Breaking: KeyFi Files Lawsuit Against Celsius, Millions Of Dollars At Risk?

Bitcoinist发布于2022-07-08更新于2022-07-08

文章摘要

The popular pseudonym Twitter account Oxb1 has revealed the identity of the user behind it and, as rumors claimed, it...

The popular pseudonym Twitter account Oxb1 has revealed the identity of the user behind it and, as rumors claimed, it is linked to lending company Celsius. Jason Stone founder and CEO of investment firm KeyFi wrote a thread explaining its relationship with the lending company and why it has decided to file a lawsuit against it.
Filed on July 7th in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, KeyFi accused Celsius of not honoring its contractual obligations to pay for “the millions of dollars it is owed” to the Stone-led company. This entity entered into a handshake agreement with Celsius to manage its clients’ funds.
The lending and borrowing crypto company attracts clients by offering high interest on their deposits, as the document explained, this forced them to seek yield with an external party, KeyFi. The latter took the funds and invested them in decentralized finance protocols, staking, non-fungible tokens (NFTs), and other strategies.
The company managed the funds via the Oxb1 Ethereum address which held millions of dollars in Celsius’ client funds. In late 2020, the document claims, KeyFi and Celsius decided to formalize their agreement and create a new company called Celsius KeyFi. Stone explained:
After discussions with Celsius in mid 2020, Celsius began an acquisition of KeyFi’s assets and team. Thereafter, I pivoted KeyFi to staking and deploying DeFi strategies for Celsius. In August 2020, 0xb1 was created, along with other addresses, to send Celsius’ customer deposits to us to manage.
Clients were unaware of these activities and were unaware that the company included, as part of their terms of service, a clause in which they allegedly agreed to transfer ownership of the funds from their addresses to Celsius. At one point, KeyFi managed over $2 billion in assets.

Bitcoin Celsius BTC BTCUSD

BTC’s price trends to the downside on the 4-hour chart. Source: BTCUSD Tradingview Celsius A Ponzi Scheme?
In late 2021, Stone and his team discovered that “Celsius had lied to us”. KeyFi was tasked with setting positions and applying investment strategies under the agreement that Celsius was hedging their actions.
However, Stone discovered that the company had “naked exposure to the market”. In other words, Celsius was not mitigating the risk from KeyFi positions or protecting itself against impermanent loss.
In addition, the document clients that the company was using its clients’ funds to prompt up the value of its native token CEL and manipulate the market. The document filed with the NY court says:
The parties’ relationship began to break down when Stone discovered that not only did Defendants lack basic security controls to protect the billions of dollars in customers’ funds they held, but that they were actively using customer funds to manipulate crypto-asset markets to their benefit. The most egregious example of this was Plaintiff’s discovery that Celsius used customer bitcoin deposits to inflate its own crypto-asset called the “Celsius token” (“CEL”).
In March 2021, Stone and his team decided to terminate the relationship but were met with opposition from Celsius. Stone claims he has been trying to reach an agreement with the company but failed.
Celsius has been attracting a lot of attention after it halted all users’ withdrawals, and allegedly entered a state of insolvency. Thus, Stone and KeyFi are looking for compensation via court.
The exact amount of money to be paid to KeyFi, if they win the case, will be determined by the court.
Given the public speculation about the company’s solvency, and my observation of Celsius’ loose relationship with the truth, I feel it is only prudent to finally set the record straight. I have brought legal action against Celsius to settle this issue once and for all.
— 0xb1 (@0x_b1) July 7, 2022
The document accused the CEO and Celsius’ founder Alex Mashinsky of “enriching himself” and allegedly transferring funds from the Oxb1 address to “his wife” and the company of running a “Ponzi Scheme”. At the time of writing, there is no official statement from Mashinsky or Celsius about these accusations.

你可能也喜欢

下一轮加密牛市,会从SpaceX的链上交易开始吗?

本文预测了2026至2029年加密行业的潜在演变,核心观点是市场主线将从“代币叙事”转向“真实资产入口”。 2026年,市场对优质私有资产的需求将推动SpaceX、OpenAI等公司的Pre-IPO永续合约在Hyperliquid等平台上成为热门交易标的。与此同时,大多数AI与加密结合的尝试将被证伪,唯有预测市场可能存活。行业将分化成喧闹的零售交易与安静的机构基础设施两个经济体。 2027年,公链基金会将被迫在零售“赌场”与机构合规基础设施之间做出明确选择,后者将因合格投资者门槛的逐步放宽而获得未来零售基础。稳定币、代币化私募资产将继续增长,但受政治与监管节奏强烈制约。 真正的转折可能在2028年后出现。随着监管可能放宽对私募证券二级市场公开招揽的限制,真实公司股权将能以合规方式进入更广泛市场,取代此前的合成永续合约,成为新一轮牛市的核心资产。届时,合成资产将退居为附属品。 到2029年,加密行业可能变得更“无聊”但更重要:稳定币和链上结算将成为传统金融后台的一部分而被抽象化;唯有对应真实现金流、权益或价值捕获机制的代币才有价值,缺乏底层资产的代币将失去交易意义。 文章的关键检验变量在于:下一轮牛市的关键瓶颈是否是法律通道而非技术。如果到2028年底,散户对私有公司的投资需求仍只能通过离岸合成产品满足,则此预测需要被重新评估。

marsbit33分钟前

下一轮加密牛市,会从SpaceX的链上交易开始吗?

marsbit33分钟前

交易

现货
合约
活动图片