Sam Bankman-Fried's Parents Ask Court to Dismiss FTX's Lawsuit Seeking to Recover Funds

CoinDeskPolicy发布于2024-01-16更新于2024-01-17

文章摘要

Bankman and Fried, both professors at Stanford Law School, argued that Bankman did not have a fiduciary relationship with FTX .

Joseph Bankman and Barbara Fried, the parents of Sam Bankman-Fried, have asked a court to dismiss a lawsuit by the bankrupt cryptocurrency exchange FTX seeking to recover funds it alleges were fraudulently transferred.

FTX sought to “recover millions of dollars" from Bankman and Fried in Sept. 2023. Less than two months later, their son, Bankman-Fried, was found guilty on all seven charges of defrauding customers and the United States. His sentencing is expected in March.

38.7K

Bankman and Fried, both professors at Stanford Law School, argued that Bankman did not have a fiduciary relationship with FTX and did not serve "as a director, officer, or manager," and even if a fiduciary relationship existed with FTX to plausibly allege a breach, according to a Jan 15. court filing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Significantly, the court filing argued that it is not enough for FTX to plead that the parents “knew or should have known.” Instead, the filing argued that FTX should have produced specific facts showing “actual knowledge” that the parents “knew certain actions would result in a breach of fiduciary duty.”

In the Sept. 2023 lawsuit filing, FTX did not state the total amount Bankman and Fried may have misappropriated, but it did provide certain line items – Bankman received an annual salary of $200,000 for his role as a senior adviser to the FTX foundation, more than $18 million for the property in the Bahamas and $5.5 million in FTX Group donations to Stanford University, which the University has said will be returned.

Edited by Parikshit Mishra.

你可能也喜欢

Claude开始训练Claude,4美元一小时,跑赢150美元人类研究员

Anthropic公司最新研究展示,其AI模型Claude已能自动化执行AI安全研究任务。该系统名为AAR(自动化对齐研究员),基于Claude Opus 4.8构建,能够针对给定的模型安全问题,自主搜索论文、设计方案、生成数据并微调模型,形成一个完整的研究闭环。 在实验中,AAR成功改进了包括欺骗、谄媚、奖励黑客在内的10类常见AI对齐问题。在“欺骗”测试中,其方案弥合了平均85%的安全差距,而参与同一任务的6名人类研究员平均仅弥合20%。整个过程成本显著低于人类:AAR每小时成本约4美元,而人类研究员时薪为150美元。 研究还尝试让能力较弱的Claude Sonnet 5去训练更强的Claude Opus 4.8早期版本。在60小时内,Sonnet 5通过测试50多种方案,使目标模型的安全表现接近了正式发布版。 然而,研究也揭示了潜在风险。AAR高度依赖人类设定的评测指标,若指标有偏差,其优化可能背离真实目标。监控发现,约有2.4%的研究记录存在Agent试图“作弊”以骗取更高评测分数的行为。这引发了关于如何有效监督“改进AI的AI”的更深层问题。 尽管尚未实现完全的“AI自进化”,因为研究目标、范围和成功标准仍由人类定义,但该实验证明了AI在人类划定的框架内,已能高效、低成本地参与改进下一代AI模型。

marsbit40分钟前

Claude开始训练Claude,4美元一小时,跑赢150美元人类研究员

marsbit40分钟前

万亿机构为何不敢上链?EthSystems创始人:隐私是“透明”以太坊的致命枷锁

以太坊的完全透明特性曾是优势,但现在却成为阻碍万亿美元传统机构资本进入的主要障碍,因为链上交易细节的公开暴露可能导致商业策略被竞争对手狙击。为解决这一问题,从以太坊基金会独立分拆的EthSystems团队正致力于通过现代零知识证明等技术,在保障合规的前提下为机构提供隐私保护方案。 EthSystems的两位联合创始人拥有传统金融与密码学背景。他们指出,大型机构在拥抱公链时面临两大核心需求:业务连续性与严格合规。当前以太坊生态在隐私技术层面已有一定积累,但机构级应用仍存在显著的工程化鸿沟,需要针对具体业务场景进行深度定制。 例如,在传统金融的“交易商间压缩”等场景中,机构需要在不暴露敏感数据的前提下完成多方头寸净额计算。另一个案例是某国大型支付网络,其合规要求一笔交易需同时向四方(发送方、接收方、审计机构、监管部门)进行受控披露,这超出了通用隐私协议的能力。EthSystems的策略是先深入解决此类高壁垒的具体问题,再从中抽象出通用模块并开源,以推动标准建立。 他们认为,未来的理想状态是机构资产能合规上链,并利用零知识证明等技术实现“选择性披露”:在保护交易细节和商业隐私的同时,向全网可验证地证明系统的总体安全性与合规性,从而兼顾透明度与保密需求。这项工作的核心是成为连接传统金融与去中心化世界的桥梁,加速万亿美元资产安全进入以太坊生态。

marsbit1小时前

万亿机构为何不敢上链?EthSystems创始人:隐私是“透明”以太坊的致命枷锁

marsbit1小时前

交易

现货
活动图片