Craig Wright Accuses Critics of Bugging His House, Spoofing Emails to Bring Him Back to Court

CoinDeskPolicy发布于2024-02-29更新于2024-03-01

文章摘要

Wright returned to the stand in the U.K. COPA trial to defend accusations of forging doctoring emails he’d sent his former lawyers.

  • Craig Wright denied forging emails between him and his former lawyers on Friday during his last cross-examination in the COPA trial.
  • The trial will resume on March 12 for closing statements.
7.7K

Craig Wright accused critics of bugging his home and spoofing an email he’s been accused of doctoring during a Friday cross-examination in the U.K. trial probing his claims of having invented Bitcoin.

Spoofing involves changing the metadata of an email to – among other things – make it look like it was sent from a different address.

When asked by presiding Judge James Mellor if he could specify who did the spoofing, Wright said, “Unfortunately not. I suspect a number of people, My Lord.”

Advertisement
Advertisement

The Australian computer scientist has long maintained he’s Satoshi Nakamoto, the pseudonymous author of Bitcoin’s foundational document known as the whitepaper. A group of industry participants called the Crypto Open Patent Alliance (COPA) and several Bitcoin developers filed suit against Wright, alleging he’d committed forgeries of an “industrial scale” in trying to prove he’s Satoshi.

On Friday, Wright vehemently denied accusations made by COPA of backdating the email in question to support a statement he’d made in court the previous week concerning his former legal representatives at Ontier.

Wright instead blamed the timestamp and other discrepancies on email spoofing, spam folders, domain migrations, surveillance and hacking.

Judge Mellor asked why someone seeking Wright’s downfall would doctor an email to support something he’d said, to which Wright replied, “Oh, no. It doesn’t support.”

He said that the email was doctored by a malicious actor to fabricate an excuse to bring him back to court.

After Wright, COPA’s expert witness Patrick Madden returned to the stand to defend his new analysis of the Ontier emails. Wright’s counsel sought to establish spoofing was an easy thing to do.

When asked by Wright’s lawyer Craig Orr if the email could have been spoofed, Madden said he didn’t think it was.

Advertisement
Advertisement

“I do not think it’s practical to consider that,” Madden said.

Friday was the last day for discussing evidence. The trial will resume on March 12 for closing statements from both sides.

Camomile Shumba contributed reporting.

Edited by Nikhilesh De.

你可能也喜欢

宇树IPO,谁都输不起

宇树以150.80元发行价、219倍市盈率登陆科创板,成为国内“人形机器人第一股”。其上市前受到一级市场投资人、战略资本及散户的高度关注,网上中签率低至约万分之二。宇树近三年营收年复合增长率达226%,2025年人形机器人产品收入占比跃升至51.78%,实现了从四足机器人向人形机器人的业务转型。 此次IPO的核心意义在于为中国人形机器人产业提供了首个公开市场的估值锚点(发行市值约610亿元),其表现将直接影响后续同类企业的上市定价。然而,高估值背后也存隐忧:公司目前超七成人形机器人收入来自科研教育,工业场景落地占比仍低;产品均价快速下降,但成本降幅相对滞后;在具身智能“大脑”(AI大模型)的自主研发与规模化部署上仍需补课。 宇树上市后,其业绩需兑现三大关键考验:持续提升人形机器人营收占比、将客户从科研展厅拓展至真实的工业刚性需求,以及在行业价格战中保持毛利率稳定。机构投资者如社保基金、DeepSeek等参与了战略配售并有长期锁定期,显示出产业资本对其的押注。这已非一次普通的IPO,而是关乎整个机器人赛道估值逻辑的“样板工程”,各方均难以承受其失败。从此,中国机器人产业的故事将接受二级市场财报的持续检验。

marsbit52分钟前

宇树IPO,谁都输不起

marsbit52分钟前

交易

现货
活动图片