The DeepSeek Financing Story

链捕手发布于2026-06-18更新于2026-06-18

文章摘要

DeepSeek's financing round, totaling approximately 3 billion USD, concluded recently, revealing details about the process and key investors. The round was initiated around April with strict initial terms: a minimum commitment of 5 billion RMB, no syndication, and a pure RMB structure. These were later relaxed, with the minimum ticket size reduced to 1.5 billion RMB. A pivotal four-hour online investor meeting in mid-May served as the primary interaction for many backers with DeepSeek's founder, Liang Wenfeng. Despite not being a naturally eloquent speaker, Liang's philosophy deeply resonated. He consistently emphasized the company's singular focus on AGI (Artificial General Intelligence), the principle of "less is more," extreme caution in spending, and the paramount importance of team stability. His notable quotes included describing the team as "ordinary people doing extraordinary things" and stating that "AGI is a big enough thing; everything else is just process." The final investor list featured 10 entities, but underlying fund structures indicate participation from nearly 100 institutions and individuals. Notable lead investors include Monolith Capital (increasing its commitment from 1.5 to 3 billion RMB), Zhenxingu Capital, IDG Capital, and state-affiliated investors like Guozhitou. Conspicuously absent were major firms like Sequoia China and Hillhouse Capital, despite earlier speculation about their involvement. A core condition set by Liang Wenfeng for all investo...

Author:@Liu Jing, elsewhere

Information about DeepSeek's financing is already everywhere.

Known information will not be repeated by "elsewhere." Below are some untold stories or details we have learned about.

The Legendary Four-Hour Meeting

First, let's talk about that investor meeting, the one whispered about as the "four-hour meeting."

In mid-May, DeepSeek organized this online meeting using the Tencent Meeting system. At that time, the investors were largely finalized, with each institution having two spots to attend.

Liang Wenfeng spoke first, followed by a Q&A session where he addressed investors' questions.

Legend has it that one CVC investor spent ten minutes just asking questions: first a lengthy self-introduction, then three lengthy questions. The atmosphere became awkward for a moment—a scene easy to imagine. Some people whispered among themselves, asking who this person was.

But Liang was unfazed and answered each question seriously. Although after answering the second question, he momentarily forgot the third one and had the investor repeat it.

Prior to this, most of these investors who eventually got in had never met Liang Wenfeng offline, so this was essentially their first real interaction with him. After the meeting, many were left with a lingering impression, a feeling that the essence of the discussion remained with them.

Liang Wenfeng's memorable quotes and spirit began circulating in the market.

Restraint and AGI

Liang Wenfeng is not an exceptionally articulate speaker, and his pace of speech isn't fast, but several quotes from that meeting are often mentioned (paraphrased, the exact wording may vary slightly)—

"We have no fame or influence; we are a group of very ordinary people."

"The narrative I like is that a group of ordinary people accomplished something extraordinary. For DeepSeek, our core is to ensure team stability—this is more important than money or resources. This is the biggest risk and also the greatest challenge."

"Assuming AGI will account for 20% of GDP, those who want 5% of it will lose to those who want 1%; those who want 1% will lose to those who want 0.1%."

"We will focus on things related to enhancing intelligence; we won't do anything else."

"AGI is a significant enough goal; everything else is just a process."

Throughout the four hours, the themes Liang Wenfeng repeatedly emphasized were consistent: focusing solely on AGI; 'less is more'; restraint, and so on.

From 5 Billion to 1.5 Billion

Formal fundraising began around April this year. There was reportedly a so-called "fund white list" consisting of institutions with strong investment capabilities and good reputations.

Initially, DeepSeek required a minimum ticket size of 5 billion RMB, no syndication of shares, and a pure RMB structure.

Against this backdrop, a prominent investor who was initially rumored to definitely participate but ultimately didn't, is widely believed in the industry to have been excluded because they had reportedly marketed shares to Middle Eastern LPs.

However, in China, there are very few market-oriented funds capable of a single investment of 3 billion RMB. Therefore, some VCs repeatedly negotiated whether it could be split among multiple fund entities.

So, looking at the result, the minimum ticket size for a fund was lowered to 1.5 billion RMB, and the fund-raising method became more flexible.

There was also a rumor that participating institutions should preferably not have invested in other large language models. This was probably unrealistic for a simple reason—finding a top-tier fund that hasn't invested in large models is contradictory.

During the investor meeting, Liang Wenfeng also expressed that DeepSeek is willing to help other companies—even including other LLM companies. Of course, the premise remains that they don't poach his people.

Monolith

Monolith Capital appeared early on the investor list. The change was that initially it was 1.5 billion, but it ended up being 3 billion.

The change in numbers is said to be related to the adjustment in Guozhitou's allocation, freeing up some shares—the latter's figure of 980 million RMB suggests it was kept below the 1 billion integer.

Regardless, being willing to place big bets is indeed Cao Xi's distinctive style. He has proven it once with Kimi.

Monolith is probably the youngest VC among the participating institutions in this round.

Zhengxingu

Zhengxingu might be the most surprising presence in the final list.

Many interpret it as Zhengxingu having not invested in any Chinese LLM company during this wave, thus being more eager to get on board. However, according to our knowledge, they did invest in Kimi, likely between $6 billion and $10 billion valuation. But compared to their fund size, the investment amount is relatively limited.

One market interpretation is that the founder of Zhengxingu comes from a secondary market background and seems to have more connections with quantitative funds like Huafang. But in reality, in the secondary market, quantitative investing and fundamental investing are two distinct circles, even with different values.

According to our understanding, this investment happened not only because of Lin Lijun and his partnerYe Chunyan, but also due to the efforts of a newly joined investor.

Zhengxingu was also one of the earliest VCs to start communicating with DeepSeek.

Will DeepSeek Be Sequoia and Hillhouse's Biggest Miss?

Now to the most surprising part of this deal.

In the initial rumors, Hillhouse would participate and invest 5 billion. Zhang Lei also reportedly mentioned to friends multiple times that since 2025, he and Liang Wenfeng had occasional exchanges, and when in Beijing, he would visit Liang's home.

But this story later evolved into: Hillhouse wouldn't participate, but Zhang Lei personally would invest. Reasons cited include Hillhouse's fundraising cycle and regulatory considerations.

Ultimately, neither Zhang Lei nor Hillhouse appeared on the list.

Sequoia China, on the other hand, was almost considered a non-participant from the beginning. The most widespread version cited concerns about overseas LPs. We asked several people close to Sequoia, and they expressed similar sentiments. Of course, other explanations are also circulating.

The bottom line is that Sequoia and Hillhouse, the two institutions that seemed almost certain to be involved, ultimately were not. A senior lawyer told us that for companies with an RMB structure, theoretically, investors cannot be hidden.

Among the established VCs, only IDG invested.

So someone asked us a question in return: Could DeepSeek potentially become Sequoia and Hillhouse's biggest miss?

It's hard to say. However, based on our understanding, DeepSeek might not just raise this one round.

100 Institutions and Individuals

Looking at the investor list, only 10 parties are listed as participating. But "elsewhere" did a simple look-through of the fund entities and found that the actual number of participants is quite high.

For example, the external CVC related to the CATL system—Puyuan Capital's backers include: state-owned assets from Xiamen, Ordos, and other regions; entities related to CATL; and the National Green Development Fund.

Several IDG Capital funds related to this transaction have strong insurance capital characteristics and account for a very high proportion of the 30 billion. Additionally, there are entities related to Nongfu Spring, Septwolves, etc.

Monolith's current LPs are mainly state-owned assets from Zhejiang and Shanghai, as well as listed companies like By-health and Yanghe Distillery.

Furthermore, iHealth Labs is also a participant. In fact, iHealth is also an LP behind many GPs.

A rough estimate, after a shallow look-through and simple deduplication, suggests that nearly 100 institutions or individuals participated in this round of DeepSeek's financing.

The Key Requirement: Don't Poach Talent

We won't reiterate DeepSeek's investment terms here. Just one addition: whether dealing with large corporations or VC funds, Liang Wenfeng's most important requirement is: do not poach DeepSeek's people or encourage them to start their own ventures.

"China's Largest Listed Company"

Returning to viewing this as an investment, what kind of odds does DeepSeek really have?

One participating investor once worriedly said, could this be an investment with too much consensus? According to the experience of the investment industry, consensus outcomes are often mediocre.

But it's hard to say that about DeepSeek. Or rather, we cannot simply understand it through a conventional investment lens, whether in terms of its significance for China's AGI industry or its spiritual meaning.

As one investor put it: "They are doing all this with immense goodwill. He seems to be telling us: this is how the world should be."

So while some hesitated, others believed, "there's no reason not to invest"—if it does IPO as some expect, could DeepSeek potentially become China's largest listed company by market cap on the A-share market?

Low Profile and Ambition

While following DeepSeek's financing progress, one prominent feeling stood out: for most people, DeepSeek was probably a completely unexpected answer. Even for the most competitive investors, they never imagined it would open up for fundraising one day.

So as mentioned, most of the well-known investment veterans only recently connected with the company. Objectively, Liang Wenfeng has indeed long avoided meeting with investors.

When news of the fundraising spread, many institutions didn't even attempt to compete for an investment opportunity. But looking at the result, some got their ticket based on synergy, some on insight, some on brand spirit, and some simply on persistence.

"elsewhere" tried to ask some investors, but most didn't want to discuss this investment much. The sensitivity of the deal is one reason, but more so, it seems to be a conscious desire to maintain this low profile, stemming from a sense of shared honor.

One participating investor said that throughout the process, he cherished every document, hoping to have them framed someday. Another investor repeated twice the 16-character phrase released with the DeepSeek V4 preview:"Not lured by praise, not frightened by slander; act according to the Way, upright and correct oneself."

热门币种推荐

相关问答

QWhat is the main topic of the article 'DeepSeek Financing Story'?

AThe main topic of the article is the details and background stories behind the latest financing round of the AI company DeepSeek, highlighting key events, investor meetings, and the company's philosophy.

QWho is Liang Wenfeng and what is his core message during the four-hour investor meeting?

ALiang Wenfeng is the founder of DeepSeek. During the four-hour meeting, his core message was to focus solely on AGI, emphasize team stability, and advocate for a 'less is more' and 'restrained' approach, stating that 'our core is to ensure team stability—this is more important than money and resources.'

QWhy were venture capital giants like Sequoia China and Hillhouse Capital absent from DeepSeek's investor list according to the article?

ASequoia China was reportedly absent due to concerns related to its overseas LPs. Regarding Hillhouse Capital and its founder Zhang Lei, various reasons are mentioned, including the firm's fundraising rhythm and regulatory factors, but ultimately neither participated in this round.

QWhat was the primary non-financial requirement DeepSeek had for its investors?

ADeepSeek's primary non-financial requirement was that investors, including large corporations and VC funds, must not poach DeepSeek's employees or encourage them to leave to start their own ventures.

QWhat is the article's perspective on the broader significance of DeepSeek beyond just an investment opportunity?

AThe article suggests DeepSeek's significance extends beyond a simple investment. It highlights its importance for China's AGI industry and its inspirational value, describing the team as acting with 'great goodwill' and potentially becoming 'the largest listed company in China's A-share market' if it IPOs.

你可能也喜欢

Michael Saylor:反对 BIP—110 的 110 个理由

Michael Saylor发表长文,系统性地阐述了反对比特币改进提案BIP 110的110个理由。他认为,BIP 110旨在通过修改共识规则来限制区块链上的非支付类数据存储(如铭文等),但其根本动机源于对特定应用的价值判断和“垃圾信息”的担忧,而非修复协议的安全或技术漏洞。Saylor强调,比特币的核心优势在于其中立性、硬共识和开放的无许可创新环境。 他反对BIP 110的主要论点包括:该提案将社会性价值判断提升为协议法律,破坏了规则的中立性;其举证不足,未能量化所谓“紧急威胁”的具体影响;提案捆绑了七项过于宽泛的技术限制,可能误伤未来的合法金融应用与升级路径;临时性的共识规则增加了系统复杂性和协调风险;可能对矿工收入、网络安全和长期创新产生不确定的负面经济影响。 Saylor指出,比特币已具备区块大小和手续费市场等中立的调节机制,节点和矿工也可以自行制定中继和打包策略,这些是比动用共识分叉更优的解决方案。他警告,BIP 110会开创一个危险的先例,即通过协议规则排除不受欢迎的用途,这可能导致未来更多的治理冲突,并扼杀尚未被发现的创新。他呼吁社区应完善测量、采用更精准的资源定价机制,并等待压倒性的共识,而非仓促实施一个可能弊大于利的方案。他最终主张,比特币需要的是“中立性的守护者”,而非“救赎性的守护者”。

marsbit4分钟前

Michael Saylor:反对 BIP—110 的 110 个理由

marsbit4分钟前

United Stables 市值突破 10 亿美元,Chainlink 数据喂价保障 U 代币抵押资产

United Stables发行的稳定币U市值已突破10亿美元,其关键在于采用了Chainlink数据预言机网络来提供抵押品定价和数据基础设施。 这一里程碑事件突显了在稳定币领域,可靠的数据基础设施已非可选,而是必需品。稳定币的价值依赖于用户对其抵押品、定价和赎回机制的信任,若相关数据薄弱或不透明,将阻碍其在DeFi中的整合与应用。Chainlink通过提供外部数据源,为U稳定币生态系统支持自动化的抵押品审计和定价。 需要明确的是,Chainlink在此扮演的是基础设施角色,它本身并不直接赋予稳定币价值,而是通过提供可靠的数据层,使其他系统能更安全地与稳定币交互。U市值的增长也表明,尽管稳定币市场仍由巨头主导,但新的发行方正在凭借强大的基础设施支持找到发展空间。 对于LINK持有者而言,这一集成案例巩固了Chainlink在稳定币关键基础设施(如抵押品验证)领域的战略地位,增强了其网络效应和机构相关性。然而,单一稳定币的增长并不能直接等同于LINK代币的费用增长或价格驱动,其影响更多是间接和战略层面的。核心在于,稳定币正变得越来越重要、受监管且依赖基础设施,而Chainlink正将自己定位为该环境中的关键服务提供商。

bitcoinist1小时前

United Stables 市值突破 10 亿美元,Chainlink 数据喂价保障 U 代币抵押资产

bitcoinist1小时前

交易

现货

热门文章

如何购买S

欢迎来到HTX.com!我们已经让购买Sonic(S)变得简单而便捷。跟随我们的逐步指南,放心开始您的加密货币之旅。第一步:创建您的HTX账户使用您的电子邮件、手机号码注册一个免费账户在HTX上。体验无忧的注册过程并解锁所有平台功能。立即注册第二步:前往买币页面,选择您的支付方式信用卡/借记卡购买:使用您的Visa或Mastercard即时购买Sonic(S)。余额购买:使用您HTX账户余额中的资金进行无缝交易。第三方购买:探索诸如Google Pay或Apple Pay等流行支付方法以增加便利性。C2C购买:在HTX平台上直接与其他用户交易。HTX场外交易台(OTC)购买:为大量交易者提供个性化服务和竞争性汇率。第三步:存储您的Sonic(S)购买完您的Sonic(S)后,将其存储在您的HTX账户钱包中。您也可以通过区块链转账将其发送到其他地方或者用于交易其他加密货币。第四步:交易Sonic(S)在HTX的现货市场轻松交易Sonic(S)。访问您的账户,选择您的交易对,执行您的交易,并实时监控。HTX为初学者和经验丰富的交易者提供了友好的用户体验。

3.0k人学过发布于 2025.01.15更新于 2026.06.02

如何购买S

相关讨论

欢迎来到HTX社区。在这里,您可以了解最新的平台发展动态并获得专业的市场意见。以下是用户对S(S)币价的意见。

活动图片