Is Ethereum cheaper in the U.S? Demand is starting to fade and…

ambcrypto发布于2026-03-25更新于2026-03-25

文章摘要

Ethereum's current stability may be misleading, as underlying demand, particularly from U.S. investors, is weakening. The Coinbase Premium Index remains negative, indicating ETH is trading cheaper on Coinbase compared to Binance due to lower buying pressure or increased selling in the U.S. This persistent discount exists even during brief price recoveries, suggesting weak sentiment among American investors. While large players (whales) remain active with consistently high average order sizes dominating spot activity, retail participation is notably absent. This one-sided market structure, reliant on whales without broader retail support, lacks staying power and makes any price upside fragile. Technically, Ethereum is holding above $2,100 but appears shaky. The RSI is neutral, while the MACD is flat, signaling a loss of momentum in its recent push. Derivatives data align with this caution: Open Interest has declined from earlier highs, indicating traders are stepping back, and Funding Rates, while positive, show a lack of aggressive long positioning.

Ethereum [ETH] may not be as strong as it seems right now. While the price might look momentarily steady, there’s more to this than what meets the eye.

Large players have continued to stay active, but will this pace hold without retail support?

Not enough demand for Ethereum

According to a recent report, Ethereum faces weaker demand from U.S investors, even with global activity. The Coinbase Premium Index, which compares ETH prices on Coinbase and Binance, was negative with a value of around -0.0149 at press time.

Source: Cryptoquant

Put simply, this means Ethereum [ETH] might be trading cheaper on Coinbase, than on Binance. That means lower buying pressure or a hike in selling in the U.S.

Here, what’s interesting is that this gap has persisted even during a recovery. No matter how brief it may be. A move back towards neutral or positive levels, however, would prove improved sentiment and stronger support from U.S investors.

The whales are here, but retail is not

Things get clear when looking at order flow. While U.S demand has been weak, large players have been active in the market.

In fact, CryptoQuant data highlighted consistently elevated average order sizes. So, whale-sized trades have been dominating Ethereum’s spot activity.

Source: Ethereum

What’s missing, however, is retail participation. There’s little indication of smaller order flows picking up alongside these larger trades. The market structure has been pretty one-sided.

Such setups may lack staying power.

Steady, but not quite powerful

Source: TradingView

On the daily chart, Ethereum [ETH] held on above the $2,100-zone. However, it looked shaky at best. Especially since while the RSI was at neutral levels, the MACD was flat. Put simply, its recent push has been losing strength.

Source: Coinalyze

Derivatives numbers appeared to be of a similar vein too. Open Interest fell lower from earlier highs – A sign that traders may be stepping back.

At the same time, Funding Rates suggested longs were still dominant… but not aggressively so.


Final Summary

  • Ethereum doesn’t have much U.S demand.
  • Whale activity has been dominant, but lack of retail support makes any upside fragile.

热门币种推荐

相关问答

QWhat does the negative Coinbase Premium Index indicate about Ethereum demand in the U.S.?

AThe negative Coinbase Premium Index indicates that Ethereum is trading cheaper on Coinbase compared to Binance, suggesting lower buying pressure or increased selling activity from U.S. investors.

QHow has whale activity contrasted with retail participation in Ethereum's market?

AWhale activity has been consistently elevated with large order sizes dominating spot trades, but retail participation remains weak with no significant increase in smaller order flows.

QWhat technical indicators suggest Ethereum's recent price push is losing strength?

AThe RSI is at neutral levels and the MACD is flat, indicating that Ethereum's recent upward momentum is weakening despite holding above the $2,100 zone.

QWhat does the decline in Open Interest and neutral Funding Rates imply for Ethereum's derivatives market?

AThe decline in Open Interest suggests traders are stepping back, while neutral Funding Rates indicate longs are dominant but not aggressive, reflecting cautious sentiment.

QWhy might Ethereum's current market structure lack staying power according to the article?

AThe market structure lacks staying power because it relies heavily on whale activity without broader retail support, making any potential upside fragile and unsustainable.

你可能也喜欢

如何让自己变得让人工智能永远也无法取代

面对人工智能的冲击,许多人担心工作被取代。然而,真正的威胁在于个人对他人和系统的依赖,以及由此产生的“薪资奴役”——即为生存而从事无意义、枯燥的工作。摆脱这种困境的关键,不是抵制技术,而是成为拥有高自主性的“不可受雇”个体。 文章提出了成功抵御AI替代的五个核心要素:自主性(主动行动的能力)、品味(判断事物价值的经验)、说服力(让他人关注你工作的能力)、毅力(坚持并从错误中学习)和迭代(根据反馈持续改进)。这些能力无法仅通过理论学习获得,必须通过实践来培养。 要启动转变,首先要彻底改变环境,重塑身份认同。其次,应选择一个能获得真实、快速反馈的实践领域,例如创业。在众多技能中,内容创作(媒体)比编写代码更具优势,因为其价值是主观的,需要独特的审美和判断力,这正是AI目前难以完全复制的。 具体行动上,可以从三个步骤开始: 1. **挖掘原始素材**:反思自己长期痴迷的知识领域、轻松解决的难题或童年被压抑的兴趣,找到独特的个人经验。 2. **确立反向思考主轴**:找出你坚信但主流观点错误的地方,或行业内普遍忽视的“皇帝新衣”,形成独特的批判性视角。 3. **立即发布**:将前两步的思考融合,撰写并发布第一个核心内容(如帖子、视频),勇敢接受真实世界的反馈,并在此基础上持续学习和迭代。 最终,抵御AI的关键在于构建一份与自身身份深度契合的毕生事业,通过持续的内容创作和真实互动,建立无法被自动化取代的独特价值和影响力。行动,从今天发布第一个想法开始。

marsbit4小时前

如何让自己变得让人工智能永远也无法取代

marsbit4小时前

通过掷骰子离线保管比特币密钥:并非人人愿意为之

文章探讨了通过投掷骰子生成比特币钱包种子短语的安全方法及其现实挑战。核心观点如下: **1. 骰子提供物理熵源** 骰子结果由众多微小变量决定,理论上虽可预测,但实践中无法被攻击者复制或计算,从而提供高质量的随机性。每个六面骰子投掷约产生2.585比特熵,50次投掷即可满足典型12词助记词(128比特熵)的安全需求。 **2. Coldcard漏洞事件凸显手工熵源的价值** 近期Coldcard硬件钱包因固件漏洞导致其内部随机数生成器存在缺陷,致使约1128枚比特币被盗。但那些**完全**通过足量骰子投掷生成种子短语的用户未受此漏洞影响,因为他们的主密钥未使用有缺陷的生成器。 **3. 重要警示:手工种子并非万能保护** 安全研究员指出,即使用户使用骰子生成了安全的种子,若他们使用了Coldcard的其他功能(如生成纸钱包、克隆密钥、共享签名密钥、密码等),这些**衍生密钥**仍可能调用有漏洞的随机数生成器,从而存在风险。安全种子不保证设备生成的所有秘密都安全。 **4. 手工生成熵源的现实局限性** 尽管数学上可靠,但该方法对大多数用户并不友好: * **过程繁琐易错**:需投掷50-99次,精确记录,任何输入错误都会导致钱包完全不同。 * **引入新风险**:用户可能在记录、转换过程中泄露信息,或使用有偏的骰子/投掷方式。 * **用户体验差**:难以想象大规模推广需要用户手动投掷近百次骰子。安全措施需适应现实生活场景和普通用户的知识水平。 **5. 给用户的建议** 受影响的Coldcard用户应: * 更新固件至最新版。 * 检查是否使用过有漏洞的功能生成了次级密钥或密码,如有则需立即更换。 * 考虑采用多签方案,使用不同厂商的设备分散风险。 **结论**:手工投掷骰子生成熵源是技术娴熟用户的一个有效安全选项,但其过程复杂、容易出错,不适合作为主流用户的默认方法。长远目标是依赖安全、透明且无需专业知识的硬件/软件随机数生成方案。

cryptonews.ru7小时前

通过掷骰子离线保管比特币密钥:并非人人愿意为之

cryptonews.ru7小时前

交易

现货

热门文章

加密市场宏观研报:美国“加密货币周”来袭,ETH开启机构军备赛高潮

本周,加密市场迎来两股重磅催化——华盛顿“加密货币周”的立法攻势与以太坊机构布局的密集爆发,共同构成加密行业2025年下半年的“政策拐点”与“资金拐点”。这一轮加密周期的深层逻辑,正从比特币转向以太坊、稳定币及链上金融基础设施。我们认为:美国的政策明朗化+以太坊的机构化扩展,标志着加密行业正进入结构性转正阶段,市场配置的重心亦应逐步从“价格博弈”过渡至“规则+基础设施的制度红利捕捉”。

2.0k人学过发布于 2025.07.17更新于 2025.07.17

加密市场宏观研报:美国“加密货币周”来袭,ETH开启机构军备赛高潮

相关讨论

欢迎来到HTX社区。在这里,您可以了解最新的平台发展动态并获得专业的市场意见。以下是用户对ETH(ETH)币价的意见。

活动图片