Crypto community confused as Celsius continues with weekly rewards

Cointelegraph发布于2022-06-28更新于2022-06-28

文章摘要

Members of the crypto community on Twitter have been left bewildered by the beleaguered Celsius Network continuing to pay weekly rewards despite pausing withdrawals two weeks ago.

Members of the crypto community on Twitter have been left bewildered by the beleaguered Celsius Network continuing to pay weekly rewards despite pausing withdrawals two weeks ago.
As previously reported, crypto lending platform Celsius paused withdrawals on June 13 after citing extreme market conditions amid the current bear market. Reports soon followed that the firm was undergoing liquidity issues and may be heading towards insolvency, potentially putting users’ funds at risk.


Figures such as Bitcoin (BTC) OG and CEO and co-founder of online investment platform BnkToTheFuture, Simon Dixon, tweeted his bewilderment to his 59,300 followers on June 27 over receiving nearly $4,000 worth of crypto rewards but being unable to withdraw them:
“Email on one of my accounts. Can’t withdraw but @CelsiusNetwork is still paying out. I’m curious if you think the rewards should still be coming? Thoughts?”
Upon searching “Celsius still paying” on Twitter, there are countless users raising questions over the lending platform, with some such as 'CryptoStylesUSA' calling it “insulting” that Celsius continues to pay weekly rewards while keeping their “crypto hostage.”


According to Celsius' website — which is currently undergoing revamp due to the liquidity issues — the company is still advertising annual percentage yields (APYs) of up to 18.63% on crypto deposits, which many have argued is unsustainable.
The SNX native token from decentralized finance (DeFi) platform Synthetix is the only asset this promotio offers at the time of writing. The top tier stablecoins have roughly a 9% APY listed, while Polkadot (DOT) and Polygon (MATIC) have offered APYs as high as 11.87% and 9.52% apiece.
Celsius also appears to be still offering 10% rewards on first deposits up to $250,000 despite not currently allowing users to withdraw from the platform.
While it is still uncertain what the exact fate of funds belonging to Celsius users will be, the firm reportedly onboarded advisers from a management consulting firm in advance of the company possibly facing bankruptcy. Celsius also hired lawyers on June 14 to help restructure the company amid its financial woes.
On June 27, rumors started circulating that Celsius CEO Alex Mashinksy allegedly attempted to leave the country via Morrison Airport in New Jersey but was stopped by authorities. It appears the story originated from crypto analyst Mike Alfred, however, the firm has reportedly denied the accusations.

你可能也喜欢

为什么「AI服务订阅制」,注定会走向消亡?

Anthropic发布最强公开模型Claude Fable 5,但宣布14天后将其从所有订阅计划中移除,转为按用量积分付费。这并非孤立事件,过去八周内,OpenAI、GitHub和Anthropic自身都采取了类似行动,将高级功能或agent用法从固定订阅中剥离,转向按实际使用量(token)计费。 其根本原因在于,传统订阅制依赖一个前提:用户的消费存在生理或时间上的自然上限。然而,AI Agent的出现彻底打破了这一限制。Agent能自主执行复杂任务,消耗的token量是普通对话的数十倍,且无需用户实时参与,导致“消费上限”不复存在。重度用户的超额用量使固定价格的订阅模式在精算上难以持续,出现了“逆向选择”——越是高价的订阅档,吸引来的越是意图“跑满”额度、导致更高补贴成本的重度用户。 行业曾尝试提价、限流等修补措施,但均告失败。如今,所谓的“订阅制”正在被掏空内核:形式上仍是每月扣款,但核心的“固定价格、放心使用”承诺已被移除。例如,GitHub Pro的月费实则为预付费积分;Claude的积分按API费率扣费。固定订阅可能仅能保留在纯聊天等消费量受限于人工时间的场景,但这类场景正被行业发展的主流边缘化。 资本市场的压力(如公司筹备上市)也加速了这一进程,公开市场投资者难以接受持续亏损的订阅模式。未来,AI支出将像云服务支出一样需要精细管理。对用户而言,这意味着“薅羊毛”的补贴期即将结束,价格信号将回归,每个人需要为自己的实际使用量付费。 文章建议,在当前订阅制仍提供高额补贴的窗口期,用户应充分利用以完成高消耗任务。订阅制的消亡不会有正式宣告,它将悄然转变为账单上一项基础的“入场费”。在此之前,且用且珍惜。

marsbit20分钟前

为什么「AI服务订阅制」,注定会走向消亡?

marsbit20分钟前

交易

现货
合约
活动图片