UK–U.S. crypto pact: Analyzing insights from landmark meeting

ambcrypto發佈於 2025-09-16更新於 2025-09-17

Key Takeaways

What did the UK–U.S. crypto meeting cover?

Chancellor Rachel Reeves and U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent discussed stablecoin regulation, the joint digital securities sandbox, and cross-border capital flows

Can the UK accelerate this progress?

The government’s alignment with U.S. regulation could help reduce capital flight and restore London’s standing as a competitive digital asset hub.


The UK has been lagging in streamlining crypto regulations. However, they appear to have reversed course after collaborating with the U.S., concentrating on stablecoins and innovation sandboxes.

The meeting on the 16th of September at Downing Street brought together Chancellor Rachel Reeves, U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, and representatives from Coinbase, Circle, Ripple, Citi, Bank of America, and Barclays.

The two control about 35% of global finance. The U.S., in particular, has been at the forefront of crypto deregulation.

UK-U.S. crypto alliance

Industry groups urged the UK government to include stablecoins and tokenization in the U.S.–UK Tech Bridge initiative. 

The primary goal was to establish legal standards for stablecoins and launch a joint digital securities sandbox to test blockchain applications in finance.

Although the agreement had not yet been formalized, discussions centered on the cross-border movement of capital, a key issue in shaping future cooperation. 

These proposed alignments with the U.S. are seen by many as a potential bullish catalyst for the crypto sector.

Ripple’s Cassie Craddock noted that such collaboration could “set a template for international cooperation in our industry.

Will the UK finally catch up? 

The move could help the UK narrow its gap with leading financial centers by clarifying rules for digital assets. Clearer regulation may boost institutional confidence, unlock capital inflows, and expand crypto adoption in Britain.

This joint framework may strengthen Bitcoin’s legitimacy, drive innovation, and reinforce dollar-pound leadership in digital markets.

Failure to align could see massive capital leave the UK and the EU from a broader perspective. European regulators have been pushing for stronger oversight in crypto, as noted earlier in the AMBCrypto report.

The crypto community disagrees with BoE

In the meantime, the crypto community called out the Bank of England (BoE) after it proposed a cap on stablecoin ownership.

BoE suggested a cap of £10,000 to £20,000 per user, claiming that stablecoins can take as long as 24 hours to process transactions.

Aave founder Stani Kulechov criticized the plan,

“This is absurd, and we need to push back against this kind of regulation. Stablecoins issued onchain do not pose greater risks than traditional electronic money issued on more fragile electronic databases.”

The meeting on the 16th of September took place just ahead of President Donald Trump’s state visit to the UK, where further announcements on digital assets were expected in coordination with Prime Minister Keir Starmer.

This timing reflects a broader shift in the United Kingdom’s stance on cryptocurrencies, driven by its growing alignment with the United States on digital asset adoption and regulatory cooperation.

Share

你可能也喜歡

Hyperliquid的合规之路:从无需许可到许可制HIP-3

Hyperliquid(基于HyperCore的去中心化交易基础设施)因其无需许可、用户自托管的特点,与美国针对期货交易的严格市场结构法律(涉及注册交易平台DCM、清算所DCO和经纪商FCM)存在根本冲突,因此一直对美国市场进行地理封锁。 为了解决此困境,Hyperliquid成立了政策中心(HPC),积极游说美国监管机构(CFTC、SEC),主张将Hyperliquid视为“中立基础设施”。其核心提议是:允许已受监管的实体(如经纪商、交易平台)在履行其原有KYC、市场监控等合规义务的前提下,利用Hyperliquid的底层技术(如HyperCore)来构建和运营产品,而非要求协议本身改变其无需许可的特性。 作为这一合规路径的实例,Hyperliquid已在测试网推出具备许可权限的HIP-3部署者功能。此类部署允许受监管实体创建仅对白名单用户(即已完成KYC的合规用户)开放的市场,并拥有对用户账户执行特定操作(如强制平仓)的权限,从而模仿传统金融中FCM的职责。尽管这些合规市场会形成独立的订单簿,但通过白名单做市商的桥梁作用,它们仍能共享Hyperliquid主市场的流动性。 总之,Hyperliquid的战略目标并非直接向美国用户开放其原生免KYC前端,而是通过提供工具,让合规机构能在其底层上构建符合美国法规的产品,从而为美国投资者提供间接参与其生态的合规通道,同时保持协议本身的中立性与开放性。

marsbit27 分鐘前

Hyperliquid的合规之路:从无需许可到许可制HIP-3

marsbit27 分鐘前

AI时代最大的政治经济学命题:机器人越来越能干,人类如何分享价值?

《经济学人》近期评论引发思考:中国在机器人、AI等尖端领域取得突破的同时,居民消费疲软、企业利润承压,这背后触及一个更深层的全球性命题——当机器(尤其是AI)越来越能替代人类劳动时,人类如何分享机器创造的价值? AI正在改写财富分配的底层逻辑。过去技术进步虽提升效率,但人仍是生产核心,生产率提升能转化为就业与工资增长。然而,AI首次大规模进入认知劳动领域,未来可能替代大量知识乃至决策工作,导致经济成长但直接参与创造的人减少。核心矛盾从“失业”转向“分配”:若劳动被机器替代,而新收入来源未建立,社会可能面临生产能力增强但大众购买力不足的困境。 当前全球已出现技术红利与大众收入传导的断点。美国科技巨头市值飙升,但劳动收入占GDP比重长期下降,财富向少数集中。中国同样面临挑战:虽在新能源、机器人等领域进步显著,但需打通“科技创新→企业盈利→居民收入→消费增长”的传导链条,解决收入预期不稳、社会保障不足等根本问题,让生产率红利惠及全社会。 未来可能的发展路径包括:传统资本主义(利润归资本,再分配靠税收)、国家资本主义(政府通过持股让全民间接分享收益),以及更具创新性的方式,如建立数字主权基金、全民持股或新型基本收入制度,让社会成员直接分享智能经济创造的增量价值。 对中国而言,最大优势不仅在于市场与产业链,更在于协调政策与长期发展的制度能力。未来的重点应是同步推进AI发展与收入分配改革、社保完善、职业再培训等,构建让普通人共享技术进步红利的机制。 AI时代的终极竞争,不仅是技术比拼,更是建立适应智能经济的新分配体系的竞赛。谁能率先让增长成果转化为广泛的社会福祉,谁就能掌握下一轮文明演进的话语权。

marsbit48 分鐘前

AI时代最大的政治经济学命题:机器人越来越能干,人类如何分享价值?

marsbit48 分鐘前

交易

現貨
活动图片