Ripple CTO Schwartz Revisits NSA Past And Satoshi Speculation

bitcoinist发布于2025-10-24更新于2025-10-24

文章摘要

Ripple chief technology officer David “JoelKatz” Schwartz has resurfaced a years-long thread of speculation around Bitcoin’s origins and his own...

Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure

Ripple chief technology officer David “JoelKatz” Schwartz has resurfaced a years-long thread of speculation around Bitcoin’s origins and his own pre-Ripple work with US government agencies, clarifying once again that he neither possessed “high level” intelligence nor claims special insight into Satoshi Nakamoto’s identity—while acknowledging that a US intelligence provenance for Bitcoin is “not a terrible theory.”

The renewed attention follows a fresh exchange on X on October 23, 2025, in which Schwartz responded to questions about prior employment and nondisclosure obligations—context that traces back to an October 24, 2022 thread where he weighed in on Satoshi debates and litigation risk tied to public claims about identity. “There is nothing defamatory about saying that Craig Wright is not Satoshi, just as there is nothing defamatory about saying that I am not Satoshi,” Schwartz wrote in 2022, adding, “There is nothing inherently wrong with not being Satoshi.”

In the same 2022 exchange, after community member @XRPcryptowolf joked “David Schwartz is Satoshi confirmed jk lol” and floated the notion that “Satoshi is really the CIA or NSA,” the Ripple CTO replied: “That’s not a terrible theory. If the NSA or the CIA happened to stumble on how to make bitcoin, it might make sense that they would implement and deploy it to eliminate the risk that someone hostile to the US would do it first and potentially made billions of dollars.”

Ripple CTO Shuts Down Satoshi Claims

The 2025 follow-ups drilled into Schwartz’s own past work and what, if anything, it implies. In response to a commenter’s claim—“Well, you’ve worked at the NSA, getting high level information, by your own words.” The Ripple CTO flatly rejected the characterization, indirectly doubling down that he isn’t (part of) Satoshi Nakamoto: “I never got anything even remotely resembling high level information. I had to certify that the thing I was working on would meet the NSA’s requirements without even being allowed to see most of them.”


He then shared vignettes about the compartmentalization he encountered. “One requirement that I was allowed to see was that you had to be able to stop it from processing classified data if you lost control over it. I was puzzled—if you lost control over it, by definition you can’t stop it, right? It was explained to me that that’s…” He also noted signage he wasn’t permitted to have explained: “They wouldn’t even tell me why there’s little signs all over the place (generally on entrances or containers) that can be set to ‘OPEN’ or ‘CLOSED’ and what ‘OPEN’ and ‘CLOSED’ mean on those signs.”

Schwartz further recounted how, at one point, he recognized the user interface of “one thing I worked on” not through briefings but “because late one night I happened to have the Discovery Channel on and saw our UI on a screen.” He clarified the lineage of that code: “To be precise, that was work I did (on the same core code) for NATO shortly before I adapted it for the NSA. I don’t remember how I found out what the NSA was using it for. I don’t think I should reveal the exact uses, but they’re pretty boring.”

Asked when his nondisclosure agreement would expire, he answered: “I have no idea. They didn’t let me keep a copy and I don’t remember—if I ever even knew. I just hope nobody really cares any more. Plus, I never really knew anything all that secret.”

The through-line between the 2022 and 2025 messages is clear: a willingness to treat state-origin hypotheses for Bitcoin as plausible without endorsing them. “There is nothing inherently wrong with not being Satoshi,” the Ripple CTO emphasized in 2022. By 2025, his clarifications around the nature of his NSA and NATO work add color but not conspiracy: process-driven engineering inside a tightly siloed environment, limited visibility into end use, and no privileged window into intelligence secrets.

At press time, XRP traded at $2.42.

XRP price
XRP bulls face the 0.5 Fib, 1-day chart | Source: XRPUSDT on TradingView.com
Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com
Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.

Jake Simmons has been a Bitcoin enthusiast since 2016. Ever since he heard about Bitcoin, he has been studying the topic every day and trying to share his knowledge with others. His goal is to contribute to Bitcoin's financial revolution, which will replace the fiat money system. Besides BTC and crypto, Jake studied Business Informatics at a university. After graduation in 2017, he has been working in the blockchain and crypto sector. You can follow Jake on Twitter at @realJakeSimmons.

你可能也喜欢

你必须认识的19位00后出生的中美顶级创业者·21世纪接班人登场

00后创业者正登上产业舞台,中美两国的年轻创始人展现出不同特点。 中国00后创业者更聚焦物理世界,致力于为AI装上“身体”。他们密集进入机器人、芯片、算力和生物材料等领域。例如,2004年出生的黄一创办人形机器人公司RoboParty,快速获得近5亿元融资;清华博士秦深涛创办渊澈太初,从具身智能数据切入,运营5个月融资超5亿元。其他如灵心巧手、零次方机器人、UniX AI等公司,也分别在灵巧手、清洁机器人、家庭机器人等硬件方向快速推进。他们的路径常从高校实验室、竞赛和供应链出发,强调样机、成本和交付能力。 美国00后创业者则更擅长重组数字世界,将AI迅速转化为软件、订阅和全球服务。典型如高中同学创办的Mercor,估值一度达100亿美元;Etched专注于Transformer推理芯片;Cal AI、Turbo AI等应用则以小团队快速获取千万用户。他们的起点多来自校园项目、加速器和风投网络,注重验证用户增长和收入模型。然而,过快的增长也伴随管理、合规和信用挑战,如Delve和Cluely曾陷入争议。 整体而言,这代创业者的共同特征是“时间压缩”——学校、研发、融资同步进行。大模型、开源社区和成熟供应链降低了创业门槛,让他们能更早坐上牌桌。但产品可以快速做出,打造可持续的好公司却无捷径,管理能力和信用需要时间锤炼。 这并非单纯的“少年天才”现象,而是新一代站在了更长的技术杠杆之上。他们接过的并非传统家业,而是AI、机器人等新兴领域的技术窗口与商业考卷。未来几年,名单必将洗牌,能否从产品创造者蜕变为真正的企业领导者,将是决定他们能否留下的关键。对于更早的创业者而言,需要重新评估哪些能力壁垒已被瓦解,并思考与这些年轻团队的新型合作可能。

marsbit20分钟前

你必须认识的19位00后出生的中美顶级创业者·21世纪接班人登场

marsbit20分钟前

交易

现货
活动图片