Gemini IPO Stumbles as Profitability Concerns Shadow the Exchange

TheCryptoTimes发布于2025-10-07更新于2025-10-07

New York City-based crypto exchange Gemini Space Station Inc, saw its stock surging after initial public offering (IPO) in September but then it dropped quickly, which left a lot of investors cautious. At the time, the  IPO raised $446.3 million, but the stock is now down more than 11% as competition and lack of profit is challenging the company. 

Right now, Wall Street is split on how the exchange will recover with six analysts giving buy-equivalent ratings and five hold-equivalent ratings, according to a Bloomberg report.

Early Hype Fades Quickly

On the first trading day, Gemini’s stock jumped 14%, helped by the twins founders, Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss’ political connections and also the frenzy around other crypto companies like Circle Internet Group and Bullish which recently had successful stock launches.

However, this surge did not last long as the stock is now down more than 11%. Meanwhile, its competitors are doing better. Circle shares have soared over 370% since their IPO, and Bullish is up more than 75%. Analysts say Gemini is playing catch-up. 

Citigroup’s Peter Christiansen, who maintains a neutral rating, said: “We believe investors can wait for more execution proof-points in rebuilding the user base, institutional partnerships, and providing a better line-of-sight towards profitability.”

Profit Challenges Since IPO Launch

So far, Gemini is not making a profit yet. In the first half of the year, the company lost $282.5 million while earning $68.6 million from trading fees. Most of its income comes from people trading on the platform, but it has spent a lot on marketing to attract more users. 

Another problem was the Earn program, which gave customers interest in cryptocurrency deposits. After the 2023 crypto crash, the program’s partner, Genesis Global, went bankrupt. Gemini had to pay $37 million to the New York Department of Financial Services and $50 million to the New York Attorney General, though it did not admit any wrongdoing.

One bright spot is Gemini’s crypto rewards credit card, which offers users cashback in cryptocurrency. Truist Securities analyst Matthew Coad said the card helps the company earn more money and get more users. However, he warned that the stock could still be very unpredictable because the overall crypto market is unstable.

Also Read: Pineapple Financial Kicks-off $100M Asset Treasury, Buys $8.9M in INJ


Mobile Only Image

你可能也喜欢

专访7名普通职场人:AI来了之后,你过得还好吗?

专访七位来自不同行业的职场人,探讨AI浪潮对其工作与生活的真实影响。受访者普遍通过ChatGPT、Claude等工具接触AI,主要动机是降本增效、应对职业不确定性。AI显著改变了他们的工作模式:编程、搜索、内容创作等任务效率大幅提升,“一人团队”成为可能,思维方式也从传统学习转向AI驱动。 然而,效率提升背后伴随普遍焦虑。AI并未减少竞争,反而将竞争推向新高度,要求从业者持续学习新工具与工作流。许多岗位(如文秘、财务、客服、基础编程与设计)面临缩减风险,技能“平权”效应使得“强者越强,弱者越弱”。受访者感到的威胁不仅来自收入压力,更源于对职业未来结构变化的担忧。 面对冲击,他们积极寻找人类不可替代的“护城河”。关键在于从执行者转向复杂系统的负责人、超级协调者或独立创造者,核心价值在于业务理解、风险判断、审美与市场需求洞察、以及人际沟通与异常处理等AI难以替代的能力。尽管对AI工具已有中度甚至重度依赖,但他们认为,若工具失效,工作虽会变慢但不会瘫痪。 最终,AI已成为职场“必选项”。旧的职业边界正在瓦解,新的价值体系则在形成——真正重要的不再是单一技能,而是整合AI、驾驭复杂性与承担最终责任的能力。

marsbit7分钟前

专访7名普通职场人:AI来了之后,你过得还好吗?

marsbit7分钟前

中本聪摊上官司?价值837亿美元BTC要被人“合法招领”了

纽约州最高法院近期受理了一起离奇诉讼,匿名原告“Noah Doe”及两家怀俄明州公司,依据纽约州失物招领法,试图通过法律程序获得39,069个长期休眠比特币地址的所有权。这些地址共持有约379万枚比特币,总价值近3000亿美元,其中包含疑似属于比特币创始人中本聪的约109万枚BTC(价值约837亿美元)。 原告声称通过“算法”识别出这些“被遗弃”的地址,并向警方递交了仅包含地址列表的U盘,随后通过链上OP_RETURN消息和发布新闻稿等方式试图联系“失主”。依据对每个地址价值“低于10美元”的评估,原告试图适用快速确权程序。 然而,此案存在多处疑点:将公开的区块链地址视为可“拾得”的实物财产是否适用旧法;每个地址实际持有价值数百万美元,远非原告声称的“低于10美元”;原告及其空壳公司被允许匿名起诉,却要求真正的持币者暴露身份以维护权益。 专家分析指出,即使原告胜诉,也无法获得私钥或直接转移比特币,只能获得一纸法院声明。其真正风险在于,未来若相关比特币流入受监管的交易平台,原告可凭此判决对资产提出权利主张,从而冻结资产并迫使持币者现身,破坏其匿名性。目前,法院快速作出完全有利于原告的缺席判决可能性较低。

marsbit12分钟前

中本聪摊上官司?价值837亿美元BTC要被人“合法招领”了

marsbit12分钟前

中本聪摊上官司?价值837亿美元BTC要被人“合法招领”了

一起离奇的诉讼案正在纽约州最高法院审理。一名化名Noah Doe的个人及两家怀俄明州的空壳公司,依据纽约州的失物招领法,试图通过“宣告判决”程序,合法获得39,069个长期未动的比特币地址所有权。这些地址总计持有约379万枚比特币,按当前价格价值约2935亿美元,其中包括疑似属于比特币创始人中本聪的21,923个地址(约109万枚比特币,价值约837亿美元)。 原告的“套路”是:声称自己“捡到”了这些公开地址(实际从未持有私钥),将记录地址的U盘交给纽约警方,并通过链上OP_RETURN消息发送“弃置通知”,以此满足失物招领法中的“尽合理努力寻找失主”要求。关键在于,原告聘请的匿名专家将每个地址的“现状”价值评估为“低于10美元”,从而启动了法律中处理低价值失物的最快程序。 分析指出,此案疑点重重:将公开的区块链地址视为可被“捡到”的实物失物,法律适用性存疑;每个地址实际持有价值数百万美元的比特币,“低于10美元”的估值极为荒谬;原告及公司使用化名起诉,却要迫使真正的持币者暴露身份以自证所有权。 即使原告胜诉,他们也无法获得任何比特币的私钥,只能得到一纸法院的所有权声明。其真正意图在于:当这些地址中的比特币未来流入受监管的交易所或托管机构时,原告可凭判决文件主张权利、冻结资产,从而迫使匿名持有者现身并陷入漫长诉讼。目前,由于被告均为匿名地址且难以主动应诉,案件可能走向缺席判决,但法院鉴于案情新颖、金额巨大,最终做出完全支持原告的宽泛裁决可能性较低。

Odaily星球日报14分钟前

中本聪摊上官司?价值837亿美元BTC要被人“合法招领”了

Odaily星球日报14分钟前

交易

现货
合约
活动图片