Strike CEO forced out after JPMorgan raises ‘fraudulent activities’ concern

ambcrypto发布于2025-11-25更新于2025-11-25

Key Takeaways 

What triggered the latest crypto debanking controversy?

Strike CEO revealed that JPMorgan Chase blocked his account and restricted customer deposits into Strike. 

How did the community react? 

The community slammed JPMorgan. But the bank had not issued any statement on the issue as of the time of writing. 


Crypto debanking is back in the headlines, this time throwing JPMorgan Chase under scrutiny.  

Jack Mallers, CEO of Strike, a U.S.-based Bitcoin [BTC]-focused payment platform, decried that JPMorgan kicked him out of the bank. 

He added that the bank blocked some customers from depositing with Strike, claiming that the firm was involved in “known fraudulent activities.”

JPMorganJPMorgan

Source: X

Senator Lummis slams JPMorgan

Reacting to the alleged banking restriction, pro-Bitcoin Senator Cynthia Lummis slammed JPMorgan’s actions. She warned that such debanking would push digital assets overseas and added

“Operation Chokepoint 2.0 regrettably lives on. It’s past time we put it to rest to make America the digital asset capital of the world.”

The systematic and targeted crypto debanking was widespread during the Biden era, a phenomenon the industry dubbed “Chokepoint 2.0.” 

Many U.S. banks viewed crypto firms and investors as reputational risks due to the prevailing political climate and regulatory pressure at the time. 

When the tides shifted after the pro-crypto Trump administration took office in 2025, a formal inquiry was quickly established to address the issue.

By August, President Donald Trump signed an executive order advocating for fair banking to remedy the situation. The Fed and other regulators were ordered to remove “reputational risk” and others as part of the solution. 

The White House, at that time, added that the digital assets industry has been the target of “unfair debanking initiatives.” 

Unfortunately, three months after the order, the same issue is surfacing again.

Divided opinions on crypto risks

Supporters of the JPMorgan move, such as Steve Hanke, claimed that $28 billion has been laundered by criminal rings through cryptocurrency since 2024.  

However, John Deaton, a former U.S. Senate aspirant, clapped back, noting that JPMorgan has paid $40 billion in fines for illicit activity since 2000. He added, 

“Since 2000 JPMorgan alone has paid $40 billion in fines for illicit activity – significantly less than the total fined all crypto companies.”

Interestingly, in August, even President Trump claimed that JPMorgan and Bank of America rejected his deposits. According to him, this supported his belief that the debanking was due to politics. 

That being said, it remains to be seen whether the friction between the crypto industry and banks will be fully resolved.

Share

你可能也喜欢

全球程序员都在给Anthropic白送钱!官方终于看不下去了

Anthropic官方发布博客,针对开发者使用Claude Code时可能产生的不必要高额费用,总结了六条核心省钱建议: 1. 任务完成后及时使用 `/clear` 清理对话,避免无关历史占用上下文。 2. 对话开始时固定好模型和推理强度,中途切换会导致提示缓存失效,需全价重新计算历史。 3. 使用 `@` 引用文件,而非手动输入路径,可避免Claude进行工具调用和试探性读取,减少上下文累积。 4. 为输出冗长的命令(如运行测试)添加静默参数,减少输出内容对上下文的占用。 5. 在会话缓存仍有效时(如休息前)进行 `/compact` 压缩对话,成本仅为十分之一。 6. 将产生大量输出的任务交由子Agent处理,其独立上下文不会污染主对话。 文章解释了费用产生的机制:输入token(预填充)成本较低,输出token(解码)成本约为其5倍。模型(Opus/Sonnet/Haiku)和推理强度直接影响单价和token数量。 **提示缓存是关键的省钱杠杆**:若请求前缀与之前完全相同,服务器可加载缓存结果,读取成本仅为正常输入价的10%。但切换模型、改变推理强度、执行压缩、缓存过期等操作都会导致缓存失效。 此外,对话历史会因不断追加文件内容和命令输出而“变胖”,导致后续每轮对话成本呈接近平方级(O(n²))增长。除了上述建议,还可使用 `/rewind` 回退无效轮次以保住前面缓存。 文章指出,管理token开销正成为AI时代开发者的新技能,关系到使用效率和成本控制。Anthropic自身大量使用AI编写代码,精细的成本管理至关重要。

marsbit1小时前

全球程序员都在给Anthropic白送钱!官方终于看不下去了

marsbit1小时前

交易

现货
活动图片