What’s the truth behind RWA tokenization? ‘More friction, more cost’

ambcrypto发布于2026-03-04更新于2026-03-04

文章摘要

The article examines the debate surrounding the real-world asset (RWA) tokenization trend, questioning whether it truly adds value. Analyst Anndy Lian criticizes the sector for contradicting core crypto principles like decentralization and trust minimization, arguing that it introduces more intermediaries, friction, and costs. He believes only tokenized stocks offer a clear advantage over traditional crypto products. Despite these concerns, major institutions like BlackRock and platforms like Robinhood are actively pursuing tokenization, highlighting its potential to democratize access to financial markets. The RWA market has grown to $26 billion, with increasing user adoption. The recent Iran tensions demonstrated the utility of 24/7 trading platforms like Hyperliquid for price discovery and hedging. While challenges remain, the trend appears resilient and may evolve to address existing risks.

Is tokenization, wrapping a real-world asset (RWA) and offering it via crypto rail, really worth it?

There’s been sharp debate over the efficacy of the overall RWA trend after analyst Anndy Lian poked holes into the sector’s value proposition.

For Lian, the sector lacks key crypto ethos (trust minimization, permissionless, and decentralization).

In contrast, it just adds a new layer of middleman and more overhead costs to run 24/7.

For him, the only segment that makes sense is tokenized stock, which is a better offering than crypto perps (perpetual contracts with no expiry dates).

However, in general, the additional layer with similar traditional disclosure requirements just adds to operational cost, warned Lian.

“Reality: tokenizing RWAs adds intermediaries: Legal wrapper entities, custody providers, compliance oracles, insurance layers, off-chain dispute resolution. More parties, more friction, more cost.”

Do benefits outweigh costs?

While Lian’s argument is plausible, the fact that major players like BlackRock are still betting on it means that the benefits could outweigh the mentioned costs.

In fact, the main argument by supporters is that tokenization democratizes access to financial markets.

And Robinhood is already giving European citizens access to U.S. stock markets via crypto rails. Securitize, Ondo Finance, and other issuers have also ramped up scaling.

As of writing, the global RWA market has hit $26 billion, up 8% in the past 30 days of trading. Over the same period, the total asset holders have crossed half a million to 657K users.

And the growth has been tremendous even as the broader crypto rout deepened, underscoring the demand for these RWA products.

Interestingly, the Iran escalations over the weekend reinforced the need for 24/7 markets, especially for hedging purposes.

According to Bloomberg, Hyperliquid was one of the select available and liquid platforms for traders (including speculators) to express their macro views over the weekend as global tensions heightened.

During the tensions, oil, gold, silver, and other derivatives tracking traditional assets hit record highs on Hyperliquid.

For Flowdesk OTC trader Karim Dandashy, Hyperliquid acted as the ‘price discovery over the weekend.’

Put differently, the RWA trend may be here to stay despite the inherent issues highlighted by Lian. Perhaps, it will evolve to better handle the risks raised rather than be stifled by the perceived cost implications.


Final Summary

  • Analyst discredited the tokenization trend as ‘non-crypto’ that adds more friction and cost rather than offering any ‘real value.’
  • BlackRock and Robinhood are still positioning themselves for the tokenization boom, suggesting that the benefits may outweigh the perceived risks.

你可能也喜欢

为什么美国没有出现“花呗”、“借呗”?

马斯克近期提及X Money计划,再次凸显美国缺乏像微信支付或支付宝那样的一站式支付平台,同时也引发疑问:为何美国没有发展出类似“花呗”、“借呗”这样庞大的信用贷和消费贷产品? 美国金融底层存在显著需求。FDIC 2023年数据显示,约560万家庭无银行账户,1900万家庭银行服务不足;美联储2024年报告指出,年收入低于2.5万美元的成年人中22%无银行账户。这些人因资金不足或不信任银行系统而依赖现金,甚至不得不使用年化利率高达400%的发薪日贷款。此外,“先用后付”服务虽在年轻群体中增长,但用户规模相对较小,传统银行也在快速跟进类似功能。 信用卡体系在美国占据主导地位:约70%-80%成年人持有信用卡,未偿余额达1.28万亿美元,平均年化利率22.3%。2024年消费者支付了1600亿美元利息。信用卡生态依赖交叉补贴——无法全额还款的用户以高利率补贴全额还款者,形成“合法掠夺性贷款”体系。 美国未能发展出互联网小额信贷的原因是多方面的: 1. 严苛且碎片化的监管体系(联邦与州双轨制),合规成本极高,保护了银行而非消费者; 2. 严格的数据法律(如FCRA、CCPA)禁止科技公司将用户行为数据直接用于信贷风控; 3. 资本市场对互联网公司涉足金融业务给予估值惩罚,因金融业务被视为重资产、低增长; 4. 信贷定价权被大型银行集团(如JPMorgan、Bank of America)垄断,它们通过游说和行为惯性维持高利率信用卡生态。 综上,监管、数据法律、资本估值和银行巨头共同阻断了互联网小额信贷在美国的发展路径。

Odaily星球日报22分钟前

为什么美国没有出现“花呗”、“借呗”?

Odaily星球日报22分钟前

交易

现货
合约
活动图片