From Utopian Narratives to Financial Infrastructure: The 'Disenchantment' and Pivot of Crypto VC

marsbit发布于2026-03-30更新于2026-03-30

文章摘要

From Utopian Narratives to Financial Infrastructure: The Disenchantment and Pivot of Crypto VC The crypto industry, once championing "blockchain, not Bitcoin" and a broad Web3 vision, is now seeing venture capital flow overwhelmingly into pragmatic financial applications, particularly stablecoin payments. Following the decline of the Web3 and NFT boom in the early 2020s, investment has cooled for many sectors but surged for payment infrastructure. Key signals include Stripe's $1.1 billion acquisition of Bridge and Mastercard's $1.8 billion purchase of BVNK. Data from Architect Partners shows funding for crypto payment companies skyrocketed to $2.6 billion in 2025, exceeding the total of the previous three years combined. In contrast, funding for decentralized applications (DApps) and blockchain gaming has collapsed. The total private crypto funding reached $20.4 billion in 2025, still below the 2022 peak of $27.6 billion. Stablecoins, like USDT and USDC, are now seen as a breakthrough application, with their annual transaction volume soaring 72% to $33 trillion in 2025. Their core appeal is enabling efficient, real-time global value transfer, solving long-standing issues of cost and speed in cross-border payments. However, the industry faces significant challenges from established "gatekeepers" like Visa and Mastercard, which control terminal access. The piece also notes the declining market share of Binance and the emergence of new products like Franklin Templeton's toke...

Written by: Suvashree Ghosh, Matt Haldane

Compiled by: Saoirse, Foresight News

Not long ago, the crypto industry was chanting the slogan "blockchain, not Bitcoin," claiming that distributed ledger technology would go beyond financial applications and completely reshape the internet. However, recent financing trends indicate that in the real world, cash is still king.

Since the Web3 and NFT craze subsided in the early 2020s, investment enthusiasm in the crypto industry has noticeably cooled. But one niche has bucked the trend, attracting increasing venture capital—stablecoin payments.

Stripe's acquisition of Bridge for $1.1 billion last year was an early signal of traditional financial institutions beginning to lay out stablecoin payments. Since then, a batch of startups including ARQ, KAST, and RedotPay have successively secured new funding to build cross-border payment channels and stablecoin-based financial services. Mastercard's acquisition of BVNK for $1.8 billion last week further confirms the market's strong interest in this sector.

"Startups related to stablecoins are almost the hottest area for venture capital financing right now," said Rob Hadick, General Partner at Dragonfly Capital. "Stablecoins have broken away from the entire crypto industry to become one of the few truly breakthrough applications with widespread real-world adoption."

According to data from Architect Partners, which specializes in annual crypto financing reports, the total financing for crypto payment companies soared to $2.6 billion in 2025, exceeding the sum of the previous three years. Driven by Mastercard's acquisition of BVNK, this number is expected to continue climbing this year.

Crypto Payment Infrastructure Financing: 2025 company financing exceeded the sum of the previous three years

Meanwhile, overall private financing in the crypto industry increased from nearly $13 billion in 2024 to $20.4 billion in 2025, but still fell short of the 2022 peak of $27.6 billion.

Total Financing for Cryptocurrency Companies: The number of crypto financing deals rose last year but still hasn't reached the 2022 peak

Currently, the two areas with the most concentrated private funding are "Investment & Trading Infrastructure" and "Brokers & Exchanges," both financial application businesses. Payment infrastructure firmly holds third place. In stark contrast, the blockchain gaming sector, which was once at the core of the Web3 and NFT frenzy, saw its financing drop from $3.76 billion in 2022 (about 14% of total financing) to the point where it was no longer listed as a separate category in 2025.

In fact, various types of decentralized applications (Web3 functional layer) collectively raised $5.2 billion in 2022; in the 2025 report, only the consumer DApp category remained, with financing of just $864 million.

Financing by Cryptocurrency Subsector: Payments跻身 among the top three sub-sectors attracting financing in 2025

Stablecoins are building more robust financial infrastructure for blockchain. These tokens are typically pegged 1:1 to the US dollar, with their value tied to underlying assets. Driven by the Trump administration's pro-crypto policies, market enthusiasm for stablecoins reached unprecedented heights last year.

According to Artemis Analytics data, the total transaction volume of stablecoins surged 72% in 2025, reaching $33 trillion. The two largest stablecoins by size are currently Tether's USDT and Circle's USDC.

Circle's stock price recorded its largest-ever drop on Tuesday as investors assessed potential adjustments to U.S. stablecoin regulations and the impact of intensifying industry competition. But the core appeal of stablecoins remains clear: transferring funds as efficiently as possible.

Cross-border payments remain slow, costly, and capital-intensive. Despite years of fintech development, cross-border transfers still heavily rely on prefunded accounts in different jurisdictions.

"Stablecoins have completely changed this landscape," said Prajit Nanu, co-founder and CEO of cross-border payments company Nium. "They enable value to move globally in real-time without the same level of capital efficiency drain, which is why investors see them as the core infrastructure for the next generation of payments."

This industry still has powerful "gatekeepers." Large payment networks like Visa and Mastercard control access to payment terminals. Eric F. Risley, founder and managing partner of Architect Partners, wrote in the report that the channel distribution issue "is a major concern for every stablecoin and related payment company."

Binance Spot Trading Market Share Trend Chart

As of February this year, Binance's share of Bitcoin spot trading had fallen to 27% (this data varies slightly depending on the statistical method), and its share of all cryptocurrency trading fell from 52% to 32%. Its most profitable derivatives business also saw a significant decline, dropping to 34%.

Franklin Templeton partnered with Ondo Finance to launch an ETF tokenization product, tradable via crypto wallets 24/7, bypassing the broker accounts and limited trading hours that fund investments have relied on for decades.

Industry Voices

"The irony of holding this event in Las Vegas right now is just palpable," said Ben Johnson, Head of Client Solutions at Morningstar, stating bluntly that this industry has "completely crossed the line between investing and gambling, with no room for turning back."

ETFs, originally created to simplify investing, have now become a vehicle for the newest form of financial gambling in the U.S. Bloomberg Intelligence data shows that 36% of the 1,000 new funds launched last year were leveraged products or crypto-related funds.

相关问答

QWhat is the main shift in focus for crypto venture capital investments according to the article?

AThe main shift is from utopian narratives like Web3 and NFTs towards financial infrastructure, particularly stablecoin payments and related services.

QWhich specific area within crypto has seen as a 'breakthrough application' with real-world adoption?

AStablecoins are identified as a breakthrough application that has gained significant real-world adoption, especially in payment infrastructure.

QHow much did funding for crypto payment companies reach in 2025, and how does it compare to previous years?

AFunding for crypto payment companies reached $2.6 billion in 2025, which exceeded the total of the previous three years combined.

QWhat major acquisition is mentioned as a signal of traditional financial institutions' interest in stablecoin payments?

AMastercard's acquisition of BVNK for $1.8 billion is highlighted as a key signal of traditional financial institutions' growing interest in stablecoin payments.

QWhat problem do stablecoins primarily solve in the global financial system, as per the article?

AStablecoins solve the problem of slow, costly, and capital-intensive cross-border payments by enabling real-time global value transfer with greater efficiency.

你可能也喜欢

深度:外宾 Genspark

文章《深度:外宾 Genspark》揭示了人工智能创业公司Genspark及其母公司MainFunc在身份叙事与商业运作上的复杂性。 Genspark自称是总部位于加州帕洛阿尔托、由微软等前员工创立的“硅谷公司”,并积极利用与OpenAI、Anthropic、微软等巨头的合作(如API采购、客户案例、高管合影)来强化其“美国AI公司”的品牌形象。然而,其核心创始人景鲲和朱凯华均出身百度,这段重要履历在对外宣传中被系统性地淡化或省略。 文章指出,Genspark在面对不同社群时姿态迥异:积极亮相主流国际商业会议并赞助,但对硅谷华人社区活动和中国同行则显得疏离甚至回避。在技术合作上,它热情宣布接入美国闭源模型(如GPT、Claude),却通过第三方平台间接调用中国的开放权重模型(如Kimi、DeepSeek),避免与中国模型公司产生直接的品牌关联。其重要投资方之一、来自新加坡的蓝驰创投也被在对外叙事中“隐身”。 商业层面,Genspark被描述为“AI界的Costco”,其核心模式并非技术创新,而是快速复制市场已验证的热门AI产品形态(如Perplexity的搜索、Manus的通用Agent、Plaud的硬件等),将其整合进统一的订阅套餐,再通过大规模、高调的广告投放(如超级碗、纽约地铁)和联盟营销驱动增长。尽管网站流量存在波动,但其宣称的年化收入快速攀升至2.5亿美元。有分析认为,其收入可能部分来自无法直接获取美国前沿模型服务的中国客户,通过Genspark进行“中转”。 文章最终揭示,Genspark的成功依赖于一套精密的双重策略:在台前构筑纯正的硅谷身份,充分利用美国科技生态的品牌和资源;在幕后,则可能依赖一个未公开的、位于中国的研发团队作为其“产品工厂”,并隐秘地整合来自中国的资本、技术供应链与潜在客户。它试图让世界相信其只是一家美国公司,而其真正的竞争力恰恰来自这种游走于中美两个世界之间、却选择性呈现的商业与叙事系统。

marsbit39分钟前

深度:外宾 Genspark

marsbit39分钟前

比特币该不该“一成不变”?Craig Wright再掀治理路线之争

比特币治理再次成为焦点,核心问题是:一套运行十多年的去中心化规则,谁有权改变?Craig Wright近期主张协议应永久固定,认为比特币的核心价值在于其公开、透明、不可随意改变的货币规则,而非交易速度或功能扩展。这重新引发了社区关于治理模式的讨论。 支持固定协议者强调,规则的确定性是比特币区别于传统金融体系、建立信任的基石。若协议可被频繁修改,恐将削弱其核心价值。另一方面,反对者认为,面对安全威胁、效率问题和用户需求的变化,系统必须具备升级能力。真正的争议并非“改或不改”,而在于改变的权力归属与过程是否符合去中心化原则。 文章回顾了比特币并非一成不变,如隔离见证(SegWit)和Taproot等重要升级均通过社区共识完成。然而,治理过程也暴露矛盾,例如2017年的区块扩容之争最终导致了分叉。争论的实质是“规则优先”与“适应现实”两种价值理念的冲突。 同时,开发者角色的影响力也成为隐忧。尽管比特币没有中心管理机构,但核心开发者在维护代码和推动讨论中具有重要话语权。然而,任何重大升级最终仍需依赖矿工、节点运营商及广大用户的社会共识,这是一种独特的协调机制。 对于市场参与者而言,治理争论直接影响比特币的长期价值:协议稳定性关乎市场信任,而技术升级能力则决定其网络竞争力。比特币未来的挑战在于,如何在保持核心规则稳定与适应现实需求之间取得平衡。 Craig Wright的个人争议虽影响其可信度,但其提出的治理问题具有讨论价值。比特币最大的创新或许不仅在于技术,更在于这种无中心权威的全球治理实验。其未来发展很可能是在核心稳定的基础上,通过社区共识进行有限且谨慎的升级。这场关于稳定与进化的争论,仍将持续。

marsbit41分钟前

比特币该不该“一成不变”?Craig Wright再掀治理路线之争

marsbit41分钟前

讨论:韩国工人害怕失业,马斯克却在预想“没有工作”的社会?

本文探讨了韩国现代汽车工人因担忧AI与机器人技术威胁就业而发起罢工,与埃隆·马斯克所描绘的AI和机器人将创造“极度丰裕”、使工作成为可选项的未来图景,两者之间形成的鲜明对比与深刻分歧。 文章指出,工人的焦虑源于技术替代的长期可能性被舆论提前兑现,尽管当前人形机器人要稳定替代汽车生产线上的熟练工人仍面临巨大技术挑战。这种情绪与历史上的“卢德运动”一脉相承,其核心并非反对技术本身,而是追问技术提升效率后,新增财富如何分配,以及转型成本由谁承担。 马斯克提出的“全民高收入”愿景,其实现前提是技术创造的巨大生产力能被社会广泛分享。然而,从当前依赖劳动获取收入的社会,过渡到那个理想未来,中间可能存在漫长的“阵痛期”,部分群体可能首先承担失业与技能贬值的代价。 文章最后强调,面对机器人产业化趋势,社会不应只是被动等待。正如工业革命伴随产生了劳动保障等一系列社会规则,对于AI与机器人技术,也需要提前建立关于利益分配、就业转型、安全责任等方面的规范与框架。这种对“条条框框”的探讨,并非阻碍技术进步,而是确保其能够健康、包容地融入社会,最终让技术红利惠及更多人。韩国工人的忧虑虽然可能早于技术成熟度,但相关的社会讨论已然刻不容缓。

marsbit52分钟前

讨论:韩国工人害怕失业,马斯克却在预想“没有工作”的社会?

marsbit52分钟前

交易

现货
活动图片