The DeepSeek Financing Story

链捕手发布于2026-06-18更新于2026-06-18

文章摘要

DeepSeek's financing round, totaling approximately 3 billion USD, concluded recently, revealing details about the process and key investors. The round was initiated around April with strict initial terms: a minimum commitment of 5 billion RMB, no syndication, and a pure RMB structure. These were later relaxed, with the minimum ticket size reduced to 1.5 billion RMB. A pivotal four-hour online investor meeting in mid-May served as the primary interaction for many backers with DeepSeek's founder, Liang Wenfeng. Despite not being a naturally eloquent speaker, Liang's philosophy deeply resonated. He consistently emphasized the company's singular focus on AGI (Artificial General Intelligence), the principle of "less is more," extreme caution in spending, and the paramount importance of team stability. His notable quotes included describing the team as "ordinary people doing extraordinary things" and stating that "AGI is a big enough thing; everything else is just process." The final investor list featured 10 entities, but underlying fund structures indicate participation from nearly 100 institutions and individuals. Notable lead investors include Monolith Capital (increasing its commitment from 1.5 to 3 billion RMB), Zhenxingu Capital, IDG Capital, and state-affiliated investors like Guozhitou. Conspicuously absent were major firms like Sequoia China and Hillhouse Capital, despite earlier speculation about their involvement. A core condition set by Liang Wenfeng for all investo...

Author:@Liu Jing, elsewhere

Information about DeepSeek's financing is already everywhere.

Known information will not be repeated by "elsewhere." Below are some untold stories or details we have learned about.

The Legendary Four-Hour Meeting

First, let's talk about that investor meeting, the one whispered about as the "four-hour meeting."

In mid-May, DeepSeek organized this online meeting using the Tencent Meeting system. At that time, the investors were largely finalized, with each institution having two spots to attend.

Liang Wenfeng spoke first, followed by a Q&A session where he addressed investors' questions.

Legend has it that one CVC investor spent ten minutes just asking questions: first a lengthy self-introduction, then three lengthy questions. The atmosphere became awkward for a moment—a scene easy to imagine. Some people whispered among themselves, asking who this person was.

But Liang was unfazed and answered each question seriously. Although after answering the second question, he momentarily forgot the third one and had the investor repeat it.

Prior to this, most of these investors who eventually got in had never met Liang Wenfeng offline, so this was essentially their first real interaction with him. After the meeting, many were left with a lingering impression, a feeling that the essence of the discussion remained with them.

Liang Wenfeng's memorable quotes and spirit began circulating in the market.

Restraint and AGI

Liang Wenfeng is not an exceptionally articulate speaker, and his pace of speech isn't fast, but several quotes from that meeting are often mentioned (paraphrased, the exact wording may vary slightly)—

"We have no fame or influence; we are a group of very ordinary people."

"The narrative I like is that a group of ordinary people accomplished something extraordinary. For DeepSeek, our core is to ensure team stability—this is more important than money or resources. This is the biggest risk and also the greatest challenge."

"Assuming AGI will account for 20% of GDP, those who want 5% of it will lose to those who want 1%; those who want 1% will lose to those who want 0.1%."

"We will focus on things related to enhancing intelligence; we won't do anything else."

"AGI is a significant enough goal; everything else is just a process."

Throughout the four hours, the themes Liang Wenfeng repeatedly emphasized were consistent: focusing solely on AGI; 'less is more'; restraint, and so on.

From 5 Billion to 1.5 Billion

Formal fundraising began around April this year. There was reportedly a so-called "fund white list" consisting of institutions with strong investment capabilities and good reputations.

Initially, DeepSeek required a minimum ticket size of 5 billion RMB, no syndication of shares, and a pure RMB structure.

Against this backdrop, a prominent investor who was initially rumored to definitely participate but ultimately didn't, is widely believed in the industry to have been excluded because they had reportedly marketed shares to Middle Eastern LPs.

However, in China, there are very few market-oriented funds capable of a single investment of 3 billion RMB. Therefore, some VCs repeatedly negotiated whether it could be split among multiple fund entities.

So, looking at the result, the minimum ticket size for a fund was lowered to 1.5 billion RMB, and the fund-raising method became more flexible.

There was also a rumor that participating institutions should preferably not have invested in other large language models. This was probably unrealistic for a simple reason—finding a top-tier fund that hasn't invested in large models is contradictory.

During the investor meeting, Liang Wenfeng also expressed that DeepSeek is willing to help other companies—even including other LLM companies. Of course, the premise remains that they don't poach his people.

Monolith

Monolith Capital appeared early on the investor list. The change was that initially it was 1.5 billion, but it ended up being 3 billion.

The change in numbers is said to be related to the adjustment in Guozhitou's allocation, freeing up some shares—the latter's figure of 980 million RMB suggests it was kept below the 1 billion integer.

Regardless, being willing to place big bets is indeed Cao Xi's distinctive style. He has proven it once with Kimi.

Monolith is probably the youngest VC among the participating institutions in this round.

Zhengxingu

Zhengxingu might be the most surprising presence in the final list.

Many interpret it as Zhengxingu having not invested in any Chinese LLM company during this wave, thus being more eager to get on board. However, according to our knowledge, they did invest in Kimi, likely between $6 billion and $10 billion valuation. But compared to their fund size, the investment amount is relatively limited.

One market interpretation is that the founder of Zhengxingu comes from a secondary market background and seems to have more connections with quantitative funds like Huafang. But in reality, in the secondary market, quantitative investing and fundamental investing are two distinct circles, even with different values.

According to our understanding, this investment happened not only because of Lin Lijun and his partnerYe Chunyan, but also due to the efforts of a newly joined investor.

Zhengxingu was also one of the earliest VCs to start communicating with DeepSeek.

Will DeepSeek Be Sequoia and Hillhouse's Biggest Miss?

Now to the most surprising part of this deal.

In the initial rumors, Hillhouse would participate and invest 5 billion. Zhang Lei also reportedly mentioned to friends multiple times that since 2025, he and Liang Wenfeng had occasional exchanges, and when in Beijing, he would visit Liang's home.

But this story later evolved into: Hillhouse wouldn't participate, but Zhang Lei personally would invest. Reasons cited include Hillhouse's fundraising cycle and regulatory considerations.

Ultimately, neither Zhang Lei nor Hillhouse appeared on the list.

Sequoia China, on the other hand, was almost considered a non-participant from the beginning. The most widespread version cited concerns about overseas LPs. We asked several people close to Sequoia, and they expressed similar sentiments. Of course, other explanations are also circulating.

The bottom line is that Sequoia and Hillhouse, the two institutions that seemed almost certain to be involved, ultimately were not. A senior lawyer told us that for companies with an RMB structure, theoretically, investors cannot be hidden.

Among the established VCs, only IDG invested.

So someone asked us a question in return: Could DeepSeek potentially become Sequoia and Hillhouse's biggest miss?

It's hard to say. However, based on our understanding, DeepSeek might not just raise this one round.

100 Institutions and Individuals

Looking at the investor list, only 10 parties are listed as participating. But "elsewhere" did a simple look-through of the fund entities and found that the actual number of participants is quite high.

For example, the external CVC related to the CATL system—Puyuan Capital's backers include: state-owned assets from Xiamen, Ordos, and other regions; entities related to CATL; and the National Green Development Fund.

Several IDG Capital funds related to this transaction have strong insurance capital characteristics and account for a very high proportion of the 30 billion. Additionally, there are entities related to Nongfu Spring, Septwolves, etc.

Monolith's current LPs are mainly state-owned assets from Zhejiang and Shanghai, as well as listed companies like By-health and Yanghe Distillery.

Furthermore, iHealth Labs is also a participant. In fact, iHealth is also an LP behind many GPs.

A rough estimate, after a shallow look-through and simple deduplication, suggests that nearly 100 institutions or individuals participated in this round of DeepSeek's financing.

The Key Requirement: Don't Poach Talent

We won't reiterate DeepSeek's investment terms here. Just one addition: whether dealing with large corporations or VC funds, Liang Wenfeng's most important requirement is: do not poach DeepSeek's people or encourage them to start their own ventures.

"China's Largest Listed Company"

Returning to viewing this as an investment, what kind of odds does DeepSeek really have?

One participating investor once worriedly said, could this be an investment with too much consensus? According to the experience of the investment industry, consensus outcomes are often mediocre.

But it's hard to say that about DeepSeek. Or rather, we cannot simply understand it through a conventional investment lens, whether in terms of its significance for China's AGI industry or its spiritual meaning.

As one investor put it: "They are doing all this with immense goodwill. He seems to be telling us: this is how the world should be."

So while some hesitated, others believed, "there's no reason not to invest"—if it does IPO as some expect, could DeepSeek potentially become China's largest listed company by market cap on the A-share market?

Low Profile and Ambition

While following DeepSeek's financing progress, one prominent feeling stood out: for most people, DeepSeek was probably a completely unexpected answer. Even for the most competitive investors, they never imagined it would open up for fundraising one day.

So as mentioned, most of the well-known investment veterans only recently connected with the company. Objectively, Liang Wenfeng has indeed long avoided meeting with investors.

When news of the fundraising spread, many institutions didn't even attempt to compete for an investment opportunity. But looking at the result, some got their ticket based on synergy, some on insight, some on brand spirit, and some simply on persistence.

"elsewhere" tried to ask some investors, but most didn't want to discuss this investment much. The sensitivity of the deal is one reason, but more so, it seems to be a conscious desire to maintain this low profile, stemming from a sense of shared honor.

One participating investor said that throughout the process, he cherished every document, hoping to have them framed someday. Another investor repeated twice the 16-character phrase released with the DeepSeek V4 preview:"Not lured by praise, not frightened by slander; act according to the Way, upright and correct oneself."

热门币种推荐

相关问答

QWhat is the main topic of the article 'DeepSeek Financing Story'?

AThe main topic of the article is the details and background stories behind the latest financing round of the AI company DeepSeek, highlighting key events, investor meetings, and the company's philosophy.

QWho is Liang Wenfeng and what is his core message during the four-hour investor meeting?

ALiang Wenfeng is the founder of DeepSeek. During the four-hour meeting, his core message was to focus solely on AGI, emphasize team stability, and advocate for a 'less is more' and 'restrained' approach, stating that 'our core is to ensure team stability—this is more important than money and resources.'

QWhy were venture capital giants like Sequoia China and Hillhouse Capital absent from DeepSeek's investor list according to the article?

ASequoia China was reportedly absent due to concerns related to its overseas LPs. Regarding Hillhouse Capital and its founder Zhang Lei, various reasons are mentioned, including the firm's fundraising rhythm and regulatory factors, but ultimately neither participated in this round.

QWhat was the primary non-financial requirement DeepSeek had for its investors?

ADeepSeek's primary non-financial requirement was that investors, including large corporations and VC funds, must not poach DeepSeek's employees or encourage them to leave to start their own ventures.

QWhat is the article's perspective on the broader significance of DeepSeek beyond just an investment opportunity?

AThe article suggests DeepSeek's significance extends beyond a simple investment. It highlights its importance for China's AGI industry and its inspirational value, describing the team as acting with 'great goodwill' and potentially becoming 'the largest listed company in China's A-share market' if it IPOs.

你可能也喜欢

执法机构声称CLARITY法案帮助罪犯。行业代表称他们错了

美国全国警长协会致信参议院两党领袖,警告《CLARITY法案》现行版本将为去中心化金融系统的某些参与者提供广泛的注册、KYC(了解你的客户)、反洗钱及制裁法规豁免,可能使不法分子利用旨在隐藏数字资产交易的平台与服务。这是该协会第三次提出类似警告,并联合了多个检察官及警察局长组织,共同指出法案第604条可能为人口贩运、制裁逃避者和洗钱者制造漏洞。 该条款通常被称为“区块链监管确定性法案”,旨在保护不托管用户资产的非托管软件开发者。执法机构认为其措辞过于宽泛,可能让实际托管资产或协助洗钱的运营商也获得保护,从而削弱与传统金融机构相比的KYC和反洗钱标准。 区块链协会对此提出反驳,称这是对条款的“根本误解”,强调第604条仅解决开发者的错误分类问题,并非为犯罪分子提供豁免,也不限制制裁执行或妨碍针对洗钱等犯罪的起诉。 这一分歧成为参议院投票前的关键争议点。执法社区内部意见也不统一:美国黑人执法官员全国组织已公开支持法案,认为其在保留现有执法权限的同时增加了新工具;美国大县警长协会则对第604条的立场从反对转为中立,称持续谈判已澄清条款的实施方式。随着参议院计划在8月休会前表决,关于开发者责任的争议已成为最具细节和重要性的议题之一。

cryptonews.ru7分钟前

执法机构声称CLARITY法案帮助罪犯。行业代表称他们错了

cryptonews.ru7分钟前

萨伊勒将此策略称为“加密货币市场的摩根大通”

迈克尔·塞勒将MicroStrategy的策略定位为“加密货币市场的摩根大通”,以强调其对比特币市场的影响力远超单纯的机构买家。近期,摩根大通发布报告警告称,MicroStrategy调整后的比特币销售政策可能给市场带来“双向风险”,即这家长期大买家可能转变为影响价格的卖家。该行认为,公司需持有足够支付24-36个月优先股股息的现金储备,远超其当时约17个月的水平,并指出2026年加密市场走势将部分取决于MicroStrategy如何管理其比特币储备以及美国《CLARITY法案》的进展。 塞勒公开驳斥了公司面临抛售压力的说法,否认了有关批准50亿美元新售币计划的报道,称其资本管理系统是现有工具,市场误读为被迫抛售信号。数据显示,截至8月2日,MicroStrategy持有842,138枚BTC,近期出售了1,638枚BTC,同时将美元储备增至40亿美元并回购了8,100万美元优先股。摩根大通认为这种多线操作正是引发市场波动的原因。 摩根大通分析指出,MicroStrategy在2026年已购入约137亿美元比特币,占该行预估的行业净流入的70%,目前持有近4%的流通量。按其上半年速度,全年购买额可能达320亿美元,远超此前年份。这种单家公司的交易活动足以影响整个资产类别,恰似摩根大通在传统市场的分量。 公司第二季度财报显示,尽管比特币持仓增长,但仍从盈利140亿美元转为亏损82亿美元。塞勒强调,MicroStrategy计划继续净买入比特币,并澄清自己从未出售过个人持有的任何比特币,以此区分个人持仓与公司国库的偶尔销售。

cryptonews.ru28分钟前

萨伊勒将此策略称为“加密货币市场的摩根大通”

cryptonews.ru28分钟前

交易

现货

热门文章

如何购买S

欢迎来到HTX.com!我们已经让购买Sonic(S)变得简单而便捷。跟随我们的逐步指南,放心开始您的加密货币之旅。第一步:创建您的HTX账户使用您的电子邮件、手机号码注册一个免费账户在HTX上。体验无忧的注册过程并解锁所有平台功能。立即注册第二步:前往买币页面,选择您的支付方式信用卡/借记卡购买:使用您的Visa或Mastercard即时购买Sonic(S)。余额购买:使用您HTX账户余额中的资金进行无缝交易。第三方购买:探索诸如Google Pay或Apple Pay等流行支付方法以增加便利性。C2C购买:在HTX平台上直接与其他用户交易。HTX场外交易台(OTC)购买:为大量交易者提供个性化服务和竞争性汇率。第三步:存储您的Sonic(S)购买完您的Sonic(S)后,将其存储在您的HTX账户钱包中。您也可以通过区块链转账将其发送到其他地方或者用于交易其他加密货币。第四步:交易Sonic(S)在HTX的现货市场轻松交易Sonic(S)。访问您的账户,选择您的交易对,执行您的交易,并实时监控。HTX为初学者和经验丰富的交易者提供了友好的用户体验。

3.3k人学过发布于 2025.01.15更新于 2026.06.02

如何购买S

相关讨论

欢迎来到HTX社区。在这里,您可以了解最新的平台发展动态并获得专业的市场意见。以下是用户对S(S)币价的意见。

活动图片