OpenClaw "Endorses" Venice: What Other Targets Are There in the Privacy AI Track?

Odaily星球日报发布于2026-03-05更新于2026-03-05

文章摘要

OpenClaw's brief endorsement of Venice has drawn market attention to the growing intersection of privacy and AI in the crypto space, sparking discussions around several related projects. Venice (VVV) is positioned as a decentralized, privacy-first alternative to ChatGPT, emphasizing its no-logging and no-censorship policies. Its token has surged amid both growing demand and a reduction in token supply. NEAR Protocol is shifting its narrative toward becoming an infrastructure layer for AI agents, particularly through its Confidential Intents system, which adds optional privacy to cross-chain transactions to combat MEV and front-running. Sahara AI aims to build a decentralized AI ecosystem that addresses data ownership and fair value distribution. Its ClawGuard system provides safety mechanisms for AI agents, while its data service platform incentivizes users to contribute data. Phala Network offers privacy-preserving computation via TEE-based smart contracts, providing a secure execution environment for AI agents. It has partnered with projects like ai16z to integrate confidential computation into agent frameworks. Analysts note that interest in privacy-AI projects had been building even before recent hype, suggesting the trend may have longer-term potential beyond short-term speculation.

Original | Odaily Planet Daily (@OdailyChina)

Author | DingDang (@XiaMiPP)

The hot topic OpenClaw has started endorsing Privacy AI, and the "desperate crypto retail investors" seem to have found a new direction for speculation.

It is precisely within this narrative context that a batch of projects related to privacy computing and AI Agent infrastructure have begun to re-enter the market's view. Odaily Planet Daily's review found that during this wave of heated discussion, several projects have already become potential beneficiaries.

VVV(#133)

Venice is an AI generation platform focused on censorship resistance + privacy, positioning itself as a decentralized version of ChatGPT. The starting point of the Privacy AI hype originated from Venice. This is because OpenClaw had once highlighted Venice in its official documentation, only to remove it hastily within 24 hours. Although the recommendation could be removed, this action drew more attention to Venice and its privacy-first features.

Unlike most AI projects, Venice's core narrative is not AI model capability, but privacy itself. Against the backdrop of mainstream AI platforms increasingly strengthening content censorship, and with ongoing controversies over AI data leaks and model training, this "no recording, no censorship" product positioning precisely hits the most sensitive values of the crypto community.

In an era where the AI Agent trend is rapidly fermenting, Venice has stepped into this "era dividend" quite aptly. More coincidentally, the Venice project is actively reducing the token supply of VVV, decreasing inflation. Increased demand meeting reduced supply further strengthens the positive feedback expectation for the VVV token.

Read reference: OpenClaw Endorses Venice.ai, VVV Token Surges Over 500% in a Month

NEAR(#43)

Near Protocol, this veteran high-performance public chain project, is also actively seeking self-reinvention under the impact of the AI wave. It is no longer just a "traditional L1" pursuing TPS and low gas, but is gradually shifting its narrative focus towards the execution layer and settlement infrastructure in the era of AI Agents, attempting to find a new growth narrative in this new technological cycle.

Since the beginning of 2025, it has been vigorously promoting the NEAR Intents (Intent System). This system allows users or AI agents to simply express the "final desired outcome," and the backend will automatically complete complex operations across 35+ chains without manual bridging, wallet switching, or routing management.

On February 25, 2026, NEAR officially upgraded this intent system and launched Confidential Intents. This version introduces privacy computing capabilities into the original intent execution framework. Through Near's privacy sharding mechanism combined with Trusted Execution Environments (TEE), cross-chain transactions can hide key details during execution, such as swap paths, trade size, or specific strategies. However, it does not enforce privacy on all transactions like Zcash or Monero, but rather adds an optional layer of privacy protection to intent execution. Its main goal is not to anonymize transactions, but to prevent MEV, front-running, and sandwich attacks and other on-chain arbitrage behaviors, thereby making transactions more secure during execution.

In the future, AI agents might become the main "users" of blockchain. They will autonomously hold assets, conduct cross-chain transactions, execute strategies, and even coordinate with each other. Under this vision, blockchain not only needs to handle high-frequency transactions but must also provide capabilities like verifiable execution, privacy computing, and cross-chain coordination.

Near's current layout is precisely built around this imagination. It attempts to build an open network that can both support AI agents in automatically executing complex tasks and ensure the process is verifiable and secure. Against the backdrop of the continuously impacting AI wave, this transformation can be seen both as an attempt to actively embrace the new narrative and as a self-reshaping of a veteran public chain in the new cycle.

SAHARA(#295)

Sahara AI's core goal is to build a decentralized, transparent, and secure AI ecosystem, making the development, training, deployment, and commercialization of AI fairer and more trustworthy. The project is committed to solving the problems currently faced by the AI industry, such as data privacy, algorithmic bias, and unclear model ownership.

The rise of AI Agents is bringing forth a new question: Who exactly do the data, models, and capabilities used by these Agents belong to? In the current AI industry structure, this question hasn't been properly resolved. The data required to train models often comes from a large number of dispersed contributors, but the final profits are highly concentrated in the hands of a few AI companies; model developers, even with technical capabilities, often can only依附 on platform ecosystems; and as AI Agents begin to call models, data, and tools autonomously, the entire value chain will become more complex. Without a clear set of rights confirmation and profit-sharing mechanisms, the future AI economy will likely repeat the path of Web2: data owned by users, value captured by platforms.

Sahara AI is precisely trying to establish new rules in this环节. Its ClawGuard security system provides verifiable safety guardrails for AI agents, ensuring they operate safely within preset rules. The Data Service Platform (DSP) allows users to earn token incentives by labeling and contributing AI training data, gradually forming a decentralized data market. Under this mechanism, data contributors can not only participate in the AI model training process but also receive continuous收益 when the data is used, while the platform also ensures data quality and privacy protection through on-chain mechanisms.

PHA(#601)

Phala Network is a privacy-preserving smart contract platform built on Substrate, aiming to provide verifiable privacy-preserving computation services for Web3 applications. To understand why Phala benefits from the AI Agent热潮, one first needs to answer a more fundamental question: What infrastructure does the operation of AI Agents actually rely on?

If we break down the current Agent ecosystem, its tech stack can be roughly divided into several layers. The top layer is the model layer, which includes various large language models or reasoning models, such as OpenAI, Claude, and a series of open-source models; below that is the Agent framework layer, including tools like LangChain, AutoGPT, OpenClaw, etc., which are responsible for organizing tasks, scheduling models, and calling external tools; further down is the execution environment layer, where the Agent actually runs code, calls APIs, and executes automated tasks; additionally, there is the payment and identity layer, used to handle payments, identity, and reputation systems between Agents; and at the very bottom is the compute power and privacy layer, responsible for ensuring the computation process is trustworthy and data security is not compromised.

From this structure, Phala's position恰恰 spans the execution environment layer and the compute power & privacy layer. Its core technology—a confidential computing network based on TEE (Trusted Execution Environment)—enables AI Agents to run programs securely off-chain while ensuring the computation process is verifiable and data is not窥探 by external parties. This is particularly crucial in the Agent economy.

In terms of specific ecosystem implementation, Phala has already begun to integrate with AI Agent projects. For example, Phala collaborated with ai16z to build a TEE component for its Eliza multi-agent framework, integrating trusted execution technology directly into the Agent runtime environment; meanwhile, some AI Agent token issuance projects (like aiPool) have also adopted Phala's TEE technology to manage private keys and on-chain assets.

In the future, as AI Agents evolve from "chat tools" into digital entities capable of holding funds, executing transactions, and even operating protocols, secure execution environments will gradually become an indispensable infrastructure layer for the entire Agent ecosystem, and Phala is trying to occupy this position.

Conclusion

When reviewing these projects, an interesting finding is: The time when these tokens actually started rising was actually earlier than the recommendation event these past few days. That is to say, before Venice brought "Privacy AI" to the forefront, a portion of funds in the market had already noticed this direction in advance, it just lacked a clear enough narrative trigger point at the time. The OpenClaw recommendation event was just a fuse that ignited attention.

In fact, whether it's a16z or Delphi Digital, their annual investment research reports for 2025 listed privacy and AI as key focus areas for 2026. However, when these macro judgments真正落到 the market, they often need a specific event to trigger consensus. And in early 2026, privacy and AI have come before us in such a combined form.

As for whether this will become the next long-term trend or just another short-lived thematic speculation,恐怕 still requires time to provide the answer.

相关问答

QWhat is the core narrative of Venice (VVV) in the context of privacy AI?

AVenice's core narrative is not AI model capability but privacy itself. It positions as a decentralized ChatGPT alternative, emphasizing 'no recording, no censorship' to address data leakage and model training controversies in mainstream AI platforms.

QHow is NEAR Protocol adapting to the AI wave and what key feature did it introduce in February 2026?

ANEAR Protocol is shifting its focus to become an execution layer and settlement infrastructure for the AI Agent era. In February 2026, it upgraded its intent system to Confidential Intents, introducing privacy computing capabilities via TEE to hide transaction details and prevent MEV and front-running.

QWhat problem does Sahara AI aim to solve in the AI ecosystem, and what is its ClawGuard system?

ASahara AI aims to address data privacy, algorithmic bias, and unclear model ownership in AI. Its ClawGuard system provides verifiable safety guardrails for AI agents, ensuring they operate within preset rules securely.

QWhich technology does Phala Network (PHA) use to provide privacy for AI Agent operations, and why is it critical?

APhala Network uses TEE (Trusted Execution Environment)-based confidential computing to enable AI Agents to run programs off-chain with verifiable computation and data privacy. This is critical as Agents evolve to hold funds and execute transactions, requiring secure execution environments.

QAccording to the article, what was the role of OpenClaw's recommendation in the privacy AI trend?

AOpenClaw's recommendation of Venice acted as a catalyst that drew market attention to privacy AI, though the trend had already been noticed by some investors earlier. It served as a narrative trigger for broader consensus.

你可能也喜欢

如何让自己变得让人工智能永远也无法取代

面对人工智能的冲击,许多人担心工作被取代。然而,真正的威胁在于个人对他人和系统的依赖,以及由此产生的“薪资奴役”——即为生存而从事无意义、枯燥的工作。摆脱这种困境的关键,不是抵制技术,而是成为拥有高自主性的“不可受雇”个体。 文章提出了成功抵御AI替代的五个核心要素:自主性(主动行动的能力)、品味(判断事物价值的经验)、说服力(让他人关注你工作的能力)、毅力(坚持并从错误中学习)和迭代(根据反馈持续改进)。这些能力无法仅通过理论学习获得,必须通过实践来培养。 要启动转变,首先要彻底改变环境,重塑身份认同。其次,应选择一个能获得真实、快速反馈的实践领域,例如创业。在众多技能中,内容创作(媒体)比编写代码更具优势,因为其价值是主观的,需要独特的审美和判断力,这正是AI目前难以完全复制的。 具体行动上,可以从三个步骤开始: 1. **挖掘原始素材**:反思自己长期痴迷的知识领域、轻松解决的难题或童年被压抑的兴趣,找到独特的个人经验。 2. **确立反向思考主轴**:找出你坚信但主流观点错误的地方,或行业内普遍忽视的“皇帝新衣”,形成独特的批判性视角。 3. **立即发布**:将前两步的思考融合,撰写并发布第一个核心内容(如帖子、视频),勇敢接受真实世界的反馈,并在此基础上持续学习和迭代。 最终,抵御AI的关键在于构建一份与自身身份深度契合的毕生事业,通过持续的内容创作和真实互动,建立无法被自动化取代的独特价值和影响力。行动,从今天发布第一个想法开始。

marsbit2小时前

如何让自己变得让人工智能永远也无法取代

marsbit2小时前

通过掷骰子离线保管比特币密钥:并非人人愿意为之

文章探讨了通过投掷骰子生成比特币钱包种子短语的安全方法及其现实挑战。核心观点如下: **1. 骰子提供物理熵源** 骰子结果由众多微小变量决定,理论上虽可预测,但实践中无法被攻击者复制或计算,从而提供高质量的随机性。每个六面骰子投掷约产生2.585比特熵,50次投掷即可满足典型12词助记词(128比特熵)的安全需求。 **2. Coldcard漏洞事件凸显手工熵源的价值** 近期Coldcard硬件钱包因固件漏洞导致其内部随机数生成器存在缺陷,致使约1128枚比特币被盗。但那些**完全**通过足量骰子投掷生成种子短语的用户未受此漏洞影响,因为他们的主密钥未使用有缺陷的生成器。 **3. 重要警示:手工种子并非万能保护** 安全研究员指出,即使用户使用骰子生成了安全的种子,若他们使用了Coldcard的其他功能(如生成纸钱包、克隆密钥、共享签名密钥、密码等),这些**衍生密钥**仍可能调用有漏洞的随机数生成器,从而存在风险。安全种子不保证设备生成的所有秘密都安全。 **4. 手工生成熵源的现实局限性** 尽管数学上可靠,但该方法对大多数用户并不友好: * **过程繁琐易错**:需投掷50-99次,精确记录,任何输入错误都会导致钱包完全不同。 * **引入新风险**:用户可能在记录、转换过程中泄露信息,或使用有偏的骰子/投掷方式。 * **用户体验差**:难以想象大规模推广需要用户手动投掷近百次骰子。安全措施需适应现实生活场景和普通用户的知识水平。 **5. 给用户的建议** 受影响的Coldcard用户应: * 更新固件至最新版。 * 检查是否使用过有漏洞的功能生成了次级密钥或密码,如有则需立即更换。 * 考虑采用多签方案,使用不同厂商的设备分散风险。 **结论**:手工投掷骰子生成熵源是技术娴熟用户的一个有效安全选项,但其过程复杂、容易出错,不适合作为主流用户的默认方法。长远目标是依赖安全、透明且无需专业知识的硬件/软件随机数生成方案。

cryptonews.ru5小时前

通过掷骰子离线保管比特币密钥:并非人人愿意为之

cryptonews.ru5小时前

交易

现货
活动图片