After Institutional Support and Price Surge, Revisiting the True Value of Bittensor's 128 Subnets

marsbit发布于2026-03-17更新于2026-03-17

文章摘要

After removing institutional support and price increases, this article re-evaluates the real value of Bittensor's 128 subnets. Bittensor operates as a decentralized AI ecosystem where each subnet functions like an independent startup with its own token (Alpha), revenue model, and team. There are two primary ways to earn: TAO emissions (protocol subsidies based on staking inflows) and Alpha token PnL (capital gains from subnet performance). Since the Taoflow update in November 2025, subnets with negative net staking flow receive zero emissions, creating a competitive environment. Approximately 3,600 TAO (around $960k daily) is distributed, with the top 10 subnets controlling 56% of emissions. Key case studies include Chutes (SN64), which demonstrates product-market fit with 400k users and 9.1 trillion tokens processed at 85% lower cost than AWS, and Templar (SN3), which offers asymmetric upside by training frontier LLMs in a fully decentralized manner. The investment framework positions TAO as an index fund for the entire network, while Alpha staking represents concentrated bets on specific subnets. The ecosystem is attracting institutional interest, with significant holdings from DCG and Polychain Capital. The conclusion emphasizes evaluating subnets based on product utility, staking flow, team execution, organic demand, and liquidity conditions.

Author: Kaff

Compiled by: Yuliya, PANews

TL;DR

  • Bittensor consists of 128 independent subnets, each operating like a startup with its own token (Alpha), revenue model, and team.

  • There are two ways to make money: TAO emissions (protocol subsidies from staking inflows) and Alpha token PnL (capital gains from subnet performance).

  • Since Taoflow in November 2025, subnets with negative net staking inflows receive zero emissions—forcing them to either succeed or die.

  • Approximately 3,600 TAO (~$960k) is distributed daily across all subnets, with the top ten controlling ~56% of the share.

  • Chutes (SN64) is the clearest example of product-market fit: 400k+ users, 9.1T tokens processed, 85% cheaper than AWS.

  • Templar (SN3) is the most asymmetric bet: fully decentralized training of frontier LLMs with a ~$60M market cap vs. OpenAI’s $800B.

  • TAO = broad index fund to the entire network, while Alpha staking = concentrated investment in specific startups—with 100%+ APY potential but real risk.

  • Alpha tokens carry no formal yield promise; their value depends entirely on market dynamics and team execution.

1. Subnet Structure: Who Does What?

When people think of Bittensor, the most common mental model is: this is a decentralized AI project. While true, it’s incomplete.

In reality, Bittensor is 128 independent AI startups competing in a brutal economic system, each with its own token, revenue model, and struggle for survival. By March 2026, the total market cap of all subnet tokens was ~$1.12B, equivalent to 27% of TAO’s own market cap. Grayscale calls it “Y Combinator for decentralized AI.” Except instead of a committee deciding who gets funded, the market decides.

Understanding this mechanism allows you to evaluate which subnets are creating real value and which are dying.

Each subnet is an incentive-based competitive market producing specific digital goods—AI inference, GPU compute, model training, financial data analysis, and more.

Each subnet is driven by three roles: subnet owner, validators, and miners:

Alpha Tokens: Equity in the Subnet

When you stake TAO to a subnet, your TAO enters an on-chain AMM pool (similar to Uniswap V2 mechanics). In return, you receive Alpha tokens. The price formula is:

Alpha Price = TAO in Pool ÷ Alpha in Pool

Alpha tokens have a hard cap of 21M (echoing TAO’s supply), and they auto-compound every ~72 minutes (one “tempo” = 360 blocks).

2. Two Revenue Streams and Why They’re Overlooked

In Bittensor, there are two completely separate ways to make money:

Revenue Stream 1: TAO Emissions via Taoflow

Since November 2025, Bittensor adopted the Taoflow model, a fundamental shift in how emissions are allocated.

Previously, emissions were calculated based on token price. This created a loophole: projects could artificially inflate their token price to capture emissions, build a “TAO treasury,” and slowly dump while still collecting rewards.

Taoflow fixed this by tracking net staking flow of TAO: staking inflows minus unstaking outflows. The mechanism runs in four steps:

After TAO’s first halving on Dec 14, 2025, block rewards dropped from 1 TAO to 0.5 TAO/block. Currently, ~3,600 TAO (~$960k at current prices) is distributed daily across 128 subnets. DCG estimates over $100M flows into the ecosystem annually.

Revenue Stream 2: Alpha Token PnL

This is the part most TAO holders aren’t tracking.

If a subnet performs well, Alpha’s price (denominated in TAO) rises. When you unstake, you receive more TAO than you initially put in. This is Alpha PnL = capital gains from holding a specific subnet’s token.

Taoflow creates a powerful flywheel effect:

  • Great product → more people stake TAO → positive net flow

  • Positive flow → more emissions → deeper liquidity pool

  • Deeper liquidity → lower slippage → attracts more capital

  • More capital → Alpha price rises → Alpha PnL increases for existing holders

The reverse is also true, and equally brutal. Sustained negative flow subnets → zero emissions → stakers continuously withdraw → death spiral.

3. Which Subnets Are Winning and Why?

Here’s a snapshot of leading subnets ranked by emission dominance and realized PnL (rPnL):

  • SN3| templar: Large-scale LLM pre-training | Emission Share: 30.39% | rPnL: $6.43M

  • SN4| Targon: AI inference market—hosting and serving AI models for real-time predictions | Emission Share: 10.39% | rPnL: $12.47M

  • SN68| METANOVA: AI drug discovery company developing therapies to reprogram body and mind | Emission Share: 5.95% | rPnL: $900k

  • SN81| grail: Verifiable LLM post-training processing | Emission Share: 4.8% | rPnL: $109k

  • SN75| Hippius: Decentralized storage and web infrastructure with IP management | Emission Share: 4.56% | rPnL: $4.48M

The top 10 subnets control ~56% of the total daily emissions.

Case Study: Chutes, The Textbook Example of Product-Market Fit (PMF)

Built by Rayon Labs, Chutes is a decentralized serverless AI inference market, a Web3 alternative to OpenAI API and AWS for model deployment.

What stands out about Chutes:

  • Processed 9.1T tokens since late 2024

  • 400k+ users (100k+ via API)

  • 85% cheaper AI model deployment costs vs. AWS

  • Models supported: DeepSeek, Mistral, LLaMA, and dozens more

  • Platform revenue auto-staked → buys back Alpha tokens → organic demand flywheel

During a spike in February 2026, Chutes attracted over 2,740 TAO in just 9 hours. Alpha tokens peaked at $99.94 (0.225 TAO), with an FDV of 2.05M TAO (~$518M at TAO’s peak).

Rayon Labs also operates SN56 (Gradients—model training) and SN19 (Nineteen—high-frequency inference), collectively commanding over 23% of total emissions at their peak.

Case Study: Templar (SN3), The Most Asymmetric Bet in the Subnet Ecosystem

On March 10, 2026, Templar (SN3) completed Covenant-72B, a 72B parameter model hailed as the largest decentralized pre-training run in history.

4. The Mechanics Behind It: Registration, Yuma Consensus, and Competitive Pressure

Registration, A Competitive Arena

Not everyone can open a subnet. Registration uses a dynamic burn pricing mechanism: the cost doubles with each new subnet registration and halves linearly over 28,800 blocks (~4 days) with no new registrations.

When all 128 slots are full, new subnets must replace the worst-performing existing subnet (measured by lowest EMA price). Newly registered subnets get a 4-month grace period before being eligible for deregistration. The network is expected to expand to 256 subnets in 2026.

Yuma Consensus, Automated Independent Auditing

Within each subnet, Yuma consensus transforms validators' subjective assessments into objective reward distribution:

  • Validators submit weight vectors, scoring each miner they evaluate

  • The blockchain calculates the stake-weighted median for each miner (kappa=0.5)

  • Weights above the median are clipped—to prevent collusion and over-evaluation

  • Validators use a commit-reveal mechanism—submitting sealed weights, revealed only after a set number of blocks—to prevent weight copying

  • Validators who identify good miners early and evaluate consistently build stronger bonded positions and earn larger dividend shares

The result: No subnet owner can unilaterally change who gets rewards. This is the fundamental difference between Bittensor and typical crypto “AI projects.”

5. Investment Framework: TAO = Index Fund, Alpha Staking = Startup Bet

Auditless Research summarized it perfectly: “TAO is effectively more of an options token—a call option that can be pointed at the emissions of whatever Alpha token looks undervalued.”

How to Read a Subnet Like a Balance Sheet

  • Emissions = Protocol subsidies - network revenue, similar to government grants or accelerator funding

  • Alpha PnL = Market cap signal - the market is pricing the subnet’s true value

  • Net staking flow = Revenue growth indicator - positive flow = “product sells,” negative flow = churning customers

  • Subnet owner = Founder quality - communication frequency, delivery speed, and product roadmap are things to track

  • Number of validators = Board quality - more independent validators = less chance of manipulated scoring

Institutional Signals Are Growing

This is no longer just a retail story:

  • DCG holds over 500k TAO (~2.4% of total supply)

  • Polychain Capital holds ~$200M worth of TAO

  • Grayscale GTAO Trust listed on NYSE on January 6, 2026

  • Stillcore Capital (co-founded by Jason Calacanis) launched a fund dedicated to subnet tokens

6. Conclusion: A Starter Framework

Bittensor has created a structure unique in crypto: 128 AI businesses competing for a shared ~3,600 TAO (~$960k) daily, where capital allocation is determined solely by staker behavior.

When evaluating a subnet, ask these five questions:

  • Product: What does this subnet offer? Is there real demand for it?

  • Flow: Is net staking flow positive or negative? What’s the 30-day trend?

  • Team: Is the subnet owner communicating and delivering consistently?

  • Flywheel: Does revenue create organic demand for Alpha, or is it pure speculation?

  • Exit: Is the liquidity pool deep enough to exit without significant slippage?

TAO gives you broad exposure to the entire ecosystem. Alpha staking gives you a concentrated bet on a specific “startup”—with all the accompanying upside potential and downside risk.

热门币种推荐

相关问答

QWhat are the two primary ways to generate income within the Bittensor subnet ecosystem?

AThe two primary ways to generate income are: 1) TAO emissions (protocol subsidies based on staking inflow) and 2) Alpha token PnL (capital gains from the performance of the specific subnet).

QWhat is the Taoflow model and what fundamental change did it introduce in November 2025?

AThe Taoflow model is a fundamental shift in how emissions are distributed. It tracks the net staking flow of TAO (staking inflow minus unstaking outflow) into a subnet. Subnets with negative net flow receive zero emissions, forcing them to either perform or be eliminated.

QWhich subnet is highlighted as the clearest example of product-market fit (PMF) and what are its key metrics?

AChutes (SN64) is highlighted as the clearest example of PMF. Its key metrics include processing over 9.1 trillion tokens, having over 400,000 users (100,000+ via API), and offering AI model deployment at an 85% lower cost than AWS.

QHow does the investment exposure of holding TAO differ from staking for an Alpha token?

AHolding TAO provides broad, index fund-like exposure to the entire Bittensor network. Staking for an Alpha token is a concentrated investment in a specific 'startup' subnet, offering higher potential returns (100%+ APY) but also carrying significant risk.

QWhat mechanism ensures that no single subnet owner can unilaterally change who gets rewards, and how does it work?

AThe Yuma Consensus ensures this. Validators submit weight vectors rating miners, the blockchain calculates a median score, and weights above the median are clipped to prevent collusion and over-evaluation. A commit-reveal mechanism prevents copying weights, making the system an automated, independent audit.

你可能也喜欢

Chainlink CCIP 加入央行数字货币试点项目

Chainlink的跨链互操作性协议CCIP正被用于多个央行的数字货币及资产代币化结算试点项目,标志着该协议进入了区块链基础设施领域重要的机构性实验场景。这些试点包括巴西的Drex数字雷亚尔计划、中国香港的Ensemble代币化沙盒网络,以及香港金融管理局的e-HKD+项目(涉及澳新银行的A$DC)。目前这些均为试验阶段,尚未投入商业生产,但具有重要意义,因为它们展示了受监管机构如何测试公共区块链基础设施概念。 央行的试点项目虽然多数不会立即转化为完整生产系统,但揭示了机构正在探索的方向,尤其是互操作性这一核心主题。未来金融体系很可能由多个受监管的网络、支付系统和结算层构成,因此安全可靠的跨链通信与价值传输成为关键基础设施需求。CCIP在这些试点中扮演了跨链消息传递和结算层的角色,用于测试支付对支付结算、跨境资产流动等场景。 对Chainlink而言,参与这些试点有助于强化其机构市场定位,表明其技术正在对可靠性、风险控制要求极高的环境中接受检验。然而,试点不等于正式采用,要实现持续的商业化采用仍需克服监管审批、技术整合和机构协调等多重挑战。整体来看,这反映了资产代币化结算正成为一个重要的机构议题,行业焦点已从简单的资产发行转向互操作性、跨境结算和可编程金融基础设施。

bitcoinist9分钟前

Chainlink CCIP 加入央行数字货币试点项目

bitcoinist9分钟前

XRP账本修订案临近验证节点投票截止日期

XRP Ledger(XRPL)即将进入一项关键验证者投票窗口期,决定是否激活拟议的协议修正案。这凸显了XRPL升级并非仅由开发代码发布驱动,而需经过网络治理流程。 修正案通过rippled发布流程和验证者投票系统推进。与其他XRPL变更类似,拟议修正案需要获得广泛验证者支持才能激活,通常要求达到并维持80%的验证者同意门槛持续一段时间。这一设计旨在确保升级审慎,避免仓促变更,让参与方有充分时间评估新功能。 验证者在XRPL治理中扮演核心角色,其投票决定直接影响协议是否引入新功能,进而塑造未来在支付、资产发行和去中心化交易所等方面的效用。虽然市场注意力常集中于价格波动,但此类协议升级对网络的长期发展更为关键,可能影响智能合约功能、资产特性、交易类型及运行可靠性。 需要明确的是,投票截止日期并不意味着升级必然激活。即使功能已包含在代码版本中,仍需获得足够且持续的支持。验证者可能支持、保留支持或要求更多审查,这是一个健康的决策过程。 对XRP而言,修正案进程之所以重要,是因为其长期价值与XRPL的实用性能紧密相连。协议的进步若能带来更多用例、更好的工具和更强的应用需求,才能真正提升网络效用。因此,当前进展更应被视为基础设施的推进,而非单纯的市场价格信号。 总之,XRPL正进入又一个治理检查点,本次投票将反映验证者对推动下一组协议变更的态度。

bitcoinist24分钟前

XRP账本修订案临近验证节点投票截止日期

bitcoinist24分钟前

Solana稳定币市值突破150亿美元,网络流动性不断深化

Solana稳定币总市值突破150亿美元,显示出该网络流动性进一步深化。这一里程碑数据来自DeFiLlama,表明Solana生态中的稳定币活动日益活跃,为交易、支付、去中心化金融(DeFi)和链上结算提供了更坚实的基础。 稳定币是链上金融的“营运资本”,用于交易出入场、协议借贷、流动性池和支付结算,其增长比单纯的投机活动更能体现网络的真实效用和流动性提升。Solana凭借低费用和快速确认的优势,吸引了大量美元流动性。 目前,USDC和USDT仍是主导,但Solana的稳定币生态正趋于多样化。这有助于DeFi协议、支付应用和机构产品的集成,但也带来了复杂性,用户需关注资产的流动性、可赎回性和风险。 稳定币的增长直接利好Solana DeFi和支付领域:借贷市场可深化,去中心化交易所的大额交易滑点更低,支付应用能结算更多价值。这强化了Solana将高性能与日益增长的流动性及用户友好应用相结合的核心叙事。 关键点在于,市场将关注这些稳定币是否被活跃使用,而不仅仅是供应量。Solana的挑战在于通过构建有吸引力的应用,将流动性沉淀下来。跨越150亿美元大关是一个重要信号,表明Solana正在构建支撑更大规模金融活动的基础,其发展叙事正逐渐脱离纯粹的炒作周期。

bitcoinist39分钟前

Solana稳定币市值突破150亿美元,网络流动性不断深化

bitcoinist39分钟前

XRP持有者转为盈利,但现货需求已消失:1.10美元支撑能否守住?

XRP近期市场结构发出矛盾信号:现货交易活动减弱,资金转向衍生品市场。尽管交易量持续下降,价格仍维持在1.086至1.113美元区间盘整,表明多空双方均未取得决定性优势。 通常情况下,现货活动减弱会降低投机兴趣。然而,XRP的未平仓合约却增加了约5.9%,达到4.238亿,同时预估杠杆率升至0.162。这种分化很关键,因为衍生品可以维持头寸而无需向市场注入新资金。随着现货流入和流出暴跌约99%,杠杆交易者日益成为XRP价格发现的主导力量。这也解释了价格为何持续盘整而非选择方向突破。但除非现货需求回归以验证这些头寸,否则不断增长的杠杆使XRP在市场情绪突变时极易遭遇急剧平仓。 市场可持续性的一个关键因素是持有者盈利状况。随着XRP的30日MVRV比率回升至1.03,近期买家已重返盈利状态。这一改善与比特币、以太坊等其他主流资产同步,表明投资者情绪正在广泛复苏,而非仅限于XRP。 盈利状态的改变也影响了市场激励机制。随着更多短期持有者脱离未实现亏损,持币压力通常会让位于获利了结的意愿。尽管XRP价格仍低于历史抛售区,但由于缺乏新的需求入场,且获利了结压力可能显现,当前价格走势的可持续性正面临越来越大的挑战。综上所述,虽然持有者恢复盈利,但涨势更多由衍生品市场的杠杆驱动,而非真实的现货需求。随着获利了结压力增大以及对可持续性的怀疑升温,1.10美元的支撑位正面临风险。

ambcrypto1小时前

XRP持有者转为盈利,但现货需求已消失:1.10美元支撑能否守住?

ambcrypto1小时前

交易

现货

热门文章

如何购买S

欢迎来到HTX.com!我们已经让购买Sonic(S)变得简单而便捷。跟随我们的逐步指南,放心开始您的加密货币之旅。第一步:创建您的HTX账户使用您的电子邮件、手机号码注册一个免费账户在HTX上。体验无忧的注册过程并解锁所有平台功能。立即注册第二步:前往买币页面,选择您的支付方式信用卡/借记卡购买:使用您的Visa或Mastercard即时购买Sonic(S)。余额购买:使用您HTX账户余额中的资金进行无缝交易。第三方购买:探索诸如Google Pay或Apple Pay等流行支付方法以增加便利性。C2C购买:在HTX平台上直接与其他用户交易。HTX场外交易台(OTC)购买:为大量交易者提供个性化服务和竞争性汇率。第三步:存储您的Sonic(S)购买完您的Sonic(S)后,将其存储在您的HTX账户钱包中。您也可以通过区块链转账将其发送到其他地方或者用于交易其他加密货币。第四步:交易Sonic(S)在HTX的现货市场轻松交易Sonic(S)。访问您的账户,选择您的交易对,执行您的交易,并实时监控。HTX为初学者和经验丰富的交易者提供了友好的用户体验。

3.0k人学过发布于 2025.01.15更新于 2026.06.02

如何购买S

相关讨论

欢迎来到HTX社区。在这里,您可以了解最新的平台发展动态并获得专业的市场意见。以下是用户对S(S)币价的意见。

活动图片