CoinDeskPolicy發佈於 2024-04-08更新於 2024-04-09

文章摘要

Countries have varying definitions and categorizations for stablecoins that may pose a risk to financial stability, the report by the Financial Stability Institute said.

  • Countries around the world must ensure consistency in their approaches to regulating stablecoins, a new report by the Financial Stability Institute says.
  • Differing approaches could pose challenges to an integrated financial system, the FSI added in its report.

Countries need to make their regulatory frameworks for stablecoins consistent with one another, the Financial Stability Institute (FSI) warned in a report published Tuesday.

The FSI, jointly created by the Bank for International Settlements and the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, is tasked with assisting regulators worldwide in strengthening their financial systems. The institute's report on policy implementation insights for stablecoins – which refers to cryptocurrencies whose value is pegged to other assets such as sovereign currencies – warns of the dangers of fragmentation in supervision across the world.

"Stablecoins may still be unregulated or lightly regulated in other jurisdictions," said the report, authored by FSI Deputy Chair Juan Carlos Crisanto and Senior Advisors Johannes Ehrentraud and Denise Garcia Ocampo.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The authors argued that while many regulatory approaches have similarities when it comes to key requirements, the differences are largely driven by the variety of stablecoin design features and perceived risks. The report warned that this fragmentation in approaches to supervision could pose challenges to an integrated financial system and threaten financial stability.

Nations around the world have been exploring how to regulate stablecoins for several years. The U.K., for instance, passed legislation to recognize stablecoins as a means of payment in 2023, while the European Union passed the landmark Markets in Crypto Assets regulation (MiCA) to supervise issuers and service providers handling stablecoins. Japan too has started regulating stablecoins, while the U.S. is considering a stablecoin bill.

The FSI report says jurisdictions have varying definitions and categorizations for stablecoins that may pose a risk to financial stability. There are also discrepancies in requirements for the disclosure of reserve assets kept by stablecoin issuers to maintain the crypto's value against its reference currency.

Advertisement
Advertisement

"A consistent regulatory framework, as well as its global implementation, is essential to address stablecoins’ risks, prevent regulatory arbitrage and ensure a level playing field in the digital asset ecosystem," the FSI report said.

Ensuring the interoperability of stablecoins with central bank digital currencies (CBDC) and other digital assets would also be key to promoting an integrated financial system, the report added.

Global organizations such as the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and Financial Stability Board (FSB) have issued or are working on universal norms for stablecoins.

Edited by Sandali Handagama.

你可能也喜歡

商务部最新出口管制 10 家美企,一文看懂牵动股市的三条线

6月22日,中国商务部将10家美国实体列入出口管制名单,禁止向其出口军民两用物项,其中MP Materials、USA Rare Earth等企业涉及稀土、军工和无人机领域。市场普遍将此视为利好中国稀土产业链的信号,但分析认为其影响已部分反映在股价中。 具体来看: 1. **稀土板块上游(如北方稀土、广晟有色)** 股价已接近年内高位,“反制受益”逻辑基本被消化,本次管制更多是趋势确认而非新起点。 2. **稀土产业链中下游的磁材环节(如正海磁材、大地熊)** 股价仍处低位,涨幅落后于上游。其中大地熊因军工磁材业务与管制主题关联度高,但公司财务基础相对薄弱。 3. **无人机板块(如中无人机)** 业务与管制名单中美企直接对标,但当前股价回落主要反映前期业绩兑现,后续走势取决于军贸订单节奏。 4. **对美股被管制企业(如MP Materials)的影响** 并非单纯利空。这些企业作为美国供应链安全的核心,可能同时面临中国供应限制与美国政策扶持,市场最终定价需观察开盘后表现。 核心观点:事件对A股稀土上游的催化效应已减弱,资金可能关注估值相对较低的磁材中下游及主题相关的无人机板块,但需注意相关公司的基本面差异。对美股标的的影响则较为复杂。

marsbit11 分鐘前

商务部最新出口管制 10 家美企,一文看懂牵动股市的三条线

marsbit11 分鐘前

交易

現貨
合約
活动图片