Custodia Bank Loses Lawsuit Challenging Fed Rejection of Master Account Application

CoinDeskPolicy发布于2024-03-28更新于2024-03-29

文章摘要

The Federal Reserve has discretion in deciding whether to grant a master account, a judge ruled.

A federal judge has rejected Wyoming-based Custodia Bank's argument that it is entitled to a Federal Reserve master account and membership with the Fed.

Judge Scott Skavdahl, of District of Wyoming, denied Custodia's motion for judgement on Friday, writing that federal laws do not require the nation's central bank to give every eligible depository institution access to its master account system, nor did the provided evidence suggest that the Federal Reserve Board of Governors influence a regional branch of the Fed to deny its application for an account.

Custodia sued the Fed in June 2022, arguing that the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City had been taking too long to make a decision on its application for a master account. Master accounts allow banks and depository institutions to directly access the Federal Reserve, rather than require them to go through intermediary banks. It amended its complaint against the Fed last February, after the central bank rejected its application (the Fed later published a scathing report explaining its decision).

Advertisement
Advertisement

In its amended complaint, Custodia argued that the Fed's board had unlawfully directed the Kansas City Fed to reject its application, and that the Fed did not have the discretion to reject applications from nonmember depository institutions.

In his order Friday, Judge Skavdahl wrote that the law does not require the Fed to grant master account access to applicants, and that the evidence leaned toward the Kansas City Fed making the decision, rather than the board of governors.

"Thus, unless Federal Reserve Banks possess discretion to deny or reject a master account application, state chartering laws would be the only layer of insulation for the U.S. financial system," the judge wrote. "And in that scenario, one can readily foresee a 'race to the bottom' among states and politicians to attract business by reducing state chartering burdens through lax legislation, allowing minimally regulated institutions to gain ready access to the central bank's balances and Federal Reserve services."

In a statement, Custodia spokesperson Nathan Miller said, “challenging the Fed’s strong-arm tactics has always been an uphill battle, but Custodia Bank remains committed to our vision of creating a safe, tech-enabled bank. We are reviewing the Court’s decision and all of our options, including appeal."

你可能也喜欢

谷歌AI人才接连流失,是压力测试还是“讣告”前奏?

谷歌接连失去三位顶级AI人才:工程副总裁、Transformer架构提出者之一Noam Shazeer加入OpenAI;DeepMind副总裁、AlphaFold核心人物John Jumper加入Anthropic;对话式AI先驱Daniel De Freitas的动向也引人关注。这些流失触及了Transformer、对话式AI和科学AI等关键领域,引发市场对谷歌竞争力的担忧。 然而,将此事视为谷歌的“讣告”可能为时过早。这更应被看作一次压力测试。人才流失本身反映了谷歌仍是AI顶级人才的核心储备库,正因其重要才成为竞争对手IPO前夜的重点挖掘对象。 谷歌的优势在于其远超单一模型的“全栈”能力:拥有自研TPU、云基础设施、Gemini等模型矩阵,以及搜索、YouTube、安卓等覆盖数十亿用户的终端产品,构成了强大的集成生态和分发网络。此外,谷歌通过巨额投资和云服务与Anthropic等对手形成深度绑定,在“AI淘金热”中同时扮演“掘金者”和“卖水人”的角色。 尽管面临创新者困境,核心搜索业务转型挑战以及大公司决策迟缓等问题,但谷歌正通过积极整合Gemini、重塑搜索体验、战略性收购(如Character.AI)等方式应对。AI竞赛是长期游戏,谷歌凭借其技术栈、资源与生态,仍是少数有能力在多层面参与竞争的公司。当前的动荡是一次严峻考验,但并非终局。

marsbit1小时前

谷歌AI人才接连流失,是压力测试还是“讣告”前奏?

marsbit1小时前

交易

现货
合约
活动图片