How Whales Buy the Bottom of a Market Crash

ALTCOINBUZZ发布于2022-06-27更新于2022-06-27

文章摘要

What NFTs did whales buy? How did they manage to buy at the bottom?

Key takeaways:

Whales' preferences when buying at the bottom: Bored Ape Yacht Club > other Yuga Labs' projects > other blue chips and emerging projects. The exact type and price of purchase are correlated with capital size.

Among whales with a capital size of more than $500,000, some focus on only one collection, while others adhere to a diversified combination. The majority of whales are willing to spend from $100,000 to $250,000, but their costs vary.

Whales share a number of strategies in common, such as buying in batches and buying more when prices fall. Each of them also has its own secrets to maximizing the outcome.

The crypto market went through an abrupt plunge from June 7 to June 18. This article will answer the following questions:

What NFTs did whales buy? How did they manage to buy at the bottom?

What are the combinations and average prices involved?

Determining the time frame

The crypto market has been in a downward spiral since the first half of this year. In the last two weeks (June 7-18), the BTC price has continued to fall, with a two-week drop of over 40%. On the other hand, ETH also fell below $1,000 at one point due to the impact of Celsius.

BTC Price (Source: CMC)

Similarly, the NFT market has suffered the impact of the market downturn. OpenSea trading volume has been bearish lately, but statistics from June 7 to 18 showed a brief period of heavy trading where a high turnover rate was witnessed in the NFT market. For this reason, we will focus our analysis on this time frame.

Trading Volume on OpenSea (6.7-6.18) (Source: NFTGo.io)

What NFTs did the Whales Buy?

Having sorted through thousands of whale wallets, we first place our focus on the top 10 best-selling NFTs among whales. Otherdeed seems to be the most popular collection among whale buyers. A total of 173 Otherdeed NFTs were bought by whales during this period, with an average purchase price of 6.22 ETH, or $9410. On the other hand, Bored Ape Yacht Club is the tenth most popular collection, as 25 were purchased by whales, with an average purchase price of 135 ETH, or $179,849.

In addition to blue-chip NFTs, we also see some non-blue-chip projects on the ranking, such as tubby cats by TubbyCatsDeployer which places second. Whales bought 104 NFTs of this collection. According to on-chain data, whales are bulk-purchasing this collection, which may be because they are laying the groundwork for future plans. Most whales still adhere to their strategies despite the 40% drop in BTC.

Top 10 Best-Selling NFTs Among Whales (6.7-6.18) (Source: NFTGo.io)

Top 10 Best-Selling NFTs Among Whales (6.7-6.18) (Source: NFTGo.io)

By multiplying quantity purchased with transacted price (USD), we have another list of the top 10 most spent-on NFTs among whales that seems to be more in line with the market consensus. When BTC price dropped sharply from June 7-18, we found that the whales category alone had bought $4.5 million worth of Bored Ape Yacht Club, $1.88 million worth of CryptoPunks, and $1.72 million worth of Otherdeed.

It's worth noting that the top 3 on the list are Yuga Labs' projects. The amount spent on BAYC is significantly higher than the sum of the second and the third. It is clear that when the market crashes, the buying preference of whales goes like this: Bored Ape Yacht Club > other Yuga Labs' projects > other blue chips and emerging projects.

Top 10 Most Purchased NFTs Among Whales (6.7-6.18) (Source: NFTGo.io)

Top 10 Most Purchased NFTs Among Whales (6.7-6.18) (Source: NFTGo.io)

Which Whales Exactly?

Since ETH prices were volatile during this period (June 7-18), we will compare the amount spent by whales using USD as the standard.

Whales Who Bought Over $500,000 Worth of NFTs (Source: NFTGo.io)

Whales Who Bought Over $500,000 Worth of NFTs (Source: NFTGo.io)

As seen from the chart above, 5 whales bought more than $500,000 worth of NFTs. The top 3 of them tend to buy into one single project. For example, the first place wallet, btok1024.eth, spent 1024 ETH only on BAYC, which is a rather extreme case. The second place wallet, franklinisbored.eth, bought 7 BAYC NFTs, and the third place wallet, n0b0dy.eth, bought 17 Otherdeed NFTs.

We begin to observe diversity in the combination of NFTs bought, starting with the fourth place wallet, including 2 Meebits + 6 Doodles + 9 Bored Ape Kennel Club + 3 Bored Ape Yacht Club + 5 Clone X + 2 Moonbirds + 2 Otherdeed. Moreover, the fifth whale went with 4 Murakami.Flowers + 4 Bored Ape Yacht Club + 2 Clone X.

NFTs Bought by the Top 5 Whales (Source: NFTGo.io)

NFTs Bought by the Top 5 Whales (Source: NFTGo.io)

Among the whales that bought over $50,000 worth of NFTs, those that spent anywhere from $100,000 to $250,000 were the most common. In fact, there were 16 of them. According to the amount spent, the ranking and average costs are as follows:

Otherdeed: $152,373.80

Bored Ape Yacht Club: $82,259.15

CryptoPunks: $35,753.61

Art Blocks: $24,962.94

Clone X: $15,214.22

Whale Distribution According to Capital Size (Source: NFTGo.io)

Whale Distribution According to Capital Size (Source: NFTGo.io)

NFTs in the $100k-$250k Category Bought by Whales (Source: NFTGo.io)

NFTs in the $100k-$250k Category Bought by Whales (Source: NFTGo.io)

The Average Amount (USD) Spent by Whales with Between $100k-$250k Plunge Capital (Source: NFTGo.io)

The Average Amount (USD) Spent by Whales with Between $100k-$250k Plunge Capital (Source: NFTGo.io)

Probing Into the Strategies

Among the top 10 whales who bought Otherdeed within the time frame, the #1 whale bought 55 Otherdeed NFTs with 112.97 ETH ($160,000). As of June 21, Otherdeed's floor price rose to 2.4 ETH, thus making a gain of 17%, or 19.25 ETH, for the whale. Let's see how he managed to do it with $160,000.

Otherdeed Whale Ranking (6.7-6.18) (6.7-6.18) (Source: NFTGo.io)

Otherdeed Whale Ranking (6.7-6.18) (6.7-6.18) (Source: NFTGo.io)

From June 7, when Otherdeed's floor price gradually decreased, the whale began to buy 6 from the collection with an average price of 2.596 ETH.

Then, on June 9, Otherdeeds's floor price fell below 2.5 ETH. The whale once again bought another 10 with an average price of 2.368 ETH, thus reducing the cost of his short-term position to 2.45 ETH.

The plunge accelerated on June 12 that the floor price dropped to 1.8 ETH. This is when the whale made his final purchase of 39 Otherdeed NFTs with an average price of 1.89 ETH. By this time, his average cost is 2.05 ETH.

The Purchase Interval of Otherdeed's Biggest Whale (Source: NFTGo.io)

The Purchase Interval of Otherdeed's Biggest Whale (Source: NFTGo.io)

Otherdeed's Floor Price (6.7-6.18) (Source: NFTGo.io)

Otherdeed's Floor Price (6.7-6.18) (Source: NFTGo.io)

Overall, the whale's strategy is to gradually increase its position: the greater the decline, the more it buys. Purchase prices are divided into 3 ranges: 2.5-2.7 ETH, 2.3-2.5 ETH, and 1.7-2 ETH, where it bought 6, 10, and 39 respectively, lowering the average price to about 2.05 ETH.

Another thing worth noting is that when Otherdeed's price rebounded from June 13 to 15, the whale continued to buy instead of realizing its gains. This indicates that the whale adheres to its valuation, therefore, if the price remains in the "bottom range," it will continue to buy.

One interesting thing is that among its 55 purchases at the bottom, 34 were bought through offers and the remaining 21 were through direct purchases. This is the little secret to its success—people tend to prefer to offer prices amid the market downturns.

Additionally, Otherdeed's price trend shows that trading volume peaked on June 13, when the floor price dropped to a low of 1.8 ETH. This proves that many others were also trying to buy at the bottom besides whales.

Otherdeed's Trading Volume and Floor Price (Source: NFTGo.io)

Otherdeed's Trading Volume and Floor Price (Source: NFTGo.io)

Next, let's have a look at the whale who made the most BAYC purchases during June 7-18 and see how it was done.

Starting from the price on June 7, he bought 1 BAYC NFT when it dropped by 10%. Then on June 13, the price dropped by 20%, so he made another purchase. After that, he bought 5 more when the price fell by 20%-30%, thus reducing his costs to 80 ETH. On June 14, the whale bought BAYC NFTs in the top 10% rarity with 120 ETH on LooksRare.

The Purchase Interval of BAYC's Biggest Whale (Source: NFTGo.io)

The Purchase Interval of BAYC's Biggest Whale (Source: NFTGo.io)

BAYC's Floor Price (6.7-6.18) (Source: NFTGo.io)

BAYC's Floor Price (6.7-6.18) (Source: NFTGo.io)

The whale buys into BAYC based on the range of price drop. For every 10% slump, it would buy 1 NFT. Plus, this whale also bought NFTs of different rarities by category.

Through the analysis above, we can conclude some underlying rules whales go by when buying at the bottom:

For individual NFTs, bought in batches (3 batches) according to ranges, and buy as soon as the price enters your valuation range.

Buy according to the margin of the plunge instead of time—the more it slumps, the more you buy.

Try to make an offer.

For main blue chips, go by rarity classification; for new and emerging blue chips, diversify your combinations.

Try out multiple platforms including X2Y2 and LooksRare instead of limiting yourself to OpenSea.

Note: The above information is for informational purposes only. Investing in digital assets such as NFTs and cryptocurrency brings with it a high degree of risk. Please consult with a financial advisor before making any investment decisions. NFTGo does not provide financial advice and is not responsible for any losses incurred as a result of investing in digital assets.

你可能也喜欢

做拼多多的黄峥跟区块链有啥联系

本文探讨了拼多多创始人黄峥与其文章《把资本主义倒过来》中提到的核心理念,以及该理念与区块链技术的潜在联系。 文章首先指出,黄峥认为拼多多本质上是一门关于“不确定性”的保险生意。传统模式下,富人通过承担风险(不确定性)获得收益,而穷人则为求“确定性”支付溢价(如购买保险、接受低息),导致财富向上流动。 黄峥提出的“反向保险”旨在逆转这一过程,即让普通人将“确定性”(例如确定的购买意愿)卖给资本。难点在于单个消费者的承诺缺乏约束力。拼多多的拼团模式通过聚集大量用户的即时订单,为工厂创造了确定性的需求,从而消除其库存风险,并将因此节省的成本以降价形式返还给消费者,实现价值的部分“倒流”。 文章的关键转折点在于,黄峥本人提出疑问:区块链是否天生为这种“反向保险”而生?分析指出,区块链技术,特别是智能合约,恰好能解决“个人承诺不值钱”的核心难题。它可以通过代码和押金机制,将消费者的购买承诺变成具有违约成本、可强制执行的数字契约,从而建立起不依赖中间机构的信任体系,让承诺变得可信、可定价、可交易。 最后,文章延伸思考了制造确定性的两种路径:一是拼多多式,依靠聚合规模来平抑不确定性;二是比特币式,依靠不可篡改的算法规则从源头锁定确定性。两者分别以牺牲部分自由与弹性为代价。 总之,黄峥的商业思想与区块链在“构建可信承诺”这一点上产生了深刻的共鸣,拼多多的实践可被视为在中心化框架下对类似理念的一次大规模预演。

链捕手1小时前

做拼多多的黄峥跟区块链有啥联系

链捕手1小时前

打下万亿江山的存储大佬,终究成不了首富

《打下万亿江山的存储大佬,终究成不了首富》一文聚焦存储芯片企业家朱一明及其创立的两家公司——兆易创新与长鑫科技。 文章指出,即将登陆科创板的长鑫科技市值或超万亿,但因其无实控人且股权分散,作为“灵魂人物”的朱一明间接持股不足3%,难以凭借公司市值成为顶级富豪。 随后,文章将兆易创新(市值3400亿)视为“长鑫科技前传”,回顾其发展历程。公司2005年创立时资金匮乏,朱一明采取精准“捡漏”策略,在巨头退出的细分市场(如Nor Flash、利基存储)中发展壮大。公司产品从单一存储芯片扩展至微控制器(MCU)、传感器、模拟芯片,形成多元化布局,但存储芯片和MCU仍是主要收入来源。兆易创新凭借在行业周期波动中保持较高的毛利润率(常年在40%以上)和较低的费用控制,展现出“绩优股”特质,但其净利润仍随存储芯片强周期而明显波动。 文章进而分析了存储芯片行业的商业模式。历史表明,在该行业采用重资产的IDM(垂直整合)模式并进行“反周期扩张”是巨头存活的关键,而轻资产的Fabless(无晶圆厂)模式在周期低谷中抗风险能力较弱。兆易创新作为Fabless公司,难以独自涉足资金技术壁垒极高的DRAM等领域。 因此,朱一明于2016年与合肥市政府合作创立了长鑫科技,进军DRAM制造,补齐了产业链关键环节。朱一明在长鑫表现出极大奉献精神,如放弃薪酬、稀释股权、延长锁定期,这增强了国资与银行的信心,使得长鑫得以进行巨额资本投入(截至2025年末机器设备账面值约1693亿,甚至超过比亚迪)。 最终,文章点题:即便长鑫科技市值达到2万亿,结合其持有的兆易创新股权,朱一明的个人身价预估也难以跻身中国顶级富豪行列。其选择通过绑定长鑫、以非完全控制的方式打造存储帝国,奠定了产业地位,但也意味着放弃了成为首富的可能性。

marsbit1小时前

打下万亿江山的存储大佬,终究成不了首富

marsbit1小时前

交易

现货
合约
活动图片