CLARITY Act Next Up: What Happens After The Stablecoin Deal—And Why Mid-May Matters

bitcoinist发布于2026-05-04更新于2026-05-04

The CLARITY Act is moving into a tight, time-sensitive phase after the Senate Banking Committee released its draft on Friday. With the stablecoin compromise text now out in the open, attention is shifting to the long-awaited next step: a Senate Banking Committee markup.

CLARITY Act Heads Toward Committee Action

As Bitcoinist reported over the weekend, under the draft, the CLARITY Act would bar crypto firms from paying customers “any form of interest or yield” for simply holding payment stablecoins—language designed to reflect how banks pay interest on deposits.

At the same time, the bill would allow companies to offer rewards or incentives, as long as those incentives are not functionally or economically equivalent to interest earned on bank deposits.

On Monday, Eleanor Terrett of Crypto In America reported that many in crypto are framing the draft as a win for banks, arguing that a broad “no yield” approach hands banks an advantage. Banks, however, appear to be concerned that the compromise may not go far enough to stop crypto companies from finding workarounds.

The sticking point is the clause aimed at preventing rewards that are “economically or functionally equivalent” to interest on bank deposits—an effort to close loopholes, but one that may still leave room for interpretation.

A Senate Banking staffer captured that frustration in remarks shared on Friday: “Time for everyone to move on from yield. Banks should not turn a modest win into a loss.”

With the stablecoin yield provision cleared, the CLARITY Act appears to be approaching its final hurdles before Chairman Tim Scott schedules a Senate Banking Committee markup.

Per the report, industry leaders believe the markup could be announced later this week and held during the week of the 11th, when Congress returns from recess. If that timeline doesn’t work, another possible window is the week of the 18th, before the Senate leaves for the Memorial Day recess.

Final Language Not Done Yet

Behind the scenes, the focus is also shifting to “finishing touches” on other parts of the legislation. Industry insiders told Crypto In America that DeFi-related provisions—specifically the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act (BRCA)—and protections for software developers are likely to be finalized this week.

Ethics-related issues are also still in play. Sources familiar with the process told Crypto In America that negotiations on ethics provisions are ongoing, and that talks could continue even after the CLARITY Act clears the Senate Banking Committee.

While the legislative groundwork seems to be coming together, the question remains whether the markup and eventual vote will be bipartisan. Supporters are looking for Democratic buy-in, and one DeFi industry leader told Crypto In America that the next two weeks are critical.

The leader also said that bipartisan approval is key to getting the CLARITY Act done, adding that without Democrats, the measure can’t move forward. At the same time, it’s unclear whether the process will stay along party lines, as it did in the Senate Agriculture Committee in January.

The daily chart shows the total crypto market cap valuation at $2.59 trillion as of Monday. Source: TOTAL on TradingView.com

Featured image created with OpenArt, chart from TradingView.com

你可能也喜欢

DeepSeek故意做了一个难用的Agent?

DeepSeek近期战略转向引发关注。模型价格方面,V4 Pro不再延续低价策略,而新发布的智能体框架DeepSeek Harness则将焦点转向了模型运行时的底层基础设施。 过去,DeepSeek通过打造强大且价格低廉的模型,并开源开放,成功构建了以模型调用量为核心的生态。如今,其战略重心似乎从争夺模型调用量,转向了争夺调用发生的位置——即智能体(Agent)的运行时环境。 DeepSeek Harness的设计理念一反当前AI产品将复杂性封装给用户的趋势。它没有提供一个“开箱即用”的完整Agent产品,而是将构成Agent的模型、工具、技能、工作流等组件拆解为可自由替换和组合的模块,甚至允许动态加载和卸载插件。其底层内核Cordis致力于解决插件的时空可组合性问题,旨在让Agent能在运行过程中自我调整和进化,根据任务目标实时构建所需能力。 更值得注意的是,Harness并未强制绑定DeepSeek自家的模型,允许接入其他厂商的模型。这表明其野心可能不在于推销特定模型,而在于定义和控制下一代Agent的运行时标准,类似于操作系统在软件生态中的角色。 因此,V4 Pro的涨价与Harness的发布可被视为一体两面:模型开始扮演为整个生态持续提供动力的“发动机”角色,而Harness则旨在构建一个吸引开发者的底层平台。其当前相对“难用”和面向开发者的特性,恰恰反映了它优先服务于生态建设者而非普通用户的初期策略。DeepSeek的长期目标,或许是推动Agent从预定义的产品,进化为能够动态自我构建和演化的新型软件形态。

marsbit34分钟前

DeepSeek故意做了一个难用的Agent?

marsbit34分钟前

预测市场的价值、增长与风险

文章探讨了预测市场的巨大潜力、快速增长及伴随的监管与消费者保护问题。预测市场通过简单的“是/否”合约让用户对各种事件结果进行交易,价格直接反映市场认为的该结果发生概率。其核心价值在于提供高效的风险对冲工具和优于传统民调的概率预测,并能吸引用户进入平台,部分最终转化为长期投资者。以Robinhood为例,其预测市场收入已超过加密货币和股票交易。 增长主要由体育赛事(如世界杯)驱动,预测市场正在大量吸纳传统体育投注的用户和交易量。然而,这引发了严重的法律和监管争议。美国商品期货交易委员会(CFTC)认为事件合约属于其监管的衍生品,而许多州政府则视其为体育投注,应受州级监管并纳税,双方已展开多起诉讼。监管归属的模糊性带来了不确定性。 更突出的问题是消费者保护。数据显示,多数普通用户在预测市场中亏损,而专业交易者获利丰厚。平台营销方式(如推广高风险的“串关”投注)与传统投注平台类似,但针对问题性投注行为的保护措施(如年龄限制、自我排除机制)却主要依赖平台自律,而非法律强制要求,这可能导致消费者受损。 文章最后提出改进建议:将消费者保护机制内置于产品设计中,对体育类合约实施更严格的保护与税收,并利用预测市场的吸引力引导用户转向长期储蓄和投资产品,借鉴英国“有奖债券”的历史经验,将投机冲动转化为财务健康。 作者认为预测市场是“更好的市场”,但当前对普通消费者并不更友好。他呼吁平台、监管机构和州政府尽快合作,建立更完善的保护框架,以避免未来可能出现的严厉监管反弹,从而损害该市场的真正价值。

marsbit2小时前

预测市场的价值、增长与风险

marsbit2小时前

AI巨头实习生日薪揭秘:Anthropic超5000元,Kimi只能排第四梯队

2026年,AI行业实习生日薪差距悬殊。全球顶尖人才计划中,OpenAI Residency日薪约5625元,Anthropic AI Safety Fellows日薪约5198元,且后者每月额外提供1.5万美元算力经费。这些项目门槛极高,本质是“预招聘”。 美国科技大厂常规技术实习生薪资同样可观:Meta日薪约3780元,Google约3400元,英伟达美国均值约2106元(博士上限超5000元)。 国内巨头通过专项计划高薪抢夺顶尖人才:字节跳动Top Seed研究实习生日薪达2000元;小米相关顶尖实习岗位日薪在500-1100元区间。 相比之下,多数国内AI公司普通实习生薪资处于第二梯队:DeepSeek普通AGI实习生日薪500-1000元;字节普通研发实习生日薪500元;MiniMax、阿里巴巴、英伟达中国相关岗位日薪在350-800元;Kimi算法岗日薪400-450元;小米普通大模型实习生日薪300-400元;智谱AI最低,日薪200-300元,但其员工持股比例高,以期权作为重要补偿。 此前流传的“DeepSeek清华姚班实习生日薪5500元”仅为极端个例,非普遍标准。 分析指出,AI行业薪资“贫富分化”严重,中美大厂薪酬差距仍大。中国公司正以专项计划追赶顶尖人才待遇,而期权激励在该行业扮演着重要角色。行业最核心的竞争,依然是对顶尖人才的争夺。

Odaily星球日报3小时前

AI巨头实习生日薪揭秘:Anthropic超5000元,Kimi只能排第四梯队

Odaily星球日报3小时前

交易

现货
活动图片