OpenClaw "Endorses" Venice: What Other Targets Are There in the Privacy AI Track?

Odaily星球日报发布于2026-03-05更新于2026-03-05

文章摘要

OpenClaw's brief endorsement of Venice has drawn market attention to the growing intersection of privacy and AI in the crypto space, sparking discussions around several related projects. Venice (VVV) is positioned as a decentralized, privacy-first alternative to ChatGPT, emphasizing its no-logging and no-censorship policies. Its token has surged amid both growing demand and a reduction in token supply. NEAR Protocol is shifting its narrative toward becoming an infrastructure layer for AI agents, particularly through its Confidential Intents system, which adds optional privacy to cross-chain transactions to combat MEV and front-running. Sahara AI aims to build a decentralized AI ecosystem that addresses data ownership and fair value distribution. Its ClawGuard system provides safety mechanisms for AI agents, while its data service platform incentivizes users to contribute data. Phala Network offers privacy-preserving computation via TEE-based smart contracts, providing a secure execution environment for AI agents. It has partnered with projects like ai16z to integrate confidential computation into agent frameworks. Analysts note that interest in privacy-AI projects had been building even before recent hype, suggesting the trend may have longer-term potential beyond short-term speculation.

Original | Odaily Planet Daily (@OdailyChina)

Author | DingDang (@XiaMiPP)

The hot topic OpenClaw has started endorsing Privacy AI, and the "desperate crypto retail investors" seem to have found a new direction for speculation.

It is precisely within this narrative context that a batch of projects related to privacy computing and AI Agent infrastructure have begun to re-enter the market's view. Odaily Planet Daily's review found that during this wave of heated discussion, several projects have already become potential beneficiaries.

VVV(#133)

Venice is an AI generation platform focused on censorship resistance + privacy, positioning itself as a decentralized version of ChatGPT. The starting point of the Privacy AI hype originated from Venice. This is because OpenClaw had once highlighted Venice in its official documentation, only to remove it hastily within 24 hours. Although the recommendation could be removed, this action drew more attention to Venice and its privacy-first features.

Unlike most AI projects, Venice's core narrative is not AI model capability, but privacy itself. Against the backdrop of mainstream AI platforms increasingly strengthening content censorship, and with ongoing controversies over AI data leaks and model training, this "no recording, no censorship" product positioning precisely hits the most sensitive values of the crypto community.

In an era where the AI Agent trend is rapidly fermenting, Venice has stepped into this "era dividend" quite aptly. More coincidentally, the Venice project is actively reducing the token supply of VVV, decreasing inflation. Increased demand meeting reduced supply further strengthens the positive feedback expectation for the VVV token.

Read reference: OpenClaw Endorses Venice.ai, VVV Token Surges Over 500% in a Month

NEAR(#43)

Near Protocol, this veteran high-performance public chain project, is also actively seeking self-reinvention under the impact of the AI wave. It is no longer just a "traditional L1" pursuing TPS and low gas, but is gradually shifting its narrative focus towards the execution layer and settlement infrastructure in the era of AI Agents, attempting to find a new growth narrative in this new technological cycle.

Since the beginning of 2025, it has been vigorously promoting the NEAR Intents (Intent System). This system allows users or AI agents to simply express the "final desired outcome," and the backend will automatically complete complex operations across 35+ chains without manual bridging, wallet switching, or routing management.

On February 25, 2026, NEAR officially upgraded this intent system and launched Confidential Intents. This version introduces privacy computing capabilities into the original intent execution framework. Through Near's privacy sharding mechanism combined with Trusted Execution Environments (TEE), cross-chain transactions can hide key details during execution, such as swap paths, trade size, or specific strategies. However, it does not enforce privacy on all transactions like Zcash or Monero, but rather adds an optional layer of privacy protection to intent execution. Its main goal is not to anonymize transactions, but to prevent MEV, front-running, and sandwich attacks and other on-chain arbitrage behaviors, thereby making transactions more secure during execution.

In the future, AI agents might become the main "users" of blockchain. They will autonomously hold assets, conduct cross-chain transactions, execute strategies, and even coordinate with each other. Under this vision, blockchain not only needs to handle high-frequency transactions but must also provide capabilities like verifiable execution, privacy computing, and cross-chain coordination.

Near's current layout is precisely built around this imagination. It attempts to build an open network that can both support AI agents in automatically executing complex tasks and ensure the process is verifiable and secure. Against the backdrop of the continuously impacting AI wave, this transformation can be seen both as an attempt to actively embrace the new narrative and as a self-reshaping of a veteran public chain in the new cycle.

SAHARA(#295)

Sahara AI's core goal is to build a decentralized, transparent, and secure AI ecosystem, making the development, training, deployment, and commercialization of AI fairer and more trustworthy. The project is committed to solving the problems currently faced by the AI industry, such as data privacy, algorithmic bias, and unclear model ownership.

The rise of AI Agents is bringing forth a new question: Who exactly do the data, models, and capabilities used by these Agents belong to? In the current AI industry structure, this question hasn't been properly resolved. The data required to train models often comes from a large number of dispersed contributors, but the final profits are highly concentrated in the hands of a few AI companies; model developers, even with technical capabilities, often can only依附 on platform ecosystems; and as AI Agents begin to call models, data, and tools autonomously, the entire value chain will become more complex. Without a clear set of rights confirmation and profit-sharing mechanisms, the future AI economy will likely repeat the path of Web2: data owned by users, value captured by platforms.

Sahara AI is precisely trying to establish new rules in this环节. Its ClawGuard security system provides verifiable safety guardrails for AI agents, ensuring they operate safely within preset rules. The Data Service Platform (DSP) allows users to earn token incentives by labeling and contributing AI training data, gradually forming a decentralized data market. Under this mechanism, data contributors can not only participate in the AI model training process but also receive continuous收益 when the data is used, while the platform also ensures data quality and privacy protection through on-chain mechanisms.

PHA(#601)

Phala Network is a privacy-preserving smart contract platform built on Substrate, aiming to provide verifiable privacy-preserving computation services for Web3 applications. To understand why Phala benefits from the AI Agent热潮, one first needs to answer a more fundamental question: What infrastructure does the operation of AI Agents actually rely on?

If we break down the current Agent ecosystem, its tech stack can be roughly divided into several layers. The top layer is the model layer, which includes various large language models or reasoning models, such as OpenAI, Claude, and a series of open-source models; below that is the Agent framework layer, including tools like LangChain, AutoGPT, OpenClaw, etc., which are responsible for organizing tasks, scheduling models, and calling external tools; further down is the execution environment layer, where the Agent actually runs code, calls APIs, and executes automated tasks; additionally, there is the payment and identity layer, used to handle payments, identity, and reputation systems between Agents; and at the very bottom is the compute power and privacy layer, responsible for ensuring the computation process is trustworthy and data security is not compromised.

From this structure, Phala's position恰恰 spans the execution environment layer and the compute power & privacy layer. Its core technology—a confidential computing network based on TEE (Trusted Execution Environment)—enables AI Agents to run programs securely off-chain while ensuring the computation process is verifiable and data is not窥探 by external parties. This is particularly crucial in the Agent economy.

In terms of specific ecosystem implementation, Phala has already begun to integrate with AI Agent projects. For example, Phala collaborated with ai16z to build a TEE component for its Eliza multi-agent framework, integrating trusted execution technology directly into the Agent runtime environment; meanwhile, some AI Agent token issuance projects (like aiPool) have also adopted Phala's TEE technology to manage private keys and on-chain assets.

In the future, as AI Agents evolve from "chat tools" into digital entities capable of holding funds, executing transactions, and even operating protocols, secure execution environments will gradually become an indispensable infrastructure layer for the entire Agent ecosystem, and Phala is trying to occupy this position.

Conclusion

When reviewing these projects, an interesting finding is: The time when these tokens actually started rising was actually earlier than the recommendation event these past few days. That is to say, before Venice brought "Privacy AI" to the forefront, a portion of funds in the market had already noticed this direction in advance, it just lacked a clear enough narrative trigger point at the time. The OpenClaw recommendation event was just a fuse that ignited attention.

In fact, whether it's a16z or Delphi Digital, their annual investment research reports for 2025 listed privacy and AI as key focus areas for 2026. However, when these macro judgments真正落到 the market, they often need a specific event to trigger consensus. And in early 2026, privacy and AI have come before us in such a combined form.

As for whether this will become the next long-term trend or just another short-lived thematic speculation,恐怕 still requires time to provide the answer.

相关问答

QWhat is the core narrative of Venice (VVV) in the context of privacy AI?

AVenice's core narrative is not AI model capability but privacy itself. It positions as a decentralized ChatGPT alternative, emphasizing 'no recording, no censorship' to address data leakage and model training controversies in mainstream AI platforms.

QHow is NEAR Protocol adapting to the AI wave and what key feature did it introduce in February 2026?

ANEAR Protocol is shifting its focus to become an execution layer and settlement infrastructure for the AI Agent era. In February 2026, it upgraded its intent system to Confidential Intents, introducing privacy computing capabilities via TEE to hide transaction details and prevent MEV and front-running.

QWhat problem does Sahara AI aim to solve in the AI ecosystem, and what is its ClawGuard system?

ASahara AI aims to address data privacy, algorithmic bias, and unclear model ownership in AI. Its ClawGuard system provides verifiable safety guardrails for AI agents, ensuring they operate within preset rules securely.

QWhich technology does Phala Network (PHA) use to provide privacy for AI Agent operations, and why is it critical?

APhala Network uses TEE (Trusted Execution Environment)-based confidential computing to enable AI Agents to run programs off-chain with verifiable computation and data privacy. This is critical as Agents evolve to hold funds and execute transactions, requiring secure execution environments.

QAccording to the article, what was the role of OpenClaw's recommendation in the privacy AI trend?

AOpenClaw's recommendation of Venice acted as a catalyst that drew market attention to privacy AI, though the trend had already been noticed by some investors earlier. It served as a narrative trigger for broader consensus.

你可能也喜欢

Anthropic警告的递归AI,田渊栋新公司刚刚走出了「第一步」

近日,Anthropic发布文章披露,其代码库超过80%由AI撰写,并警告AI“递归自我改进”(即AI自主设计、训练后续版本)可能带来风险,呼吁行业建立暂停机制。与此同时,由田渊栋等人联合创立的新公司Recursive Superintelligence结束了隐身状态,发布了其首项公开技术成果——“迈向自动化AI研究的第一步”。 该系统旨在将传统AI研究中“提出想法-编写代码-运行实验-分析结果”的人工闭环自动化。它能够针对给定目标自动生成实验思路、实现代码、运行验证并从中学习,从而自主推进研究进程,并内置了防止“奖励作弊”的机制。 Recursive在三个差异显著的基准测试中取得了领先结果: 1. **小模型训练优化**:在固定计算预算下,将模型验证损失进一步降低,相当于以更少时间达到同等效果。 2. **训练速度竞速**:在社区持续优化两年的基准上,将训练时间从79.7秒缩短至77.5秒,核心改进包括在注意力层使用FP8计算、为优化器添加退火噪声等。 3. **GPU内核优化**:在英伟达的底层计算内核基准测试中,将整体得分提升至0.754,缩小了与硬件理论极限的差距,而这些优化策略并非来自团队的专业知识,而是由系统自主发现。 Recursive团队阵容强大,已获得巨额融资,其目标是构建能够递归提升自身研发能力的AI系统。这与Anthropic的警告形成了微妙对比:一方正在实践AI加速AI研发的路径,另一方则呼吁为可能到来的“递归自我改进”时刻做好风险管控准备。当前成果虽仅是迈向自动化研究的初步尝试,但标志着一个能够自我增强的AI研发新范式已开始运转。

marsbit4分钟前

Anthropic警告的递归AI,田渊栋新公司刚刚走出了「第一步」

marsbit4分钟前

黄金抄底指南:盯住利率,别只看战争

**黄金抄底指南:盯住利率,别只看战争** 金价在今年1月底触及历史新高后,开启了持续下跌,并于6月进入技术性熊市。许多投资者困惑:为何战争冲突下黄金不涨反跌? 文章指出,核心原因在于黄金的定价逻辑已从地缘冲突引发的“避险”情绪,切换为对利率的定价。战争推高油价和通胀预期,迫使央行维持紧缩货币政策。黄金作为不生息资产,利率(持有机会成本)越高,其吸引力就越低。5月份一度出现的和平传闻导致金价大跌,恰恰证明了“加息预期”而非“战争与否”才是当前市场的主线。 此外,本轮下跌伴随全市场去杠杆。当投资者需要补充保证金时,会优先抛售流动性好的资产,导致黄金、白银、比特币乃至纳斯达克指数在短期内呈现高度同步下跌,这与资产基本面无关。 对于抄底时机,文章建议关注三个关键信号:1. **加息预期见顶**(如市场对最后一次加息的定价完成);2. **霍尔木兹海峡复航**(缓解通胀压力的上游开关);3. **黄金ETF资金流转为净流入**(表明强制抛售压力减弱)。历史经验(如2008年、2022年)表明,金价见底通常与政策拐点(货币转向)同步,而非与战事结束同步。 文章最后给出个人策略思路(非投资建议):在4000、3700、3500美元附近分三笔试探性布局,总仓位不超过三成,并等待上述信号中至少两个出现后,再考虑追加仓位。核心结论是:在当前的宏观环境下,关注利率动向比单纯关注战争局势,对于黄金投资更为重要。

marsbit10分钟前

黄金抄底指南:盯住利率,别只看战争

marsbit10分钟前

近期链上回顾:美股冲击下毫无主线的炒

近期链上行情回顾显示,在以太坊主网沉寂后,市场注意力重回Solana,但缺乏明确主线,整体呈现“社区回归与注意力争夺”的拉锯态势。 一方面,注意力争夺成为主流玩法。市场依赖名人喊单、热点事件和快速交易,例如$JOTCHUA靠网络梗和KOL讨论热度暴涨,而同概念代币$WORLDCUP与$PITCH则因缺乏关注表现悬殊。平台pump.fun推出的悬赏任务功能进一步放大了这种趋势,出现了如纹身换赏金等极端案例,虽制造了短期热点,但也引发负面争议,被视作一种博眼球的流量游戏。 另一方面,部分项目展现出社区回归的迹象。这些项目不依赖单一名人喊单,而是通过持续建设、交付产品和凝聚社区共识获得长期发展。例如$neet、$troll、$buttcoin等老牌社区币,凭借鲜明的文化主题和活跃社区保持了相对稳定的生命力。新兴链游项目$KINS(Kintara)是典型代表,它通过扎实的游戏内容更新、经济机制设计和社区活动(如游戏内集成热门币、举办玩家赛事),逐步赢得了玩家信任,吸引了包括知名KOL在内的用户自发参与,建立起良性的网络效应。 文章最后反思,市场在追逐热点的同时,更应思考何为可持续的信任构建,期待更多依靠社区共识和真实价值支撑的项目能引导市场走向更健康的方向。

marsbit10分钟前

近期链上回顾:美股冲击下毫无主线的炒

marsbit10分钟前

交易

现货
合约
活动图片