John Deaton slams ex-SEC official over claim that token buybacks count as securities

ambcrypto发布于2025-11-16更新于2025-11-17

Key Takeaways

What’s behind the pushback against former SEC execs?

They have been correcting the flawed view that crypto had clear rules even in 2017. 

What’s the status of token buybacks?

Although they drive value accrual to token holders, at the time of writing, there was no formal classification of token buybacks or burns. 


Armanda Fischer, a former SEC Chief of Staff, has stirred some debate following her claims on the status of token buybacks. 

According to the exec, buybacks via DAOs (decentralized autonomous organizations) like Uniswap [UNI] can be deemed securities transactions, citing a 2017 SEC guidance

She added

“FYI: the crypto market structure legislation being contemplated by Congress & supported by the big crypto players generally would not allow token dividends/buybacks.”

However, crypto lawyers, including former U.S Senatorial candidate John Deaton, have slammed her claims. Deaton noted that the SEC’s 2017 directive was followed by 57 enforcement actions.

However, clearer guidance was issued in 2019 by former Chair Jay Clayton and more recently, by the Paul Atkins regime. These suggested that most tokens aren’t securities. 

Deaton also pointed out that Amanda Fischer advised Biden-SEC to file a lawsuit against Ripple Labs, but XRP was finally cleared as a non-security. This was reinforced by Judge Analisa Torres.  

He added, 

“Here’s my response to Amanda, Gary Gensler, Jorge Tenreiro, and the rest of the old crew at the SEC: Shame on you…Take the loss with class.”

What’s next for token buybacks?

All the Biden-era SEC crypto enforcement actions were rolled back under the Trump administration. Only the secondary sale of XRP to institutional investors was found to be a securities transaction, but the token was a non-security. 

Which raises the question – Are token buybacks really a securities transaction as Fischer claims? 

Hyperliquid [HYPE], Pumpfun [PUMP], Aave [AAVE], Lido [LDO], and recently Uniswap [UNI] have doubled down on token buybacks to boost token holders’ value accrual. 

Whether the ‘value accrual for token holders’ constitutes a securities transaction remains to be determined by the regulator. At the time of writing, there was no formal guidance on the same from the SEC. 

In fact, Hayden Adams, Uniswap CEO, noted that the buyback move was only made because of the current pro-crypto SEC regime. 

Other crypto lawyers, including former Uniswap CIO Marvin Ammori, also castigated Fischer’s position. Ammori quipped

“If the law was so clear, why did her SEC lose so many cases in court?”

John Deaton SEC

Source: X

By and large, the SEC’s treatment of crypto tokens has evolved since 2017. And, some instructions are about to be codified into law via the market structure bill.

However, only a formal regulatory directive on token buybacks could clarify whether it constitutes securities transactions or not.  

Share

你可能也喜欢

世界杯将至,体育正在进入“碎片化金融”时代

世界杯即将开赛,体育收藏品市场正悄然升温。国际足联宣布新规则,首次参赛球员需佩戴“世界杯首秀章”,赛后这些徽章将被嵌入球星卡,成为可能价值数百万的收藏资产。球星卡市场已发展成规模超百亿美元的另类资产世界,体育正进入“碎片化金融”时代。 NBA球星卡市场历经70多年发展,已形成成熟的金融体系。通过引入限量编号、球星签字、球衣切片等元素,并依托评级机构、拍卖平台和二级市场,这些小纸片变成了拥有明确稀缺性和流动性的金融资产。相比之下,足球世界因赛事体系分散,其球星卡市场长期未能达到同等金融化程度,但国际足联正通过类似“首秀章”的举措,积极为其创造稀缺“原材料”。 球星卡的价值核心在于绑定体育叙事和集体情绪。例如斯蒂芬·库里关键比赛瞬间的卡片能拍出数十万美元高价,其价格与特定的历史时刻和球迷情感深度绑定。这与预测市场交易未来事件的逻辑类似,都是对公众情绪的定价。 体育联盟本质上是一个永不停歇的“情绪生产机器”,通过持续不断的真实比赛、故事和戏剧性时刻,为相关金融资产提供源源不断的叙事支撑。这种基于真实世界共识和持续叙事的资产化能力,是许多NFT项目难以比拟的。如今,体育消费日益碎片化,年轻人通过短视频、社交媒体等接触体育内容,而球星卡等产品正成为这些庞大情绪价值的金融化出口。

Odaily星球日报57分钟前

世界杯将至,体育正在进入“碎片化金融”时代

Odaily星球日报57分钟前

Vitalik最新长文:AI时代,代码如何变得更安全?

随着AI编程能力快速提升,软件安全面临新挑战:AI既能高效生成代码,也能高效发现漏洞。在加密行业,智能合约、ZK证明等一旦出现缺陷,可能导致不可逆的资金损失。Vitalik探讨了应对此问题的路径——形式化验证。这种方法将程序应满足的性质写成数学命题,再用机器可检查的证明验证这些性质是否成立。虽然形式化验证无法保证绝对安全(证明可能遗漏假设、规范可能写错等),但它提供了一种更可靠的安全范式:用多种方式表达开发者意图,再让系统自动检查这些表达是否兼容。 以太坊未来将依赖复杂底层组件(如STARK、ZK-EVM、共识算法等),这些系统的实现复杂,但安全目标往往可以相对清晰地形式化。AI辅助的形式化验证在此可发挥最大价值:AI负责编写高效代码和证明,人类负责检查被证明的命题是否对应真正的安全目标。 Vitalik认为,面对强大的AI攻击者,答案不是放弃开源或依赖中心化机构,而是将关键系统压缩为更小、更可验证的“安全核心”。AI可能导致粗糙代码增加,但也可能让真正重要的代码变得比过去更安全。形式化验证与AI结合,可推动软件分化为“安全核心”和“不安全边缘组件”,前者通过严格验证承载高信任负担,后者在沙箱中运行以限制风险。最终,形式化验证有助于在AI时代构建更可信的网络安全基础。

marsbit1小时前

Vitalik最新长文:AI时代,代码如何变得更安全?

marsbit1小时前

交易

现货
合约
活动图片