Prosecutors Admit Error After Attempt to Intimidate Dragonfly Over Tornado Cash Investment

ccn.com发布于2025-07-02更新于2025-07-30

Key Takeaways

  • During the trial of Roman Storm, prosecutors suggested they were considering charges against Dragonfly Partner Tom Schmidt.
  • Schmidt had previously been planning to testify in Storm’s defense.
  • Following widespread outrage, the Justice Department backtracked on Monday, July 29.

In a chilling example of prosecutorial overreach, on Friday, July 25, a U.S. attorney working on the case against Roman Storm allegedly told the judge that they were weighing charges against a general partner at Dragonfly Capital, which invested in Tornado Cash.

Upon returning to court on Monday, the government’s lawyers walked back their previous statement, emphasizing that neither Dragonfly nor any of its employees is under investigation.

DOJ Considers Criminal Charges Against Dragonfly Employees

During Friday’s open court session, Storm’s lawyer said they had planned to call Dragonfly Partner Tom Schmidt to the witness stand. However, the lawyer said Schmidt had chosen to invoke the Fifth Amendment, which protects individuals from being compelled to incriminate themselves.

In response, Judge Katherine Polk Failla asked the government’s lawyers if they planned to prosecute Dragonfly employees.

“Not everyone, but Schmidt,” prosecutor Nathan Rehn replied.

Although the comments were removed from the record, it was too late for prosecutor Nathan Rehn to walk back his comments, which were live tweeted from the courtroom by Inner City Press.

DoJ Accused of Courtroom Bullying

To many observers of the trial, Rehn’s comments looked a lot like the Justice Department bullying a potential witness.

“We believe the government’s statement in court today was primarily to undermine a defense of Tornado Cash—to make it more difficult for the defense to call Tom to testify on the stand,” Dragonfly Partner Haseeb Qureshi tweeted on Friday.

“Prosecutors did this to prevent us from testifying for the defense,” he added in another post .

Government Walks Back Dragonfly Threat

After Rehn’s comments prompted a media furor and outrage among Storm’s supporters, on Monday, U.S. attorneys clarified that Schmidt is not under investigation.

“The DOJ has now backtracked,” Qureshi said in a post on X.

“They have stated on the record in the trial Monday morning that the media reports that they were planning to bring charges against Dragonfly were inaccurate, and neither Dragonfly nor any of its principals are targets in their investigation.”

Was this Article helpful? Yes No

你可能也喜欢

Tiger Research:金融机构跟上代币化浪潮的三大方略

Tiger Research指出,现实世界资产代币化市场正快速增长,但许多地区监管框架仍不完善。金融机构面临三种策略选择:等待本国立法、利用监管沙盒有限实验,或率先进入海外成熟市场以积累经验并建立优势。 报告强调,代币化并非魔法,而是将传统金融工具迁移至新基础设施的精密过程。机构在进入前需在六个核心领域做好准备:1) 建立离岸基地(如利用香港、新加坡或美国的现有实体、新设实体或合作);2) 获取必要牌照;3) 明确代币化的资产类型(标准化证券更易落地);4) 界定目标投资者范围(通常优先非美国投资者);5) 设计结算货币与支付流程;6) 安排其他运营要求,如区块链选择、托管及发行后治理。 具体路径主要有两条:一是直接进入已有成熟监管的司法管辖区(如香港、新加坡、美国),利用当地平台加速进入;二是采用链上原生路径,依托已有合规架构的链上平台(如Ondo Global、Plume Nest)设计发行,绕过设立实体基地的复杂流程,快速进入市场并可能对接更广泛的DeFi流动性。 报告以一家已有香港实体的中型证券公司为例,拆解了其为离岸机构投资者代币化债券的典型流程,包括评估现有基地、选择合作平台、完成合规与产品设计、建立托管结构及最终执行销售。报告最后指出,法律审查虽耗时昂贵,但等待完整监管并非唯一答案,市场不会等待。金融机构应尽快规划可行路径,通过执行积累真实运营经验,关键在于完成完整的销售过程,而非仅仅技术设计。

Foresight News1小时前

Tiger Research:金融机构跟上代币化浪潮的三大方略

Foresight News1小时前

交易

现货
活动图片