Magic Eden defends launch of NFT royalty enforcement tool

Cointelegraph发布于2022-09-15更新于2022-09-15

文章摘要

The launch of Magic Eden’s MetaShield was initially met with mixed reactions from the community.

Solana-based nonfungible token (NFT) marketplace Magic Eden has fended off some community backlash following the launch of MetaShield, its new enforcement tool aimed at deterring NFT buyers who bypass creator royalties. 
MetaShield, which was reportedly launched in partnership with NFT marketplace and aggregator Coral Cube saw mixed reactions from the NFT community following its launch on Sep. 12, who were split on whether NFT marketplaces should protect creator rights or cut royalty fees to make NFTs cheaper for collectors. 
The NFT royalty enforcement tool is designed to allow NFT creators to flag and blur NFTs that may have been sold that managed to bypass creator royalties.
In an eight-part Twitter post on Sept. 14, Magic Eden defended its new tool, noting that some of the “hardest working creators today” are getting “punished” by “custom” royalty marketplaces. 
The new tool came only a few weeks after NFT marketplace X2Y2 introduced a new feature that affords buyers with the discretion to decide whether they pay a royalty fee (and if so, how much) when buying an NFT.
Magic Eden cleared the air in its most recent thread, noting that it launched MetaShield in order to protect creators, rather than tpunish buyers. 
“Most people recognize that zero royalty marketplaces for all creators shouldn’t become the ecosystem norm,” argued Magic Eden.
“What we do is an experiment, collaborate, and ship. MetaShield might not be perfect, but it provides an option to creators in this debate.”
The NFT marketplace also confirmed that they will not be taking control of NFTs and that the royalty enforcement tool will not serve to punish buyers.
6/ Does Magic Eden care about freedom & choice? Yes.

Like collectors, creators should have freedom to defend their biz. Re: decentralization most NFTs are mutable & collectors have purchased them by their choice. We're not centralizing NFTs any more than the original technology.
— Magic Eden (@MagicEden) September 13, 2022
According to Magic Eden, MetaShield was built to allow for creators “to track Solana NFTs listed with custom royalties” and “take action where they see fit” to protect their brand.
According to the Magic Eden website, NFT creators are afforded “Editor” rights to shield the NFT, which allows them to modify the royalty, add a watermark or blur the image. Once debt has been paid, the Editor can revert the NFT back to its original state.
Community reaction
The launch of Magic Eden’s MetaShield was initially met with mixed reactions from the community.
One Twitter user claimed the addition of MetaShield further centralized the Magic Eden NFT marketplace, while another Twitter user said no one will mint NFTs if the creators use MetaShield.
There is no way you haven't seen the discussion regarding your own 2% fees on all volume, and then there is the blurring of the jpegs...

You're the problem not the royalties, bunch of centralised cucks. https://t.co/PyTNrN309v
— Grug (@WiseGrug) September 14, 2022
Another Twitter user said they were concerned that innocent buyers will be punished as they’ll have their newly purchased NFT shielded, stating:
"The biggest concern I have is that this punishes the buyer — someone who might not know they purchased incorrectly. After a certain period of time, the NFT will all of a sudden be 'shielded.' This will lead to an experience where they need to pay a lot more. 
However, many have also praised Magic Eden for “protecting” NFT creators.

Not every NFT marketplace has sided with Magic Eden. “sudoswap” decided not to adopt the royalty fee model to make its NFT platform more buyer-friendly by only subjecting them to standard 2-2.5% platform fees.
In addition to that, Langston Thomas from “nft now” said that even where smart contracts are set in place to pay royalties to creators, it’s ultimately up to the NFT marketplace to honor the royalty agreement.
This is because the NFT marketplace receives the royalty first via the transaction, and is not obligated to pass that royalty on.

你可能也喜欢

谷歌AI人才接连流失,是压力测试还是“讣告”前奏?

谷歌接连失去三位顶级AI人才:工程副总裁、Transformer架构提出者之一Noam Shazeer加入OpenAI;DeepMind副总裁、AlphaFold核心人物John Jumper加入Anthropic;对话式AI先驱Daniel De Freitas的动向也引人关注。这些流失触及了Transformer、对话式AI和科学AI等关键领域,引发市场对谷歌竞争力的担忧。 然而,将此事视为谷歌的“讣告”可能为时过早。这更应被看作一次压力测试。人才流失本身反映了谷歌仍是AI顶级人才的核心储备库,正因其重要才成为竞争对手IPO前夜的重点挖掘对象。 谷歌的优势在于其远超单一模型的“全栈”能力:拥有自研TPU、云基础设施、Gemini等模型矩阵,以及搜索、YouTube、安卓等覆盖数十亿用户的终端产品,构成了强大的集成生态和分发网络。此外,谷歌通过巨额投资和云服务与Anthropic等对手形成深度绑定,在“AI淘金热”中同时扮演“掘金者”和“卖水人”的角色。 尽管面临创新者困境,核心搜索业务转型挑战以及大公司决策迟缓等问题,但谷歌正通过积极整合Gemini、重塑搜索体验、战略性收购(如Character.AI)等方式应对。AI竞赛是长期游戏,谷歌凭借其技术栈、资源与生态,仍是少数有能力在多层面参与竞争的公司。当前的动荡是一次严峻考验,但并非终局。

marsbit21分钟前

谷歌AI人才接连流失,是压力测试还是“讣告”前奏?

marsbit21分钟前

交易

现货
合约
活动图片