CoinDeskPolicy發佈於 2024-04-08更新於 2024-04-09

文章摘要

Countries have varying definitions and categorizations for stablecoins that may pose a risk to financial stability, the report by the Financial Stability Institute said.

  • Countries around the world must ensure consistency in their approaches to regulating stablecoins, a new report by the Financial Stability Institute says.
  • Differing approaches could pose challenges to an integrated financial system, the FSI added in its report.

Countries need to make their regulatory frameworks for stablecoins consistent with one another, the Financial Stability Institute (FSI) warned in a report published Tuesday.

The FSI, jointly created by the Bank for International Settlements and the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, is tasked with assisting regulators worldwide in strengthening their financial systems. The institute's report on policy implementation insights for stablecoins – which refers to cryptocurrencies whose value is pegged to other assets such as sovereign currencies – warns of the dangers of fragmentation in supervision across the world.

"Stablecoins may still be unregulated or lightly regulated in other jurisdictions," said the report, authored by FSI Deputy Chair Juan Carlos Crisanto and Senior Advisors Johannes Ehrentraud and Denise Garcia Ocampo.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The authors argued that while many regulatory approaches have similarities when it comes to key requirements, the differences are largely driven by the variety of stablecoin design features and perceived risks. The report warned that this fragmentation in approaches to supervision could pose challenges to an integrated financial system and threaten financial stability.

Nations around the world have been exploring how to regulate stablecoins for several years. The U.K., for instance, passed legislation to recognize stablecoins as a means of payment in 2023, while the European Union passed the landmark Markets in Crypto Assets regulation (MiCA) to supervise issuers and service providers handling stablecoins. Japan too has started regulating stablecoins, while the U.S. is considering a stablecoin bill.

The FSI report says jurisdictions have varying definitions and categorizations for stablecoins that may pose a risk to financial stability. There are also discrepancies in requirements for the disclosure of reserve assets kept by stablecoin issuers to maintain the crypto's value against its reference currency.

Advertisement
Advertisement

"A consistent regulatory framework, as well as its global implementation, is essential to address stablecoins’ risks, prevent regulatory arbitrage and ensure a level playing field in the digital asset ecosystem," the FSI report said.

Ensuring the interoperability of stablecoins with central bank digital currencies (CBDC) and other digital assets would also be key to promoting an integrated financial system, the report added.

Global organizations such as the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and Financial Stability Board (FSB) have issued or are working on universal norms for stablecoins.

Edited by Sandali Handagama.

你可能也喜歡

渠道红利走到尽头,DeFi 协议靠什么抵御巨头收割?

当渠道红利耗尽,DeFi协议如何抵御科技巨头的收割?文章以Coinbase、Stripe、Kraken等巨头的动作为例,揭示了其“先占渠道,后控底层”的商业策略:依托庞大用户基础,在协议成熟后通过自建或收购掌控底层基础设施,从而将利润截留在自身生态内。 例如,Coinbase利用其海量用户推广自研二层链Base,所有交易排序费收入归己所有,而部署其上的Morpho等协议则持续为其贡献分润。Stripe收购Bridge以发行自有稳定币,将原本支付给Circle的储备利息收入内部化。Kraken收购NinjaTrader则直接获取了难以自建的衍生品交易牌照。 面对这种压力,头部DeFi协议的核心防御策略是多链部署与深度嵌入。像Morpho和Uniswap这样的协议,通过将业务扩展至数十条公链,分散了对单一链的依赖。即便在某条链上被巨头扶持的竞品挤压,整体业务仍能运转。更重要的是,当协议的技术和安全体系深度嵌入巨头核心业务(如Coinbase的借贷产品依赖Morpho底层)时,替换成本极高,形成了双向制衡。 最终,行业可能走向两种结局:一是由少数巨头垄断全产业链,开源协议沦为边缘补丁;二是开源协议通过快速的多链扩张和极高的替代成本,与流量巨头形成长期博弈与共生。目前看来,后一种可能性正在被Morpho、Uniswap等协议的实践所印证。这场关于价值捕获与分配的博弈,结果将决定未来金融科技的权力格局。

marsbit8 分鐘前

渠道红利走到尽头,DeFi 协议靠什么抵御巨头收割?

marsbit8 分鐘前

AI Agent「吃掉」了哪些加密赛道?

AI Agent 正在深刻改变加密货币行业,将原本为人类设计的平台优化为“非人类”服务。在特定赛道,AI Agent 已占据主导地位: * **衍生品交易**:永续合约市场高度依赖机器人的速度与执行。实验显示,AI Agent 的生存率和收益率显著优于人类交易者。 * **套利交易(MEV)**:这已是绝对的机器人战场,人类操作者难以规模化盈利。 * **收益优化**:新兴DeFi协议中,超过三分之二集成了自主AI Agent进行资产管理,表现通常超越静态策略。 * **现货交易**:自动化机器人估计占全球加密交易量的大部分,AI Agent驱动的交易活动增长迅速。 然而,在另一些领域,人类与AI Agent形成了共存或人类仍主导的局面: * **预测市场**:AI Agent在短期套利上优势明显,但在需要长期判断和适应变化的市场上,人类仍保持竞争力。 * **DeFi借贷**:虽然清算等环节已自动化,但核心的存款、借款决策和风险偏好仍主要由人类掌控。 * **稳定币与支付**:绝大多数稳定币转账用于真实世界的支付和汇款,主要由人类驱动,是加密货币触及实体经济的关键。 * **钱包**:作为人机交互的最后关口,交易批准和信任决策仍需人类监督,钱包正演变为更人性化的金融仪表板。 随着AI Agent活动激增,**人类验证层**变得愈发重要。World (Worldcoin)、t54、Self Protocol、Kite AI 等项目致力于构建信任与安全基础设施,通过身份验证、风险评分和问责机制,确保AI Agent代表人类行动时的安全性与可靠性。 总而言之,AI Agent在追求效率、速度的领域已占据优势,但在需要人类判断、信任和文化语境的支付、身份等创造真实价值的层面,人类活动依然至关重要。未来的关键在于构建平衡两者、确保人类不被边缘化的解决方案。

marsbit21 分鐘前

AI Agent「吃掉」了哪些加密赛道?

marsbit21 分鐘前

交易

現貨
合約
活动图片