Will the Fed Definitely Raise Interest Rates in September? How Will Crypto and U.S. Stocks Withstand the Pressure?

marsbit发布于2026-08-03更新于2026-08-03

文章摘要

The market's expectation for a September Fed rate hike surged dramatically in early August, jumping from under 50% to over 80% within a week. This shift followed a contentious July FOMC meeting, where a 9-3 vote to hold rates revealed growing dissent from hawkish members advocating for an immediate hike to combat persistent inflation. The primary catalyst for this repricing is rising oil prices, driven by renewed geopolitical tensions around the Strait of Hormuz, which threaten global supply. Energy costs directly influence inflation metrics, making the upcoming July CPI report (due August 12th) a critical data point. If it shows inflation reaccelerating, the probability of a September hike will solidify. For Bitcoin and crypto assets, this is typically bearish news. Bitcoin continues to behave as a high-beta, liquidity-sensitive risk asset. A rate hike raises the opportunity cost of holding non-yielding assets and could drive capital toward money markets, pressuring crypto prices in the short term. However, historical patterns suggest that if a hike is perceived as the end of a tightening cycle rather than the start, any negative price impact may be brief. U.S. stocks, particularly crypto-linked equities like Coinbase and growth-oriented tech stocks, are also vulnerable. Higher rates increase discount rates in valuation models, putting pressure on high-multiple companies. This coincides with a pivotal tech earnings season where investor focus has shifted from massive AI c...

Author|jk

In the short span of the past week, market bets on a September interest rate hike have jumped from less than 50% to over 80%.

Such a rapid pace of repricing is uncommon in the history of Fed-watching over the past year, and Bitcoin and various crypto-related stocks have already begun to pay the price for this possibility.

Last week, the Federal Reserve's July 29th FOMC meeting voted 9 to 3 to maintain the target range for the federal funds rate at 3.50% to 3.75%, marking the fifth consecutive meeting of holding rates steady. However, unlike previous decisions that were almost a foregone conclusion, this vote showed a clear divergence. Cleveland Fed President Hamarc, Minneapolis Fed President Kashkari, and Dallas Fed President Logan cast dissenting votes, advocating for an immediate 25 basis point hike, citing inflation having run above the 2% target for over five consecutive years. Fed Chair Walsh used a rather vivid phrase in the post-meeting press conference, saying he "asked for a proper family squabble, and indeed got one."

This division directly fueled market expectations for a September hike. According to data from the CME FedWatch tool, just one week before this meeting, market pricing for a September hike was less than 53%. But within a short week, as rising oil prices fueled inflation concerns, this probability surged to 82% at one point, currently reported at 73%. The 9-to-3 vote result represents the expansion of hawkish forces favoring a hike within the committee, which the market widely interprets as a significant increase in the likelihood of a September hike.

Current probability of a rate hike. Source: CME

It should be noted, however, that a clear gap remains between market pricing and the overall consensus among economists. A FactSet survey of economists shows that the majority still believe that interest rate cuts will resume in 2027, with a cumulative reduction of around 50 basis points. In other words, short-term interest rate futures pricing more reflects a sensitive reaction to recent oil price and inflation data.

From a broader perspective, the resurgence of these hike expectations follows a fairly clear transmission chain, with the core starting point being geopolitical conflicts near the Strait of Hormuz. Since July, escalating tensions between Iran and related parties have repeatedly threatened this key waterway, approximately 30 miles wide, which handles about 20% of the world's daily seaborne oil trade. WTI crude oil futures rose by roughly 20% cumulatively in July. Note, this is not the first conflict, but a second flare-up between Iran and the U.S. post-agreement. Energy prices are one of the most direct components feeding into the Fed's favored PCE inflation gauge, and rising oil prices quickly show up in the next inflation reading. This is the direct reason behind the market's swift repricing of hike probabilities over the past week.

Looking at specific data points, the June CPI report released on July 14th showed a year-on-year increase of 3.5%, the most encouraging reading since the Iran conflict erupted, primarily due to temporary relief from a 5.7% month-on-month drop in energy prices during the ceasefire period. However, this relief appears quite fragile, and July's renewed rise in oil prices is likely to be reflected in the next set of data. The next key node widely recognized by the market is the July CPI report to be released on August 12th. If the data shows the June moderation was real and sustainable, the probability of a September hike will likely retreat towards the economist consensus. But if the data shows energy-driven inflation re-accelerating, especially with the Iran ceasefire still incomplete and oil prices remaining above $80 per barrel, the probability of a September hike will rise further.

The Fed's own signals are also reinforcing this expectation. The dot plot from the June FOMC meeting shows that 9 out of 18 participants now project at least one rate hike this year, up from the median expectation in the March meeting, which still pointed to rate cuts. The core PCE inflation forecast was raised to 3.3% for 2026. Chair Walsh has simplified policy statements and de-emphasized forward guidance since taking office. He notably did not submit his own economic projections at the June meeting, but his press conference remarks were interpreted as hawkish by the market, directly fueling rate hike bets at the time. Some officials have held dissenting views; for instance, former Governor Milan earlier this year publicly questioned the logic of hiking when core CPI monthly readings had once turned negative. Overall, apart from the evolution of the geopolitical situation itself in the coming month, the July CPI data, the August non-farm payrolls report, and Fed officials' remarks at the Jackson Hole Economic Symposium will all be crucial windows for judging whether a September hike will truly materialize, which will also amplify volatility in crypto assets and related U.S. stocks around these data releases.

What's the Impact on Crypto Assets?

For crypto assets, rising rate hike expectations are traditionally not good news. Bitcoin is currently oscillating between $64,000 and $65,000, and remains highly sensitive to Fed signals. Bitcoin has repeatedly exhibited characteristics of a high-beta risk asset over the past year, with its price movements showing an increasingly strong correlation with the U.S. dollar liquidity cycle. Since the beginning of the year, impacted by a series of macro shocks including tariff policies and geopolitical risks, Bitcoin once fell below $64,000. Meanwhile, traditional safe-haven assets like gold and silver posted double-digit gains. This divergence itself indicates that the market does not treat Bitcoin as a true safe haven but rather as a liquidity-sensitive risk asset. If the Fed does pivot to a hike in September, the opportunity cost of holding non-yielding assets like Bitcoin will rise further, and the incentive for capital to flow back from risk assets to money market funds and short-duration bonds will correspondingly increase, posing direct pressure on short-term sentiment in the crypto market.

However, the impact of rate hikes on Bitcoin is not linear. Entering 2023, despite the Fed raising rates twice more consecutively, Bitcoin rose 21% against the trend. The actual price impact of the last two hikes was quite limited, indicating that when the rate hike path is fully digested by the market and inflation data shows marginal improvement signs, the hike itself may not necessarily suppress prices continuously. What truly determines the market reaction is often the change in expectations regarding a policy pivot, not a single rate hike action. This historical experience also provides a reference for observing this potential September hike. If a September hike materializes but is interpreted by the market as the tail end of the tightening cycle rather than the beginning, the decline in Bitcoin will likely be short-lived and shallow, with the market moving faster into expectations for a rate-cutting cycle.

How Will U.S. Stocks Be Affected?

In the U.S. stock market, crypto concept stocks and crypto-linked assets tend to amplify Bitcoin's own volatility. The share prices of companies like Coinbase (COIN), Circle (CRCL), and Strategy (MSTR) typically react more sharply to interest rate expectations than spot Bitcoin: Rising hike expectations mean higher risk-free rates, which directly increases the discount rate in stock valuation models, putting particular pressure on growth-oriented and high-valuation tech stocks. An important pillar supporting the U.S. stock rally in recent years has been the valuation expansion driven by rate cut expectations. Once this expectation is reversed, the market needs to reprice for higher funding costs, and an increase in index volatility is almost inevitable. It's worth noting that several high-weight tech stocks within the S&P 500 and Nasdaq indices have already experienced significant corrections. If September hike expectations further solidify, valuation pressure on such core, heavily weighted stocks could transmit to the entire index level.

Simultaneously, this resurgence of hike expectations coincides with one of the most capital-intensive earnings seasons for tech giants. From late July to early August, Google, Microsoft, Meta, Amazon, and Apple reported Q2 earnings, with market reactions showing clear divergence. The core point of contention lies in whether capital expenditures can translate into actual revenue. Google Cloud revenue soared 82% year-over-year, hitting a record growth rate, but its full-year capital expenditure guidance was raised to a range of $195-205 billion, and its stock price dropped 7% accordingly. Meta's revenue grew 28% year-over-year, slightly exceeding expectations, but its capital expenditure guidance was raised to a range of $130-145 billion, causing its stock to plunge nearly 9%. Apple fell sharply due to weaker-than-expected revenue guidance for its fiscal fourth quarter and renewed supply chain constraint concerns. Only Microsoft delivered a report that satisfied the market, with annual cloud revenue exceeding $100 billion for the first time and its FY27 capital expenditure guidance lowered from $190 billion to $175 billion. Its stock soared over 15% in a single day, marking its largest gain in nearly 18 years. The combined capital expenditure plans of these four companies approach $750 billion, and the market's judgment criteria have shifted from "how much they're willing to spend on AI" to "whether this money can be converted into visible revenue and cash flow."

This divergence implies heightened sensitivity for September. These giants primarily rely on debt and equity financing to fill their cash flow gaps for capital expenditure. If a September hike materializes, rising corporate financing costs would directly compress the marginal return space for their capital expenditure. At that point, market tolerance for the narrative of "burning cash on AI for growth" may narrow further, and stock price volatility for those companies with already negative cash flow and lacking compelling growth stories could be even more severe than in this July round.

Regarding the September FOMC meeting, a more accurate statement at present is that a rate hike has evolved from a low-probability event almost ruled out at the start of the year to the mainstream scenario priced in by the market at over 50%. For crypto asset and related U.S. stock investors, oil price movements, monthly CPI data, and Fed officials' remarks at venues like the Jackson Hole Economic Symposium will all be key windows over the next month to observe whether the probability of a hike further solidifies.

相关问答

QWhat is the current market probability of a Fed rate hike in September according to the CME FedWatch Tool?

AThe current probability of a Fed rate hike in September stands at 73%, having recently jumped from below 53% to a peak of 82% in a week.

QWhat is identified as the core starting point for the renewed Fed rate hike expectations?

AThe core starting point is identified as the geopolitical conflict near the Strait of Hormuz, which has driven up oil prices, a key component of inflation measures.

QHow did Bitcoin demonstrate a correlation to the dollar liquidity cycle in the past year, according to the article?

ABitcoin has repeatedly shown characteristics of a high-beta risk asset, with its price movements increasingly correlated to the dollar liquidity cycle, and is seen as a liquidity-sensitive asset rather than a true safe haven.

QWhy does the article suggest that the actual impact of a September rate hike on Bitcoin might be limited in duration?

AHistorical experience shows that when a rate hike is fully priced in and seen as the end of a tightening cycle rather than the start, Bitcoin's decline tends to be short-lived as the market quickly shifts focus to expectations of future rate cuts.

QHow has the market's judgment standard for major tech companies' capital expenditure shifted, and why is this relevant for September?

AThe standard has shifted from 'willingness to spend on AI' to 'whether that spending can translate into visible revenue and cash flow.' This is relevant for September because a potential rate hike would increase corporate financing costs, potentially reducing tolerance for companies burning cash without a strong growth narrative.

你可能也喜欢

生成模型也能端到端训练了?核心竟是一个for循环

长期以来,深度学习在图像分类、检测等任务上凭借端到端训练取得了巨大成功,但生成模型领域却始终是个例外。当前主流的自回归、扩散模型等训练时只学习预测“一小步”,推理时则需要反复展开数百上千步,这种训练与推理的不一致导致了“暴露偏差”等问题,使得生成模型一直未能实现真正的端到端训练。 最近,一篇来自UIUC与哈佛大学的论文提出了“探索式建模(Explorative Modeling,XM)”新范式,其核心是一个简单到近乎朴素的for循环:在每个训练步骤中,模型生成K个候选样本,然后仅选取其中最接近真实数据的一个样本来计算损失和回传梯度。这种做法巧妙地绕开了传统生成模型中因使用重构损失(如平方误差)而导致的“模态模糊”问题——即模型倾向于输出多个可能答案的平均值,而这个平均值往往不属于任何真实的数据模式。 XM通过这种方式,在不拆分生成过程的前提下,直接提升了模型的“生成表达力”,即模型捕捉数据分布中多个独立模式的能力。论文将“探索”验证为继模型参数量、数据量之后的第三根可扩展轴。实验表明,随着模型规模、数据量和计算量的增大,探索带来的性能收益越发显著,在图像、视频、语言等多种任务上均能带来效率与质量的提升。 更重要的是,当探索程度足够时,XM可以实现真正的端到端生成。在机器人控制等任务中,仅需一次网络前向传播的XM策略,其性能可媲美甚至超过需要上百次前向的扩散模型策略,实现了推理效率的飞跃。 尽管“最佳K样本选择”的思想并非全新,但该研究的贡献在于清晰地揭示了这一简单机制如何直接解决生成模型的核心瓶颈,并为实现高效、端到端的生成模型开辟了新的可能性。随着模型规模的持续扩大,探索这一新维度可能将发挥越来越关键的作用。

marsbit4分钟前

生成模型也能端到端训练了?核心竟是一个for循环

marsbit4分钟前

年薪百万抢电工,Meta急到自己办技校

AI竞赛正面临新的瓶颈:工地。美国正面临严重的电工、建筑工等技术工人短缺,这已成为微软、Meta、OpenAI等公司快速建设超大规模AI数据中心(如OpenAI耗资160亿美元的“星际之门”项目)的“头号障碍”。 尽管AI公司愿支付高薪(如电工年薪可达24-28万美元),远超传统行业,但熟练技工仍供不应求。麦肯锡预测,美国在2023-2030年间需额外培养13万名电工和24万名建筑工,而劳工统计局预计每年仍有8万个电工岗位空缺。这种短缺导致项目延迟,每月可能造成数百万美元的收入损失。 AI数据中心建设复杂,需应对巨大功耗(一座设施耗电堪比数十万户家庭)、复杂的配电系统以及高密度散热(需液冷技术)等挑战,因此亟需大量技术娴熟的工人。 为此,科技巨头开始亲自下场培养人才。例如,Meta投入1.15亿美元建立建筑工人培训学校,提供免费培训及生活补贴,以快速输送工人上岗。OpenAI则与建筑工会合作,提前锁定熟练劳动力。同时,企业也将招聘目光投向高中生,鼓励年轻人投身技工行业。这些举措已见成效,Z世代对技工职业的兴趣显著上升。 然而,更深层的挑战在于电力。AI数据中心用电量正以惊人速度增长,已推高部分地区的电价。此外,数据中心建设是项目制的,建设期需要成千上万的工人,但建成后仅需少量常驻人员。这意味着未来可能面临熟练工人短期过剩、并流向其他行业压低薪资的风险。如何实现劳动力与电力资源的长期平衡,仍是悬而未决的问题。

marsbit1小时前

年薪百万抢电工,Meta急到自己办技校

marsbit1小时前

交易

现货
活动图片