang Zhengwen's previous departure. He said that Da Hongfei approached him alone, stating that it was inefficient for the two of them to be responsible for NEO, so he chose to temporarily withdraw from management to "improve efficiency." However, he found that Da Hongfei was using NEO's resources to develop an independent public chain project, EON. This prompted him to return and intervene in the foundation's governance.

In community discussions in November, Zhang Zhengwen stated that NEO had previously relied on hackathons to create "false prosperity," with no real users, and many hackathon projects disappeared after receiving awards.

Escalation of Conflict

In December, Zhang Zhengwen publicly issued a statement demanding that Da Hongfei fulfill the financial disclosure obligations promised since December 9th. More explosively, Zhang Zhengwen unilaterally announced that, according to a previous phone agreement between them, starting January 1, 2026, Da Hongfei will no longer participate in NEO mainnet affairs and will instead focus on the development and operation of the sidechain NeoX and the new project SpoonOS.

Da Hongfei (Da Shu) responded immediately, stating that Zhang Zhengwen actually controls the vast majority of the funds in the NEO ecosystem (including the core assets NEO and GAS tokens) and dominates the voting rights of consensus nodes. He also accused Zhang Zhengwen of delaying the transfer of funds to the foundation's multi-signature address (Multisig) for years under various pretexts (such as waiting for the completion of the N3 migration).

Da Hongfei承诺将在 2026 年第一季度发布 2025 年末的财务报告,并会提前分享初步数据。

熱門幣種推薦

相關問答

QWhat is the core reason for the public conflict between the two co-founders of NEO, as mentioned in the article?

AThe core reason is financial opacity, with Erik Zhang accusing Da Hongfei of controlling the foundation's assets (excluding NEO/GAS tokens) in a 'black box' manner without a complete, auditable disclosure mechanism.

QAccording to the article, why did Erik Zhang initially leave NEO's management?

AHe left because Da Hongfei told him that having two people in charge was inefficient. Zhang agreed to step back temporarily to 'improve efficiency'.

QWhat specific event prompted Erik Zhang to return and get involved in the NEO Foundation's governance?

AHe returned after discovering that Da Hongfei was using NEO's resources to develop an independent public chain project called EON.

QWhat did Erik Zhang unilaterally announce regarding Da Hongfei's role starting January 1, 2026?

AHe announced that, based on a prior phone agreement, Da Hongfei would no longer be involved in NEO mainnet affairs and would instead focus on developing and operating the sidechain NeoX and a new project called SpoonOS.

QHow did Da Hongfei counter Erik Zhang's accusations about financial control?

ADa Hongfei stated that Zhang actually controls the vast majority of the funds in the NEO ecosystem (including the core NEO and GAS tokens) and the consensus node voting power. He also accused Zhang of delaying the transfer of funds to the foundation's multi-signature address for years.

你可能也喜歡

HIVE首席执行官:用于AI的GPU每小时收入比挖矿业务高10倍

加拿大上市公司HIVE首席执行官近期指出,人工智能(AI)计算业务的经济效益已远超比特币挖矿。据其透露,公司部署在曼尼托巴省贝尔加拿大AI基础设施中的504块NVIDIA B200 GPU集群,每小时每GPU收入约2.90美元,而比特币挖矿设备每小时仅产生约0.12美元,前者收益是后者的20倍以上。 基于此,HIVE将下半年战略重点转向更高收益的AI基础设施投资,同时维持其比特币挖矿业务。2026财年,公司比特币平均算力达22.2 EH/s,同比增长290%,占全网算力约3%,共开采2,885枚BTC。全年总收入达2.978亿美元,其中比特币挖矿收入增长164%,而专注于AI与高性能计算(HPC)的BUZZ HPC部门收入为1950万美元,同比增长94%。 HIVE的转型始于三年前对NVIDIA芯片的7000万美元投资,这使其在AI计算需求激增时占据了先机。公司近期获得了Chardan Capital的“买入”评级及7.50美元目标价,并与贝尔及AI初创公司Cohere签署了价值约2.2亿美元的GPU云服务协议,同时通过债券融资7500万美元用于进一步发展AI基础设施。 其最雄心勃勃的项目是多伦多地区在建的320兆瓦AI数据中心,预计2027年下半年全面运营后可容纳超10万块GPU,实现约3.6亿美元的年经常性收入。HIVE并非孤例,竞争对手如MARA、Hut 8和Terawulf也纷纷将有限电力资源转向利润更高的AI与HPC合约,这反映了在比特币挖矿利润缩减的背景下,上市矿企的普遍战略转移。 HIVE的近期目标是在本财年末将AI与HPC业务年收入提升至当前水平的十倍,这很大程度上取决于多伦多数据中心及后续GPU云服务合约能否按时推进。

cryptonews.ru1 小時前

HIVE首席执行官:用于AI的GPU每小时收入比挖矿业务高10倍

cryptonews.ru1 小時前

灰度认为,3000个链上金库管理着超过70亿美元资产,将成为加密货币领域的下一个突破

灰度(Grayscale)认为,区块链“金库”(Vaults)有望成为加密货币领域的下一项突破性创新,并进入主流应用。金库通过汇集投资者资金,将其配置于产生收益的策略中,类似于传统金融中的担保贷款凭证(CLO),但关键区别在于其基于区块链的基础设施。 传统CLO依赖托管人、受托人等中介机构,而区块链金库利用以太坊、Base和Solana等网络上的智能合约直接管理资产和处理交易。这种架构为投资者提供了实时投资组合和交易状态的可视性,有可能降低管理成本、提高流动性,并实现“完全的透明度、运营效率和潜在的更高流动性”。 目前该市场仍处于早期阶段。据灰度估算,已有超过3000个金库持有约70亿美元的资产,由57名管理者(策展人)运营,其中79%的策略专注于稳定币。相比之下,全球CLO市场规模约为1.5万亿美元。 报告指出,主要障碍在于监管不确定性。如果金库的策展人在策略选择、资产分配或风险管理方面拥有自主权,可能引发美国证券法、投资公司法规方面的审查。机构投资者在投入大额资金前,需要明确的托管、合规和投资者保护标准。 尽管存在挑战,灰度认为金库潜力巨大,其成功将取决于行业能否在保持智能合约效率的同时,满足传统金融的法律和运营标准。

cryptonews.ru1 小時前

灰度认为,3000个链上金库管理着超过70亿美元资产,将成为加密货币领域的下一个突破

cryptonews.ru1 小時前

交易

現貨

熱門文章

如何購買CORE

歡迎來到HTX.com!在這裡,購買Core DAO (CORE)變得簡單而便捷。跟隨我們的逐步指南,放心開始您的加密貨幣之旅。第一步:創建您的HTX帳戶使用您的 Email、手機號碼在HTX註冊一個免費帳戶。體驗無憂的註冊過程並解鎖所有平台功能。立即註冊第二步:前往買幣頁面,選擇您的支付方式信用卡/金融卡購買:使用您的Visa或Mastercard即時購買Core DAO (CORE)。餘額購買:使用您HTX帳戶餘額中的資金進行無縫交易。第三方購買:探索諸如Google Pay或Apple Pay等流行支付方式以增加便利性。C2C購買:在HTX平台上直接與其他用戶交易。HTX 場外交易 (OTC) 購買:為大量交易者提供個性化服務和競爭性匯率。第三步:存儲您的Core DAO (CORE)購買Core DAO (CORE)後,將其存儲在您的HTX帳戶中。您也可以透過區塊鏈轉帳將其發送到其他地址或者用於交易其他加密貨幣。第四步:交易Core DAO (CORE)在HTX的現貨市場輕鬆交易Core DAO (CORE)。前往您的帳戶,選擇交易對,執行交易,並即時監控。HTX為初學者和經驗豐富的交易者提供了友好的用戶體驗。

684 人學過發佈於 2024.12.13更新於 2026.06.02

如何購買CORE

相關討論

歡迎來到 HTX 社群。在這裡,您可以了解最新的平台發展動態並獲得專業的市場意見。 以下是用戶對 CORE (CORE)幣價的意見。

活动图片