AI Sweeps Everything, Why Are Crypto Builders the Most Secure?

marsbit发布于2026-03-20更新于2026-03-20

文章摘要

In an era where AI is disrupting industries and causing widespread job displacement, crypto builders are uniquely positioned to thrive. While AI threatens to automate many white-collar and coding jobs, the crypto sector has forged individuals with exceptional adaptability, cross-domain expertise, and rapid learning capabilities. The real issue isn’t that crypto is dying—it’s that AI is commoditizing knowledge-based work globally. True value in AI is captured by infrastructure players like NVIDIA and OpenAI, not by those simply wrapping AI models. In contrast, crypto offers structural advantages: its community operates at high information density, tracks multiple innovation frontiers, and builds non-commoditizable tech like zero-knowledge proofs and quantum-resistant cryptography. Major players like Stripe, BlackRock, and Cloudflare are investing heavily in crypto infrastructure, signaling real-world demand. The future remains uncertain, but those who build through uncertainty—as seen in past technological revolutions—will define the next era. Crypto builders, equipped with a unique skill set and mindset, are among the best prepared to navigate and lead in the age of AI.

Written by: YQ

Compiled by: Chopper, Foresight News

A current point of debate on Crypto Twitter is: 'Should I stay, or should I go?' The question itself is wrong; it assumes there is a safe place to go, but in reality, there is none.

Goldman Sachs states that 300 million jobs globally will be impacted by AI. The CEO of Anthropic claims that 50% of junior white-collar jobs will disappear within five years. Just in Q1 2026, 45,000 tech workers were laid off.

This is not a problem unique to the crypto industry; it is the Fourth Industrial Revolution arriving at everyone's doorstep.

The panic you feel is real and widespread. And those who find the next direction to build will define the next thirty years.

What I see is this: the crypto industry hasn't made you fragile; it has forged you into the fastest-learning, most cross-domain capable, and most adaptable builders on the planet. The real question is: will you use this ability, or will you discard it to chase a sense of security that simply doesn't exist.

Confronting the Real Problem

The statement 'Crypto is dead for builders' had some merit in 2022. It described a market that no longer exists today.

Behind the same anxiety lies a more brutal, yet more universal truth: AI is commoditizing all work based on existing knowledge and pattern matching.

This is the real fear, not 'crypto has no use cases.' What is truly unsettling is that Claude Code, Codex, Gemini Code Assist are already so powerful that most junior software development roles are being replaced.

Stanford University research confirms: since the launch of ChatGPT, the employment rate for developers aged 22-25 has fallen by 20%. 60% of companies plan to replace employees with AI in 2026. The marginal cost of a competent code agent is approaching zero.

This is not a cryptocurrency problem. This is a problem facing all of human civilization, and it is impacting every industry simultaneously.

Three Types of People Make Money, The Rest Panic

Stripping away the hype, who is *really* making money from AI right now?

First Layer: NVIDIA. NVIDIA's annual revenue is $216 billion; Jensen Huang aims for $1 trillion in annual AI chip revenue by 2027. This is the classic 'selling shovels' logic, proven effective time and again in every transformation.

Second Layer: Major model vendors. OpenAI's annualized revenue is $12.7 billion, targeting $54 billion by 2027. Anthropic's annual recurring revenue is approaching $9 billion, targeting $20-26 billion in 2026. They sell API calls, have recurring revenue, and real profits.

Third Layer: Fearmongers. Short video creators, course sellers, make money by telling you 'AI will replace you.' The content is fear, the product is a $99 course, with extremely high profit margins.

Everyone else is searching for a moat, but finding none. A good idea gets copied by hundreds of companies within days of launch. If the profits are attractive enough, OpenAI, Anthropic, or Google will step in and launch their own version.

Manus was the first general AI agent, then Claude launched Cowork, followed by OpenClaw open-sourcing the entire concept, garnering 219k stars on GitHub. The window from 'innovation' to 'commoditization' is now measured in weeks.

A dangerous signal: if your moat is just 'a nice interface wrapped around a large model,' then you have no moat. The marginal cost of wrapping models is approaching zero. The real barrier in the AI field lies in controlling the infrastructure that large models rely on, not piling features on top of them.

Why Crypto Builders Actually Have a Unique Advantage

Set aside shallow narratives like 'crypto is dead' and ask: how much better off is any other field?

Compared to SaaS? All features will be copied by AI overnight. Compared to consulting? Agents are replacing analysts. Compared to junior dev roles? Employment has fallen 20% in two years.

Crypto builders possess structural advantages that other tech fields lack.

One point is particularly important: the crypto crowd has the highest information density in the tech circle. They track cryptography, distributed systems, macroeconomics, geopolitics, oil, gold, AI, biotech, longevity tech, SpaceX, and all cultural hotspots.

Why? Because they are betting on it. Meme coins, prediction markets, new token offerings... Speculation is not a flaw; it is the fastest learning mechanism humans have invented. By the time traditional industries catch on to a trend, crypto builders have already built the infrastructure for it and moved on to the next big thing.

And technical barriers aren't just talk; they are measurable. The Ethereum Foundation has elevated post-quantum cryptographic security to its highest strategic priority. Vitalik's 'Ethereum Simplification' roadmap places 'full quantum resistance' at its core. Zero-knowledge proof systems, Poseidon hash functions, lattice-based cryptography...

Claude Code can easily crush CRUD apps, but it's far less effective when writing recursive SNARK circuits or designing validator penalty mechanisms with game-theoretic guarantees.

The Fact Everyone is Ignoring

Watch actions, not sentiment. Those actually doing things are giving an answer completely opposite to the doomsayers on Crypto Twitter with their actions.

Stripe won't integrate a dying protocol. BlackRock won't issue a staked ETH ETF in a dead market. Cloudflare won't co-found a payments foundation for an industry with no future.

Hype is not demand; adoption is demand. These giants are voting with their feet.

Pandora's Box is Open

Sam Altman cannot predict what GPT-6 will bring. Dario Amodei built a lab focused on safety yet still admits half of junior jobs will disappear. Sundar Pichai reorganized all of Google to pivot entirely to AI.

The people building these technologies don't know what the future holds. No one knows.

Only three things are certain:

  • The box won't close. AI will get stronger, code agents will get better, white-collar automation will accelerate. We are not going back to an era of all hand-written code. The question is not how to escape, but how you position yourself.
  • New tools create new professions. In 1995, no one foresaw 'social media manager.' In 2005, no one foresaw 'cloud architect.' Today, no one can predict the AI-native professions of 2030. But every industrial revolution has created more jobs than it destroyed, without exception.
  • Builders during the panic will dominate the next era. Amazon was born amidst the skepticism of the dot-com bubble; Stripe was founded when payments were 'already solved'; Coinbase started when Bitcoin was a joke.

When everyone feels 'now is not the time to build,' it is precisely the signal that it is the best time to build.

Your Choice

For doing old things, this is the worst of times. For trying new things, this is the best of times.

Don't leave the industry just because Crypto Twitter is full of anxiety. *Everyone* is anxious. Financial analysts are anxious. SaaS founders are anxious. Junior engineers at Google are anxious.

The difference is: the crypto industry has endowed you with a set of capabilities most builders don't have: all-weather cross-domain pattern recognition, a permissionless innovation sandbox, lean teams that can launch quickly without approval, and the community that absorbs new technologies the fastest globally.

Follow your genuine interest. Not because it's a comforting platitude, but because in a world where no one knows the future, the only reliable signal is whether you genuinely care about this thing, whether you are willing to persevere through difficult times.

And difficult times will come for everyone, for every industry.

Pandora's box is open; it cannot be closed. Pick up the new tools and move to the frontier. Those who persist in building amidst the panic will ultimately define the next era.

相关问答

QWhy does the article argue that crypto builders are uniquely positioned during the AI revolution?

AThe article argues that crypto builders possess structural advantages such as high information density, cross-domain adaptability, and experience in fast-paced, permissionless innovation. They are skilled in complex areas like cryptography and distributed systems, which are less easily automated by AI compared to routine coding tasks.

QAccording to the article, what are the three groups currently profiting from AI?

AThe three groups profiting from AI are: 1) Nvidia (selling AI chips), 2) Major model manufacturers like OpenAI and Anthropic (selling API calls with recurring revenue), and 3) Those selling fear, such as influencers and course sellers capitalizing on AI anxiety.

QWhat is the core fear that the article identifies, beyond the crypto-specific concerns?

AThe core fear identified is that AI is commoditizing all work based on existing knowledge and pattern matching, threatening to replace a vast number of white-collar and junior developer positions across all industries, not just crypto.

QWhat evidence does the article provide to counter the narrative that 'crypto is dead' for builders?

AThe article points to actions from major institutions like Stripe integrating crypto protocols, Blackrock issuing a staking ETH ETF, and Cloudflare co-founding a payment foundation as evidence of real-world demand and long-term confidence, contradicting the superficial narrative.

QWhat is the article's final advice to builders feeling anxiety about the future?

AThe article advises builders to leverage the unique skills they've developed in crypto, such as rapid learning and adaptation, and to continue building new things based on genuine interest, as periods of widespread panic are historically the best times for innovation and defining the next era.

你可能也喜欢

API 故事撑不住估值,AI 巨头开始下场做咨询

近期,OpenAI与Anthropic两大AI巨头相继成立专注企业部署的子公司,合计融资约55亿美元。这标志着前沿模型公司正从单纯销售API转向提供深度驻场咨询服务,以应对企业AI落地难的瓶颈。 OpenAI成立的Deploy Co获40亿美元投资,采用附带最低回报承诺的优先股结构,反映出投资方对其主体估值与现金消耗的谨慎态度。公司同时收购咨询工程公司Tomoro,以快速获取部署能力。引人注目的是,贝恩、麦肯锡和凯捷三家传统咨询公司也出现在投资人名单中。 Anthropic则联合黑石、高盛等成立约15亿美元的合资公司,同样旨在向企业派驻前线部署工程师(FDE)。此举部分源于Anthropic在企业市场份额(尤其是编程场景)上已反超OpenAI,对后者构成巨大压力。 这一转型伴随劳动力市场的结构性变化。美国FDE岗位需求在过去一年暴增超过800%,薪资显著高于传统软件工程师。与此同时,传统软件工程师岗位需求持续萎缩。FDE的角色本质上是将高技能工程师推向一线,从事高溢价但劳动密集型的现场集成工作,其股权激励也与母公司核心模型业务分离。 分析认为,随着模型能力趋同,竞争焦点已从技术本身转向落地能力。AI巨头通过复杂的资本结构,将未来企业服务收入证券化,并借助私募股权庞大的被投公司网络作为渠道。传统咨询公司的出资更增添了博弈的复杂性。这55亿美元的押注,可能彻底定义未来几年企业AI市场的资本与服务模式。

marsbit1小时前

API 故事撑不住估值,AI 巨头开始下场做咨询

marsbit1小时前

Chatbot烧钱三年,还是AI时代的“新大陆”吗?

过去几年,AI行业曾将Chatbot视为类似移动互联网超级入口的“新大陆”,但烧钱三年后,其商业化和可持续性面临严峻挑战。 OpenAI的ChatGPT虽拥有庞大用户,却陷入亏损,每收入1美元亏损1.22美元。国内豆包尝试付费也引发用户负面反馈。相比之下,Anthropic以企业服务为主(85%收入来自企业),年化收入已反超OpenAI,显示B端路径更清晰。用户真正需要的是能完成任务的AI助手,而非单纯聊天的对话窗口。 Chatbot的商业模式存在根本矛盾。它形似互联网产品,但底层经济学不同:每次推理都消耗高昂算力,用户越多成本越高,且缺乏网络效应和数据飞轮。其用户迁移成本低,护城河主要依赖模型能力,而随着各模型能力趋同,竞争可能沦为价格战。 变现之路同样艰难。付费订阅率低(ChatGPT付费用户仅占5%),国内付费意愿更弱。广告模式则因Chatbot交互缺乏明确购买意图、答案形式单一、损害用户信任而难以奏效,Perplexity的失败便是例证。注意力经济在Chatbot上似乎失效——供给(算力)昂贵,用户注意力却短暂。 数据表明Chatbot增长放缓,用户日均使用时长远低于主流App。其产品形态将AI能力局限在被动、回合制的“询问”,而未来方向是能多步“执行”的Agent。但若长出这些能力,它就不再是传统Chatbot。更可能的方向是AI不再需要独立App,而是嵌入现有应用(如微信)、操作系统或硬件。 行业逐渐意识到,Chatbot可能只是通往AGI的中间形态。若继续固守“入口+流量”的旧地图,恐难找到真正的新大陆。未来的价值更可能在于AI作为底层能力,与各类产品和场景深度融合。

marsbit2小时前

Chatbot烧钱三年,还是AI时代的“新大陆”吗?

marsbit2小时前

交易

现货
合约
活动图片