Uniswap Wins Legal Battle as U.S. Federal Judge Dismisses Crypto Rug-Pull Lawsuit

TheNewsCrypto发布于2026-03-03更新于2026-03-03

文章摘要

A U.S. federal judge dismissed a class-action lawsuit against Uniswap Labs and its founder, Hayden Adams, which sought to hold the decentralized exchange accountable for alleged rug pulls and pump-and-dump schemes on its platform. Judge Katherine Polk Failla ruled that Uniswap cannot be held responsible for the fraudulent actions of anonymous token issuers, emphasizing that operating a decentralized, open-source trading platform does not constitute assisting fraud. The plaintiffs had refiled the case with state-level consumer protection claims after an earlier dismissal, but the court reaffirmed legal protections for DeFi infrastructure. Following the decision, Uniswap's native token UNI saw a price increase and higher trading volume. The ruling is seen as a significant legal victory for the DeFi sector.

Uniswap Labs and its founder, Hayden Adams, saw a significant legal victory when a US federal judge dismissed a four-year-old class-action complaint seeking to hold the decentralized exchange accountable for rug pull and pump-and-dump fraud on its platform.

The decision was delivered by Judge Katherine Polk Failla in Manhattan on March 2, ruling that Uniswap cannot be held responsible for the actions of anonymous token issuers and that operating as a decentralized platform providing an open‐source trading environment does not constitute assisting fraud.

Federal Court Backs DeFi Infrastructure

Nessa Risley led the plaintiffs and filed the first lawsuit against Hayden Adams and Uniswap in April 2022. The lawsuit was dismissed in August 2023 and upheld on appeal. Again, the plaintiffs refiled in May; this time, they switched to state consumer protection concerns and claimed that the platform permitted pump-and-dump schemes and rug pulls.

The court upheld the legal safeguards for open-source DeFi platforms by rejecting the arguments once more.

Then, Brian, policy and legal lead at Uniswap Labs, said the ruling marks “another precedent-setting win for DeFi,” He stressed that even though the plaintiffs switched to state-level claims, the court once more determined that Uniswap cannot be held accountable for stated scams carried out by anonymous third-party token issuers, adding that it “defies logic” to hold a smart contract developer accountable for how others abuse the protocol.

As this decision marks Uniswap’s another major courtroom victory, as in February, Bancor-affiliated entities filed a patent infringement lawsuit against the exchange, which was dismissed by a New York federal judge, ruling that the patents at issue were based on abstract ideas and therefore not eligible for protection under U.S. patent law.

Following the ruling and continued legal wins, UNI is trading up about 1.5%, at $3.86, with a total market cap of $2.45 billion. Also, the 24-hour trading volume climbed over 23%, which signals increased market activity.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Hong Kong and Shanghai Authorities Integrate Cargo Data on Blockchain

TagsUNIUniswap

相关问答

QWhat was the outcome of the US federal judge's ruling regarding Uniswap Labs and the class-action lawsuit?

AThe US federal judge dismissed the class-action complaint against Uniswap Labs, ruling that the decentralized exchange cannot be held accountable for rug pull and pump-and-dump fraud conducted by anonymous token issuers on its platform.

QWho is the judge that delivered the decision in the Uniswap lawsuit and on what date?

AJudge Katherine Polk Failla in Manhattan delivered the decision on March 2.

QWhat did the plaintiffs claim in their refiled lawsuit against Uniswap in May?

AThe plaintiffs refiled the lawsuit switching to state consumer protection concerns, claiming that the platform permitted pump-and-dump schemes and rug pulls.

QHow did the legal representative of Uniswap Labs characterize this court ruling?

ABrian, the policy and legal lead at Uniswap Labs, said the ruling marks 'another precedent-setting win for DeFi' and stated that it 'defies logic' to hold a smart contract developer accountable for how others abuse the protocol.

QWhat was the market reaction of UNI token following the court ruling?

AFollowing the ruling, UNI was trading up about 1.5% at $3.86, with a 24-hour trading volume that climbed over 23%, signaling increased market activity.

你可能也喜欢

美国新加密法案将禁止稳定币生息,成为争议焦点

美国最新发布的加密货币市场结构草案加剧了银行与数字资产行业间的争执。法案试图为数字资产、交易所、稳定币、去中心化金融和自托管钱包制定更清晰的规则,但其中一项条款成为焦点:提议禁止向持有支付型稳定币的用户支付利息或类似收益。 银行业担忧生息稳定币可能像基于区块链的储蓄账户一样分流传统银行存款,因此支持该限制。法案草案禁止仅因持有稳定币而获得被动“闲置收益”,但仍允许基于活动或交易的奖励,这或使加密货币公司能继续提供忠诚度激励。 加密货币行业则认为其已做出重大妥协,并指责银行业试图通过游说维持对存款和支付基础设施的控制。尽管存在稳定币限制,法案仍包含被视为对加密行业和零售用户有利的条款,例如为网络代币和数字商品创建法律类别、提供更清晰的注册途径,以及保护合法的自托管钱包。 对零售用户而言,结果喜忧参半:一方面可能获得数字资产更明确的法律地位、更强的储备和披露要求以及更广泛的受监管加密服务;另一方面则可能失去稳定币近年来的主要优势——银行系统外简单的被动收益机会。这场争论的核心在于,稳定币应发展为开放的区块链金融产品,还是严格受限、仅与传统银行系统并行的数字支付工具。

ambcrypto2小时前

美国新加密法案将禁止稳定币生息,成为争议焦点

ambcrypto2小时前

交易

现货
合约
活动图片